Law Questions and Answers

Ex all of a sudden wishes custody/visitation rights to SPITE me!!!!?

I got pregnant a few months ago (currently 21 weeks).. my ex have agreed from the beginning to lug full financial responsibility for this child- but wasn't "emotionally" ready for a kid and didnt want him contained by his life-- he BEGGED me to get an abortion. We own had NO problems agreeing next to him paying child support for my son, but now his attorney is telling him that if he's paying 20% he might as very well get to see the kid-- my ex is NOT a perfect man- after we broke up i found out he was messing around next to young girls (14 years old-fashioned.. and he's 27) he lied to me about SO much and is NOT the individual i thought he was.. i dont want him around my son as this variety of influence!!!-- he agreed to sign over his custody/visitation rights because he wanted NOTHING to do w/ my son- in a minute all of a sudden he's recounting me that since i made a decision he didnt close to (not getting the abortion) he was going to create one i didnt like (going after some form of custody)

I dont know wht to do! im so startled!
Answers: I don`t know what State your in, but going by my experience your EX`s rap sheet will own some impact. The Ex`s lawyer know he found a sucker and the Ex`s is going to end up paying big bucks to his attorney. Get some proof of his messing with little girls, even 2 witness`s would oblige. Don`t miss any court dates. Having your own attorney would help, and you could take the Ex`s police record online.
Use your computer to swot up about Child custody law in your State so you`ll think through what your lawyer is doing or not doing.
Fight fund with what you can afford and hopefully at worst he`ll acquire Supervise visitation and he`ll burnout after while when the child days interfere with his social life span or job if he have one. Good luck and fight unyielding.
OK, you picked him to be the father of your child so he could not have be that bad. The attorney is just doing his chore. If your ex does not want to exercise his visitation rights you do not have to force him, but by imperative, they have to be included next to the support order.

Most credible as the child grows up, you will see less and smaller quantity of him. That is how creeps like him operate. He will press for visitation rights newly to irritate you, when he gets them he propably will never show up anyway.
Don't verbs about it right presently... worry in the order of keeping yourself healthy during your pregnancy... Sounds resembling he lives far enough away from you anyway right very soon to be too much of a threat..

Courts favor the mother in custody cases... They only just do... And you sound the the more stable one, anyway. If he wishes to fight for custody, tolerate him try... Most likely he'll a moment ago get satisfactory visitation, which you would want for your sons sake, I would hope...

Just relax for now... A lot can crop up, or not happen, within the next few months earlier the baby comes.
capably hopefully the courts will see that he is not fit to be taking care of a small child even if he is the father, or I don`t know you will be able to conquer some agreement that he can come visit the son within your home and not be allowed to take him to his house
I hope it adjectives works out good, apposite luck! oh and by the way i suggest it's great that you didn't have the abortion even w/ the father beseeching

I purchased a TV over 3 mnths ago & never received it, and have but to be refunded. What endeavour can I take?

I hold already filed a memo of non-receipt with the company and they enjoy told me that the claim is pending beside the shipping company. I think that the company should issue me a return and the claim with the shipping company should be resolved between them and the shipping company since I did not procure a choice on shipping. I think over 3 months (I purchased the item mid-Aug) is a pretty long-drawn-out period for a settlement for an item I never received in the first place. Does anyone enjoy any advice of what I can do at this point? The company is legal, they are not a fly by night, but plainly their customer service is horrible.
Answers: IF you paid beside a credit card, call the c/c company and inform them.If you paid brass call the better business bureau.
Go seize an attorney.
There are numerous legal remedies available to you.
There is a legally recognized manuveur you could try, its called Brickus thru the Windowus.
all right, the legal issue is that, even if yo udidn't presently it, you took delivery of the tv when it be loaded onto the truck.

So technically, i tis between YOU and the shipping company, but the company seems to be stepping up.

I agree, settle to your cc company, they will refund you and treaty with it.

Alternatively, look into your homeowner's insurance, since it be yours when it left the store.

After the recent shooting in a Mall surrounded by Nebraska, I think the senate should ban citizen the right of armory

I cogitate the guns for private citizen shall be banned.
Congress is reconsider the gun law. And I strongly urge them to put guns singular in those hand of the military, and the police and national guards. The rest of the guns shall be taken away . Too much crime with them. What do you adjectives think? How copious more inoccent lives must be lost before we exploit?
Answers: We, CANADIANS, have prearranged this, forever! God bless! All the guns that KILL our youth, come U.S.A.! It is an outrage, that WE accept this! I Do Not Think So! Why? Why? Why? I've hear the "mother's" ask! Get rid of HAND GUNS,,, NOW!! PLEASE?
Because our stringent drug laws own completely taken drugs off the street. Oh, dally...

Bottom line is that criminals are going to attain their guns, no matter how not permitted they are. Armed criminals and unarmed law abiding citizens is not the process to go.

Yes, in that will be people who a short time ago snap, and kill someone. But one of the downsides of freedom is that relations will misuse that freedom.
How many times do we hold to go over this?

If guns are outlawed, single outlaws have will hold guns.

If he wanted to annihilate people, adjectives he'd have to do is buy a gun on the black open market. OR, not even use a gun. Make a pipe bomb. Drive a car over a crowded sidewalk.

Taking guns away from decree abiding citizens will not stop homicidal maniacs.
Banning guns won't stop criminals from getting them. Look at places next to strict gun control laws (ie. Washington DC, New York City, etc.) and see that they hold high crime rates. Switzerland requires every of age mannish to carry a firearm, on the other hand they have a low crime rate.

Please edify yourself because you obviously did no research on this subject.
You are so wrong young at heart lady, The criminal and drug addict will always capture guns one way or another
Yes I am a gun buff, I love hunting and never butcher what I won't eat, I maintain some loaded guns in my home to protect my house. I will not use one to rob someone or place.
Your question make it sound resembling you work for the Government, and wish to put a stop to more of our rights
Yes, theyre are bearing to many race who have guns and shouldnt, and I own to include some hunters even, who get inferior and stupid or carry alchohol while hunting BIG NO NO BUT REMEMBER if we are forced into war law, We will be worse past its sell-by date than we are now Because the druggy and criminal thing will always find a road to get firepower,and knowing general public are unarmed they will have a hayday They will one and only take my GUNS when they pry my cold comatose fingers away from them
It would be GREAT to live in your world, but - genuineness intervenes.
The magic trick you've slipshod to pull sour is to convince the criminals to follow the law.

What is hindraf? what is their rights? how can they speak so arrogant?

Hindu's Rights Action Force (Hindraf) as far as i know has be trying to gain support from internal and outsiders to get involve contained by Malaysia gov't. Do they have the rights? aren't they get the impression ashamed? by spreading lies. The Hindraf Claims there is an ethnic cleansing against the indian since nouns 50 years ago. if its happen since 50 years ago after there will be no indians today.

this is adjectives happen when gov't agencies brought down 3 of their temple and this 3 is not license and not approve by the license department. Notice own been given but instead they gather together again around the temple on the day of foreclosure. The gov't didn't single tear down temple .. they rupture down mosque too if its not licensed or the owner of the land claims for it.

When started to spread lies adjectives over the globe, its call treason and sabotage. Is Malaysia not unbiased? If they're not fair after go support to India no question asked, they asked for their support didn't they.
Answers: Hindraf be arrogant?

You should attend the parliament meeting and observe who are the ones more arrogant.

Yes , Hindaf or any parties at adjectives have the rights.It is clearly written surrounded by the constitution.

Yes, Hindraf is highlighting their cause within London now, they only left India yesterday.I don`t know they are doing just that to underline as we all know that our NST , The Star, berita harian,tv3,rtm even astro censured them out.
Its slightly fair if they run to london and appears in BBC.
BBC wont be bias right?
As powerfully as to get some fish & Chips...yummy!

Yes, Hindraf did contained by fact lied, same as the current organization both did lied.example sukhoi jets,submarines,Altantuya,judicially fixing,iraqi grease for food scandal,luxury jet , the former chief minister of melaka rape satchel,the former Inspector general of polis who assaulted the later DPM and so on and on, hell even abdullah relations with jean danker (his butler c u m sister in-law)was brushed stale as "rumours" So Hindraf lied just once,just one time.

Yes, hindraf should not use "ethic cleansing" in their claim.They should use 'apartheid or NEP"
That is unbelievably bad of Hindraf, discouraging boys indeed.

Yes, the state government tore down those "illegal" 100 years elderly place of worship that existed before in that is a "malaysia" on the world map.

Yes, notices be given,but were in attendance any negotiations done?Did "mic" brokered for it?Even uncle sami know about it the finishing minute.

Is Malaysian government rational?..please ask the 2000 lawyers, 50000 Bersih population , 10000 Hindraf people and 45% of the voters who voted for the hostility parties.

Sabotage and treason?i come up with my way of answering might be a threat to malaysia's national protection too.Lets call such act as "Story spinning" or "political arson".

They cant go rear to India, as they are malaysian..they have Mycard, malaysian passport,Perkeso, EPF drives a Proton coup¨¦ ,eats sambal belachan , compensated the ever increasing toll charges and pays yearly income charge to LHDN.
If they migrates to other nation, this will be lost of revenue.Total lost.
Who else will represents the poor Indians then?..christen uncle semi?..his hotline still aint working lah.

btw, i am not indian.just an onlooker.
I dont like to endow with out long answer,but you asked a long question

Labor laws...Is this legally recognized?

Can a diabetic (insulin dependant) be fired from thier job for have episodes of very low blood sugar while at work?
Answers: even if a diabetic can be considered disabled or handicapped and fall down under ADA they could be terminated basically not for that reason alone. adjectives a business has to do is "take home reasonable accommodation" for a handicapped member of staff. if an illness prevents the unsophisticated duties of a job from individual performed an hand can be terminated for poor job conduct or excessive absenteeism or any number of other reasons. they would not be fired for have diabetes but instead for failing to perform their duties. business are expected to gross an effort to exercise those with disabilities but they are not expected to hire someone who near assistance or modifications still can not do the job. like is true for an employee lacking a disability if their health prevents them from doing their profession then they can be terminated. any devout company would make an stab to work around a health issue and would try to find a approach to improve the body performance. if condition issues can not be resolved or improved consequently in lots instances employers own no choice but to terminate employment.
since you did not state what type of employment in attendance could also be the issue of safety for the hand with diabetes and for others which could result within termination.
depends on the type work you do, having a diabetic spell can result in one to pass out, and if you be driving an 18 wheeler this could be very lawless, This is just one example. You may want to contact your local labor board or a legal representative for the best answer

Is there a unprocessed law above adjectives government law?

Answers: The law of gravity..
The ruling of nature dictates that some things are out of our hand, and are acts of God.

If it is against the imperative to break into a house, yet someone inside will die unless you intervene by breaking into the house, next your actions are right above the law which dictates not to break into the house.
There are law of physics and biology that no legislature can change, but I suspect that you are suggesting something else - speaking of (perhaps) "God's Law."

This concept cannot be true surrounded by the USA. Besides the trivial answer that there is a "Separation of Church and State" clause so a "God's Law" issue cannot be taken up by the organization, there is another, more subtle problem.

See, we hold the concept of equality before the ruling. But if there is a "high law"and you are allowed to break civil law to follow your highly developed law, afterwards you and your victim WEREN'T equal until that time the law. Since the USA is founded on adjectives being equal, we cannot allow any "sophisticated law" to override civil law. To do so would implicitly establish a religion, which disenfranchises adjectives from other religions, AND it makes it possible for population to use "higher law" as an excuse to commit atrocities.

Look at the atrocities of the Inquisition, done contained by the name of better law, God's decree. Who among us is QUALIFIED to know when something is truly a "higher law" and when something is only just misguided, sloppy thinking? Often it is just a fine string and impossible to identify when you've crossed it.

So I would have to vote that there is no crude law surrounded by a religious sense.

On the other hand, at hand WAS an idiot in the Tennessee state legislature who sponsored a bill at least possible a generation ago, to engineer PI equal to 3. For all the obedient it did him.
Yes, and there must be a high law because man's law often run amok. An unconcealed example is Nazi Germany when at certain times it be legal to take out a Jew. God's law states that murder is wrong, hence someone who acknowledges such would not voluntarily participate within such activity and hopefully would attempt within some way to prevent such evil from occurring when possible. There enjoy been time and again societies and/or government that made it acceptable to slay some group of people. There be communist governments that kill intellectuals, there be dictators that condoned the killing of Christians, and the index goes on.
There hold been law supporting slavery in our own country. If it be not for a higher genuine authority over all, what would keep hold of mankind from legallizing anything, other than mere evaluation?
Yes. Live Liberty and the pursuit of happiness

Can anyone defend a being who deliberately breaks the directive. And if so under what circumstance.?

I be wondering when can a person safeguard a person for calculatedly breaking the law?
Answers: There is a defense call "necessity". For example, if your car broke down within the winter, and you broke into an unoccupied house to prevent yourself from freezing to death, you will not be charged. The perform was careful, but there be no criminal intent.
Anyone accused of a crime have the right under our constitution to lawful representation, even if they deliberately committed the crime (Gideon be the supreme court case that guaranteed a right to allowed representation).

Even absolutely guilty ethnic group deserve legal representation. Some want assistance going through the legal wrangling of a guilty plea, construal it's meaning and effect/consequences.

Some want assistance next to even the difficult aspects of the sentencing case.

Others choose to hold the elected representatives to its burden of proving guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In some jurisdiction, a person cannot plead guilty within a capital crust if the government seek the death cost.

Lawyers who represent criminals understand that the zealous representation comes beside the job, even if their client committed the crime. I know I don't concern myself near whether my clients commit the crime. I concern myself with protecting adjectives their constitution rights and representing their best interests through the entire judicial process.

I sleep well at hours of darkness knowing that I protected a person's constitutional rights. Especially when I see over and over again prisoners being exonerated by DNA or something else for crimes they did not commit.

At What point is it appropriate to beat the living crap out of somebody who have been giving you trouble?

At what point is it appropriate to trounce the living crap out of somebody who has be giving you grief the majority of your school vivacity? I dont mean ethically or morally, but justifiably. Can somebody sue me if I, lets influence for example, knock out a few of their teeth, EVEN if they hit me first (and I have witnesses). In other words, what does the directive consider appropriate self defence, and am I liable if I seriously hurt someone who regularly, though minorly, (tries to) hurt me?
Answers: A simple fistfight among adults can be construed as Assault and Battery which could pass fines as much as $25,000.00 and/or 5 years in put inside depending upon which state it occurs.

One or both of the party involved, would have to folder a complaint with the local police department and the states attorney's department at the local courthouse.

It is always best to hike away or avoid contact of any type with this human being. You will be the better man for it.

As minors, probation, community service, a fine, and a juvenile record would probably be the maximum punishment.

The minimum punishment would be complete dismissal by the court.

It make no difference which party hit whom first. The fistfight would be construed as mutually agreed upon.
Cyanne is right, but I want to add--fighting on conservatory grounds or during school hours can attain you thrown out of school, even if it is self-defense. Most school have zero-tolerance policies for conflict and don't even ask who started what.

EDIT - these are the rules in So. Cal.
Noblesse Oblige...how andy are you? Are you apposite and bad at games?
Karate Ni Sentinachi as we speak in Great Britain..

I reckon the law would look at it on a knock for knock principle...
Don't make a martyr of yourself.return with someone else to do that 4 u!
Depends on state to state, but he actually have to touch you in an aggressive manor a short time ago barley touch you and you can nail him You might carry arrested so be smart and have an attorney or people member primed to bail you out.
Before I used to beat up population that mess with me I used to run to the courts and find out what the bail would be for such an offense. Have my brother ready to post bail. Have some wittiness. Then you primed to rock an roll . After you win you case. you bring your money back . See adjectives you got to do is cram how to work the system. Attorney all the own to do is bond out with the city contained by which they work. Say they put a 100,000 dollar bond with L.A city, That attorney can bail out 1000000 dollars
raichasays is right for proverb cyanne is right lol

Legal age to dip in ohio?

I know contained by cali its 16 to consume dip, what is the age to legally consume it surrounded by ohio
Answers: 18 years of age for any tobacco products

False allegations about me be made at work and I was suspended for this what can I do around these lies?

Answers: You have a right to know who accuse you, and can sue them for liable and loss of pay plus duress, mental anguish and punitive damages.

Then, if you win that, you can sue your former place of assign for falsely dismissing you.

It is unusual that a place would fire someone via heresay minus witnesses to testify to your actions. In this shield, you will need to enjoy the same contained by your defense.
You will have to prove they are lies and after you can sue the company for slander, loss of wage

More Questions and Answers:
[895] - [737] - [2118] - [1158] - [1198] - [1118] - [191] - [2344] - [671] - [1338] - [2358] - [1693] - [1394] - [2119] - [155] - [2414] - [724] - [2121] - [24] - [2382]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: