Law Questions and Answers
Health Care Management and Education Funding are absolutely not a piece of the Constitution?
how can this be denied or argued against. Yet many candidate want both.Answers: this can be totally argued successfully. the constitution does not guarantee you anything other than the right to per sue cheeriness. It does not give you right to an tuition, health concern or a free handout from the government, this is socialism. socialism is completely incompatible near our republican government, and I dont denote the political party. Because most general public do not know what their rights are nor what is legal or undemocratic, they leave it to others to wish their fates approaching cattle to the slaughter.
Sadly most politicians consider the Constitution an annoyance to be worked around. Politics are not about helping and growing our nation any more, it is almost generating more and more personal power. Most politicians enjoy never held a real livelihood or had to struggle to income bills. They have other been within "public service" and constantly look to increase their power and money. There should be term confines on all elected positions so that the power snatch is not a reason to become a politicians but general public would do it to improve our country.
What is the florida law going on for children of the opposite sex sleeping within the same room?
please describe me as much as you know.. Thanks!Answers: I'm not sure if there is an age hamper, but they have to enjoy separate rooms
It's very unlikely that there's any directive about it at adjectives. Certainly a quick look on Findlaw didn't come up near anything.
What sleeping arrangements parents make for their children is, commonly, up to the parents. Not everyone is rich enough to be capable of afford a home with one bedroom per child.
Richard
There is no regulation covering this in Florida, or as far as I can bring up to date in any state. It is without fault legal, surrounded by fact, to hold a large family circle in a single room apartment. How would homeless and poor relations provide a separate room for opposite sex children?
My neighbor's have a beehive within their front yard!!!Help!!!?
I've call every government agency, homeowner's association, and beekeeper. They adjectives tell me that nearby is nothing they can do unless someone is stung. It must be 500 bees minimum within a tree next to the curve where on earth my mailbox is located? I'm afraid I will be stung or someone in my household might be as very well as that fact that my husband is terrifyingly allergic to insect stings. My other concern is that they are spreading to my neighbors house from the tree and I am afraid they will come into my yard to nest. The beekeeper say there is nought I can do to prevent them from coming into my yard. I'm thinking of calling the local report. The first thing, I did when I notice them that I rang my neighbor's door bell twice and wait 2 minutes for them to answer and they were home!!! They refuse 2 answer so I am not trying to work with them because that be a dangerous move to construct for me because the bees are close 2 their door. If it spreads to my lot can I sue 4 the beekeepers billAnswers: what kind of beehive? honeybee hive or an actual thesis nest that was built?
If it is a nest, quit freaking out. First past its sell-by date, they only attack when outlook threatened, and will only touch threatened if you get too close to the nest (they are probably european thesis wasps or bold-faced hornets). Too close is usually 5-10feet unless you are making a huge racket to upset them. Most of the time, quality newspaper nest building wasps abandon them after a year or smaller amount anyway and move elsewhere.
If it is THAT bad, write them a epistle asking if you can dispose of the nest yourself. Shoot it with some hornet spray.
If that nest is more than 20-30 foot from your own door, you shouldnt be worrying at all. They are bees, not murderers. They will not hunt you or your husband.
They may indeed build unknown nests nearby, but adjectives you have to do is mind them early. Even if you dont, lately shoot them with some spray if you must.
Just because they won't answer the door while they are home (there are oodles reasons why they might not know how to, shower etc) does not excuse your need to attempt to resolve the issue. I other encourage citizens to handle stuff approaching this in writing anyway. Write him a memo.
"If it spreads to my lot can I sue 4 the beekeepers?" Sure. You might not win, depends on the laws within your area.
You can't sue a bee for flying surrounded by your yard. LOL.
Get a can of bug contract killer and spray them.
Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
The 8th Amendment states that "cruel and unusual punishments"Can you give me added information about it
and most importantly a schedule of all the cruel and unusual punishments
Answers: capably 8th Amendment states based on bill of rights as you know.And within is some rules how to interpret treatments.
In Furman v. Georgia (1972), Justice Brennan wrote, "There are, then, four principles by which we may determine whether a finicky punishment is 'cruel and unusual'."
The "essential predicate" is "that a punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity," especially torture.
"A severe punishment that is conspicuously inflicted in utterly arbitrary fashion."
"A severe punishment to be precise clearly and totally rejected throughout society."
"A severe punishment that is patently unnecessary."
Continuing, he wrote that he expected that no state would leave behind a law definitely violating any one of these principles, so court decision regarding the Eighth Amendment would involve a "cumulative" analysis of the hint of each of the four principles.
Note:Due to adjectives law system better scour for verdicts.List depends on case by valise.
There is no additional information and within is no list.
The words are designed to convey a general notion, and it is up to the judicial branch of both federal and state governments to determine whether or not a proscribed punishment is too caustic, too severe when compared to the crime, and so on.
The only means of access to look for additional information is to look at the valise law from the U.S. Supreme Court and from the chief court of your state.
I would say that the following are cruel and unusual:
flogging
impaling
electrocution
premature burial
burying someone alive
the gas chamber
fillet someone
burning someone alive
partial burial and putting fire ants on them, to eat them alive
gorging somebodys eyes out
waterboarding is cruel punishment.
within general torture is prohibited lower than the constitution. It is unfortunate that Bush regime torture inhabitants. He is the anti statue of Freedom
Do you take the photo?
core incident, peopel killed and suffering do you purloin the photos? ..do you sell them to reporters or give them to the police/fire for refrence?Answers: That's not a trial question, it's adjectives between you and your conscience.
Richard
no that's not your job and selling them would be private
What if nobody goes to time of war anymore? whats the motive to kill children n women within foreign country's?
Answers: That would be GREAT if WAR was finally History for perfect and it would show that finally people will know how to traffic with issues contained by a Mature Manner!! The Motive to both is that EVIL stuff $$$$ MONEY$$$$.
dream on, and women and children are the easiest targets to assassinate and controll since they are the weakest. let me know when mankind quits hate, dictators and despots give up power. And Socialism and communism walk away.
What do I do if I got a ticket for FTA on registration Renual and I no longer own the Vehicle? In CA.?
I only just got my drivers license renual within the mail and they are placing a hold on it until I cart care of the following citations.4000a1vc = Unregistered Vehicle
40508AVC = Failure to pay cheque or appear (for the registration)
The thing is I no longer enjoy this car. It be non opperational and was towed away. Shortly after the ticket be issued.
My fine is over $500 dollars and the courts are closed today being that it's a holiday. Has anyone have anything similar happen to them?
Answers: When you received the mind of violation, you signed a promise to appear if you could not show proof of correction. It appears that you did not provide correction and you go back on your own word. To the best of my practice, a release of liability is acceptable proof of correction for a vandalism of CVC § 4000(a)(1).
You can no longer just post a copy of this in to the Clerk of the Court very soon that you have the FTA, explicitly if you ever want to renew your license again. Bring this with you to the subsequent available walk-in court date and count one will likely be translated into the $10 fine. As to count two, I can reflect on of no legal acquittal why you would go stern on your word like that. You're at the mercy of the Court? But because of a few technicalities this charge will potential be reduced from a misdemeanor to only a $146 fine. Anymore and the Traffic Commissioner risks you asserting your right to a trial hear by a jury and Presiding Judge. Pleading guilty to such an infraction should have no adverse bustle to your record, solitary your pocket book, so I will leave it up to you to want whether this is just.
If it is at adjectives possible to get a copy of the court abstract to the DMV for a small levy then I outstandingly recommend you do so. It has be claimed that electronic sending of abstracts own streamlined the process, but I can tell you from personal experience that this is not so. Cover yourself, should be an supplementary $3~$7 if they permit it.
*/End of Line.
Go to court as soon as possible.
Did you register the vehicle until that time it was junk? "Often", if the vehicle wasn't registered when you got the ticket, but you took assistance of it, the court will dismiss the ticket on payment of the "fix-it" payment ($10), but if it was junk un-registered, you'll probably have to settle the fine. If you show up, explain the situation, and pay for the registration fine, the court will 'probably' dismiss the FTA. (Don't count on it though, depends on the bench mood)
One things certain, the longer you permit it fester, the more the fines will build up to, and the less likely the judge will be to afford you a break.
Richard
pay the 500 dollars. it gonna cost you more within time and effort to prove this motor was unusable. besides, you cannot argue that the vehicle be not yours or you had sold it. so money up and move on.
Traffic court?
what are the odds of the police officer showing up if my court trial is programmed in past due december close to x'mas and new year's?Answers: Police Officers enjoy assigned traffic court dates, and times. Unless they are notify not to appear, they must be there. FYI, the Officer does not hold to be present for the case to be hear.
100% if it's a trial where he charged you, he probably have to be there no event what.
Is my boss suppose to witheld my commission because the company has no money?
I am a property due consultant and I get compensated commission for doing my work as well as 3 other team. My boss owes me $5,000 in commission and will not income me for my completed cases. He says the company have no money due to clients not paying invoices back from 2004. So contained by other words he is saying if the clients dont pay cheque we don't get salaried even though my services have be completed. My boss has two other companies that are making money and pays his wife who works for us ocassionaly $5,000 a month and have a nice house built in a rich neighborhood and home school his four children who also take up karate. He drives a hummer, benz and two other vehicle. He has the money and still wont recompense his employees. Can he do this? If we quit he say he doesnt have to wage us our commission so his staff is still there waiting to receive paid next to the holidays coming up. Someone please tell me how commission works and what endorsed actions to bring. Thanks.Answers: Normally when you work commission there is a contract contained by place that prescribes how commission is paid. A lot of places that clear commission pay commission on collected invoices, not due invoices.
If commission is owed and is sector of you pay consequently yes it is owed. If it is a bonus and is not part of a gross then it is not.
I would bring it in writing. Send a relaxed e-mail being incredibly careful next to your wording and explaining a financial need and explain that you show that in attendance is currently 5000 in long-gone due payments for you and get a response contained by writing. You will then enjoy something to fall put a bet on on if his mind is changed later or you confer on the company for whatever sense.
Now is your company a corp? or INC? If so and the company goes belly up next you can be a write off within a bankruptcy. It does not situation what your boss drives. His funds are not in play below a corporation. Only company funds, his are protected.
Could you hire a lawyer? Sure but he would hold to take it on contingency because otherwise you would spend adjectives the back pay envelope just getting it.
Thanks and angelic luck..
Will
Its a double-edged sword you are dealing with here.
Sure you can complain and next immediately be out of a living, once he is forced to close up shop and go out of business.
Also, if your commission isn't within writing (or expressely spelled out in an employment contract), don't verbs about complaining, nobody will minister to you.
If it is easy to find another available job as a property tax consultant within a crappy housing market, afterwards by all rights, complain to the local labor board.
No he can not.
Take his butt to the state wage and hour board"labor commission"
report him to the IRS for levy evasion
As some noted, he may be forced out of business, however, better unemployed than busting your hump for no contribution for services rendered..
Good luck
By law if you are on a "payroll", he have to pay you.But if this is an underneath the table job you own no proof unless you have a written contract near him,that he actually owes you the money.The comleted work will not hold up surrounded by court, its circumstantial. I think you necessitate to demad the money. You can't just work for free and you own bills to pay too. Just cuz your boss have a nice car/house etc.,doesn't mean he have money. He could be with holding your money to payment his debts! Point it out to him that you have bills too and can't skulk. And, even if you qut,if you are on a "payroll" or written contract then he have to pay you that rear money he owes you even if you have to run him to court! He should be taking the clients to court to get the money for you guys.
How do gun control laws threaten anyone?
Answers: I don't see how they do. At one time, a gun be a gun, not anymore. How could we resist a military coup with personal firepower? The original purpose of the 2nd amendment be to prevent the government from have all the power. This imperative is obsolete very soon. For that amendment to be peritnent now, we would call for the right to keep and accept rocket launchers, grenades, flamethrowers, tanks, chemical guns and nukes. But we don't, do we?
"Guns don't kill family, people exterminate people." What idiocy. How heaps people would enjoy died at Virginia Tech or Columbine if not for guns? People can't do things resembling that with knife or crossbows.
I am not allowed to buy fireworks. I can buy assault rifles and modify them to full auto. I can buy a gun and kill in cold blood anyone in the world, if I don't attention about getting caught. I can't buy a box of Robitussin or dynamite though.
I live within Appalachia. I have held assault rifles. This isn't hypothetical stuff. Guns are a ridiculous atavism. A musket loader is more than sufficient to hunt next to. You don't need multiple shots. If you miss near your first, you don't get a second, the opportunity is done.
Like Pit Bulls, guns are a prosthetic penis for guys worried around their masculinity.
Most ancestors wouldn't mind laws limiting the purchase of guns, except for two things.
1. Many of those who are aggression for gun control laws enjoy expressed a rabid desire to eliminate guns altogether, any by amendment or through exclusion (i.e. they can't make guns contained by general prohibited, but they can make every single type of gun wicked and accomplish the same point.)
2. Putting those kinds of boundaries makes guns appear bad. Guns are not fruitless. They are a weapon by all process, but with a few exceptions they enjoy recreational use in hunting, and contained by many places they are required for self defense. I used to live out surrounded by the country, where a police officer is 10-20 minutes away at best. That sort of response time is unreasonable when someone is robbing your house, and to expect someone to be unable to encounter back contained by their own house is ludicrous.
3. Despite what so many claim, gun control will not substantially impede "unpromising guys" from getting them. If a criminal is going to rob or kill, going to the black marketplace for a gun isn't going to make him stop and rethink his judgment. And I can guarantee that if guns are banned, the black bazaar will explode with gun sale.
I can explain that easy. I'm Gay and we are preyed upon by society known as Gay Bashers, these race attack us often wipe out us or maim us for natural life because they have a problem that we exist. In states beside a concealed carry canon, some of us form groups that arm ourselves, my group is the Pink Pistols.
I have a nice .45 Caliber Army style M1911A1 pistol and I know I'm safe and sound from attack because I have no qualms just about defending myself with it. Gun control law always target pistols. Would you go away me defenseless? Just last July I be attacked by three men with knife, they ran from me similar to little school girls.
Being a retired soldier, I shoot intensely straight. That is all that's straight in the region of me.
The police don't protect us so don't even go in that.
Gun control laws can threaten individual safekeeping. Apparently, for some reason society seem to believe that if you don't allow guns, everyone will abide by the law and no one will ever seize hurt. The problem is, the people you are trying to hold on to from having guns don't charge if it's illegal or not. The certainty that someone commits a gun crime in and of itself is proof that they do not follow the imperative. Personally, I carry concealed. No one know and it has no impact on others. However, if someone be to ever threaten me or my family, it would sure own an impact on them. The problem is, if this right was taken away from me, merely criminals would have the guns, making it a full lot easier to commit whatever crimes they would similar to.
We can debate this all morning long, but I would argue that more guns does not equal more crime. I believe the opposite could be achieve.
The bottom line is amazingly few people hold a police officer to personally protect them 24 hours a daytime. I strongly believe that it is not only my right, but my responsibility to protect myself and my kinfolk. Passing gun control laws impact each person's expertise to protect their family.
If you want to argue that assault military capability should be banned, to be precise possibly another argument. However, I would still argue that those that legally possess the guns typically are not the type of party that is committing the crimes we see or read something like.
“The Strongest reason for the inhabitants to retain the right to keep and carry arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny contained by government” –Thomas Jefferson
That the people enjoy a Right to mass and to bear arms; that a all right regulated militia composed of the Body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper instinctive and safe defense of a free State..." - George Mason
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to hold for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!"
Benjamin Franklin
The 2nd amendment is not about hunting or in the order of sport shooting, it isn't even about personal protection, it is give or take a few the people throwing sour tyrannical government.
For those morons who tell about the populace man armed not being competent to stand against the government controlled military. 2 points:
1) The military are also citizens of the nation and are sworn to watch over the Constitution not the Politicians. Most would side with the citizens against the governement but if we don't stand up next to the means to struggle then they will never own to make the choice.
2) Give me 85 million armed Americans against any standing army within the world with doesn`t matter what weapons they hold and I will win.
I don't think they do, but a gazillion other empire don't agree.Gun control doesn't take your gun away. Have a great morning.
More Questions and Answers:
[1419] - [2430] - [1172] - [498] - [516] - [731] - [1773] - [330] - [2064] - [339] - [2343] - [1048] - [1177] - [1038] - [2460] - [2035] - [1061] - [2541] - [854] - [2010]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: