Law Questions and Answers
Employee to pay restitution for giving discounts??
My fiance be fired by Wilson's Leather after they claimed an audit revealed that he was giving to plentiful discounts to customers. Upon being fired, $400 be taken out of his paycheck after he admitted he give discounts. Now, three months later, he get a call from someone saw he owes Wilson's Leather restitution in the amount of $12,000 and they give him a file number and said they would dispatch him the paperwork. I don't understand why this is occurring, he didn't steal anything and it's not like he be standing at the door giving leather jackets away for free. He be a manager and he give discounts for damaged merchandise and to run into competitor's prices. They told him when he started that he as the manager have the right to give discounts where on earth he saw it fit. Apparently they have evidence of multiple transactions for smaller number than the ticket price-but why didn't they step in right away and hand over him a warning? Why examine it all attach up and then constraint restitution? Advice? Can we fight this??Answers: Absolutely argument it. If he didn't steal and he was given discretion to allow discounts, afterwards they can't demand restitution. Also, they can't prove beyond a acceptable doubt that he was the one giving the discounts. It could be a appliance error, it could be another employee using his login. Get an attorney involved... they'll write a few mean letters and Wilson's can find someone else to cover their deficit.
The money taken from his previous discharge was not permitted as well. Even if he have stolen something, they can't just cart his pay away. There's a protocol for these things... he requirements to get some lend a hand.
Restitution can only be ordered by a JUDGE. After a criminal or civil proceeding finds one financially liable.
Any employer must own your permission to get ANY payroll withholding-you must agree in writing previously even taxes and workers comp can be taken out of your gross pay.
Taking $400 from the final check is BS, and unsanctioned without his compliance. I'm curious as to the core of the phonecall from 'somebody'. Sounds like a hokey fake-out attempt by the great house of Suede and Leather.
Tell them to put up, or shut up.
Unless he signed a terribly specific document committing not to give these discounts, this be not within of their faculty, I think they own extra-limited deducting money from his paycheck.
And immediately they claim he still owes more money, I think their pretension of collecting it is not enforceable. Actually , he could argue his $400 if you know a decent advocate who wont charge too much.
TRICKY ONE. I SPENT FORTY YEARS IN SALES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE AS WELL AS MANAGING A FEW STORES ALONG THE WAY. IN THIS CASE THOUGH IM NOT A LAWYER I WOULD SAY THIS ONE PRETTY MUCH HINGES ON THE ACTUAL REASONS HE GAVE THE DISCOUNTS. IF IN FACT THEY WERE ACTUALLY THE REASONS AS HE STATED THEM, AND THEY GAVE HIM THIS LATITUDE, AND HE WENT OVERBOARD FIRING IS A REAL OPTION FOR THE COMPANY. HOWEVER FINANCIAL RESTITUTION IN THIS CASE SHOULD ONLY BE CLAIMED BY THE COMPANY IF SOMETHING WAS SHADY IN HIS DEALINGS. ALSO IT UNLESS THIS IS DETERMINED THE COMPANY SHOULD GIVE HIM THE FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS BACK. GOOD LUCK BOB
I've managed a few retail shops within the past and I've also have the ability to tender discounts as long as I met the company guidelines. As a rule, the retail chain loves have the shop manager run into or exceed it's target figures but they also repugnance not making the profit margin they expect. Normally the headquarters know fairly against the clock through the computer system about serious shortages so it is extraordinary that they took so long to make a delayed restitution constraint. A few possibilities are possible. Your fiance may know more than he's comfortable admitting to you around illegal discounts beneath his watch. Another possibility is that the remaining Wilson's body may be involved in some out of place tactics themselves and hope to avoid total blame by fingering the former boss as very well. In either event, this retailer seem to have a sloppy accounting system.
$12K is a full lot of "discounts." Don't tell me that his entire house, including you, got handsome leather attire while he be employed by Wilsons.
The company could have potentially brought criminal charges for pinching by deception, but apparently kept the issue internal or didn't feel the appointments were necessarily criminal. Again, $12K is a hell of profusely of discounts. Apparently an audit of his work has very soon come back to den him...that's probably why there be a delay.
He may want to hire an attorney if he think Wilson is really trying to put the screws on him. Wilson's is a big coproration and they've be around as long as I can remember. I think I get a jacke from them in the mid-80's so at tiniest that long. They probably have an entire department relegated to hand fraud. That being said, they know what their legitimate grounds are and what they can and cannot do.
Have your fiance' do some deep soul-searching and if he be wrong he was wrong and might want to fess up. If he feel he was contained by the right, then he should hire an attorney to negotiate/fight beside Wilson's. The fighte may be just waht is legitimately owed. Did they convey any paperwork on how they calculated $12K?
They have their attorneys and will devour him alive if he is not careful.
Don't discount them. Once a corporation starts a fight, they don't simply step away.
What are the human rights problems in Columbia and why are they going on?
I need to know a pretty generalized answer and not something copied and paste from the internet. I'm in Spanish 202 and I own to write an in-class essay about human rights issues contained by Columbia. I've done some research but its very complicated. I be wondering if someone could give me a generlized overview of the problems and perchance some solutions? Thanks.Answers: Drug traffickers and government official are violating human rights by slaughter those that are opposed to their operation.
There are no major human rights problems surrounded by Columbia, South Carolina, US. It's a nice city.
ColOmbia (there is no U in Colombia), have a fair number of problems, but I'm not going to do your homework for you. Why don't you start at Amnesty International?
If it be easy you wouldn't be research anything.
Are politicians controlled by the big Corporations?
Answers: According to the Global Justice Movement, while anyone can become a shareholder in principle, within reality it is frequently merely the wealthy who can afford to own ample stock to directly influence the voting (and hence the activities) of a large corporation. As a result, the corporatocracy might be considered somewhat synonymous near plutocracy, government by the rich.
Some argue that a valid corporatocracy can only appear when and if a organization makes it court to bribe politicians. According to this argument, that quickly make politicians very corporate-friendly, and make it easy for corporations to ratify laws as they see fit. Supporters of this viewpoint in the United States believe the allowance for struggle contributions has created a situation allowing for pervasive regulatory appropriation, offering the contributions that prompted Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as evidence. Also, many supporters of this prospect argue that when the major medium outlets are controlled by large corporations, access to information tend to become limited to what serves corporate interests, and corporate interests surrounded by turn are able to demarcate the national political agenda. Finally, according to this view, when the majority of riches of the politicians is invested into corporations, that gives politicians incentive to support the corporations.
You nail it right on the nose.
Corporations run our planet and don't you ever forget it.
Of course they are. Hillary Clinton said she will contintue to adopt money from lobbyist. "A lot of these lobbyist represent real Americans."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaAkcXynq...
Which is total bullshxt. Oil Companies and Pharmaceutical Companies do not represent me. They represent themselves and their own agenda... $Profit$
"Follow the money!" ~ Mike Gravel
Corporatism, Capitalism for America
The opening we were anyone run for the past 6-7 years.
We hold the best politicians money can buy.
Name change?
my son's father have been MIA since he be a year old, so how would I cash his first name minus the fathers consent?my son is immediately 7.
I'm changing his first label because he's never gone by the name on the pass. Always by what we called him.
I want to do this because he is call by his legal moniker at school- and it bothers him,.. its never been used. wants to be changed to stop the confusion with paperwork and those
Answers: Change it. If the father is MIA for 6 years he forfeited his consent.
online you can change name online
if he's MIA then it's w/e only just do it
its ok if thats what you really want ...and also for your son sake ..its better you do change ..i similar to ur idea ...have a word with your husband and travel ahead if he agrees with you ...
Good luck and dont forget to enlight me ...i will skulk for you to share ..what happens after ward ...Good day ..
You didn't enunciate where you are, but contained by Calif to do a name transform you have to pick up a packet of papers at the courthouse and spend $200 I believe on the file fee.
I changed (shortened) my first mark years ago but never did it legally (in the courts I mean). I only started using it on everything and now it's on my drivers license, social protection card (so it's how I file taxes), paychecks, edge accounts, credit, marriage license, medical documentation, etc. It's never been an issue, although this may come up very soon that I want a passport. My point is, for now lately start using the name you want on his arts school enrollment forms. You can always alter it legally near the courts at any time.
How much is the salary breadth for a assistant district attorney/ prosecutor?
That and do you get a judicious amount of discression in setting your pleas so the pov drug dealing criminals bring back lots of time in prison so they don't bother college kids adjectives night trying to win money money for stolen stuffAnswers: Salary range is totally dependant on where on earth you are.
The ADA's where I am (Northern CA) are going on strike surrounded by a few days because they believe their salaries ($80,000 - $137,000) are too low.
Plea offer are entirely at the ADA's discretion. Accepting them is entirely at the defendants discretion.
If the ADA sets his plea offers too illustrious, defendants won't accept them, and he'll be contained by court trying cases all the time. Since there's just a limited amount of resources available, that vehicle some other criminals will be getting off.
Richard
What do you do if there are some hiccups contained by your new livelihood?
What would you do if you join a exotic company and you work closely with the senior command and you have hiccups and obstacle... issues like the mode of transport, budgets some discrepancies contained by regards to the mission level. If the senior paperwork has a1 the utmost a2 the second highest and a3 the junior of the senior guidance and you see them treating you like you are within b1, the middle management sector... is it balanced to inform the HR about it and draw them to the reality that you are not happy or in recent times let it be?Thanks
Answers: document it, directory it away,bite your tongue,and sit and wait for a better opportunity,enthusiasm sucks sometimes,but if you stick and stay,pay your dues contained by the biz,you'll find your dream position,patience sweetie leniency..pick on your fans "thats other kool" nott
"Fair" is in the eye of the beholder.
HR exists to support the nouns team, not the force. If you complain about anything bar illegal hustle and bustle, you're just asking for trouble.
Richard
You only started a new post, you cannot expect the others to treat you as if you have be there for years. If I be you I wouldn't go rocking the boat or they'll freshly find a way to cut ties. If things haven't brightened up by your show review then that would be the time to address it. If that isn't soon adequate then you could ask your superior for counsel on how to deal.
Hang within there!
You can't move about from Great Britain to America on a raft. Work with the system but don't expect to smash it into another shape. In other words, tough work is the only cure.
Im 17 years,and im married to someone who isOlder than me, we are both muslims,is this legal inAnother country
Answers: since you are already married, this shouldn't be a problem
depends
if you are emancipated you can marry at 16 here I would assume the marital would be legal surrounded by the USA.
yes it is legal, though it may not be lawfully binding in one country as it is contained by your home country?
For example...an Iranian woman has no right to divorce within Iran, whereas she may seek to do so within America and remarry.
Her problem would then be that she have committed a crime under her own countries decree and may not be able to return to Iran.
Hi ,
Its legalized in most countries. If not, parents consent is supplied.
Good luck and strive to be relieved.
Rgds.
Your capacity to marry, if you be domiciled in the UK when you married, is govern by the law of England and Wales. To put it more simply, if it be lawful for you to bring married in the UK, where on earth the age of consent (with parental permission) is 16, then to be exact what matters. The authenticity of the ceremony is also governed by the imperative of England and Wales. If you go elsewhere, after you will be accepted as rightfully married and should run into no problems. The marriage will be standard by the overseas authorities.
I wanna know how long it takes to be a advocate.Please helP!?
I want to be a lawyer and I want to know how long it take?Answers: It seems close to there is some confusion contained by these answers. I am an attorney. It takes seven years - four years undergraduate (bachelor's), consequently three years for a Juris Doctor. Of course, some people survive to do it in smaller quantity or more time, by taking more credits at a time, et cetera. But I wouldn't expect to finish an undergraduate program and juris doctor in smaller quantity than 5 1/2 years. That would be if you finished your undergrad in 3 years (by taking summer classes and extra credits within the regular school year - not something I would suggest if you want to keep hold of a decent G.P.A.). An ABA attributed law program is traditionally three years long. You'll call for ABA accreditation to practice in basically about every state, beside few exceptions (California being one, but that's another ask altogether). Some schools may hold part time programs that allow you to complete a J.D. surrounded by 4 years. And I know at my law university, you could potentially get your imperative degree contained by 2 1/2 years by taking January-term and summer classes, but doing so was pretty bloody.
Someone mentioned the bar exam. This is a state-specific mandate test that you'll enjoy to take once completing your Juris Doctor. Generally you hold about 2 months after graduation beforehand your bar exam. I know surrounded by MN, it is given in behind schedule July (for late May grads) and again within Febuary (for December grads). Bar exam studying is not technically "school" but most people do give somebody a lift extensive prep classes for the exam, since it's of ultimate rush to pass it. For example, I graduate on a Saturday, and my prep classes began on Monday and continued for roughly speaking a month and a half. You can expect to study 5-8 hours a light of day during this time, even increasing your study time during the few weeks before the exam. It's strenous, but worth it so that you don't hold to take it again!
I hope this clears it up for you.
Traditionally it take 7 to 8 years.
Now, however, with online university study and other non-traditional methods, it can lug less.
12 years supporting schooling
4 years college
2-3 years law arts school
as much time as it takes to endorse the bar exam
Which is the most unethical profession/career?
a. lawyerb. politicians
c. entertainers
d. adjectives of the above
e. none of the above/other(please explain other)
Answers: Hmm... I would have to voice E would be the obvious one. None of the above. There are apt and bad contained by all professions. It's not the work title that makes the situation unethical, its the individuals doing it. And labels merely don't fit in material life.
e. none of the above
-every profession can be wrong to a certain extent.
e.
Those who stay barely audible while others erode common sense.
a. lawyer
your client pays you money to convince people that they did/didn't do something. your morale is individual tested everyday,
you have to collide for something that sometimes you know is right or wrong. its hard to draw the column.
D. All of the Above
Lawyers...Johnnie Cochran, F. Lee Bailey, John Edwards
Politicians...Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, Hillary Cliton
Entertainers...Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Rosie O'Donnell, Bill Maher
depends on the individual and the lines they draw. a lawyer might draw the rank at defending a brutal murderer while another doesn't. It just depends.
I devise that in today's society that it would enjoy to be a certain group of politicians...we wont speak which group :)
D. None of the above.
None of those professions are unethical unless that individual surrounded by the professions doesn't follow the "rules". Plus if you are going to say those career are unethical because of what a specific individual did after you could make the skin for every career nearby is (ex. teacher, doctor, waitress, etc.)
You can't be careless as to say this one specific art is unethical when every profession there is similar contained by one distinct way: they are in attendance to serve and benefit the customer (which could be you). Plus ethics or moral differentiate among individuals base on their belief, religion, experience, etc.
E. Strippers and prostitutes.
A and B
Entertainers only hold the credibility that brain motionless fans grant them. If you do something just because an entertainer say it's right, then you can't assume for yourself. If more people did research and in actual fact took the time to find out the truth then inhabitants like Barbara Streisand, Rosie O'Donnell, Joy Baher and the rest of the Left Wing nuts wouldn't hold any ratings.
e. None of the above.
I would call a military officer the most wrong profession.
An officer is in BUSINESS of bloodshed people. Not lone do they kill the antagonist, they often command their own soldiers to run on suicide missions, or on missions that will definitely enjoy a high loss of time.
You may argue that a politician is the one who starts the war, but a politician MAY be pro-peace, while the officer is BY DEFAULT surrounded by the business of war.
What can be more immoral then sending family who are entrusted to you to certain release?
Either religious leader or a cop. I instinctively would go beside religious leaders (priests, pastors, ministers, rabbis, sheiks, etc.). While you will find a apt one once in a while, the considerable majority of religious leaders are out to prey on our need to connect to something larger than ourselves.
They will verbs the scriptures (of any religious book) to suit their needs. They will adjectives sell God's mark (no matter which describe they think He has) to the absolute bidder, usually governments. They enunciate God supports the government (no event which government) as that government sends innocent soldiers freshly trying to protect their families into a time of war for pretty much anything except self-defense. Resources, power, land, etc. All of them are the solid reasons.
No situation who you believe God to be, it would make sense that He wishes us to come together; we are all His creations. Instead the churches (or synogogues, mosques, etc.) right to be heard God supports our side and hates the other side; and so we adjectives support the killing of our brothers and sisters (both within our military and in theirs) because we believe God supports it too. But they are adjectives human, and God loves them as His sons and daughters just as much as we are His sons and daughters.
In exchange, the government do basically anything the church tell them to do. Don't like homosexuals? Government will verbs them for the church. Don't like a rival religion, Government will verbs them for the church as well. The schedule goes on and on.
Cops are somewhat better. But in the conclude, they screw people over too. They will convey the innocent to jail for have the wrong skin color, or for considering themselves the equal of the officer. Then they will let the guilty dance free because they happen to be rich, and are feeling like to pay a price to capture out of jailtime. So the cop accepts the bribe and let them go on their approach, while the poor are stuck being poor. Because once you stop in incarcerate the chance of you getting a employment are down to nearly zero. So because they get screwed when they were innocent, the poor are in a minute required to rob stores and steal purses and such (they got to chomp through at some point).
All of them are ethical and also unethical.
You can't only exclude them as totally unethical.
But in attendance is a profession going on (unexposed)
in countries similar to India,Malaysia,Thailand and Sri Lanka,
The operation is to forge passports,visas etc., especially for Canada.
(Europe and UK are also included) for the purpose of illegal immigration..
Most dishonourable and disturbing.
E they are all ethical professions,lone some of the people who slither thru them aren't ethical
Why is Murshid Kuttihassa allowed to post this article?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...I posted the same exact article, but I voiced DISGUST at the outcome of the Saudi Arabian Court! He voiced PLEASURE about it. My post be taken down for "violating community guidelines", nonetheless his post still stands. Can you see the favoratism here? Can you see the obvious double standard? IT IS DISGUSTING. Yet, the relatives who are offended by his post are doing nil...they could easily report it...
AND IF THEY ARE reporting it, later what is YAHOO doing about it? Nothing! Read the article.read his post.and next decide for yourself! There is no freedom of speech here. What are you going to do in the order of it?
Please, if you do report his initial post, give me a thumbs up so WE CAN KNOW that performance is being taken..and overlooked by Yahoo.
Answers: Hey, I got a TOS spot for telling someone that he should look surrounded by Wikipedia if he didn't know what the French/Indian War was and stop expecting to be spoonfed answers for the rest of his go.
Freedom goes as far as a complaint box contained by this country.
We nuked him! :)
(WOOHOO!)
I'd be interested in an actual judgment from a saudi citizen regarding their own civil affairs.
It is such a exceptional opportunity.
Why would do you want to deny him the ability to share near the world and let the world generate its own decision going on for what they think?
Who appointed you the one that should coordinate who sees what?
More Questions and Answers:
[2405] - [1331] - [2401] - [983] - [96] - [1551] - [1235] - [1113] - [316] - [488] - [1806] - [694] - [1297] - [381] - [2332] - [1564] - [2476] - [675] - [733] - [360]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: