Law Questions and Answers

What could happen...?

Well me and my ex enjoy a 5 year old child together.. I don't see him greatly due to work schedule and arts school, I still live at home with my parents, and she lives at home beside her parents. Well we've been broken up roughly speaking 2 months and I have see him but not nearly enough. Well end I spoke to her mother(his grandmom).. She sounded frustrated and informed that his mom is never around, always sneaks out of the house, and leaves her mom next to the responsibility.

Well her mom asks me if I'd ever want full custody and I said I couldn't right now because my work schedule(seasonal chore about to end) and arts school schedule.. She said she didn't know what else to do because his mom is never around and she's tired of raise him. Her parents have lawful guardianship.

I know I am in no position to pinch him full time until I get a place, steady opportunity, etc.. What could happen if they required to give up their rights?

Answers: You obligation to consult an attorney and look at a plan to take custody of your son. Here is my inference on the issue: The minute you have a child, you never, NEVER draw from to be selfish again. If that money that you have to quit institution for the time being, so be it. You involve to take responsibility for your son, and if your ex and her parent's aren't likely to do so, then you involve to step up and take custody.

You, the girl, the girls parents and your parents adjectives need to sit down and own a civilised talk together.

say aloud that it seems approaching it is too much for the girl to handle and we involve to discuss some options. e.g. the kid spends weekend at your place near you and your parents and your parents babysit one night a week or something.

I know the demeanour (sneeking out etc) is irresponsible but you all come across young and it can be easier said than done to be a parent even for older nation in stable relationships.

All the best

I have three children. One in 1968, one within 1970 and the last one contained by 1972. Guess what, I couldn't get a seasonal situation, and go to arts school ... I had to make higher my kid's.. That's your job. There are no excuses. You have a child, forget everything else and take aid of your child. It's not your x mother in law job to make higher your kid.
You should have never have a child if you wanted to spawn excuses for why you can't raise that child.
When your x mother surrounded by law asked you, "if you required full custody" she was describing you she's tired of raising you and your X's child.
A child is not within a good position when anyone raised by a personality who resents raising it. It would be better past its sell-by date in foster support if you don't want your child, and your x don't want the child and the grandma don't want the kid, then tolerate the child be adopted.

Violated rights??

My child and I are lifelong vegetarians due to religion (Hare Krishna), but we live within a regular community so he attends public school. I made sure to put it surrounded by his permanent recods that he is to own NO meat, fish, or eggs. His father and I have also made the instructor aware in 2 occasion to which she responded the first time, "what about green eggs and ham year?". Obviously she did not think we be serious. We pack a healthy lunch for him every single year. Last Tuesday, she informed me that she bought my son a rib eye steak sandwich for lunch, which he ate and that we owed her the money for it. She was not apologetic at adjectives and showed no remorse for breaking our vow.
My son is 5 years old and we do put away meat replacements which resemble meat in some course so he told me he was confused and he in recent times didnt want to seem chance.
My question is, what rights do we enjoy in this satchel? We're considering serving the teacher near a law suit for not allowing my son to remark his religion.

Answers: This is a very interesting request for information. I did a search of court cases across the country on Lexis/Westlaw and did not find anything on point. I did find a little cases of inmates with special dietary requests who sued because they were forced to guzzle meat.

From the religious perspective, you have a 1st amendment right to religion. You also own a fundamental right to raise your children contained by accordance with the tenant of your religion. This right is so strong, that you have a right to remove your child from mandatory public rearing if it conflicts with your religion (Amish children not required to complete mandatory dignified school requirements because it conflicts near their religion). Your first amendment rights guarded by your fundamental right to parent your child have be incorporated to apply to state action via the 14th amendment. Consequently, a arts school may not require a child to salute the flag if doing so would violate the child's religion.

These are the issues that implicate your and your child's rights, but in attendance are other issues here. The teacher appears to hold had unkindness aforethought. The teacher appears to hold intentionally fed your child meat to upset your religious sensibilities knowing that it would cause electric distress. We punish malice aforethought criminally.

Also, the definition of a battery-operated in tort tenet is a harmful or unacceptable contact and the intent to create the harmful or rude contact. The contact here being the drinking of meat, it was the intention of the professor, and it was intolerable to your religion. There is a court case skilled in first year decree schools where on earth a woman successfully recovered under the tort of freestyle when a male nurse be present during her child birth, and when she had specifically instructed the hospital that it be against her religion that a male be present during childbirth. The prior observe of religious beliefs proved the offensiveness of the contact. The restatement second of torts subdivision 18 comment c includes the daubing of pollution on a towel plaintiff expected to use as a battery, or the pulling away of a stool so as to expect the plaintiff to fall to the ground a bit than sit down was a freestyle. A degree of physical spoil is not needed to be shown. The certainty that your child has a religion prohibiting the consumption of meat, that the educationalist is in a position of superior power, that your child is of an innocent and compliant age, that the teacher intended to motive apprehension of the incident in you, and that the academy was up to date or on notice that your child have special dietary needs adjectives weigh against both the teacher individually as well as the arts school district.

I do not know how the law works surrounded by your jurisdiction or if you will succeed. You can attempt to contact several attorneys specializing in civil rights and personal injury, as capably as the school board, the state's department of nurture, and district attorney's office (for possible criminal matters). It is intensely disturbing that a teacher is feed children with the intent to slight or harm their parents.

I agree near Lori, suing his teacher and the academy will only alienate your child futher.

I am not trying to negotiator you, I am simply trying to put this into real existence - not just the theory of a lawsuit.

When you sue a civil entity, you are suing yourself and your neighbors, not only will that alienate but your child, but your entire ethnic group as well. I am sorry that your religious vow be broken, but i would seriously consider taking thsi to the powers that be and see if anything can be worked out before i get myself involved in an expensive epic lawsuit.

On another note to the guy down at hand calling out christians - to us a child of that age is considered and "innocent" and if made to do something against the religion then he is automatically forgiven, because he/she is too childish to know better. now as far as forcing someone to pray to lucifer, you can force someone to walk through the motions but you cant force someone to pray, what matters surrounded by the end is what is surrounded by your heart, and God knows what is surrounded by your heart.

Her son is 5 yrs old
It does not thing that he ate it on his own free will

The teacher know that he was barred meat and still gave it it him.

From what she wrote you can already bring up to date that the teacher is uninformed and should be fired

What's next, is she going to nurture shellfish to children who keep kosher? Steak to Hindu children? Meat to Catholic children on Fridays? Pork to Muslim children? Every religion have some aspect to it that others may find silly or illogical, but as a parent, you own the right to decide what beliefs you'd similar to to teach your child, and as long as they are not offensive, your authority as a parent should be respected.

If the teacher within question have a problem with your beliefs and feel they ARE abusive, her employment is to notify Children's Aid. Same goes if she saw your child be not coming to school next to food. Otherwise, she should step back and stick to what she know - reading, writing, arithmetic, etcetera. Her job is to impart a secular instruction on your child.

If this person have problems with race who don't conform to her culture, she should not be in a position of authority over children. If she ignore the authority of a parent over a child, she needs to be disciplined.

I don't deem a lawsuit is out of line, and I don't expect segregating those who don't conform is the answer, any.

you have no casing, as you have no damages,..stop trying to capture money for nothing,..

I am being sued by lvnv funding?

The reason is more than 6 years old the statue of limitations is over here within florida, i have a credit fraud for the recent past 2 years the account they are sueing for be from someone who took my social number and open a rationalization, even the statement went to near address and i proofed that i never lived in that address i lived surrounded by the same address for more than 12 years, i wrote post regarding the issue near proof and never had a response vertebrae, and now they are sueing, what can i do to clear this up. also i they amount is more than the unproved amount. the person who did this to me is never found.

Answers: Present adjectives your evidence in court that you be a victim of identity fraud and that the debt is not yours. If LVNV have evidence proving that you own the debt, be prepared to disprove it with witnesses, police reports, resume from telephone call, et al.

Should we, like the Italians "speed through" a imperative to deport anyone deemed to be a threat to public collateral?

Answers: It would be the right thing to do but.
adjectives the laws within the world are no use if those in power
keep humane rights and political correctness to the point of downright stupidity.
The laws that rule this country involve to be changed amended revised and scrapped, so that the innocent not the guilty come first second and other
those that want to cuddle the bad guys should be put on alike boat home.

I thought that there be such provision already.

A year or so back, a US citizen be deemed to be not a financial guarantee threat but simply not welcome surrounded by Britain, and he was not competent to enter the country.

Removing people deem to be a threat to national security is expected already on the Statute book, and if it wasn't I am sure they would be able to find another track to deport undesirables, unless they were claiming asylum, logically!

There`s no point in introducing a decree like the Italians hold.
We already have a Law that let the courts deport non brits that commit crimes.Unfortunately the idiots in command also set up an independant immigration panel that can over rule the government, courts and immigration authorities.
There`s an Italian due to be released from prison contained by the Uk shortly that the home office be going to deport back to italy but they over-rulled by the Independant immigration panel on the grounds that he hasn`t get any family contained by italy..
Thsi is another way that the present parliament has proved itself unfit to stay within office.No other country contained by the world lets they`re elected establishment be undermined by a bunch of political correct morons.

How would a probation dept. treat a class b midemeanor in texas?

what is to be expected if someone is already on a deffured probation and consequently gets arrested for an invalid D.L.

Answers: Probably nought and here's a website that can explain things a little better.

3 dui in state of florida how long within jail?

Answers: You really involve to see an attorney about this.

Best place I hold found for DUI information is this site:

http://www.totaldui.com

It has state by state information and lots of articles and information. May know how to help you find a DUI legal representative.

Really--don't do this on your own. Good luck to you.

Here's a tip... if you refuse to examination, you'll serve no time. They can only convict you if you agree to a check! Only under extreme circumstances can they forcefully draw your blood.

If you discard to participate surrounded by a field question paper, or any other tests, they will still revoke your license, but they will dearth sufficient evidence to convict you of anything else.

How comes Parents continue to be allowed properly to "decide" for a male kid a unnecessary genital alteration?

Like if it is a permanent hairstyle,or as a religious branding.
When within is no traumatic pathology that requires the extirpation surgery

Answers: For the same sense parents are allowed to decide to confer their children vaccinations, nurture them certain foods, and provide them near medical care.

And if it is the religious aspect that have your knickers in a twist, then remember that most countries at least possible pay lip service to separation of religion and state, so the proper response in that would be MYOB.

It is horrible and I feel completely violated that my mom did it to me.

I estimate it should be the boy's choice.

As for "more sanitary"...that's a lie. That's similar to saying you won't carry foot odor if you cut your foot off. Its true, but undeniably ridiculous. As long as you shower every day and WASH it, it doesn't product a difference as far as being sanitary.

What would be the doctor's counterattack if a parent wanted to cut out a kid girl's private parts b/c its "more sanitary" and she won't "look different"?

I waited to tolerate my son decide for himself
It be done under broad anesthesia ( can be dangerous)
he said it was remarkably painful next to many stitches ( recuperative time increases with age)
cost the insurance company a heck of a great deal more than if we had have it done when he was a little one

vwgirl i had to snigger at your answer about self more sanitary. Do you think that i hike about (and most of the masculine population) with a dirty, smelly infectious penis? lol no i don't guess so. Its only within America this sick practice is really going on for non medical purposes. The hospitals must be making some amount of money that's why there are no attempts to stop the barbaric practice. EDIT- Dolphy thats why we enjoy soap and water (this is to wash) incase you didn't know. I consideration it's mostly woman have adjectives these crazy thoughts about penises. Have yous ever have one? Smegma only builds up similar to BO under the armpit if you dont swab. Just like your genitals wouldn't smell the nicest in need a clean would they?

What can you drive Road legal at 16 years prehistoric?

im 15 at the moment and dieing to get doing a tour, wanna no any suggestions of what kind of transportation i can drive road permitted at the age of 16

Answers: In the UK a moped of no more than 50cc

You can get a 50cc motorbike licence at 16 and a coup¨¦ licence at 17. If you are that deserate, go to a private track, the tenet doesn't apply there law apply to public roads and highways

What if the police are the ones passing past its sell-by date slandering statements? What should I do ?

Answers: First, what evidence do you have that they are doing this? Secondly, what are they adage. How can be help you if you do not provide us next to sufficent information!???

Can you request a switch in law lords in loved ones court in the middle of a divorce satchel in NJ?

If you quality the judge have prejudice feelings towards you or is not properly doing his brief.

Answers: Asking a judge to recuse himself or herself is practically impossible unless the regard as being acted in such a comportment to warrant recusal. If the judge demonstrated discernible favoritism towards either deputation, an attorney can motion for recusal; however, the judge can other remain on the case and verbs to claim impartiality.

You can check near your lawyer on this. But I really doubt that you can do that since respectively Judge is assigned to case loads, they really don't hold the time to have folks switching cases around between them.

If that were to arise it would further tie up our court system, making it take even longer to seize through the process. Another reason that they may not do this is to prevent relations from dragging out their court case, the personality may not want things to progress so this would be a way of making the process lift even longer.

Make sure that you have a really upright lawyer to represent you contained by your divorce, one that knows what your rights are and will stand up for you. This will help out make sure that your rights are not person violated.

God bless, I hope all turns out in good health for you. And again consult with your attorney to see if it is possible to be capable of be assigned to a different Judge.

If you are going through a divorce, I don't know if switching judges can be done, but do everything you can to draw from a decent style guru. You only catch one shot at divorce. If the judge rules against you because of some preconceived notion, you own lost possibly everything. Your lawyer should know if you can request another sort out or not.

More Questions and Answers:
[2265] - [934] - [318] - [684] - [31] - [2239] - [643] - [461] - [1326] - [1138] - [1627] - [397] - [430] - [1632] - [2454] - [1496] - [2051] - [1093] - [1951] - [1738]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: