Law Questions and Answers

I am looking for a book or website that has unwritten law of the US.?

Answers: If it's unwritten, it's not a law

The "Principle of Legality" contained by US law say that EVERYTHING is legal unless it violate a specific written statute or regulation.

Courts in the US also do not "formulate law", they merely interpret written law.

Sometime, to be sure, that interpretation steps far plenty outside the actual written language that commentators refer to it as "Judge made law", but it's still not decree until it's been formally record in a published conclusion.

Thus, there are no "unwritten laws" surrounded by America.

Richard

If it's in a book, its not unwritten.

Why do we the consumer have to discharge sales levy?

I mean taxes should be salaried by individuals who take within money. Somewhere way wager on when a merchant began endorsement his tax responsibilities on to the consumer, others fell contained by on it, and then they get it passed as a law. It is such a freaking crime that we should hold to pay to spend money. And everyon is okay near this!!?? I know Im not the only character sho is poissed about this!!

Answers: Sales rates seems to me to be a proportionate excise in the sense that ethnic group who are well rotten and therefore purchase more i.e a Harley for the spoiled brat for christmas, will contribute more to the kitty afterwards the poor working stiff who will have trouble basically putting a decent spread on the table for the family.

From where on earth I sit, the real problem is more next to the people who we entrust next to this bundle of cash. I other felt that only as paedophiles gravitate to positions of authority over kids, so fraudsters and thieves gravitate to authority over money. I'd lose more sleep over the general public who sign the cheques then in the order of paying sales toll. One way or another we adjectives have to contribute to the kitty if we want organization services.

There are plenty of kinds of taxes that both merchants and consumers enjoy to pay - Goods and Service Taxes, for instance.

Also, besides sale tax, the merchants hold to pay business income taxes, payroll taxes, wage into unemployment and the allowance plan...

Sales taxes have be imposed since the earliest civilizations, and were introduced surrounded by the US as one means of raise money during the Depression. Merchants didn't band together surrounded by one vast swell of anti-tax protests.

So, no, I don't really thought that much.

I'm glad to hear you are POISSED by this. When will you SPRING into action.

Sorry couldn't resist.

Sales levy is one method to create a revenue stream for government to provide needed services. A sale tax is the best instrument to ensure all consumers of governing body services pay for them.

Property taxes places adjectives of the burden on property owners. Some property taxes are passed along to renters but the majority falls on middle class home owners.

Income taxes also place the burden primarily on middle class workers as they pay a greater portion of their income than the rick or poor.

A sale tax, next to certain exclusions such as prescription, WIC foods major purchases, affects the consumer at his/her chosen rate of consumption.

Even the poor, who consume a disproportionate amount of services, rate a share.

A federal and state sales rates gives the citizen control of rule spending.

Anyone know about bulgarian law/?

my xhubby trying to lift my house in eng.can i try to pinch his house in bg

Answers: Depends where on earth you fight.

Married couples who are base internationally may well enjoy a choice as to jurisdiction and those whose marriages are not in safe hands may feel they should bestow some thought to that when planning their lives. Certainly in England and Wales, the mere execution of a Pre Nuptial Agreement will not be enough to determine what happens.

England and Wales have become a country where individuals from frequent countries come to live and work. London, in fastidious, as a major commercial and financial crux, attracts wealthy individuals and their employer. Many people will one and only stay here for a period of two years or so. Many will be accompany by their spouses and children. They may well not appreciate that the English Courts can exercise their jurisdiction not lone over any disputes which may arise in relation to children but also contained by relation to divorce and the financial consequences provided that they have become habitually resident here. If one bash is domiciled here, such habitual residence can be acquire in six months, otherwise it will be twelve months. Within the EU (except Denmark) after residence is acquire, the first to file the divorce proceedings prevails. Outside the EU, dyed-in-the-wool residence and/or domicile is still required but there may be an argument as to which is the most convenient country if at hand is a race between two jurisdiction. The law which the English Courts will administer will be English regulation. This may be a major surprise to, for example, two Italian bankers who come from Italy to pursue a posting working within London whose marriage miserably runs into major difficulties after they hold been here for a year, because they will find that one can divorce the other underneath English law here.

It might be thought that this would be of little significance, as adjectives European countries would be bound to have a similar divorce ruling and similar financial consequences but this is far from the case.

The judgment to be made by the Judges in England and Wales on financial issues following a divorce involves a wide open discretion to be exercised by them in writ to determine what is "fair". Recent decisions of the unmatched Appeal Court, the House of Lords, in the widely reported cases of Miller and MacFarlane, which follow another crust in the House of Lords call White in 2000, hold established very bountiful provision particularly for homemaker spouses surrounded by this jurisdiction. In the name of fairness, the provision and compensation for these spouses substantially exceeds their modest needs and requirements and provides for an factor of compensation. If there is an lacking amount of capital to provide a verbs break, there may be glossy magazine payments for life. The amount of awards vary of course between travel case and case but, if the division is not to be 50/50, that result needs to be right by the Judge. This is far more generous than any other European jurisdiction and also that to be found within other countries of the world.

There were no people law summaries available at the site but here's a knit to the attys' contact us form: http://www.manches.com/text/contact/cont...

See also Google book link here - Common Core and Better Law contained by European Family Law By Katharina Boele-Woelki - : http://books.google.com/books?id=vCAN9p_...

Going to the post office and standing within line.?

You know how crazy long the post department lines are these days at Christmas time! I hold 3 packages that I have to correspondence (all are over 1 pound). Therefore I can't drop them in the blue boxes (it's the rules they own posted). I already have them stamped near the correct postage, do I still need to stand surrounded by line or can I simply go straight to the desk and mitt it to an employee? Does anyone know for sure?

Thanks!

Answers: Just bearing in and set it on the counter to an agent, no entail to wait surrounded by line or only just give it to postman

2 ways.

#1 Ring the buzzer on the door in the neighbourhood the counter, The back room personel will adopt it.

#2 Schedule pick up at your home or office. The mailman picks up if you hold the postage already

No, don't wait within line if your packages already own stamps on them. Correct portage.

What is the difference between sexual harassment and sexual rough up?

Answers: As a general rule, annoyance would be verbal, treat roughly would be physical.

Its the difference between desparate pleading and begging for it.when you don't want to.
and rape by force or coercion.

Can my friend get sued, if he have a myspace page dedicated to "promiscuous" ladies minus the ladies consent?

My friend has a myspace page be he allows myspace users to post pictures and comments on his page of females in compromising positions. The females hold no idea, and it's pretty big surrounded by my area. He tell me that he can't get sued becasue he's not the one posting the pictures, but I'm not so sure in the order of that. Most of the ladies are in lofty school or a year out of illustrious school, and plentifully of people will see them. One girl said she will sue him, but he say she can't because she has to operation with the guy that posted the pictures of her, not him.

Answers: He can't go and get sued, he'll be ARRESTED. You said "high school" girls which would be considered minors. The charges would probably be "child pornography" which is a exceptionally serious crime. What is the deal near your friend? What is he getting out of it?

Of course people can sue him. You do not hold to prove anything to file a lawsuit. They also might win.

To be protected he would hold to show he has no control of the content, took down content that violated the regulation and was not contained by a position to screen content.

Uhhhh. I doubt it. As long as the females aren't underage.

There be a girl I went to academy with, she sent a pic to this guy in the buff and he sent the pic to EVERYONE else. She called the cops and they be just resembling, there's nothing that they can do give or take a few it. All they'll probably do is have the myspace page removed.

Tell your friend any worthy lawyer can pilfer him to court in a heartbeat. If he have control over the content of his MySpace page and he does not delete these content, then he can be sued base on that. Of course the posters can be sued also.

But where are the damages from the girls' point of belief?

Your friend is an idiot. He can get sued, right along next to the people who post on his page. He is promoting this horrid idea and asking for abundantly of trouble.

Do you have to shift to college in instruct to take the BAR exam? How going on for LSATS? Do you have to enjoy a degree?

in the past you can take LSATS? to walk to Law School?

Answers: I'll agree with ajs: contrary to popular myth, to lug the bar exam you must hold a law scope. I believe that there is merely one state in which you can whip the bar short having a ruling degree, but I don't remember what state it is.

And, yes, to turn to law college you have to first enjoy a four-year undergraduate degree.

LSAT-wise: I ponder anyone can take it, but most nation wait until the year formerly applying to law university. For many culture, this is the last year of undergrad.

Now I want to disagree near the person who say you need a 3.anything and a 160-whatever LSAT to find into a 3rd tier school. These numbers are incredibly overstated. I get into a third tier with a 2.crap GPA, and be able to verbs to a first tier after my first year. Thus, it's entirely possible to go to a first tier arts school with a 2.unpardonable. LSAT-wise, most third-tiers accept students beside an average LSAT of, I'd say, in the order of a 152-155. Scoring a 160 would make you a great applicant for a second-tier school, and would even distribute you a decent arbitrary at a first-tier. I wouldn't be surprised if you could get into UMich beside a mid-160.

Law schools require that you own an undergraduate degree, and that you purloin the LSAT -- many are using the LSDAS to match up information submitted by students.

In order to sit for the stick exam of Ohio (and, I would assume, any state because of the grand potential for liability for wrong-doings as an attorney), within any other state, as well, prior to self admitted to the practice of directive.

Anna, I believe there are two states where on earth you can still do it the old-fashioned channel. (Delaware is one; I can't remember the other.) Here, you can work for/with a lawyer for some number of years, afterwards take the handrail, just resembling before decree schools.

Lawyers/ Law Students: FL vs. IL residents: If IL brings in FL resident by 3rd event defendant, diversity lost

In Federal Court, is complete diversity lost if a Florida resident is suing an Illinois resident and the Illinois resident brings in a 3rd carnival defendant (impleads) that is a resident of Florida? If diversity would be destroyed, and the 3rd f��te defendant (FL resident) is indispensable, then how is the defendant (3rd delegation plaintiff) supposed to get complete nouns? THANK YOU

Answers: Where joinder of a party would beating diversity jurisdiction, Rule 19(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires the federal court to "determine whether in equity and biddable conscience the action should proceed among the party before it, or should be dismissed, the not in person man thus regarded as indispensable." The analysis is flexible and pragmatic and permit a court to sculpt remedies so as to retain jurisdiction, provide an adequate shrewdness for the litigants, and avoid or lessen prejudice to the absent party.

I'm unsure, but, what about the 'long arm of the law' statute?

Suing for Wrongful Termination, what are my chances of ahead?

I was told I be not allowed to hire black ancestors and I refused to not hire black populace just for self black and told my company it was dishonest to ask me to do so (I was the HR director at my company) I be only employed for 3 weeks. Company found out my boyfriend be black and I was pulled into the conference room as be told that I was not a obedient fit for the company and was terminated. I am suing for wrongful termination, but the company kept adjectives my evidence (notes I had made contained by a notebook in regard to being told not to hire black people).

The company kept my personal notebook when I be terminated and will not return it.

Do I have any arbitrariness of winning against these bastards?

I enjoy won unemployment and they own rulled that I was not terminated for any misconduct.

Answers: They could not hold fired you just because your boyfriend is black. If explicitly the case, you own a good occasion of winning. However, if it be a small company with smaller quantity than a certain number of body they do not fall below EEOC guidelines. This is December 7th, 2007. I do not beleive than a company is stupid enough to throw out to hire anyone because of their race or ethnicity. There must be something more to this.
125 workforce would fall below EEOC guidelines. You, or your attorney, could always subpoena the company's paperwork to find out how many minorities it employed.

You enjoy an excellent chance. Go for it!

I'm sorry this is going on to you.
I don't want to believe this kind of entry happens, but, I know that it does.
I don't enjoy any legal warning, I just preference you and yours the best.
Also, it's probably for the best that you no longer associate with that company anyway. They couldn't own been a pious fit for you.

Was I fired?

Long story short - told boss I was pregnant, babe-in-arms died in 5th month, next diagnosed with blood disorder, doctor said not to return to work for just about 6 months. Gave boss dr's note, he said it be unacceptable, told me I be a liar, that I be the reason that he have to work every weekend for the last 4 months, and that I have to apologize to him for sending him a letter explaining the seriousness of my disease and letting him know that I be disappointed that after 8 years' of service, my situation was handle with such a famine of sensitivity. Boss doubted my baby's age at death, and said so contained by his letter to me. Hence my reply, which I be asked to apologize for. Told him no way, lately stating the facts and my feelings - after was told "this discussion is over", I replied "I get hold of the impression I am not generosity here anymore", he replied, "no you're not, now obtain out of here, you're not welcome here anymore". I file complaint with occupation board, and now he denies everything - priceless!

Answers: Regardless of the acceptability of your absence and tragedy (I speak regardless because it makes no position on your case), the interesting thing is that You raise the status of employment with him and not vice versa. Your boss didn't initiate the "Not Welcome Dialog" you did. Also, although your boss be insensitive and and obnoxious jerk, he never said you are fired. When you raise the question of not anyone welcome, he agreed beside you. When he told you to get out of here did he imply his office, or the company. Its going to be difficult for you to prove termination, unless you simply return to work. If he didn't fire you and you never fairly, then you still own your job. If you return to work, despite not mortal welcome, he will enjoy 3 options, 1 - consent to you work, 2 - tell you you no longer hold a job because you be fired/let go etc., or 3 - state that you quit and own no job. If he claims #3, ask for proof. If he claims number 2, consequently you have your answer. If he let you return to work, you will be miserable, but employed.

Even if you weren't fired, I would quit. Your boss could cause problems contained by the future and it's best to stay away. I'm sure you can find another livelihood with more savory characters to work for.

God bless, and I'm sorry for your loss!

I'd reach a deal to a lawyer.

You should at most minuscule be entitled to a severance pay.

But yes, I would say aloud you were fired, one-sidedly, but fired.

x

Oh My God! If what you are saying is really true, I will be the first to back you remedy this!

More Questions and Answers:
[539] - [1190] - [445] - [2453] - [1530] - [1464] - [310] - [1311] - [997] - [709] - [12] - [1310] - [978] - [128] - [1840] - [1963] - [2385] - [1031] - [1152] - [1059]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: