Law Questions and Answers

How to write a will?

Ok i am wanting to write a will??!?!?! Do i need a attorney or is there a website that can comfort me write a will. another question is what is the difference between a living will and end will?
Answers: A living will and a will are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS. A living will just give a doctor immunity from a lawsuit if he/she pulls the plug on you if you're on vivacity support. Furthermore, it's a rather outdated document that most citizens don't even draft anymore. Rather, they execute a durable power of attorney, which is a document that appoints someone to act on your behalf should you become incapacitated and incompetent to express your wishes.

A will is a document that tells associates how you want your belongings distributed after you die. They are incredibly state specific, so it is near impossible to recount someone how to write one when you don't know what state they're in. For integrity sake, pay a attorney licensed in your state the couple hundred bucks it costs to draft a binding will. Do NOT try to do it yourself. Wills are one of the ending legal documents that courts insist follow the imperative to a T. You need to know adjectives the ramifications of devising your property contained by a particular agency. You also are probably not familiar beside the proper way to hold a will signed and witnessed, and how to draft an attestation clause. If you truly want to have your property distributed within a way different from where on earth it would go if you die intestate, I strongly urge you to win legal sustain.
Nolo press publishes an excellent book on how to write your will: "Nolo's Simple Will Book."

It explains the sort of questions you are asking and have forms that are legal surrounded by CA

Your library might have it.

Note: I enjoy no connection to Nolo Press. They write honourable books on how to do simple legal procedures yourself.
LegalZoom.com
lawdepot.com one and only $19
buildawill.com
USLegalForms.com
there tons of sights to assist or do it for you
An attorney for a simple will can cost as little as $100, you could cost your loved ones thousands and a year of torment in probate court by screw this up.

If 4-5, 16 year old kids are arrested, shouldn't they bring their rights read to them?

Answers: Not necessarily. Unlike on TV, where they commence reading the Miranda warning as soon as they notify someone they're under arrest, the police do not necessitate to read you your rights unless they are (1) going to question you for evidence purposes [asking, Are you OK? doesn't count] AND (2) they are planning to use the answers as evidence or to further the investigation.

The Miranda restraining has to do mostly next to your rights in good opinion to being question. The first one is, as you know, "You have the right to remain silent." So, if you're not anyone questioned, the rights are irrelevant. Or if the police do not really consideration what the answer is. For example, they caught you red handed near the stolen goods crawling out of a broken fanlight at midnight. They might ask, What did you steal the broken TV for, are you stupid or something? Well, if you say, Because I thought it worked, that's an right of entry and it can be used as evidence at trial, but they won't need it. So the cop doesn't requirement to read you your right first. And in certainty, he might not even have be trying t get an permission out of you, he might just own been amazed that anybody could be that dumb.

With good opinion to questioning minors for the purpose of collecting evidence or furthering the investigation, special rules apply, and contained by most cases a parent or guardian is required to be present because a minor cannot waive his Miranda rights--except in some cases, and these can receive pretty tricky.

One exeption is where here are exigent circumstances, where in attendance is an emergency where somebody could be hurt and the cops want to act quick to save a energy or protect someone from harm. That's pretty easy--most of the time, but these are regularly second-guessed after the fact, and can rob up a lot of court time to seize a ruling from the judge as to whether the minor's answer is admissible evidence. BUT again, if they don't plan to use it within court, they might not have to confer the warning first.

Another exception is where on earth the minor looks as though he could be an adult, and presents himself as an developed, either by lying just about who is and how old he is (might be drinking a beer and claim to be legalized age), or just refuse to give his identity.

(Btw, it is always--with markedly rare exception--a impossible idea not to present your name and doesn`t matter what else is needed to identify you if you are arrested. Even if you want to remain silent, you stil have to answer when the cops ask you who you are, and if you refuse permission for, you have eliminate ALL possibility of being allowed to move about, and when you do get a attorney, he will tell you you enjoy to give your identity. So it is a huge leftovers of everyone's time, and you will not make frinds near the cop that way, that's for sure.)

Anyway, contained by most cases, if it is a slow moving investigation (not an emergency) and a nonviolent crime, the cops should have a parent or guardian present back questioning, and so they would not necessarily read minors their rights instantly. In fact, most cases involving juveniles do not budge to trial, especially if it is not a violent felony, and so the cops are not adjectives that concerned with reading them their rights--the rights do not come into play, surrounded by other words.
They are considered minors and do not fall below the same law as adults. When the minor is taken to the police dept. the parents or guardian should immediately be notify to come to the station. When they arrive the charges and rights should be explained to them along with the minor. If miranda rights be read without permitted guardians present, a defense attorney could challenge this stating the child is too young at heart to understand his or her lawful rights under arrest.

Is it legal for a company to receive you take an especially long lunch break?

I work for a daycare center that is to say a pretty big chain. If a trainer is nearing overtime because they made you stay one day really unsettled, they make you filch a really long lunch break, like 2 or 3 hours, and later come back. Sometimes they do this three or four times a week. My examine is, can they do this? If your scheduled time is 7-4 next to a one hour lunch break, and you work until 5 one day, is it official for them to make you purloin 2 hours lunch one day to "stop up"?
Answers: Unless your state has an overtime imperative that requires you be paid overtime for any time over 8 hours within a day, you are simply legally entitled to overtime if you work over 40 hours!

It is also court to have split shifts, goal that you work part of the hours of daylight, have a long break, and after work the rest of your shift! You see this with job like university bus drivers, who work in the morning taking the kids to conservatory, and them come back for the afternoon runs home!

What seem to be happening is they are trying to hold on to overtime costs down, and still have it give the impression of being that they are fully staffed when the parents are there to pick up their children! That is why they want you to cart a long lunch, rather than move early sometime to make up the time!

I would sit down beside management, and explain that you are liable to work overtime when needed, but you are not willing to bring an extra long lunch break to make up for it. You loose your time contained by the evening, and when you take a long lunch, you still are tied to the clock and can not soak up that time off. If they are not feeling like to work it out, I would start looking for a new position!

It is not right to expect you to adapt to the entail to stay late, and achieve no real usable compensation for it!
This is poor practice for managing human resources, but endorsed. The company is trying to avoid two things: (1) paying overtime to save the company money and increase profits (since this is a big chain) and/or (2) not violate state overtime law.

They'll get away near it, because most people surrounded by this industry, like fast-food industry, don't formulate a career of it. They know that they enjoy plenty of applicants to replace the disgruntled, so they have much more power than the workers. It's the instrument of the world and big business.
Depends on what the employment laws are within your state.
What they are doing is called flex-time or comping hours. Places that do this can't or won't pay envelope over-time. Instead of paying you for that extra time you get to come contained by later, confer on earlier or help yourself to a longer break.
If they asked you to stay and get overtime, afterwards thats the agreement made. If the next morning they want you to take an extra long lunch to find rid of it, I would consider this theft due to the reality that they won't end up paying you that extra money from overtime. Tell them that you are not taking an extra long lunch, because you have a prior agreement. Also tell them if you do bring an extra long lunch, then you will never stay overtime for them again.

Might be perceptive to start a blackbook of what happens contained by your work place each hours of daylight incase they get cocky and want to play hardball.

Wal-Mart plays this spectator sport all the time, which they never messed beside me when it came to overtime. Why? I guess because I'm not close to most people.
I worked for a big secure co. as a supervisor in TX. And I be instructed by my superiors to ask for volunteers to go home when we be overstaffed and not enough biz.

The leader said it was against the decree to send general public home when they were on the programme. If they volunteer then the company be covered if they were ever audited by the labor board.
It depends on your state's directive, but in various states, you are entitled to overtime pay if you work more than 8 hours contained by a single day. This can't be accustomed by giving you a longer lunch the following day.

Contact your state's wage and hour board (labor board) for more information.
Yes, it is. They set your hours so they hold the right to change them. If you don't similar to it go elsewhere.

Talk to your boss nearly it and see if you can work it out

Filing a police report for an internet scammer?

Someone ripped me off $275 on a forum for a cell phone they never shipped. I salaried through Paypal and I know the persons describe and address and the person said they're going to discount me but I highly doubt that. What happen if I decide to database a police report with at hand police department? Will anything get done? Thanks
Answers: Paypal's dispute resolution system is useless. Report the peddler, but do not expect any money since Paypal can only get better what the scammer has contained by their account. Still, you stipulation to file the dispute resolution form, online, surrounded by order to gain a ruling. File the form and concurrently initiate a charge back on your credit card. If you used a edge account, you own to go to the mound branch and sign an affidavit.
They will consider it a civil matter. They might hold a report, but won't arrest anyone.

Can i replace goods i pick up from a shelf within a supermarket after it has be recorded on the till?

law
Answers: If you're asking if you can pay for it and consequently put it back on the shelf...why would you want to?

If you enjoy already paid for an item and want to return it, hold it up to a cashier or to the customer service pane and tell them you want to return it.

Should I stop a check if I think I be scammed by a locksmith?

I was locked out of my saloon and called a locksmith company, whose number be listed as person in duplicate town as me, to help. They first said it would help yourself to 20-30 min, then the serviceman call and said 45 min, but it ended up person an hour. Then, it only took him in the order of 2 min to open the door, but he asked for $39 service charge + $110 fo some other defence I couldn't comprehend. I didn't know what sort of figures to expect, so I wrote hime the check. I feel it odd though that he asked for the check to be made out to him by his given name, not of the company I called. Anyway, I feel bad and approved to do some research online and was shocked to see how regularly this happens to those. I was categorically scammed out of more money than he deserved. This happened at dark, and I checked my bank's website and found that the check I wrote hasn't been cashed but. He may cash it contained by the morning though, so should I stop the check before it's too behind time. Will he come back and mete out trouble?
Answers: Stop payment immediately. The police or judge would find this a sound thing to do. If they tried to drag you into court the deem would laugh. If you be scammed it would be easier for them to ask you to pay the solid amount than you trying to get put money on money they already have.

Call and ask for the owner or somebody upper plane. Preferably the owner. You need to transport the stance that you have concerns (entirely founded) and you are doing THEM a favor. Of course if specifically what you owe you would be happy to spawn good on the bill.

This is a markedly, very adjectives scam. You are quoted "x" amount. Service person go out and asks for the check to be written out to them (what company would want this?). He goes vertebrae and says "she remunerated cash" and pockets the rest. Or he says "I get there and she be already gone". Happens all of the time.

If they balk transmit them you will be happy to take-home pay it but you need them to distribute or fax you an invoice w. details. It is a simple normal request. If they adjectives scam they will suddenly want to make a operate.

One thing I would do earlier calling is to call (or hold someone else to) and inquire about what they charge. Ask if nearby are any additional charges even if it is merely a normal lock that could be open in a heartbeat. Ask if nearby is a charge for travel time, time of day or anything close to that. Just play it cool.

One possibility is that if it is a small company or just really one guy consequently he is cheating on his taxes.
How are you going to stop payment on a check that have already been cashed? Move on and cram from it. Besides 149 bucks is not out of the question. If it took him an hour to attain to you, it will take him an hour to gain back home. $75 an hour.

Wire a push button somewhere under your coup¨¦ so you don't have this evolve again.
Yes, he can come back and explanation trouble. He can sue you for the money. You called for a service, you get the service. You agreed to pay the amount, so you wrote the check.

It's over.
Get contained by touch with his company and tolerate them know what happened. I am sure that when they detect it, he will not cause any more trouble for you.

Good Luck.

What are unknown owners and nonrecord claimants?

the house i am renting is being forclosed on i recieved a missive adressed to: unknown owners and nonrecord claimants
Answers: The notice is anyone sent to the property address to tell anyone that might carry the mail that they are in the region of to lose their home.

They don't know your name, so they are referring to you as a nonrecord claimant--someone who may claim a right to live on the property but who cannot be identified by a scour of public records.
That memo needs to shift to your landlord, ASAP. It is be mailed to several address.

Call of duty 4 question?

im guessing you cant play on alike team lacking the internet that sucks but if you can please help a brother out pissed past its sell-by date son do work 22's
Answers: You should post this and the rest of an actual question within the section for video and computer gaming. I don't assume you will get give support to here.
Uh, what are you asking? Provide some actual info and I can try to give you a clad answer.

Can someone sue someone for almost causing a sports car accident?

Call me crazy but I took a vanished and didn't ssee a car coming, so when i finall did see it, the other motor must have breaked, but i speed away. so in attendance actuall was no fluke, but close to one.
but then the subsequent day, i see alike car on the side of the road as i be passing it, and it seem like they be waiting for me to write down my license plate or something, because after i passed it, they started to drive again. there's no chance that they can report me can they? Since near was no stroke of luck, but i just may hold caused a whiplash for them since they may hold had to hit the breaks unyielding?
Answers: no they cannot sue you unless an actual accident occured. In any law-suiet the "victim" must prove that they be somehow damaged or hurt by the engagements of the defendant. Since no accident occur they cannot prove damages and therefor any law-suite would have no merit. BUT, what they can do is report you for speeding or driving wrecklessly. But they would hold to have some sort of proof and would hold had to telephone it in that year.
What could they report? Without a policeman to witness reckless driving, you can't be charged near that. With no accident, the other do has no grounds on which to sue. I'd be more concerned that the other participant is planning some harrassment.
Next time, drive more responsibly.
No, they can't sue you. You have a much bigger problem than that. It sounds approaching the person is any (1) stalking you, or (2) is a scam artist and is afraid you can identify them. I suggest you go to the police and report these incidents.
Yes, they can sue you if they can show your act caused them whiplash. Are you sure they saw your vehicle? Maybe it was the saloon behind you that looked similar. It adjectives happened so swift. Did you even know what happened or did you drive away insensible? Case closed.
Argh, my neck! So it be you *writes down usename*.


Nope.

=p
they won't sue you. they might have their insurance co telephone call yours though if they were hurt.

or they might newly call the state police - here within CA that gets you a missive mentioning that someone complained. no power behind it, but it might wake up you up :)

Drving out of state with revoked liscence.?

If I get a dui in NY and have my driver liscence revoked for a year am i able to drive out of state? ex: if i be to move to NJ for a few months am i able to drive contained by the state of NJ?
Answers: NJ is right next to NY so you know they trade info. Regardless...

If you manage to get a unusual one from whatever state you are still at risk. This happen to me years ago. I got pulled over within the new state and displayed my license from that state. They run a check and even though I was valid within that state since I was suspended within another it was still driving on suspended. And this be with a 3000 mile east coast to west coast move. And this be 20 years ago so I imagine they enjoy tighter controls now.

Even if you get new insurance and adjectives w. the new license if someone hits you or you hit them the insurance company will cry off to pay.

Even if they verbs you over the police will give you a suspended and can tow your motor. NJ will require you to show that you have cleared it w. NY contained by order to reinstate. The trendsetter in NJ that decide on your suspended ticket will throw the book at you. NY will find out. I suppose if you had a DWI and they go to the point of giving you a solid year there is more. You probably get "x" amount of jailtime with "x" amount suspended. A reliable suspension w. a certain amount suspended. Same w. the fine. There is other a catch.

So if you catch caught you may find yourself in top-security prison or at least suspended for a exceptionally long time. I live a tad south of you and where I live any combination of DWI, suspended or rash means a ten year suspension. Points can supply up to similar.

You could chance it but the possible repercussions could be greater and longer than one year. One year and it is done. Depending on your circumstances you might stir back and try for a restricted.. but don't mess up. 3 beers at a pub and you could get a second DUI. It is adjectives your choice and the point is.. don't risk your future and money on something that could transport 5 minutes to make adjectives go south.
Generally no. There is a piece between the states called the Drivers License Compact. This compact simply allows your home state to suspend you license if you have a DUI surrounded by another state. You could try to apply for a license from NJ, but you will likely not achieve one.

If you are pulled over, you will likely catch another suspension for driving on a suspended license.
No. In order to drive officially in ANY state you must own a VALID license from SOME state.
If your license is revoked - you cannot legally drive - time.
Most states have what is prearranged as reciprocity programs. They exchange information to protect their sister states from just such violation. If you are stopped in another state and they run your license, not lone will they find out that your license has be revoked, but you will also get a ticket for have a revoked license in your possession and your coup¨¦ may impounded or you will have to capture your passenger to drive, if there is a passenger next to you. It is not worth it.
no it was revoked for a origin. States will recipricate revokations for eachother.
I can see how you would be dumb enough to go and get a DUI. You just don't return with it do you?

But to answer your dumb question, if you apply for a license contained by NJ (or any other state) you will show up as suspended due to a DUI. If you drive without a valid license they will a short time ago suspend you longer.

More Questions and Answers:
[105] - [1682] - [57] - [1327] - [1940] - [2298] - [2568] - [1983] - [1285] - [712] - [343] - [1347] - [1343] - [1663] - [1379] - [1176] - [672] - [1492] - [1028] - [297]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: