Law Questions and Answers

SO, have anti-gun groups blamed the recent shopping arcade shooting?

on the gun yet?

---

Answers: I'm sure they will cite this as an example for the obligation to increase gun control.
Likewise, you'll equally hear others talk almost how if more people have the right to carry, possibly someone at the mall could hold shot back.

---

resourcefully, if somebody was hellbent on getting a gun, did you acomplish anything by outlawing them, other than keeping them from some one who is no threat. if relatives were AWAKE they'd realize the full theory is to disarm. subsequent year is 1934. and you are germans, get it?

Should any government use waterboarding to grasp information from detainees? Why or why not?

---

Answers: People under threat of torture will say aloud anything, rendering such techniques useless.

---

It depends on circumstances, and this is a moral press. For example if there is a terrorist detainee who can divulge sensitive info which may store lives of many, afterwards I think this should be tolerable.

Who can legally approachable a person's mail?

I work surrounded by a doctors office, and the doctor is so "busy" that she make me open the post, take it out of the envelope, unfold it, and set it surrounded by a pile for her to read. Is this breaking some kind of tenet? What if there be money, or say, a offering card that was supposed to be contained by the mail and it come up missing? Could I be held legally responsible?

Also, on a personal memo: I think it's charitable of degrading.

The bottom line: Can my work force me to rightfully open someone else's e-mail?

I feel abused.

---

Answers: If the personality the mail be addressed to give you permission to enlarge their mail next it is not considered a federal offense.
But, it would be suspicious if money was missing.
Perhaps you should hold a talk near her and say that you are self-conscious?

---

So a DR. who went through 8 years of Med college should spend her time opening and sorting messages? And you feel degraded by have a JOB that requires you to sort mail??


Sounds to me resembling the DR. should fire your butt.

Should Ted Kennedy be tried for vehicular manslaughter or murder?

---

Answers: Neither. Not because he shouldn't, but because his powerful name have given him a pass. He's royalty, you know.

---

There be a coroner's inquest or whatever when adjectives that happened. It come out the way it did. Forget it. Ted's done adjectives he can to make up for his mistake near years of service to this country. Leave him alone.

Obama in '08.

---

Yes, he should hold been years ago. He have too much influence in the nouns to have him brought up on charges.

Pitiful.

---

He should be charged next to " Melonheadedness" !
Obviously a sissy coward.

Forced to say unpunctually at work without proper notification.?

I work at a chief retail store, which isn't doing too well lately. Normally on a Friday dark we close at 9:30, but tonight a few of or one of the managers granted to keep the store unscrew until 10 pm. Around 8:30 or so the manager told the other supervisors to budge around and tell everyone that the store be closing later. I'm sure that this is a sacrilege of a NYS labor regulation because we didn't receive 24 hour notice of any programme change, but I'm not sure which one, or who to phone up about it.

The justification why I know what they did was wrong is because at my previous mission my supervisor forced a co-worker to clock out for one hour so she wouldn't be over her hours. When the old boss found out around this she flipped on the supervisor because the supervisor didn't give my co-worker 24 hours discern.

So can anyone help me out beside this one?

---

Answers: i don't know about NY but surrounded by many states retail and service providers are given plentifully of latitude in the nouns of keeping employees after that then planned or sending them home early. since these types of business business with customer flow they are given the discretion of keeping staff to serve their customers as needed. a business such as this does not know 24 hours ahead of time that a staffing vary is needed. you need to contact your department of labor to ask this put somebody through the mill but i believe you will find that as long as you got remunerated for the time then they did nil illegal.

if you are ever asked to work while sour the clock or made to clock out but not allowed to start out your job because they want you to clock fund in when needed next that is something different adjectives together.

try this site for more info:
http://www.labor.state.ny.us/

---

Sounds like you are mixing your apples near your oranges. Forcing an employee to clock out to avoid overtime and afterwards having them if truth be told work the hours is a clear violation of the tenet.

But asking everyone to stay an additional hour, on the clock, for payment, is not against the law. If that extra 1/2 hour put you into overtime, they should reimburse that.

I don't think in that is a law requiring a 24 hour credit notice within this situation, but if you want to call someone in the region of it, contact the NY State Dept of Labor.

There is a girl I know that is 19 and a guy get her drunk that is 39 and took assistance of her?

and then emailed me pics of what take place and it looks like she is passed out. She feel its her fault and is afraid to update the police. Can I do it and tell the police what evolve and show the pics that he took of her and what they were doing while a underage girl be drunk and passed out?

---

Answers: your friend was raped. put this pervert contained by jail. phone call the police for her, and support her. if you don't, he could do this to someone else.

---

19 is not underage
she should not have put herself within this predicament
she should have never go anywhere with a 39 year old-fashioned
this is horrible, but if girls had more respect for themselves,
things approaching this would not happen

---

How did she bring the pictures if she was passed out?
Part of the story is missing here.
You stipulation to ask your friend the rest of the story.

---

Underage is under 18 (or anything the age is in your hard to please area). 19 is of age everywhere. However, since there are pics, she would enjoy a case for rape if she wish to pursue it. You can take them to the police but they cannot do anything unless she requests to press charges.

What is the maxim sentance that can be given if it is a arson charge surrounded by the state of georgia?

if the property only recieved smoke wounded and no one died what can be the saying sentance for a arson charge

---

Answers: Quite frankly, it depends upon the circumstances. A person can capture 40 years to life within prison if the arson was committed during an attempted murder, or within connection to some other grievous conspiracy. However, it is more predictable that a 1st offense will get 1 to 10 years, if here are no other circumstances and the arsonist is an adult.

Did we violate international law by going to period of war in Iraq?

We did not catch permission from the UN to run towar, does that mean we are surrounded by Iraq illegally?

---

Answers: yes we did,much resembling the Japanese did when they bombed Pearl Harbor...

---

Oh my.
-Permission?

That's why they call it period of war.

---

Articles 41 and 42 of the U.N. Charter (which is a treaty and part of the supreme directive of the United States under Article 6, clause 2 of the Constitution) avow that no member state have the right to enforce any resolution with armed force unless the Security Council decide there have been a matter breach of it resolution, and determines that all nonmilitary ability of enforcement have be exhausted.

So yes. But you know how Bush & Co. feel almost the UN--they're not important until they involve them.

---

No, if you continue to read the UN Charter and not of late pick out what helps your shield, it goes on to read aloud that a country does not need consent from the UN if it is acting in "self - defense". I've never instinctively worked with the Bush direction, but that's most likely why they said Iraq be a threat to the US.

Disability act?

I be wondering how or where i could progress to find a copy of the person near disability act? perferably online. Thanks

---

Answers: The below relation should help.

http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.ht...

Getting access to your full medical records contained by the UK?

I asked PALS (Patient Advisory Liason Service) in the NHS - and they told me what a Doctor writes within your medical records cannot be challenge as they are a 'guest' of the Hospital and not an employee resembling a normal appendage of staff - to make them immune from endorsed action apparently..

I complained almost pages of bizarre claims just about my childhood, and they said I cannot see any further information about me, because it may be unsafe to me, the doctor, or a 'third party' if I find out what they wrote!!!!!

When I insisted, a person working for PALS simply repeated the phrase to me - which be basically, you're never going to see what we really wrote within full, so tough luck mate.

They said the only means of access to take movement about written facts that are untrue - is to sue the Hospital trust, not the Doctor.

Even consequently, she told me that a Doctor simply has an 'opinion' on a lenient, and is not making a statement legally - so no Doctor can be sued anyway for lying!!!

Clever huh?

---

Answers: First piece of direction, keep away from PALS they are employed by the Area Health Authority, so are on their side not yours despite what they claim. You can apply to the Hospital Trust for copies of your medical documentation and they cannot refuse you access. You can sue a Doctor despite what inhabitants are saying, but they are back by the Medical Protection Society, a form of insurance company and you will have an uphill skirmish against them. You can also make a formal complaint to the GMC against the Doctor for lies written within your records and you can win as recent cases hold proved. Good luck.

---

How Broken Soul!!!..You want wampum!! Thats NOT NICE!!
they think they are autonomous but you will own to Sioux!!!

GERONIMO!!

---

You are right, the doctor can not be sued. It is the hospital that would be. You can however complain about the doctor, but due to the time that have gone by, I doubt that your complaint will be taken up.
http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/art...
http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/art...

Complaints about a doctor step through a local resolution service intially, then can be referred onwards. Even if the hospital eliminate to deal next to a complain about a doctor, you still enjoy the right to take your complaint to the subsequent stage (who may then, if they be aware of it is appropriate, force the hospital to deal beside it.)

As for accessing your archives, if your records contain information on a third group, then you will never be allowed to see that information. So the answer above is incorrect. You just have access to them from 1997 and entries formerly that date that involve thrid parties will not be disclosed if nearby is information that is feel by the hospital to be damaging, not to them, but to the third shindig (e.g. confidential information etc). http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/art... They are actually not your library anyway. They belong to the government, but as they are give or take a few you, you are allowed access to them.

---

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

---

Answer question:

This question has already close!