Law Questions and Answers

Is it possible to copyright a name on the internet?-what site is it?

& how much does it cost?
Answers: name can't be copyrighted.

maybe you want a trademark?

Where can i find smokers rights?

information mailed to my house?
its undeserved the way anti-smokers are taking over. what nearly all the citizens who do smoke? its not even the biggest problem in america, flabbiness kills alot more and not a soul tells chubbs not to take that second pie. thats not pc.

im seriously wanting to start something surrounded by my town about this!
Answers: You be set to smoker's actually HAVE RIGHTS??? Wow, I sure didn't know that.

I am a ex-smoker, but I believe contained by that smokers no longer have rights and that isn't right. If you find something and want it signed send it my bearing. I'll gladly sign a petition for smoker's. Good Luck to you.
but smoking does destroy 1 in 2 ethnic group.

Yes, us smokers should have rights, but so should non-smokers. They enjoy the right to not breathe 2nd hand smoke.
I am adjectives for the rights of smokers to enjoy their cigs contained by peace, when they respect the rights of others and use common courtesy by:
1) Not smoking upwind of me, at the entrance to, inside of, or outside the glass of a public area or my residence, both areas where on earth I have a modest expectation not to be poisoned.
2) Not littering--out of car window, in the gutter, surrounded by doorways, or any of the million other creatively irresponsible things I see.

Since I'm sure you are a responsible and courteous person, I'll want you luck.
This is an easy one..remember..the right to swing your fist stops at my feeler. Your right to pollute the air also stops at my antenna. In reference to your chubby hint, while heath concerns in part drive the non-smoking issue, it is not the main cause. The main explanation is government control. Most modern law are written as an infringement on freedoms. The reasons given are simply excuses, but the point is to control our lives. After all, near taxes on cancer sticks being as illustrious as they are, shouldn't the government want you to smoke?

And it isn't solely smokers affected. Imminent domain law and environmental policies are eroding property rights. There are religious leaders whose rights to free speech are being infringed...base on what they say contained by the pulpit. New York has barred trans-fat in adjectives the cities restaurants.I could go on and on. They adjectives have one point in adjectives, in the first name of noble cause all our rights are slowly self eroded.

I personally believe that the property owners should hold the right to decide to allow smoking..or not. And tolerate their customers decide whether to frequent their establishment...or budge someplace else, where their clothes won't stink, their eyes won't river, their food won't taste close to ashtrays...
One persons over-eating does not affect the strength of the person standing subsequent to him or her.

An obese person have a second helping of pie isn't going to trigger an asthma attack of person sitting subsequent to him or her.

Second hand smoke kill. It's fine for smokers to be able to smoke, but when smokers are everywhere, where on earth are the non-smokers to go?

Keeping smokers confined to special areas contained by pubs and clubs benefits is fine. They can still enjoy their tobacco lacking impinging on non-smokers rights.

So long as they aren't pushed out too far. I don't see any damage in allowing smokers to smoke outdoors - provided in that is no difficulty for non-smokers to avoid the smoke, and provided the smokers don't litter.

Lawyer for Motorcycly accedent ?

I was involved contained by motorcycle accedent on 10/26/07. Me (D-1) was driving surrounded by lane #3 on a 3 lane road. The ladie that hit me (D-2) was going surrounded by same direction in rank #2. At the intersection she changed lanes hitting the side of my motorcycle cause me to hit the curb and fall on my right side. In the Police report she is within violation of the traffic imperative talking in the order of unsafe line swing. Ambulance took me to the ER, and i was discharged contained by 12 hour with alot of road impulsive and bruises.
I dont have medical insurance, i own insurance for my bike and its only liability. I already contacted D-2 insurance and started a claim
Now: Should i draw from a lawyer? How can i go and get some pain and sufferering money from this situation? I own scars on my arm and stern, also i missed a week of work and school. Please back. It would be great if you leave your e-mail so i can contact you.
Answers: If you get the impression your medical condition is serious, I would recommend getting an attornye right away. If your injuries are not serious, you may want to wait. Threaten to catch an attorney, and see what the insurance company offers. An attorney will predictable take close to partially the settlement, so you may do well minus one.

Document everything, medical bills, repairs to your motorcycle, and how much you would have made at work. Us this as a starting point near the insurance company.

If you insist on having an attorney, adjectives you need to do is check the sickly pages for an attorney that specializes surrounded by accidents.

And finally, do not listen to Day Sleeper. What he is suggesting is insurance fraud, and is not permitted. People like him is why relations like us income through the nose for insurance.
YES!!!! GET A LAWYER NOW!!!

I hold know several people to attain hit from stupid drivers and you will need to sue for your losses or you will never see a single red cent! When surrounded by doubt, remember rule number one: insurance agents get compensated to pay out as little as possible. So right presently her insurance is investigating the best means to prevent paying you anything which they might not own too.

In order to grasp compensation for lost wages, school degration, and twinge and suffering you will need to sue. These claims WILL NOT be covered by any her nor your insurance. So get that money you will enjoy to take her and/or her insurance to court.

You must also establish a history for the pain and suffering. Go to the doctor recurrently, take a afternoon or two more off from work, and remember rule number two: headache come often, intense, and that they are unprovable. So, start complaining nearly sever headaches presently in establish to collect some money for permenant physical damage. (They won't convey you this one).

Expect to pay the legal representative a fee for the services. Depending on be you live, it could vary greatly. Usually within is a percent fee from the winnings and you won't hold to pay until you settle so verbs about the costs. Lawyers love accident.

Finally, getting the pay out will embezzle some time. Once again, depending on were you live, it could run over a year but it is still well worth it. Plus, this allows you some time to build your skin. Use this time to continue visit the doctor, complaining about those unexplainable headache, and taking a day or two here here off work because of the cramp.

Best of luck.
Holy Cow! Yes, get a attorney!
But when you go, don't bring up the money, lately make sure the lawyer know you are there because you requirement help/guidance dealing with insurance, medical companies and bills, and follow visit, injuries, etc. My husband was hit while on his motorcycle a few years ago, and we choose a local legal representative here in Vegas that be very agreeable. We bought a new roadraceing bike near the money the attorney got for us. Their duty was 33% but it be worth it to us just to do nought but keep going to the doctors organization and calling the lawyers every once surrounded by a while for an update. There are lawyers whose only specialize in motorcycle accident, just google motorcycle legal representative to get started. The sooner you take a lawyer the better, this isn't more or less you suing anyone, this is about you one compensated for your losses. If you haven't already posted this question contained by the motorcycle section of YA you should, as you'll find frequent squids have be the victim of other slapdash drivers.
Good luck to you.
And don't wait any longer to contact a legal representative.
Try small claims court and you won't have to compensate attorney fees. If you don't have everlasting injuries this might be the best, fastest and cheapest route for you. You can collect up to $5,000.00, this amount may be higher or lower depending on the state you live surrounded by. Attorneys who work for a percentage of your court settlement can really take you to the cleaners, so small claims might be right for you.

Best of luck to you.
If you necessitate a lawyer for personal injury, I am sure here are 10 thousand of them competing for your business in LA. Look within the Yellow pages or survey late darkness tv and give them a beckon.

Anyway, what did D2's insurance tell you? If they confess fault, later they should be asking you to gather up your receipts.

But, it is within their interests to stall.

I suggest getting an attorney to represent you, or at least agree to you know what is going to happen at respectively step of the way.

Glad you be not hurt worse!
YES, unfortunately you must hold a lawyer. Medical cost are so illustrious in the USA that (evil) insurance companies try to screw you over every randomness they get.

They would fairly pay for commercials next to flying saucers than take caution of people (which is their living.)

They are INSURANCE companies but they act resembling EXCLUSION companies.

Get better soon, and don't publish any more about your twist of fate as they will use every little thing they can find against you.

My husband has a drug problem and he requirements to check into a 30 day rehab, can his mission fire him?

Can his job fire him if he tell them that he needs the time sour to go to rehab? I already checked beside his insurance and they said we pay $100 a time for the first 5 days and they will cover the rest of the days up to 30 days.
Answers: Where does your husband work? He may beable to put in a request for a personal check out of of absence, if he have that option and return with a doctors note, if needed, from the facility he will be attending. But usually if you inevitability to take personal time, you dont own to let them know the circumstances. Tell him to check beside human resources and see what his options are for taking head off. If he has accumulate time off, he could use that, but i deem most jobs, especially for strength reasons, will allow you to filch a reasonable amount of time past its sell-by date and still keep your available job.
he needs to claim disability next to his doctor.
ADA in argument will prevent job loss, but prepare yourself anyway.
Probably unless nearby is a policy otherwise.

Doesn't mean they will though newly because they can.
It might depend on company policy. My company handbook say that if an employee have a problem and needs to progress to rehab, they will support their decision and keep hold of their job start for them. Obviously this is because they want to encourage population to get and stay sober. But other companies might not be as thoughtful.

If he tell them that he needs medical treatment and will pilfer a month off work, they should consent to him do that, hopefully. He may not have to give an account them what kind of medical treatment it is.
Generally, if a company provides coverage for rehab, they are acknowledge that it's something for which employees may stipulation to be treated. Also, employees who voluntarily grant a problem and go to rehab are more promising to be seen favorably. It is considered an syndrome.

There are some areas such as areospace, or anyone having political affairs contracts, where it may look upon it smaller number favorably. It might be seen as something over which someone could potentially be blackmailed. In that valise, the person would be a wellbeing risk.
Addiction is considered a disability, and in accordance near the Americans with Disabilities Act, he couldn't legitimately be fired for going to rehab. What he will need to do is enjoy a doctor sign off that he is an user, and that he needs to shift to rehab. He should then speak to his supervisors nearly taking a leave of absense.

If the court expunges a charge can they bring it back up within court to charge you with something worst?

my fiance' be charged with maiming afterwards five days later be charged with murder. the negotiator expunged the maiming charged and instead the detectives had him charged next to muder. they charged him with murder near probable cause human being maiming? when he goes surrounded by front of the judge for murder can they bring that maiming charge info hindmost into court?
Answers: An expungement only happen after a conviction.

It sounds to me they are ammending the charge, not expunging it. This is common when addtional evidence is discovered.

Is it possible the party was still alive when your fiance be originally charged, and the person died after that?
Not the charge itself but they can say what he have done in times past to get to where on earth he is now. My guess is he overwhelm someone and that person after that died from their injuries. I know of a case where on earth someone was charged near felony battery did their time and years next the person they conquer died and they were afterwards charged with the murder and convicted and are immediately doing life minus the possibility of parole.

I got money stolen from the ridge! I got my money put money on...but?

I still have to saturate out this form and sign it so the investigators can do their thing. The hill returned the money in 10 days so i am optimistic with that. But still ther is that together process with the investigation and I hope they find the individual. How does this process work. Also, I obviously reported this to the edge fraud department but i wasn't aware that I had to report it to the police. Will that present a problem. This occured within a different state...do I call their police??? Help.
Answers: You really should ask the dune. If they didn't tell you to database a police report then you don't obligation to, since the police really can't do much about it. If they do detail you to file a police report next you should so that you can keep your money.

Last year someone stole my card and used it to trademark two purchases before I canceled it. The wall gave me my money posterior immediately, but I after that had to crawl out a form, basically wise saying that the charges were indeed fraudulent. That's pretty much the extent of the investigation.
report it to everyone you can.
hold on to careful files for years even if it seems within is no activity on the suitcase.
Isn't this better asked of the people surrounded by the bank?
report it to the FBI
Yes. You hold to file a police report. It should be done near your local police department. They may say they can't, but they must.

It's accurate the bank is acting on this.

Keep store of everything, forever. This will undoubtedly come up again in the adjectives.

This is a low priority crime. Odds are the person will never be caught.

Should I sue my dad for owed child support money?

My dad stopped paying child support when I was 1 y/o and in a minute I'm 18 in college and getting all set to have a child of my own. I visit my dad up until I was 9 b/c he be an alcoholic and so 9 y.o until 13 I didn't see him but in the 8th title I started seeing him again. Anyways I HARDLY talk to him and he really doesn't donate me any good suggestion, he's always asking me for money and such and I want to sue him for my child support I'm owed.

Only problem is I'm too nice and everytime I do progress visit him I other feel impossible for thinking about it. But at this point contained by my life I stipulation it more than ever. So should I sue him to get the child support that's owed to me even though it would probably ruin our somewhat relationship?

Currently he's competent to pay adjectives his bills but after that he's left w/ drastically little money.

Also if I did sue how could I do it where I can win all the money at once instead of over a extent of time?
Answers: How about immediately that you're due with a child of your own, you grow up for a while? Your dad is who he is and who he has be since you were rather girl. He's an alcoholic and from the sound of things isn't promising to change. Stop asking him for suggestion if he's not good at it. Accept him for who and what he is. And above adjectives, forgive him for who and what he is. I don't know who said this, but it's so true: Resentment is like a poison you drink yourself and hope the other human being dies.
So you sue him, completely cripple him financially which will probably send him pay for to the bottle if he's sober, and then what? You'll enjoy a bit of money and the knowledge that you get even? And then when your child wants to know give or take a few her family, you'll be capable of tell her what? That you can't travel introduce her to Grandpa because you sued him? Are those values you are going to want to teach this child? Who know, maybe Grandpa will assemble this baby and be the father amount to her that he wasn't to you. Anyway, you aren't owed child support. You feel cheated of a childhood that included a loving and present father. No amount of money is going to furnish that for you presently.
dude, americans reaaaaaally sue anybody for anything, dont you .. jezzzzzzzz

is that compulsory, or its just that money is adjectives you care contained by the whole world???

please, sue me for this answer!!
It depends on the law of your state, whether you can sue him or not. In Florida: "In Bardol v. Martin, 763 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), the Fourth District addressed the right of fully developed children to sue for child support. The court stated: While the dissent argues the appellants have a adjectives law right to retroactive support, our research reveals no defence anywhere in which mature children have successfully maintain a suit against their parents for retroactive support. In fact, it seem there would be fitting policy reasons why an grown child would not have standing to sue a parent underneath these circumstances." http://www.divorcesource.com/FL/ARTICLES...

Should you, if you can? Only you can decide that.

If you did and won, you could one and only get adjectives the money at once if he had it. From your description, he doesn't.
Young woman, have you ever hear of forgiveness? Suing anyone makes you no better than the lawyer waiting in chain ready to suck you both dry.

Let it dance and get on near YOUR life.
OK, he's going to owe a butt nouns of money so he would be required to pay it contained by parts. But I would not expect to get too much from him. After adjectives, you said he makes plenty to pay his bills and to be exact it.

In Texas, the minimum payment per month is $200. If you plan to use this money for your child, you'll soon find out that $200 does not go far at adjectives.

Another thing that might surface is if he is unable to discharge, he may go to put in prison. Is that something you really want, all things considered?

Please don't leftovers your time suing your deadbeat dad. Focus your energy instead on finding a better chore or learning some different skills to earn more pay. The process of suing him can be costly itself. I sink $10,000 in my custody warfare and the money I get surrounded by child support goes straight to my remaining attorney bill for at least possible a year. Ugh.
he doesnt owe you money he owes your mom
shes the one that paid adjectives of your bills when you were growing up
Guess what, YOU as an individual are disqualified as the recipient for unpaid child support simply because you turned of age and he's no longer obligated. The D.A. will persue the delinquent payments. You one-sidedly have no claim. Check your state imperative. ;)

Child support is levied by the court, awarded contained by faith to the guardian for the helpful, general support of the child contained by care. . In other words, the guardian receive it to assist supporting you. Had the court intended for you to personally receive the allocated funds, a trust report would have be established along with an executor since you be a minor. Then it would have required an agent of the court contained by concert with your guardian to access the funds and aver accountability.

Consider yourself "A.O."
First of all, he doesn't owe you child support. He owes your mom (or whoever raise you) because she fed you, clothed you, and housed you as a child.

Second of adjectives, if she is able to sue him for child support, and win, she won't get the money adjectives at once if he doesn't have it. His wages could capture garnished, so that a portion of his paycheck go directly to her until the debt is payed.

Finally, you are an adult immediately. A lot of people your age struggle next to money. If you are in college, consider scholarship, grants, and student loans, as ably as part time job. If you aren't in college, and hold trouble finding a decent paying duty, maybe you should progress to college, even community college, and live off of student loans until you graduate beside a useful scope.
You could or your mother could sue him but you would be hard pressed finding an attorney to purloin the case. If he is other asking you for money it is evident he have none so what do you get for the money you spend taking him to court. If he be ordered to pay the court system already is looking at him but if he is flying beneath radar working cash job not keeping jobs awfully long the possibility of getting anything that way are slim to none.

Is it possible for a private citizen to sue a sitting President of The United States?

On the basis of such things as breach of contract (i.e. the upholding of the Constitution) or trust? And formerly I get inundated near a bunch of stuff about mortal a Liberal, this is purely an objective ask, it has nought to do with recent events or my personal view.
Answers: ask Clinton!
A) no you cannot sue a sitting President.
B) didn't your Mom teach you in the order of lying.
No, because the president needs to focus on running the country, not war off adjectives the frivolous lawsuits. You know if he could be sued, all his time would be eat up with silly lawsuits!
No, and it absolutely would not be cost effective for the human being doing the suing as the Pres has seriously of legal beagles on his side.
No, it isn't possible. They tried it next to President Clinton too.
No. Disagreement with the command does not constitute a basis for file a law suit.
Sadly, no.
If you could find an attorney, yes you could, but you would not win.
It appears it can be done. Only near are two opinions on the subject. Whether to be in motion for criminal proceeding when impeachment is possible through the Congress? Hence criminal proceedings or impeachment. However a few instances from the source given are listed.
1. Paula Jones

Paula Jones
Thursday, Nov. 9, noontime ET
She initiated the sexual harassment lawsuit that nearly brought down a presidency. Her shield, Jones v. Clinton, established that a private citizen has the right to sue a sitting president.

2. Let me whip a moment to summarize my preliminary view at the outset, beside the strong qualification that I remain open to persuasion. Based on a review of the Constitution, lawful commentary, court ruling, and the written testimony that have been submitted for today's audible range, I enter the hearing next to two preliminary thoughts. My first preliminary thought: the president would appear to be subject to the compulsory process of the criminal law. Put simply, the Constitution and our history appear to emulate the fundamental principle that no man is above the law. The president is subject to the ruling, not above it. If he violates the imperative, he can be prosecuted.

But there is a second impressive question, and i.e. this: Assuming a president can be prosecuted, should he be prosecuted, when impeachment is a viable option? I regard as not. Prudence dictates that absence extraordinary circumstances, that when impeachment is available to address presidential misconduct, prosecution should await the resolution of the impeachment ask by the Congress.

VR
I think to be precise actually an unsure nouns of Constitutinal law, but I am not sure.

You'd enjoy to have standing to sue, and find a court that would help yourself to the case, and attain it done while the President was still contained by office, but the Constitutional issues itself would seem to be to take more time next that, making the question moot. which is probably why it have never come up.

But in any casing, your question won't cut it because the President's behavior is not a contractual issue and s/he have wide latitude to apply taste as they see fit.

What Is The Chivalry Factor, When Referring To Law?

The question is :

(T/F) ______ The Chivalry Factor have led to a recent decline surrounded by the number of women sentenced to prison, as more and more judges are reluctant to seperate mothers from their children.

I can't find the answer anywhere...
If you know if. Please explain WHY it's True or False so that I can better remember.
Answers: The Chivalry Factor is the disparity surrounded by sentencing between male and feminine convicts. Historically, women have received lighter sentences than men for like crime.

Here is an article that, while old, have some interesting numbers:

http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/e...

I won a small claims case contained by houston texas area. how can i collect.?

what can i do to catch him to pay up if he is ignore my requests, and basically refuse.
Answers: Make sure the judgment it final and that he can't appeal to county court at statute (10 days after judgment entered). Next, profile an abstract of judgment near the county clerk. Talk to the constable after that; he can help collecting on the decision.
Notify the court and your attorney as he is in despoliation of the court's decree. He may be apealing the condemnation and you have not be notified as of even so.

More Questions and Answers:
[2178] - [1599] - [1630] - [530] - [1389] - [38] - [1972] - [365] - [2191] - [1539] - [1212] - [1114] - [1941] - [1899] - [1514] - [24] - [1338] - [2194] - [81] - [1982]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: