Law Questions and Answers
If you lost your freedom. what would you do?
Answers: If you have be tracking the illegal immigration situation as I enjoy, you would realize that the freedom we now know is unlike the "freedom" we may come to enjoy. Primarily, I'm talking in the region of the freedom of opportunity because the illegals we are granting our trillions of tax dollars and quasi-citizenship to are far more attuned to socialism than to capitalism. Like it or not, capitalism is the bucket from which we adjectives feed and provides us near the life style we own. Farrakhan, King, and others have set a model for the nation near million man marches, etc., that I would love to see emulate with a million man demonstration on Washington wherein each of the million carried a rifle as a clear message to our parliament that we do, indeed, govern. Our elected leaders of both parties see no problem here. I surmise the "people" do.
...and I would vote for a strong independent in a heartbeat!
i would not be as moving,as many of you know profession loss is also a serious life inhibiting state a loss of a freedom
so i be and am less out and give or take a few and truly bored most of the time. Now the loss of freedom you mention may also refer top if Germany one the war,would we know how to choose a lifestyle the "" government didn't approve! When one or heaps hate you as a anyone this is also a loss of freedom.
Get one of those Freedom Mobility Wheelchairs?
I would fight until any I got it spinal column or I was kill. I refuse to live surrounded by a country or a society that is not free. Freedom is my God-given right, and I will encounter for it, no matter the consequences.
DON"T TREAD ON ME!!!
Unfortunately, America already seem to be headed down *that* slippery slope! For example, the so-called "Hate Crime" legislation Congress is trying to overrun is nothing but legislation against "thought crimes", ala "1984" by George Orwell! *Every* intentional crime is a "dislike intensely crime", for goodness sakes!
If the United States establishment starts allowing international law to filch precedence over U. S. law, an extra freedom lost!
If we allow our military troops to come under the direct command of the United Nations, another one lost!
Even pro-life articles surrounded by Christian publications seem to own to be politically correct and call the pro-abortion position, "pro-choice", instead of what it *really* is! At impossible to tell apart time, people holding a pro-life position give the impression of being to have to allow those holding pro-abortion beliefs to refer to *them* as "anti-abortion" or "anti-choice"!
Every time we allow the management to take over a responsibility which should be the church's responsibility, or our own, a new freedom is lost!
We should be constantly fighting against respectively encroachment on our freedoms beefore they *all* disappear!
oil up my assault rifle and shotgun
Who is,orwas the54 massachuetts infortry?
Answers: The 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, an infantry regiment that fought in the American Civil War, be one of the first official black unit in the United States armed forces.
Please check your spelling subsequent time
Let's ask Jules:
http://doyouspeakenglish.ytmnd.com/
Do you think that physician assisted suicide should be court?
i have to do a debate within my current events class and i got assigned to be for the topic. why should it be officially recognized? Please post any information sites also.Answers: www.religioustolerance.org/euthanas.ht..
www.painandthelaw.org/palliative/physi...
www.apa.org/monitor/oct04/jn.html
one reason would be If the tolerant was suffering and drugs could n ot steal the pain away, the lenient could go to a better place.
If the long-suffering was living on existence support and was against it.
I struggle to read out this but YES
Suffering is inhumane, when a sick person have no other prognosis but suffering until death afterwards, if they choose, they should be allowed to pass
Yes because I believe that associates should be able to control their own lives, it's their choice, its their existence. I have a signed document stating that if I downfall up in the hospital similar to a vegetable for more than 1 week, my sister has my authorization to pull the plug lower than my wishes as I would not like to live that instrument. I hope this helps and extraordinarily good luck to you on your essay!!!
I'd right to be heard yes!
I don't believe is should be legal. The doctors hold taken oaths to perserve time, not to take it. I for one cannot simply stand by and allow someone transport another's life. You may phone it assisted suicide, but it is still murder. Taking a person's life of your own accord is no different than unwillingly taking it. No if's, and's, or but's. We cannot decide who should be kept alive or should be in motion on to the next time.
I think it should depend on the situation.
If someone is going to die anyway and they are within pain, cant meander..can't enjoy what little life span they have departed..then yes.
If they know they are going to die, but can still delight in life.
after no.
Basically, I think it should depend on the "competence of the rest of their life".
Example: I had to put my cat down a couple years ago (he be 16...in relatives years). There was a surgery they could do, but it would simply extend his life MAYBE 6 months and the talent of that 6 months would not be guaranteed to be a GOOD 6 months. I had to have an idea that about his existence and the quality of it. Why extend his already throbbing, difficult life??
Not singular should it not be legal, it is degenerate and goes against the sixth of the ten commandments:
You shall not murder.
As to the Hippocratic oath, it have undergone many change since first written, and this is the relevant text from the modern revision:
Most especially must I tread with caution in matter of life and demise. If it is given me to save a time, all gratitude. But it may also be within my power to hold a life; this awesome responsibility must be face with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above adjectives, I must not play at God.
Written in 1964 by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, and used surrounded by many medical school today.
And to those responding to this question equating the taking of a human existence as equal to the euthanasia of a pet, if you value your existence so little, I feel sorry for you.
Simply put, what is the poor law?
Answers: If you are conversation about the UK's Poor Law, Wikipedia have a good explanation of the Poor Law and its revisions. All of the poor houses and such be abolished over 70 years ago so not really an issue. The United States doesn't enjoy debtor's prisons or poor houses either.
Can a minor buy a violent video team game in california?
Can they?Answers: im not sure roughly cali but the legal age say 17 which technically is a minor so yeah
Depends on what you consider violent. Minors can buy any hobby rated E-T, but to buy rate M you have to be at smallest 17
Once upon a time, all the Labour Party,and adjectives the Trade Unions called for the abolition of Public Schools?
A greatly common purpose given was that they produced a "Bunch of Queers"!Don't you devise that,in our more enlightened times,the Government and TUC should be demonstration for more and more Public Schools. In order to produce the creative,sensitive,civilized, and super-intelligent, people that this Country so desperately wants.
Could even have Muslim Public Schools: within order to produce a more
gentle,intellectual,
sensitive,bomber.
Answers: Methinks I detect a touch of irony here! Considering that a goodly portion of the New Labour elite are the products of such school do you really think that they want to abolish them?
New Labour own already effectively pulled up the ladder. Despite the prominence on educational restructuring and the political rhetoric and spin about enlightening opportunity working class people are still educationally disadvantaged, beside more leaving academy without bookish or vocational qualifications.
Student loans and fees enjoy deterred and excluded more people of working class rudiment from higher training. There are now smaller quantity people of working class native land in UK restricted universities - ie: Oxbridge, St Andrews etc., than nearby were within 1926, the year of the General Strike.
Thanks. Made me laugh.
Seriously though, a social special might not be such a bad model. Let's face it, we get rid of the elite system and presently we have Jade Goody is a role model - how could we do worse.
EDIT: Sorry, should be "Jade Goody AS a role model." See, should enjoy listened surrounded by school.
The policy of abolish Public schools be in direct to establish equality in childhood. It had be argued that Public school well-read children were given an unwarranted advantage over children adjectives in State school.
Then the "educationalists", in the interests of equality, adopt the policy of comprehensive schools providing tuition to chidren of mixed abilities contained by a single school or class. After a prolonged extent of public denial, it was recognised that children be leaving university after 10 years of full time education unqualified to read, write or even speak grammatical English, and that even the politicians were sending their children to Public school.
Now, it is recognised that "the educationalists" have not come up next to the goods, and whilst extremely persuasive about the reason for the failure of guideline in school, had simply get it badly wrong, and call for abandoning to more traditional methods of rearing, if Britain is not to be the illiterate man of Europe.
Are Public schools producing "bunches of Queers"? Surely, the current thinking is that homosexuality is entirely above-board and merits equal opportunity?
Could be your last sentence IS the track to go?
I attended a Public university so thank you for putting me up in the bracket of super intelligent. I other knew I be, but it's nice to get it from somebody else. Seriously though most Labour politicians send regrets to send their children to the local comprehensive school, so that should be telling us something going on for today's education system.
Use of Copywrite Images On Your Blog?
Can't seem to find a proper answer.Here's the question:
I have a blog that I write to and I find interesting articles on the internet.
Example of a blog that are similar to mine
www.engadget.com
If I find a exotic article that I'm commenting about beside an image, can I use the emblem on my blog and at the bottom of the article just influence image from --- With the URL to where on earth I found the image.
If the portrait directly relates to the blog post, is simply putting a link to the article source satisfactory?
Or will I be breaching copyright laws?
Answers: To own a valid copyright, you must create an innovative work of authorship, and it must be fixed.
A work is an original work of authorship if it have even the slightest modicrum of creativity (a very low standard). A single brush stroke across a oilcloth is enough. A sculpture entitled "Broken pencil" is a harder luggage for the "author" to make.
A photograph is fixed if it is contained in a computer image folder.
Photographs are copyrightable subject matter underneath the Copyright Act of 1976. The subject of the photograph is not, so if you take like peas in a pod photograph of Mt. Rushmoore for example, you are not infringing if you use it.
Attribution is not a cure to copyright infringement.
To commit copyright infringement, a copyright holder must prove that he or she owns a valid copyright (fixed, original work of authorship), that the work be copied, and that there be misappropriation. A copyright action is file in federal or state court and can be file in the author's jurisdiction.
There are several defenses to copyright infringement, such as reasonable use, but these are handled on a armour by case proof. Fair use is an affirmative defense, meaning it does not contest infringement, singular that it was a do use.
This does not constitute legal suggestion, but states Copyright law surrounded by general principles. To buy an answer to your question, you should contact an intellectual property attorney within your jurisdiction. Without knowing the jurisdiction of the copyright holder, no one cas voice for sure. The copyright laws surrounded by California, Australia, and New York are all thoroughly different. International copyright law does apply since the US is a signatory to the Berne convention.
Why we the people of india contained by some constituecies elect criminals as our rep. in states and hub.?
we the people of india do also elect ciminals to rule us. how is that we do not bear into account the circumstance of the candidate while using our right to vote. the parl. or the state legislature will not pass a legislation to stop entry of criminals contained by the parl or state legislature as it will be not be in their interest. it is for the citizens of india or to some extant for the election cmmission to do some piece in the thing. otherwise you can imagine what will be state of affairs contained by the country if one day pepole close to anant singh or shahabuddin become prime minister or cm..Answers: Philippines does likewise and look at their state of affairs
The credit union is not amortizing my coup¨¦ loan correctly is this a violation of my rights?
I own recently gone over my wage recipits and found that several months the credit union have amortized my loan correctly, they are taking out more interest from the payment than what they are supposed to. I am wondering if this is a sacrilege to my rights and if there is any permissible ramification for this?Answers: Bring a copy of the note that you signed to the Credit Union and a copies of the salary receipts that you are questioning.
Ask a representative to figure the correct principal and interest amounts due, based on the spoken language in the file that you signed.
See if the principal and interest amounts calculated by the representative match the amounts on the wage receipts.
If they match, the transmittal receipt is probably correct. Ask the representative to explain to you why the amounts that you expect for the interest costs are different from the amounts calculated by the representative.
If the representative calculates an amount different from the amount shown on the wage receipt, you may own a valid lawsuit against the credit union.
.
.
It might be a breach of contract, but in attendance are no "rights" involved.
If I run over a pedestrian in New York City and nobody care, was it really a crime?
Answers: are you self serious?
lmao idk
but it would be funny .!
DUH! I think the limp person sure as HELL care!
Lily
Gosh, I hope it's not someone you care going on for.
YES!!!!
if they were jaywalking consequently it's not your fault. I would freak and die if I ever hit someone. I kill a bird once while driving and can't forget it... feathers everywhere. It was so gross
it's a crime if you don't report it straight away. ask a police officer that question subsequent time you get pulled over. upright luck.
Dude. Don't make yourself believe a lie. A felony is a felony.You took someones natural life.
If someone runs over you in New York, and nobody care, is it really a crime???
ha ha very funny, i guess if pedestrians started to go and get jaywalking tickets then smaller amount running over will occur.
Yes! If you carry run over by someone and they run (called a hit and run), then they can achieve charged for the crime, but if they stayed at the crime site, then they would not procure charged.
and if you were jay walking, or running when the neutral changed, then the charge would be on you.
Well did you massacre him or not???
But seriously now, stop picking up my fellow New Yorkers. I be born and raised surrounded by NY and NYers care even though you would find it frozen to make eye contact beside them.
If you feel the guilt inside of you consequently it's a crime.
But if you don't feel anything next it's not.
yeah!!!! It doesn't matter if nobody care. We are talking roughly speaking someones life.
A crime is a crime no thing who sees it. You might not procure caught by the police, but you might feel guilty going on for it untill you do something about it. I know i would.
i.e. what is known as a victimless crime, close to punching someone in the dismal
On two levels endorsed and moral.
HEY HALLE!!
its a crime but i'd laugh sooo easier said than done if you did it
Well as my late mother used to say-so God knows and you know and you know what the ten commandments are , so even if it looks similar to nobody cares contained by NYC, someone ACTUALLY does.
What kind of human one are you that you'd even ask that kind of a give somebody the third degree? Of course it matters and it's still a crime.
To be honest, at first I thought this be a stupid question, but next I rephrased it like so: "If I run over a pedestrian within New York City and nobody (including the pedestrian) would press charges, would it really be a crime?" Yeah, that seems to be a more interesting grill. I would suppose it would still be a crime since wreckless driving is illegal.
More Questions and Answers:
[1216] - [762] - [442] - [1282] - [1365] - [1393] - [377] - [803] - [1279] - [2505] - [1238] - [262] - [1440] - [2002] - [2470] - [384] - [1503] - [609] - [348] - [1656]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: