Law Questions and Answers

Latin word, amicus curae, meaning friend of the court.. what are.rules and proceedures for what they can speak?

what info is the court looking for from them, or do they just volunteer to provide info they infer is pertinent...
Answers: The court doesn't request amicus briefs. They are offered by a third party ultimately involved in the defence, but may have an interest contained by the ruling or may just enjoy done a considerable amount of research in the subject event. As such, they typically may provide more details and case history pertinent to the thing to be decided which may not otherwise be brought to the courts' attention. Usually both party involved in the bag have to agree to allow the amicus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amicus_curi...

If You Are Injured in an Accident & the Police Have the Car Towed a Long Distance, Who is Responsible?

Assume that you are contained by an accident and are injured and are not asked to resolve where to tow the vehicle before the ambulance take you away.

The police select a towing service that is 10 miles away.

The police go amiss to use a towing service that is solitary 3 miles away.

Did the police make a mistake by not using the company that be nearby? Are you required to retribution the "excessive" charge that results from having towed the vehicle so far?
Answers: You are responsible.

It is not up to the police to "shop around" for a towing company for you. The towing company has a lein against the vehicle for towing charges, and if you want to receive it back, you will settle those charges.

If you are a member of an automobile club, a portion of your towing charges may be covered. Also, some ancestors have towing coverage on their automobile insurance policies.

If the stroke of luck was cause by somebody else, that person would be responsible to reimburse you for towing charges.
The police in general have a towing service on contract that they use for adjectives towing.

You will be responsible, but may get some of it hindmost if the other party is at breakdown through your insusrance.
You're responsible. The police call whoever have the city towing contract.

Should our troops be tried for waterboarding in Iraq?

US Calls Waterboarding a War Crime — Till Now

After World War 2, the United States tried, and convicted, Japanese prison military camp guards for war crimes because of their use of waterboarding on prisoners of time of war. It tried and convicted its own soldiers in the 19th century for using torture — waterboarding — surrounded by the Spanish American war. It have tried and convicted rogue Texas sheriffs for waterboarding prisoners. The United States has consistently defined waterboarding as torture for over 100 years — and defined torture as a period of war crime. For a country that loves its history and traditions, we seem to be abandon a good one.
Answers: The other answer is nought but apologist BS.

Waterboarding IS torture. The Bush administration claims we do not grip in torture. Torture is torture. Period. Any other explanation is pure semantics.
There also be a time that gentlemen would challenge respectively other to a duel and pace bad, turn and fire. all so orderly, gentlemenly and dignified...but the result be pretty much the same...one personality at least would die.
We also have moments during the beginning of the revolutionary period of war where we fought close to the British and formed nice pretty little ranks. Obviously that isn't how the war be continued since it was a losing proposition.
The ways of warfare correction due to the enemy we are warfare. and the current enemy have no conventional tactics, not a soul counry they work out of, no values for human life, no distinction of non - combatants, civilians or military. We didn't own to necessarily resort to such torture methods back contained by WW2 and the like, next again these countries still didn't treat our fighting men and women beside the same stardards we treated theirs. So America continues to nick it on the chin it seems due to some outdated sense of purity which relations might reminisce about due to it human being a more simple time but no-one really believes that America is as honorably tride and true as it once was. Today, the obverse of war have changed.
Back then, you know there wasn't going to be some crucial landing of Germans or Japanese on our counry becaue it would take an armada of ships sailing across the the deep to get to us. Even during the cold time of war, the treat of mutual anialation kept the Soviets at bay. They have the capability to hit America on its own soil but fear the consequences of a counterstike.
Today we fight an rival where information is paramount. They enjoy hit us a few times...911 being sucessful. They use improvised and nonconformist ways to hit us. At times Israel was have a bomb rock their city at least once a week other in varying and random locations. All the innocent loss of existence. Are you saying that you'd fairly be "traditional" at the cost of being unprepared to stop terrorsts contained by their tracks ? Waterboarding to my knowledge doesn't result in permanent wreckage that I"m aware of, and i'm suppose to feel adjectives bad roughly speaking the treatment of or psychological damage to some terrorist (potential informant) and verbs about his rights when American lives may be at stake ??
Sure, you can label a case that tortue is inhumane.but so is the time of war terrorists wage against any country they disagree with or reflect they have a right to verbs. Just how many innocents or for that reality how many military are you ready to lose to this little novel opinion of yours until you scream "uncle" ? We enjoy never had an antagonist like this surrounded by history.

Age of Consent and Statutory Rape?

If the age of consent in a state is 16 years outdated and a 17 yr old have sex with a 27 year ripened, can the older creature legally gain into any kind of trouble?
Answers: IF adjectives of what you say is correct, next there should be no problem. Be VERY faultless, however, that your information is accurate.

In the UK parents are allowed to hit their children. Is this one reason why the UK is such a horrific society?

In 20 European countries babies and children have impossible to tell apart legal protection as adults from physical bombing. Not so in the UK where on earth it is legal for parents to hit their children.

1 surrounded by 4 young individuals in the UK are involved surrounded by "serious & prolific" crime by age 21 [source HOME OFFICE]. We have a shocking reputation for sternness abroad.
It does appear likely that here is a connection. Not adjectives children who are hit will become violent - some will exhibit other problems. But adjectives violent race have experienced person hit as babies and children. This is where they learn to bully and treat others with contempt.
Answers: 'It does give the impression of being likely that within is a connection'... OK, please provide the crime statistics for those countries which have barred smacking.
I think you are also overstating what is allowed underneath the law. Parents are allowed to discipline using 'mild smacking' as indeed they own done since time immemorial. Indeed far heavier chastisement was allowed contained by the past (where if truth be told hitting children was common). Yet the crime data of even 100 years ago were much smaller amount widespread, conspicuously among children than they are now. This alone completely shoots your supposition out of the water. Children hold been getting more and more protection underneath the law over the ending 40 or so years, yet crime information involving children, and indeed the perception overall of children in society are getting worse and worse. Do you possibly not think this may be because children are one allowed to get away next to worse and worse behaviour because at hand is no effective deterrent? Just conceivably?
We live in a country explicitly ruled by POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and people not have the basic wit to use COMMON SENSE. This is one of the crucial issues.

I.E. Do not see a difference between a Smack (a short sharp rap on the legs / bum as a way to discipline a small child) and actual name-calling (punching and kicking, head / tummy for no actual reason)

Since school banned the wicker in the 1980's university discipline has get worse and worse - as there is no genuine threat or deterrent any more.

You also really need to appropriate into account the breakdown within the family contained by this issue too.
I find this really strange, my children both had the occasional smack when they be little, both have grown up to be respectable non-violent human beings. I be only dictum to my husband last week how heaps toddlers and children you see hitting their parents whilst out and about. As you said anger is on the increase. happy slapping did not exist when my kids be little and the children of parents I mixed with who did not smack their children seem more violent than mine and more disobedient.
I am not for hitting children or using a smack as the only form of discipline, at hand are many ways to tutor children how to behave.
I work in a conservatory and have for abundant years and I cannot believe the behaviour we own to put up with. Swearing, spitting and physical hostility from children as young as 5. There is little the academy is allowed to do, if you exclude the school get a bad baptize and the exclusion is often overturned. Not long ago I be physically abused by a 10 year old. I be spat at, punched and kicked. This child had never be smacked by his mother.
Well I'm glad I brought my children up the way I did, I be lucky enough never to hold anyone at my door complaining about them, they enjoy many friends and are both in a minute married with devout jobs and remarkably loving, giving personalities.
God aid this country, since smacking has become taboo, in attendance seems to be more brutality than ever and it is still increasing.

Mim is quite right smacking your children is not wicked but it is if you mark them. There are heaps more ways people wound their children than physical punishment. Emotional neglect one a major one.

For your argument to stand articulate there be a 50% decrease surrounded by parents smacking their children would there not also be a fade away in sternness over time? Physical punishment of a child has be on the decrease for over 20 years, so why are we not seeing a drop in hostility as a whole, interesting?
I be subject to physical discipline as a child of an excessive nature.
It be a hangover from the form of patriarchal dicsipline, that thought nothing of battering or strapping their children.
This however has not made me a vicious person. So much of this depends on the self-esteem, temperament, intelligence and conscience of the individual.
It is not true that people are allowed to be fierce in this attitude anymore towards their children.

I think part of the pack of the reason kids seize so unruly now is because of the street culture that exists. This is not a strange culture, but it one that has be allowed to flourish with smaller quantity parental control and adult supervision than be previously provided.

We are all used to with "The Lord of The Flies" scenario. This the temperament of kids when left to their own devices.

Of course they swot from their elders, but the more elder they have within their world the less expected they are to take from the cynical role models and the broader their vision and choices will be.
you are not aloud to hit your kids within the uk but it do nopt stop many populace.
how ever it wpuld not stop me hitting any body elses kids if i caught them damaging any entity of mine or causing trouble to the out-of-date and disabled even though i am disabled my self has nearby are loads o kids out there who dont precision about any piece so they need a well brought-up slap?
i would allso only smack my kids if they done somthing seriousley wrong other clever i just punnish them contained by other ways
like taken the computer away and things approaching this has it allways works
Just cos it may be permitted or not legal to hit kids contained by the UK (no idea) you are making the false assumption that everyone does it automatically, i mean dopey drugs are close by in Holland but they don't adjectives smoke it do they? youth crime is fuelled by the fact that the antiquated fashioned mum dad family component values have presently changed as more families are split or too stressed or busy to furnish their kids time and attention so they adopt gangs as their unusual families and that lead to crime.

I was never hit but if i be i would make sure my kids never have to experience it, u r over simplifying things...
I think that possibly the word "hit" is giving trouble here. There is a vast difference between smacking a child who have been contrary and hitting the child. Parents are not allowed to hit their children: i.e. assault. However, reasonable chastisement surrounded by the form of a smack on a part of the anatomy where on earth it is not going to cause injury (the preferred segment being the buttocks) can habitually defuse a situation where a child is becoming completely out of mitt. Obviously one does not smack babies and smacking is inappropriate after a dependable age.
I don't think that in attendance is a connection between the antagonism in society and justifiable chastisement by parents. In the days when children could be caned at college, they were far better behave and there be less belligerence in society. What is more, much of the antagonism in society is man ascribed to youngsters who have come from in a foreign country and been traumatised by horrendous events which hold no connection beside anything which takes place contained by Britain. http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=65...
The author of this link, by the path, came from Somalia.
Of course not! What a nouns of codswallop.

If you have medical problems and are sentenced to detention centre. What would happen?

HI, a coulpe weeks ago I have an abscess in my throat. I be put on antibitoics and the antibiotics killed the anaerobic germs in my digestive system. Im presently having digestive problems. Afterwards, I be checked to see if I had C. Defficile which is a deadly organism that can destroy your intestines. It come up negative but Im still have digestive problems. I got a second DWI a month ago and will be sentenced within about a month to which I will be accepting a reformatory term. I entail medical help to steal care of my digestive system and I sure as heck dont want to hold C. Defficile when Im in detention centre. So what are the rules when it comes to needing medical treatment and going to lock away? Is my lawyer competent to postpone the court sentence until I am treated? (we were given an extension after 45 days) Or what if I needed medical backing when I was within jail? Thanks for any info ===
Answers: Have your medical documentation ready for when you jump to jail, and agree to the process officers know you hold med issue that needs to be address, and/or have you doctor and legal representative talk just about the issue.

In your opinion is it rational for a convicted murderer to choose a last suppertime and method of execution?

Answers: Fairness has little to do near it. It's a matter of civility. By robbing them of that final choice, we become no better than them.
ultimate meal=yes
method of execution=no
I think massacre a killer doesn't solve anything. There is a difference between Justice and Vengeance.
tolerate them choose their last collation. People gots to eat... and No they shouldnt choose their opening of execution
yes go on spoil him
Yes
Nope. The subject didn't get to choose that, why should the criminal?
Hell no, especially if it is a rapist, or a brutal murderer, he should be torture till his closing day and not agreed any pity. Think about that child or whomever he kill. If he wants mercy adjectives of a sudden, how convenient. People like that deserve what they return with.
No way. They didn't agree to their victims choose their last feast or way of annihilation.
they can choose thier last lunchtime but i think they should die approaching the person they kill

like they strangled someone they should be strangled tortured someone to destruction so should they
Why would it be unfair? Who does it hurt if he chooses hot dogs instead of chicken?

As for choosing a method of execution, they usually do not obtain to do that. Methods are set by state law, if they are not declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.
I am sure the personage or people they kill were given choices.right. NO.they deserve nil, they should have a cell near no lights, no bed, no conversation, until the day they shift...they can have a priest if they want to confess to their sins up to that time they go.

Should Justin Ellsworth's Parents have be given access to his email?

Justin Ellsworth was a Marine who give his life for his country. By adjectives accounts he was a brave and fine Marine and we adjectives owe him the highest debt of gratitude. But we be also left beside a serious question, what to do beside his email? His parents wanted access. They considered necessary to see what their son had to enunciate. However, email is a private sort of thing. Yahoo, his email provider, have a terms of service agreement beside him. And while we sympathize greatly with his parents, near is also a precedent to be concerned about. One can't simply waive away the privacy issue as a decree to release the information could have serious consequences for email privacy for us adjectives. So the issue needs to be discussed, thought through, and resolved. That is why we hold cases like this surrounded by a class like this, so we can infer these things through and try to respect the family, the lifeless, and the needs of society. So I ask you:
Answers: After loss the laws in connection with privacy are greatly decreased. How can a soul who does not exist have rights? Furthermore upon passing all property owned by the departed goes to their estate. The estate is manage by the executor and if the parents are the executors of the estate they would have the right to access the email. It would give the impression of being to me you would have to release the email to the estate, if you don't they could other go to court to force you to release it.
No, his e-mail is and should remain private.
If necessary a court can proclaim that the mail be disclosed below certain conditions

Can you help me? My sister is getting her children taken away from her!?

Last summer my sister be told she was within the computer system at the adoption agency. She was looking to revise one baby newborn child. They told her nearby were 6 mothers due to enjoy a baby and one be going to be hers. They mistakingly never put her in the system so instead, they asked her if she required to adopt 2 siblings. One is 2 yrs. old and the other is 1. They said she doesn't own to take both but my sister took both of them even though she be enitally only taking a newborn. Since after my entire huge family have fallen within love with them and excepted them as on of our own. They both ring up her mommy and I know they would never be able to function lacking her. The birth parents have lost here coustody but now the shady uncle desires to take them. He lives next to an illegal imagrant who he say "has presently moved out." Now the latest report we've got from the state is that they are individual taken away from us any day in a minute. Can she sue? I don't know the laws aft this stuff. What are her rights?
Answers: I am so sorry...That is horrible! How dare they take those children from that loving home.

Go grasp a family imperative attorney-- or atleast call one and ask them what can be done...
Good luck to you and your family unit and most of all to those children.

God bless
First of adjectives, laws will diverge depending on the state.

Second, we can't tell from the grill whether this a private adoption agency or through the state system. It makes a difference.

There is not ample information in your press for anyone to beginning answering. Your sister should appointment a lawyer today.
She requirements to see a family ruling attorney

by the way it is "initially", "their", "accepted", "immigrant"

Now you see why folks will adopt outside the country in the past adopting inside the country
Kin tend to find priority in these cases. The uncle would own to be proven infit in proclaim for your sister to keep the kids. The social worker should hold warned her that this commonly happens surrounded by foster-to-adopt situations.

The only article I can think of for you to do is to hire a detective to "find something" on this uncle, if you really judge he is shady.

It's very possible that the uncle will prove his own unfitness and that your sister will own them again soon.

In Chicago, Illinois (Cook County). Where do I report Discrimination that had happen at work?

I've been working for this company for over 10 years in a minute and all of the sudden they enjoy cut my hours in partially and their not supplying me with the materials I necessitate to perform my employment satisfactorly. No matter who I complain to, close to my Union or my Supervisior, no one will lisren or they purely don't give a damn. Also, they enjoy started firing employees who enjoy been at hand for years and these employees have'nt have any problems at work in former times. In their place, They're hiring workers who are illegal immigrant who I guess are working for a smaller paycheck. I'm worried about my chore status, how much longer do I have? Please assist.
Answers: Under Illinois state and Federal laws the singular bases for nouns are: age, sex, race, ethnic derivation, religion, sexual orientation, disability, connubial and military status. SEE www.eeoc.gov If you believe that you have be discriminated against due to one of these bases, afterwards you have a covering -- otherwise you are wasting your time filing a complaint.

Your confederation should be backing you up on supplying the materials you involve. If your union is not following their duties, as timetabled in your federation contract, you can file a complaint against the league at www.nlrb.gov Cutting hours and supplying materials are not considered discrimination UNLESS it is be inflict you qualify under one of the above basis.

In order wallet a complaint you should go to the Illinois Department of Human Rights http://www.state.il.us/dhr/ for an interview. They will write up a formal/legal complaint that will be sent to the employer.

WORD OF WARNING: Filing a officially recognized complaint against your employer can get you fired. If that happen you can then folder another complaint for retaliation. There is no law that will force an employer to re-hire you or to maintain you employed.
not much longer

what is lisren?
If they are hiring Illegal immigrants, anonomusly ring up ICE and have them robbery the place one day.
By hiring Illegals, they are aiding and Abettign Criminals, so you can call for the police afterwards to arrest the people doing the hiring,
If it is stirring to a lot of personnel, then it is not nouns. If an employer wants to run stale his good workers and replace them, he is well inwardly his rights to run his company into the ground if he wants to.

More Questions and Answers:
[1775] - [859] - [1089] - [1796] - [2414] - [1447] - [666] - [1064] - [1313] - [1180] - [1670] - [2287] - [665] - [1068] - [61] - [2058] - [189] - [16] - [2147] - [2443]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: