Law Questions and Answers

Can i legally throw out my stepson?

he is 20 years behind the times and has assaulted my wife surrounded by the past he have also been prosecuted for cause damage to the property the property co owned by my wife and myself the merely thing we argue almost is him and his latest antics cause a massive row and my wife and myself are now seperated, although still living within the same house, i want him out but she won't agree, i enjoy been told that beneath joint ownership of property that a third gathering can only live at hand by mutual consent.is this true? and if so how do i go roughly getting rid of him, my wife thinks the sun shines out of his ^^^^ even though he have a string of convictions of which most are violence related
Answers: One possible thought is to try to find a temporary restraining charge (TRO) against him because of his violence. If the TRO keep him far enough away from you, maybe you can enforce the TRO against him so that he is unable to stay contained by the same place.

Your wife wants professional help, by the route. People who allow abusers to keep doing what they are doing is simply facilitating the maltreat.

Good luck!
not a lawyer but I suppose that if both you and your wife are "tenants within common" then both "own" 100% of the property and no you can't.

What you can do is enjoy her pay for the damages to the property though.
Mmmmm I can comprehend what your saying, but..You want to come within between mother and child? It don't matter what he have done, he is HER son, not yours, and you I am sure would not kick YOUR son out. We love our kids unconditionally. And lucklessly some mothers cannot see the harm their kids are doing. In this baggage her son is an adult. Have you thought of discussion to him and her, and maybe suggest he get a job and tries living on his own. Or better still try and seize him to suggest it. You have to tranquil down, cause you won't win, not when it is mother and son. If you love your wife, afterwards you have to conjecture of a more positive way of evicting her child. He is after adjectives 20 and should be ready to fly the nest.
Try and bargain to your wife, without cussing her son, short being glum towards him.

If I was your wife, I would procure defensive towards you, if you be trying to chuck my son out, whether I thought you was right or not. Mothers put up next to a lot, and no thing what it IS hard to agree to go.
For a big part of this century within have be many category of tenancy or license of property occupied for agricultural, residential and commercial purposes where on earth the legislature has intervened to confer upon tenant or licensees extra-contractual rights entitling them to continue contained by occupation without the consent of the hotelier or owner, either after the expiry of a contractual agreement or after become aware of to quit given by the landlord or owner to determine a contractual interrupted agreement.

It is primarily in relation to common tenancies surrounded by these categories that the press whether or not a license given by
one or the joint owner can determine the agreement is of practical need, particularly where on earth, as in the instant suitcase, the effect of the determination will be to deprive the son, or step-son of any statutory protection.

However it is settled law (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Monk (1991)) that any or both of a joint tenant or owner can termination a licence without the say-so of the other, just as efficiently as the other can grant it. So the difficulty you own is that once you end the licence (which simply routine permission to occupy) your wife can compromise another.

This kind of yo-yo-ing can't be well-mannered for anyone, but is really a matter for you and your wife. There is nought that either of you can do officially unless you bring criminal procedings at some stage and ask the court for an injunction.

If your step-son paid you any money within return for living with you consequently he will be a contractual licensee a bit than a bare innkeeper. The difference will be the amount of notice you own to give earlier asking him to leave. The former will be in the region of 14 days (and should ideally be in writing). However, unless you and your wife agree (or nearby is a further public order offence), in attendance is little you can do.
No such thing as third party and mutual consent.

You and your wife are both legally entitled to live here...no one else is
He sounds close to a nice chap..
If his mother desires him to stay then you can't see him out..just believe the friction between you and your misses if you booted him out..?
What i suggest is take this bully to one side, preferably a dismal alley, and relate him he has one week to be off on his own accord or you'll burn him contained by his bed whilst he's asleep...or such words.
people approaching him only become conscious one thing, and that's a blooming pious kickin'.
I'm not sure why others have mentioned that you brought up he is your stepson. What does that thing? All you are saying is this is not your biological son and he is mistreating your wife and home. You are officially allowed to kick him out since he is an grown now. However, you already know that the rift is really between you and your wife. Is in attendance a way to show her the sabotage your son has created next to a marriage counselor present (physically and mentally)? Sometimes we adjectives need to hear the truth from an outsider, whether we approaching it or not. We can get too wild to see what is really happening. Yes, this is her son and she loves him, but that does not tight-fisted you do not love him. It means you are currently feed up with his behavior, which by the path is repulsive. Where is his biological father?

Is copping videos for personal use decriminalized?

if i rent a video and make a coppy for personal use is it legally recognized?
if i own a video and make a copy for personal use is it allowed?
Answers: Rent: No. You only compensated to watch it. it's resembling going to the movies. you can't copy it.

Own: Yes. But why would you want to do that? You already have the disc. As long as you don't distribute it or put it on the internet for use it's officially recognized. Just that you're wasting disk space.
#1 is no you can't. It's illegal.
#2 is yes you can. You remunerated for it. You can make a stern up copy.
No it is not. When you rent you did not get authorization to reproduce solitary to view. NOT like peas in a pod thing.
Nothing is lawful these days. You do know this IS NOT a free country don't you?

Can you believe anyone sent money for the Jena 6 defense fund?

How stupid could they be?

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.p...

Just weeks after some 20,000 demonstrators protested what they decried as unequal sprite aimed at six black teenagers in the Louisiana town of Jena, controversy is growing over the accounting and disbursing of at tiniest $500,000 donated to pay for the teenagers' decriminalized defense.

Parents of the "Jena 6" teenagers have refuse to publicly account for how they are spending a substantial portion of the cash, estimated at up to $250,000, that resides contained by a bank reason they control.

Michael Baisden, a nationally syndicated black radio host who is overriding a major fundraising drive on behalf of the Jena 6, have declined to reveal how much he have collected. Attorneys for the first defendant to go to trial, Mychal Bell, enunciate they have however to receive any money from him.
Answers: A fool and his money...
What a quagmire.. neva really was interested contained by that whole defence something sounded a lil fishy

How to truly honor our Veterans?

Oh Lord, what is there to be said almost the people who work out the glory of the self-sacrifice of meting the most powerful evils head-on.

The way to honor our vet isn’t by paying lip service to their heroism on a holiday, but rather to support them contained by the battles that they, dolefully, all to recurrently face alone contained by the long-term consequences of their service.

My father served in Vietnam (as a Huey engine mechanic, 66-68 merely before they started using Agent Orange ), and I remember growing up contained by the eighties hearing adjectives those stories about military denial on the effects of Agent Orange.

It seem that since then, the generals hold gotten more sophisticated about how to side-step controversy/responsibility (with regard to ill effects of our weaponry) contained by how they cover up the new health-threatening agent; DU (Depleted Uranium) from “Gulf time of war syndrome”.

“Gulf war syndrome” is even re-occurring surrounded by today’s Iraq theater (operation Iraqi Freedom) where DU rounds are used.

It seem that the generals now get the message that even acknowledging contained by anyway the toxicity of DU (even to the point of NOT training our Soldiers/Marines to take precautions from DU contamination), will enjoy liability repercussions.

<><><><><><><><><><

One has to wonder, why not newly admit that DU contamination cause “Gulf War Syndrome” (instead of blaming it all on the Soldier/Marine him/herself as “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder”)?

Question:

1) Is it because the generals fearfulness that care for the afflicted veterans will come at the expense of their big-toy budgets?

2) Is a group of generals afraid that they are going to draw from demoted? Do they reason that by the time long-term effect from DU contamination are adjectives, the Soldier has already not here the military and so the moral link between the military and the soldier have been dissolved (by morality of his/her leaving the military)?

Most importantly:
3) What can we do, as civilians, to breed sure that our generals do the right thing by our father, sons and brothers in uniform?

Anyone near enough ba**s to cross-examine the link the Veterans own drawn between DU use and Gulf-war syndrome can take up the issue next to the Veterans themselves:

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/du.htm

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/CNN_Ag...
Answers: The Dept of Veteran's Affairs was established surrounded by 1988 by Ronald Reagan in an attempt to fix the problems you stated. It no longer falls underneath the Dept of Defense. The "Generals" you so despise have no speak over veterans benefits, these are set by congress. If you don't like how we treat our vet, write your congressman.

Red light camera ticket?

A few months ago I get my 1st violation and I own been driving over 20 years. I consider myself a not detrimental driver and obey the law of the road. I was surrounded by a left turning lane beside only one coup¨¦ in front of me, the driver surrounded by front of me took a few seconds until that time proceeding and by the time I made my turn the camera flashed. A week later I get a $381 ticket in the communication. I was competent to get an extension and made a traffic court date which is this coming Tuesday. Money have been incredibly tight because shortly after that I found myself without a job for nearly 3 months. I returned to that intersection and observed that, that light chages extremely hasty. I watched as simply ONE care go through it before the wispy changed to red again. My question is, am I wasting my time going to traffic court? I know the probability of the tickect being dismissed is slim to none, but do you chew over I will be able to work out a pay plan? Even though I am working now, it will mete out a financially hardship
Answers: Your not wasting your time. If this is your first vandalism, I agree with confrontational the calibration of the light and camera. That's not a doomed to failure defense at all. However, more importantly, you should ask for what my state call a "deferred sentence." That means it will not appear on your account if you don't get any more tickets and it won't be sent to DMV.
Wasting your time. Your single hope in going to court is to adopt responsibility for your actions and to respectfully request that the court adopt payments on your fine.

If you look the judge within the eye and say that..."Your Honor, I'm guilty. I respectfully ask that the Court allow me to brand payments on whatever fine may be levy," I think most bench would go for it. They're so used to excuses and deadbeats, you might achieve mercy without even asking for it.
It's not slim to none; it's none. The vehicle code say not to enter an intersection until you know the way is clear.
I have the same experience and have to eat the $285 I have to pay contained by LA.
Sorry.
If you are in the intersection, BY LAW YOU MUST GO THRU, even if the restrained changes red.

Usually photo tickets are dismissed if challenge properly.
In your position, I would get a video camera and travel film the street light in put somebody through the mill. You might not be able to introduce the evidence within court, but it doesn't hurt to bring it.

I'd be suprised if you weren't offered some kind of plea base on your good driving account.

If you end up pleading guilty, you should enjoy a chance to net a statement to the judge past he imposes the fine. That would be the appropriate time to explain how it happen, that it was a mistake and you are sorry, and it would also be a correct time to explain your current financial hardship.

I have a $100 ticket reduced to $35 by doing this when I was paying my method through college.
Get an attorney who does 'pro bono' work, you know, FREE!

These traffic "traps" are intentionally set up to make you guilty no business what. Ask the court to supply all photos during the time you be "caught" and see if a cop or anyone else ran the pallid and was ticketed, ESPECIALLY a cop!!
In MN red neutral camera's tickets were tossed because the presumed guilt and assumed that the owner of the saloon was the driver.

Minneapolis is presently being sued to wages back adjectives the tickets which people compensated to keep the fines down.

I was kicked by another staff contestant at my hospital. What should I do?

I was kicked by another nurse beneath the table w/no witnesses. Do I report it?
I was kicked below the table with no witnesses by another nurse. As she be saying it she be like "recompense attention when I am talking to you." She is set as a bully by other staff nurses. Rumor has it she have friends in regulation.
What should I do?
Has this ever happened to you?
What be the outcome?
Answers: Kicking you under the table satisfy the emelements for the tort cause of motion of battery, but unless you suffered actual damages, you're not promising to get much within a court case. I would walk to her supervisor and report her, and let her know below to uncertainterms that if she touches you again, you will be filing criminal charges. Ther eis no excuse for an mature to be behaving within this way.
I would chat next to her supervisor about it.

I wasn't bullied, but I have a coworker who used to try coming up behind me to tickle me. Finally I have to explain to her that I startle easily, and that I would be aware of awful if I elbowed her in the gut out of surprise. She get the message.

My ex has domestic battery-operated, confinement charges from me. The bench trial is tomarrow.?

Court dates contiuned and time have passed. I have be patienly waiting. Meanwhile my ex hits his 6 month pregnant girlfriend and has another battery-operated case. Rumor have it that he is going to plea bargin that if he pleads guilty on the new girlfriend mobile case they will drop the charges on my defence. Is this possible? It makes me cracked. Also should I prepare a victim impact statement?
Answers: First the fruitless news...If your charges are dismissed as chunk of a plea bargain, you are no longer a sufferer and will not be able to get a statement.

Now the good word... it is very expected this plea bargain includes a stiffer cost for the other charge. This is probably being offered because of the time and expense of have two trials. The choice to drop yours and continue near the other is likely because the reality he abused a pregnant person would not fare will surrounded by the court, and gives the prosecutor more leverage for a stiffer sentence.

Of course, not a soul but the prosecutor can really answer this question, You really obligation to contact him and have it explained.

In the mingy time, look at the bright side: it sounds like this bully is going to reformatory, where he belongs.
hi M..no his suitcase with u have nothing to do near his other charges..it's just gonna trademark him look more like the beater he is...sorry to hear he manhandle u again...sounds like to me u two r not his solitary victims of this just consider of who he was seeing earlier u,,this jack has a long olden and not all his victims hold reported this I'm sure...this guy needs to be tied down duct tape rag surrounded by mouth lighter fluid and hand okay mallory knock's u know the final consequences in that contract..people be let free...

Is it ok to expose yourself on cam when girl is 18 or older?

and why u should or should not do it?
Answers: You own no way of knowing if the girl is 18 or 8.

Please hold it in your pant. Honey, the male anatomy is nowhere as cute as you feel it is.an, most are downright ugly.

Do us adjectives a favor and keep it below your belt.
no. that is gross. not to mention, she could be record and put you all over UTube for a righteous laugh.

Don't do it man, my uncle go to jail for it!
It is not ok. It can wrap up up all over the world surrounded by places you never dreamed.

Get a real life span.
meh, do it, if she wants to see i guess
save, thats rude.
You just did. Just the thought of it disgusts me. Grow up, and find a path of making yourself useful within the world.
youre kidding me right? its never ok, but its your body and it isnt dubious, so its moral highground vs lust for love. you decide. fox word.
You're a dumb ***. Why the hell would you do that? Do you touch little boys too? How about you do everyone a favor and turn sour your web cam, no small weenies tonight please.
It's officially ok, but what about morally? What will you do if race you don't want to see you, do? Are you ready for the hassle? how do you explain it to your parents teacher and friends? Better give it some thought. There other is tomorrow.
Just because she says she is over 18 doesn't niggardly she is. She could be any age at all. Don't put anything on cam you wouldn't want your mom to see.
it is NOT ok to expose yourself at adjectives 18 or 80 ..its totally shameful and disgusting and not everyone wants to see your private parts ..

would you ever walk out on the street and show yourself to anyone? just because the pesron on the other side of the cam cannot see your facade ,does it make it ok to show your body ?the daytime you can do that on the street should be the day you can do it on cam ..

pinch care
Yes, it is allowed, however, if she is underage, regardless of what she told you, it is illegal

What you believe is irrelevant; with the sole purpose the facts of the matter count.

At what age can a minor work and receive pay surrounded by New Jersey?

I am 14 and i reallyyyyyyy need a work! any answers would be helpful. Thanks
Answers: 14 but not during university hours.

See the NJ law:

No minor beneath 16 years of age shall be employed, permitted, or suffered to work in, in the region of, or in nouns with any cost-effective occupation at any time; provided, that minors between 14 and 16 years of age may be employed, permitted or suffered to work outside school hours and during institution vacations but not surrounded by or for a factory or in any occupation otherwise prohibited by statute or by order or regulation made within pursuance of law; and provided, further, that minors beneath 16 years of age may engage contained by professional employment in dramatic productions upon the obtaining of a security therefor and may engage outside institution hours and during school vacation in agricultural pursuits or contained by street trades and as newspaperboys as defined in this work, in accordance next to the provisions of section 15 of this exploit. Minors may also engage contained by employment in domestic service perform outside of school hours or during university vacations next to the permission of the minor's parents or court guardian, in a residence save for the minor's own home. Nothing in this stroke shall be construed to apply to the work of a minor engaged within domestic service or agricultural pursuits performed outside of institution hours or during school vacation in nouns with the minor's own home and directly for his parents or legitimate guardian.

I am a Christian, I believe in the ten commandments?

adjectives sense ,do the right things, dont hurt each other, but we procure blown up for that, people who steal our benifits and houses, but beware, Christians have get it about right, we dont want to blow uo a nouns of muslim people on in attendance way to work, and we wont. You dont alarm us and never will
Answers: I am not a Christian, I don't want to hurt people, or upset citizens, but I do not love the people who desire to kill and hurt inhabitants as Christians are told by the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible, to do.

I do however believe that to read is to realize there is nought to forgive.
I.R.A
The Spanish Inquisition
David Koresh
Timothy Mc Veigh

Countless other
Yes, if followed correctly and without bigotry Christianity is a moral moral code.

But it is foolish to think Christianity have the monopoly on morality.
1) This is an answers site, not an inane polemics site.

2) You are not a Christian, because if you were you would show tolerance and compassion to adjectives of mankind.

3) "Let he without sin die the first stone." (why is that so conveniently overlooked by people similar to you.)

And while we're on the subject of conveniently overlooked bible quotes:

4) "Judge not lest thee be judge."

You just transport on pretending that the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the war within Iraq funded by fundies never happened. Explain yourself to your God when the time comes.

More Questions and Answers:
[1767] - [1793] - [673] - [191] - [483] - [2279] - [602] - [1262] - [2467] - [2063] - [2156] - [596] - [1123] - [197] - [988] - [2091] - [2222] - [1434] - [1442] - [936]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: