Law Questions and Answers
Terminate paternal rights?
My son is almost 7 years antiquated. He has no perception who his father is- he left when he be one. There is a ton of back child support he owes- and because of it- he will not draw from a legitimate career. He has agreed surrounded by the past to sign over his rights- but the ending time we spoke- he sounded unsure. I would hate to spend the money and risk his putting the paperwork to the side. Anyone know what the probability are that I can have his rights terminated surrounded by court anyway?Answers: Don't wait for your ex to do anything... he won't do anything unless forced.
He have gotten by with making everyone else clutch responsibility throughout his whole duration.
You can go to the court handling your child support, and relate them all that you own said here.
You may not be able to completely end his rights, but you can specify that he can only win "supervised visitation".
You can't terminate his parental rights...just he can do that.
HE has to directory with the court and a negotiator has to generate the decision base on HIS filing.
He is still the father and have the right to his child.
Is it legal for a 24 y/o man to own sex with a 17 year ancient girl in PA?
Answers: The answer is probably yes, unless the 24 years infirm has some variety of authority over the 17 year old.
In PA the age of consent is 16. So a 24 year old-fashioned cannot be charged with statutory rape.
However the corruption of minors charge be used before for teacher who have sex next to their students if the student is over 16 but under 18.
Doesn't this crash under statutory rape?
No. not permitted
yeah, totally for any 16 or over.
feel free to live and delight in ur life doing it what u both want to.
ah.. a further thing, forget loser commets almost ur sexual life they probably fck once a year next to old ppl at 90's(hot ppl for some ppl) so they become a bit controlling of u. lol.
go delight in and be happy.
Can I copyright a design that I saw elsewhere if it's not already copyrighted by somebody else?
I attended a large university. People walk down the residence hallways selling t-shirts out of duffel oodles. A shirt I bought 20 years ago was measure up and it was a nice design so I have some made by a local t-shirt shop. My sister made the template from my description. I listed them on eBay. During the auction I received a message motto my design was copied and the auction would be shut down by eBay. It never be (auction ended today) and I told the guy I saw the design 20 years ago.It's such a cool design that I'd similar to to copyright it. If he has be selling the shirts already does that make him exempt from copyright or does it prevent me from copyrighting it? Do I enjoy to sign something saying it be an original design of mine. I see this as similar to 3-peat. People used the word adjectives the time and then Pat Riley established to copyright it. Now he has to be rewarded if it's used in print by anybody. Is my t-shirt view the same entry? Thank you Yahoo! Answers!
Answers: I think it is kinda resembling a first come first serve basis. I live practical Columbus Ohio and not to long ago our zoo changed their name. The morning the topical name be announced in the medium a local man bought the rights to that web moniker, and the zoo legally could not do anything give or take a few it. I'm thinking copyrighting your t-shirts should be the same item. The first person to do it get it. That and I have hear a lot of stories just about people stealing other peoples ideas/images/products doesn`t matter what and having them copyrighted. Then the unproved person can do zilch about it. I read aloud you should hurry and do it!
chances are if he/she didn't copyright it nonetheless, you can as long as no one do it previously you. At least you should try to copyright it.
Is collective security really exist?
Answers: adjectives security is collective, individual surety is a illusion of men near big guns and small ...
What is an issue or situation where you reflect on young general public are treated unfairly lower than the law?
Thanks for answering!Answers: Now in attendance are no unfair dismissal law a young personality can be sacked when their employer is informed that the work place agreement does not come across the fairness test. Even though it is apparently against the directive where do they stir for help when they don't enjoy the resources to fight.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/social...
I cannot afford my own Medical Coverage but I enjoy to pay for Others including folks who have never even worked here
Non-citizens should not attain for free what some have payed in attendance whole existence for.
What does this not meet lawful requirements?
Iris and Mrs Campbell are approached by a service user in a rudder chair. He say that he wants to spawn a complaint because no one answers his buzzer during the dark. Iris tells him that staff be too busy and that he would get them into trouble over zilch.Answers: The issue here is your use of the phrase 'legal requirements'. it is not a phrase which is defensible except in context.
Therefore you stipulation to explain, legal requirements for WHAT?
For example, the permitted requirement for a care home are different to the trial requirements under contract or contained by tort or as an employer.
There is nothing dishonest or unlawful in your description, but it may be contained by breach of obligation or remiss depending on the context.
Your initial question does not really engineer sense - there does not appear to be anything unofficial here, but the organisation's policies appear to have be ignored. The service user would enjoy the right to go above the principal of the people he spoke to and have a right to have his concerns taken seriously.
He may hold to go to a service director or to an ombudsman, or to the social services / local authorities.
This is a bit bewildered. If this is a 'paid for' service consequently contract law would be invoked and it would epend on the precise quality of the contract. If some kind of public authority service here is still a duty to provide the service but there is usually a somewhat obscure complaints procedure to dance through if anything goes wrong. The procedure habitually results in associates giving up.
There's no excuse for the response 'we'll get into trouble' That's what happen if you dont do your job and dont tqke tolerable steps to cater for sudden emergencies.
You don't enunciate in what nouns, so we can't prognosticate on illegalities. However, I'd guess this is a rest home or similar, so they should, in their conditions of service, be providing tolerable cover.
That being so, "self too busy" is not good ample, what if the gent had suffered a sudden condition? There should be a proper complaints procedure in place, getting someone into trouble is irrelevant. If the cover is scarce, management should be providing extra.
Not sure of your press, can only assume from it that the service user is a resident of this particular building ?, if this is correct afterwards he/she needs to sort a formal complaint to the management of the said premises
Are you protected by copyright law when you use pirated software?
A hypothetical scenario:Suppose you create this fancy symbolic art using a pirated software of Adobe Photoshop. Posting it on the Web, you found out that people claimed your art as theirs and made profits rotten it.
Are you protected by copyright law and can sue those wrong doers, or do your works automatically become member of the public domain once you used illegitimate software to create it?
Answers: The short answer is, yes, you still maintain your copyright. In analogy, If you write the world's best innovative on a stollen computer you still own the copyright to the novel.
I would voice no. What is interesting is you break the law, next you want the law to protect you? That could be an interesting court satchel.
Morally, you are way stale track and a very dishonest individual who wants his cake and drink it, too. So sue the other person, next let's watch Adobe sue you.
What do contingency-fee and sign on mean in：?
Michael Belanger, president and co-founder of Jarg, said within a phone interview that his company had perceive the infringement several years ago, but lacked the resources to press its casing until it found a law firm ready to fund the case on a contingency-fee principle. Northeastern then signed on.Answers: Contingency vehicle a law firm does not charge up front, but shares contained by any cash settlement, if they win the luggage.
Northeastern then signed on = they took the crust on contingency.
What is a criminal court case i can look up?
within my law class i involve to write some info on a court case. do you know hwere i can find a infirm or recent court case on the internet?Answers: Miranda v. Arizona (consolidated near Westover v. United States, Vignera v. New York, and California v. Stewart), 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a highlight 5-4 decision of the United States Supreme Court which be argued February 28–March 1, 1966 and decided June 13, 1966. The Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult beside an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. The Miranda notice required by the Supreme Court in this skin is an example of a prophylactic rule formulated by the judiciary in charge to protect a constitutional right.
The best place to find case history is at the following website;
http://findlaw.com/
Good Luck,
Child support and signing away rights?
Can a man sign away his parental rights in Florida if the mother doesn't want him to? Does he still hold to pay child support if he does?And I don't want to hear anything roughly how it's his responsibility because it's not! It's her responsibility! I know the child didn't ask to be born but he didn't ask her to have or hold the child either. He didn't even know this woman get pregnant until recently when we get a letter from Child Support Enforcement. No one would dare make clear to a woman who got pregnant that she HAD to own the baby AND save the baby because she "spread her legs". Women enjoy options after getting pregnant and i conjecture men should too.
Answers: No he can not do that. His first step is to get a paternity exam. Just because she says he is the father does not trade name it fact. Regardless of how you touch about it if he is shown to be the father he will own to help support it. It does give somebody a lift 2 to make a newborn. His choice/ rights end when he have unprotected sex and a baby is the result. Fair? No, but to be precise the way it is,
Unlikely - unless someone else be willing to assume the necessity for him - if someone were to want to adopt the child he could relinquish his parental rights.
On another document - is this person undeniably certain they are the biological father? Would it be worth asking for a paternity examination?
He should definitely request a paternity audition. IF he is the biological father...
A man cannot just sign away his parental rights to get hold of out of paying child support (in any state). If they could men (not all, but many) would be crumpled up to the do it, and the taxpayers would be overburdened (and they already are) with responsibility of providing for these children who’s ‘fathers’ granted to abandon financially.
He may not want the child, but undoubtedly he wanted the sex, and anytime you enjoy sex you take a adjectives that a child will result from that, and you will then be rightfully obligated to provide for that child (as you should be). Maybe he needs to consider getting a vasectomy...or giving up sex until he does want children.
First sour, who knows the answer to your put somebody through the mill other than the courts and child support organization in Florida.
However, I cogitate it would be prudent for the man to insist on a paternity test. I would not congratulate a man who turned his back on a child that MIGHT be his. I wouldn't respect him, congratulate him or love him.
However, you come across as a person who really doesn't fastidiousness if this man turns his back on a child who might be his, you give the impression of being more worried that he has ties to another woman.
Are you insecure?
The model of denying parentage to avoid (refuse) child support is reprehensible. The fact that this would even come up as a query or option is horrible. The first article that most men are taught, is to be responsible. This is even true of the animal empire. The fact that for so plentiful men it is a foreign concept, does not speak well of our sexual characteristics. This is possibly why many women look for men to provide financial support, because they seem to be sadly unqualified to act as a role-model or authority numeral.
Incidentally, it is doubtful that she simply laid there near her "legs open", someone else had to be present and do more than view.
More Questions and Answers:
[2283] - [1517] - [371] - [2331] - [575] - [1794] - [2069] - [645] - [2000] - [270] - [961] - [1910] - [376] - [1444] - [345] - [801] - [1319] - [1965] - [157] - [1043]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: