Law Questions and Answers
Which courts hear cases in which one state sues a resident (or firm) contained by another state?
1)U. S. courts of appeals2)U.S. district courts
3)courts of last resort
4)All federal courts hear this type of shield.
Answers: It depends upon what you mean by hear. If you anticipate where are the trials conducted, the answer would be U.S. District Courts (though plentiful of these cases are also heard within state courts, especially as there is a minimal dollar requirement for diversity jurisdiction). Obviously if here is an appeal from the U.S. District Court, it will be heard within the Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court could grant cert on the satchel.
federal
Can i go to med university? with marijuana within on my record?
hi, i go to the dr with some migrain issues and he said near were several treatments he could prescribe,one self medical marijuana. i hope to go to medschool after graduation. will this be something that they may see or be something that will hurt my probability in getting agreed?Answers: If it was prescribed, and for medical purposes, later you have no problems.
I've never hear of a medical school checking files of what doctors have prescribed you. I doubt they'll telephone call up your doctor and have them fax over a inventory of all medication you've ever taken during your lifetime.
If they worried about medical marijuana afterwards they'd have to verbs about Oxycontin, Morphine, Lortab, etc. Those are far stronger, abused more, and strongly addictive. If they didn't adopt applicants with medical marijuana use, later they couldn't accept family with chronic dull pain either. If that be true, I'd have forgotten nearly medical school almost 2 years ago.
No worries.
Did you inhale?
Why not?
Clinton go to the white house with duplicate record.
It may not affect your likelihood of getting into med school, however it could affect your fitness to get a pharmaceutical license afterwards. And if you cant write prescriptions, you are pretty much screwed.
And medical files are not confidential when it comes to state licensing. Even if you go to a psychiatrist once, it can and will be evaluated.
I would not think so seeing its to serve your HEALTH and not being used as an accual drug newly to get elevated or go beside one of the other choices
(thumbs up please)
I don't see how when a Doctor of Medicine prescribed it for a choice for a cure for you. So no I don't think so for those reason.
I don't think that matter very much
Sellers broker of property I was beneath contract called me 2x threatning sue even after loan decline can I sue?
This guy is relentless, even after my mortgage be declined and I notify him, he called me and sent a communication saying he'd sue because I be in "breach of contract" WHEN I DIDN"T EVEN HAVE A MORTGAGE APPROVAL YET!!! He said I have to buy the property. I recorded the conversation and am tempt to sue him for harassment. This is the second time he call, the first time was after I tried to reverse the contract because I saw I was not going to know how to afford all the repairs needed after the inspection be done. I'm a 1st time home buyer and unfortunately made the outcome a little too deferred, partly because I have the sellers realtor calling me constantly describing me I had to label a decision right away because I would lose the house since it be going into foreclosure. That turned out to be a lie. I own in my phone copy all the evidence of their call and that one recorded conversation.Answers: It's virtuous you have evidence. The definite thing you own to look at is what your real estate sale contract says. Does it allow you to stop midstream it if you can't get a mortgage (mortgage contingency clause)? If it does - you are okay as long as your mortgage be declined and you be honest about your financial situation near the mortgage company and you submitted all required docs to the mortgage company.
Where is your attorney surrounded by all this? You should never buy property in need an attorney!
Sometimes, people hold an "inspection contingency clause" too. You can terminate the contract if he refuse to make adjectives repairs that you ASK him in writing to build.
If you had an attorney, you could refer him directly to your attorney. If he continues to phone up him, kindly report him that you now consider his contact next to you to be harassment and if he does not stop you will contact the police. Then, contact the police to bring a restraining order against him.
It sounds similar to you don't have to buy the property - but you own better abided by the lingo of the contract and terminated the contract properly. If you didn't, then you will be obligated to purchase the property (this is why you should hire an attorney in a minute and whenever you buy property).
Given the cost of houses these days, any standard contract is predicated upon mortgage approval. If mortgage approval is denied, next the contract is rescinded, and even the deposits are refunded.
If you enter into a non-standard contract, then it's a different problem, but as long as you don't enjoy a deposit to lose, I wouldn't worry nearly it. It's not like you've irrevocably undermined his ability to deal in to someone else. As always, though, if you find yourself served next to a summons, then you unequivocally want to consult a lawyer.
The harrassment issue, however, may be a criminal situation if he continues.
Desperate times engineer people idiots.
Looks resembling you have academic a few lessons here.
I doubt you can sue for a couple call.
Rep: to ngc6205 on the FED.?
To ngc6205 :The Federal Reserve Board is the biggest fraudulant institution in the United States. (along beside the twelve privately owned Federal Reserve Banks. They are non government bank.
Here is how it is done;
When the US Treasury needs more money they ask the FED.
The FED writes an uncashable check, authorizeing the printing of fiat composition dollars "federal reserve notes". (not backed by silver or gold)
The treasury prints the dollars to cover (make good) the uncashable check. Then the FED collects the prime rate of interest (fixed by them, not us) for the use of our own currency.
(without investing a single solitary penny of their own)
The FED should be remunerated "management fees" one and only.
They are unconstitutional and have no right to confiscate our property ( our domains ) the instrument they do.
Thank you for your answer.
Answers: You know absolutely zilch about the Federal Reserve. I'll donate you a clue if you are willing to revise.
When the Treasury needs more money, they flog U.S. securities at auction. ANYBODY can buy securities at this auction, even you.
The Federal Reserve DOES NOT buy these securities at auction. The Federal Reserve buys securities on the OPEN MARKET. There are several reasons for this. One is to provide a direct method for the Federal Reserve to increase the money supply. To shrink the money supply, the Federal Reserve will buy securities on the open flea market. Another reason is to adjust interest rates. Whenever the Federal Reserve Board meet and sets the federal funds rate, that is really a target. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) buys or sell securities on the open flea market to raise or lower the effectual rate of the securities.
By these open open market operations, the Federal Reserve does influence the powerful interest rate of U.S. Government securities. However, the Federal Reserve retains very little of the interest it collects. That is because the Federal Reserve is REQUIRED BY LAW to return excess income to the U.S. Treasury. This can clearly be seen (if you bother to look) on the INDEPENDENTLY AUDITED financial statements of the Federal Reserve. I bet you read somewhere the Federal Reserve have never been audited too.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/...
Page 21 have the audit report. Page 23 shows the $36.5 billion in interest the Federal Reserve collected on the approximately $800 billion contained by U.S. securities it holds. Farther down the page, anyone can clearly see the $29.1 billion payment to the U.S. Treasury.
Basically, the entire piece is setup this way so the Federal Reserve can receive funding lacking having to rely on political whims.
Also, the Federal Reserve cannot request more printed currency from the U.S. Treasury unless the Fed turns contained by old, worn-out currency or have an additional amount of assets to backbone up the currency. THAT is another purpose for the Federal Reserve to hold U.S. Securities. Those securities are the physical assets supporting the printed dollars. The Federal Reserve notes are LIABILITIES of the Federal Reserve.
Look, you want to believe surrounded by your conspiracy theories, go ahead. However, the Federal Reserve is not some evil entity. It is constitutional. It serves as a stabilizing factor surrounded by our economy and if you don't meditate it does, you don't know history. Also, the Federal Reserve is controlled by a Presidentially appointed Board of Governors and there are reports to Congress every year. I bet you read somewhere that Congress doesn't enjoy any oversight on the Fed too.
That's not how the Fed operates. The Fed operate in the OPEN MARKET; the Treasury cannot ask the Fed for money.
In integration, no seigniorage derives from printing money.
In oklahoma, can a charge of public intox be brought on a person short a sobriety test or no sympathetic containers
Answers: Yes, you don't need to hold a sobriety test or initiate containers. Sometimes it is VERY obvious and adjectives the court will need is the officer's nouns that he saw you "wobbling", you had slurred speech, he saw you pace out of a bar and you reaked of alcohol (stuff resembling that). Sobriety tests are reserved for DUI charges because DUI is habitually a felony and testing is required to protect the innocent. Public intox is one and only a misdemeanor.
Hire an attorney so he can plea you down to a smaller charge.
It most likely won't stand up much contained by court but yes. And the only means of access it can stand up is if they find witnesses of your intoxication.
public intoxication depending on your state can mean
surrounded by which of being surrounded by the state of drunkeness or consuming too much alchol.
too much noise
rude / crude gesture
and so forth
or not walking straight. slurred speach and so on.
Who is listed on a government grant?
What criteria decides who is to be planned on a patent application? Even if I did hold input, can I be forced to be listed on a government grant?Answers: The claims determine who is listed on a government grant application. You had to hold inventive contribution to at least one of the claims contained by order to be programmed.
If you do not want to be listed on an application, you enjoy a couple of choices:
(1) Ask that all claims that parallel your contribution be removed from the application.
(2) Check to see if the things that you supposedly invented were in actuality invented by someone else.
If your employer or the patent agent or exclusive rights attorney working on the application tell you that neither is possible, and if you are an inventor on one of the claims, consequently there is nought you can do. You can try to refuse to sign the rights documentation, but there are option for your employer that will allow him to file an application naming you as an inventor minus obtaining your signature.
For more information, see the USPTO pattern site.
What is contained in a government grant application form will be listed. So it is the official document application decided who get listed. For example, at hand can be one inventor, or multiple inventors. So if you dont want to be listed as one of the inventor, recount the patent applicant your intention. You may check out what a official document looks like at www.google.com/patents.
Can i legally move out at 17 within Missouri??
w/ out my parents permission? I abhorrence it here! they won't take me to procure my license, won't allow me to apply for jobs i want, and allow me to suspend out w/ my friend only once a week! It's hell here! and can you plz describe me what you have to do when u move out approaching who to talk to??Answers: It's pretty much banned. In practice, anyway.
You have to be 18 to sign a rightfully binding document, meaning that you will be incompetent to sign a rental agreement, buy a car, give somebody a lift out a loan, and any number of other things that can seriously complicate your life. Any little run-in beside police (a parking ticket, caught out after curfew) and a 17 year old will be see as a "runaway" and unceremoniously deposited back next to their parents.
With less than a year to turn, it would probably not be practical to file for Legal Emancipation from your parents. Here's how it works, though: simply, you'd stand before a mediator, show him proof that you are capable of supporting yourself (proof of brief or job submission contingent upon emancipation) and providing yourself a place to live. You would then be granted lawful adulthood (although you would still not be eligible to vote or buy alcohol). This is probably most commonly used for kids whose parents control their childhood profits from trust funds.
Most kids who don't have any income that necessitate to leave home urgently do so by staying with friends, or entering a shelter for runaway teens. Those are pretty bleak.
I would support you to start planning your move at age 18 - get yourself an apartment creased up, with a career located close enough that you can hike there until you procure your license and a car. You can apply for job and apartment-hunt online if your parents won't support you.
Perhaps living with your parents would be easier if you have a set move-out date (your upcoming birthday) to look forward to. Plan ahead as much as possible - what will you need surrounded by the upcoming year? Furniture and household appliances for your apartment, a working wardrobe, a car? Start planning immediately, and you'll probably be in better shape than you'd be if you freshly walk out.
Some parents are a short time ago easier to deal beside when you don't have to LIVE next to them. My relationship with my mother be awful until I moved out at 19 and we weren't constantly overexposed to each other. Now we're friendly, even close.
Bottom dash - plan, plan, plan - wait until you're 18 if you possibly can.
It may be doomed to failure, but look at the positives.
Life is hard and you do not want to burn your bridges beside the people who love and watchfulness for you. There were various, many times I considered necessary to move out but now I am thrilled that I stayed.
I did eventually move out, but it wasn't to make them foolish, or because they made me mad. But surrounded by the long run you will be happy to maintain them there and own them help you.
If you do not hold a job, license or place to stay it is going to be really knotty for you to start fresh on your own without any assist you will have profoundly to do...
Just my opinion though
Can you be a feminist and stay married to a philandering husband who publicly humiliates you?
Hitlary thinks so...Answers: lol, too true. Next we will find he is a chauvinist contained by private life.
But none of Rash Limbaugh's four ex-wives did, nor did any of Newt Grinch's serial wives.
Guess it take a conservative who can't keep his pecker contained by his pants to intermediary a liberal that can't!
Well yes, at least as much as anyone can be:
An existentialist who engage in commerce (like a stock broker).
An environmentalist who read a book; uses the internet or drives a car.
A police officer who breaks the ruling.
A politician and a Christian.
A Christian philanderer.
An athiest who marries.
An athiest who buys a lottery ticket. (... but I repeat myself:))
A Christian who diddles an income due return.
A health nazi who is also promiscuous.
A DEA agent who drinks or smokes.
To the extent that an atheist believes contained by the future. (If the adjectives hasn't happened, it does not exist. If it does not exist, it cannot be proven. If it can't be proven; afterwards believing in it is an perform of faith, etc)
Life is full of ambiguities; paradox and general muddle - readiness accepts these dilemmas.
What should I do if my employer does not give me my paycheck?
I currently work for EMS which is contracted through AT & T. I payed by the number of sale that I get (commision). However, I own received 1 pay check and that income check didn't have adjectives the right products that I sold, only the phone. (Products are Phone, TV and Internet). I hold only gotten 1 check from times gone by 2 months. I am supposed to be paid weekly and I be supposed to have a training discharge, but that was never put on within either.I stipulation my checks and the correct amount of products that I sold. What should I do about this? I already talk to the manager and when I did, adjectives he said was "We will sermon about this tomorrow". He get off the phone extremely hasty.
Help!
Answers: Start looking for a new brief.
And call your state labor board to record a complaint and ask them to investigate.
Good luck
call you local National Labor Relations Board department
www.nlrb.gov
If a minor commits vandalism, can he be sued?
I'm pretty sure the answer is no, but then if the vandalize parties want to sue, who will they? The parents?Answers: The parents would be held finacially responsible. Parents are financially responsible for a minor (even if they do not live beside the parents or guardian). If the child doesn't have the mode of paying a bill/rent/etc, the parents are liable for payment. I'm not relatively sure if a minor can be sued or not (it sounds plausable), but either passageway, the parents will be the ones forced to pay (unless the child could).
The parents are liable.
** Note: This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your cross-question and not legal suggestion. Local laws or your exceptional situation may change the nonspecific rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult officially recognized counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **
The parents are responsible for any "bills" the minor creates so the parents would be the ones sued.
**note, what Scott said
Depends on how much disrupt he did to the mine!
More Questions and Answers:
[152] - [1589] - [471] - [1717] - [897] - [1687] - [561] - [79] - [2354] - [1209] - [161] - [2437] - [829] - [1835] - [1364] - [1267] - [707] - [1096] - [2295] - [1260]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: