Law Questions and Answers

I bought a computer at a Yard Sale- it has Porno surrounded by the history. What should I do with it?

It appears to be fully developed, should I turn it into someone or just erase it ? Its gross.
and Why didn't the entity who sold it erase this crap?

Answers: delete the history.

unless its kiddie porn there's nothing to turn contained by.

alcohol swabs to sanitize the keyboard and mouse...

simply erase it. Someone forgot to do it, or thought they HAD done it. Unless it's kiddie porn, it's legal, even if you find it distasteful.

So a moment ago nuke it and move on.

Peace.

Was a patio sale, what did you expect?

FOLLOW-UP to child custody question..?

OK.. so far everyone agrees.. it is NOT kidnap if there is no custody proclaim.. no restraining order and they are still married.
NOW.. my interrogate is.. which state do you file for custody in/.? the state that the child is surrounded by now.. or linger till the dad gets him here and files surrounded by this state?? Are there Florida or Tennessee law that support your answer? if so.. what are they??? LINKS PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answers: Holy crap...
SOMEONE has legitimate custody. In MANY STATES, even if parents married, living together, and one parent leaves the state with the child, IT CAN BE parental abduction.
The adjectives attitude is that if a parent takes a child against the custody of the other parent, it isn't abduction. WRONG.
http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/pkrepor...
A file for custody has to be contained by the child's home state.
Rather than accept any answer from here (which can be wrong), dad requests to consult an attorney. Or google the law which applies to the state where on earth the child lives.
If mom is endangering the child, consequently he can ask for an emergency hearing.
I cannot find the table beside the relevant laws... trust me, I researched it when my grandchildren be taken, and it is a huge mess, when state laws are inconsistent. I reflect on 38 states (at the time) do consider it to be parental abduction if the child is taken without the consent of the other parent OR a court demand.

Question involving a theft?

OK my son lately was caught stealing an iPod from the store that he worked at. He be fired and was told if he remunerated a restitution for the iPod that he wouldn't go to incarcerate. He paid the restitution for the item but they kept the iPod and told him he would procure it after the courts released them to give it put money on. We contacted both the police dept. and the local courts and they have no opinion what we are talking going on for. It's been almost 3 months and the store keep saying that they enjoy to wait on the courts ok to supply the iPod back to my son. I recognize he should be punished for stealing but he did technically pay for the item and the store is trying to hang on to it and the cash. Is at hand any legal likelihood I have for this? I don't want to win him in anymore trouble but he did payment for the item. Can I file a report against the store for thieving?

Answers: he should be punished to the fullest extent of the law

Your theiving little brat get screwed by a businessman who is a h*ll of a lot smarter than he is. Tell him to put a article bag over his principal and feel stupid, consequently, while he can't see what's coming, beat his sorry little *ss to guide him a lesson that you should have instilled within him before he be old plenty to have a assignment: Taking things that aren't yours is WRONG.

If he was someone I know, I'd kick his *ss myself because he's making my prices jump up.

I'm thinking that if he paid the money out of his own pocket... that you as his parents should clear him go I-Pod-less. By helping him box legally for an item he originally stole... come on. That's newly teaching him its alright to maintain up with this worthless behavior. There is a reason the court system is not giving it vertebrae.. probably because the court system sees that even the parent involved contained by this case is not getting the POINT of PUNISHMENT...

The court is punishing him because he commited a crime.. in a minute if they see that even the parent didn't learn from this.. why would they make available it back to him? He didn't RIGHTFULLY remuneration for it the first time around.. so why does he DESERVE it back? He doesn't.

He have no RIGHT to own that I-Pod.

You are an enabler, you think your son should be capable of keep the ipod? Get a freaking brain man!

Your son salaried a fine for stealing, he shouldn't be able to preserve what he stole even if you consider this "technically" paying for the item. I would consider it a fine for being a theif!!!

Now you want to turn around and database a report against the store for theft? That is rich. What loving of lesson do you think this is law your son?

Then you add on that you BEAT HIM? WTF? Drop the intact thing of trying to seize the ipod back, you nouns like a concrete dummy!

You indicated, "paid a RESTITUTION for the iPod." Please, read what this medium, The law of restitution is the regulation of gains-based recovery. It is to be contrasted near the law of compensation, which is the statute of loss-based recovery. Obligations to gross restitution and obligations to wage compensation are each a type of endorsed response to events in the genuine world. When a court orders restitution it directions the defendant to give up his gain to the claimant. When a court orders compensation it information the defendant to compensate the claimant for his loss.

Restitution, like other permitted responses, can be triggered by any one of a variety of causative events. These are events surrounded by the real world which trigger a legally recognized response. Broadly speaking, an obligation to get restitution can be triggered by two different types of causative event:

Wrongs
Unjust enrichment
It is arguable that other types of causative event can also trigger an obligation to spawn restitution, but the above two are by far the most important. They will be considered contained by turn. It should be pointed out at this stage that the following analysis is based on English tenet. However, it is largely an analysis of principle rather than covering law and thus should have considerable relevance for most adjectives law systems.

Imagine that A commits a wrong against B and B sues surrounded by respect of that wrong. A will certainly be liable to wage compensation to B. If B seeks compensation later the court award will be measured by reference to the loss that B have suffered as a result of A’s wrongful act. However, surrounded by certain circumstances it will be unseal to B to seek restitution fairly than compensation. It will be in his interest to do so if the profit that A made by his wrongful exploit is greater than the loss suffered by B.

Whether or not a claimant can seek restitution for a wrong depends to a full-size extent on the particular wrong surrounded by question. For example, within English law, restitution for breach of fiduciary duty is widely available but restitution for breach of contract is legally exceptional. The wrong could be of any one of the following types:

A statutory tort
A common statute tort
An equitable wrong
A breach of contract

So, basically, your son did NOT 'pay' for the IPOD, he compensated restitution. SO, the store is entitled to keep it.

If I be you and the store gave it fund, I WOULD NOT give it to your son!!! You are vitally telling him it's okay that you steal and if you seize caught, you can just salary for it then!!!

What smarts!!!

I judge you should since they are wanting to go ahead and keep hold of the ipod though. technicly that is merely like cliché that i sold you a vehicle but i get to preserve the vehicle and the money because of a lein or something. but def i would stay on top of that any tell them they stipulation to pay you put a bet on the money or give you the ipod that you bought

What reasons will a authority approve termination of par. rights for a step-parent adoption??

I'm up-to-date on child support, was a fitting bio. father, just haven't visit in a year due to my ex- & her husband anyone across the country(but I do call& send gifts).

My ex- have had sole custody for a year immediately and I want to move on next to my life. My ex- & her husband ( he make 100k per year, I make $40k) agreed to consent to me terminate my parental rights and consent to him adopt the kids. We are all for this even the kids. Of course, money does play into this somewhat but I can't enlighten the judge this (child support is $972 plus$368 medical per mo.) Me, my ex-, and her bright husband have other communicated easily and they speak that I can stay at their house anytime after this is all over to pop in the kids. However, even if this were not the armour I would be okay with this. The kids are 11 and 13.

What reason can I write to the judge to engender this go through? I'm inclined to lie to get hold of this over with.

Answers: You relate the judge that adjectives of you feel that it is surrounded by the best interest of the children. That while they love you they have a strong bond next to their stepfather, and he is the one whom is there hours of daylight to day taking comfort of them. They can be carried on his health insurance if he adopt them, they will be entitled to inheritance from him if he dies, and they will have a more stable vivacity not having to accord with mom's house and dad's house and the issues that walk with that situation.

I would be honest and voice that you do not wish to willfully desert your children just to enjoy to get this done, that voluntarily terminate your rights is something that you have thought over for moderately some time, and feel that it truly is what is within the best interest of the children and that is adjectives you have ever required for them...the best possible life.

I would also share your plans for an unfurl stepparent adoption. Open adoptions are when nearby is still contact between the relinquishing parent (you) and the adoptive family and child(ren). The children are not going to lose you out of their lives completely, you are stepping put a bet on as their legal parent so that they can hold the stability and normalcy of a nuclear family, as very well as the financial stability that goes along near an intact family.

You can also put in the picture the truth about your financial situation, you simply can't afford to keep hold of this up, so instead of eventually falling behind on child support and facing the permitted ramifications of that, as economically as knowing that your children are not receiving the money that they depend on for morning to day go, you are willing to sign over your rights so that they will own the love, financial stability, and normalcy that they deserve, and that you are at peace with the declaration because you know that you can still see them and have a relationship beside them, in your eyes the children will consequently receive the best of both worlds.

"best interest of the children" is a buzz word/prase it's a good article to use. Judges must make their decision based on the best interest of the children.

check out the intermingle for more info on stepparent adoption

Don't lie. The believe to be has probably see it all previously. You should talk to an attorney.

However, I focus all you entail to do is agree to the adoption for it to go through.

That finishing sentence speaks volumes.

The standard for this application is the best interests of the child.

You do not love the children. They are just an financial burden. You would even lie to be rid of the burdens, monetary, emotional and social, that the children represent.

The children would be better within foster care than have to be around a father who wants to be free from them.

That should do the trick.

Now I gotta step wash my hand a few dozen times.

Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.Aum mani padme hum.

My understanding is that it's pretty much simply a matter of wise saying that you want to...if the mother is on board, I don't see a problem.

Most states own a website where you can find out most things approaching this. Do a search for your state's website and include the words "end parental rights" in quotes similar to you see here.

Usually with a step parent adoption, you should be capable of "simply" sign the paperwork - essentially that you do not object to the adoption.

May I suggest they contact to the county attorney where on earth they are at? I know where I used to live, the county atty did adjectives the paperwork for almost nothing - IF the biological parent agreed to the adoption.

Good Luck to you adjectives.

My question is within the details, it didn't fit...?

We live in a system surrounded by which you are innocent until proven guilty. Because of this criminals sometimes get away next to crimes they have committed. Do you cogitate that we should keep this system or alteration to a philosophy of guilty until proven innocent?

Answers: remember where our law came from, for a devout and entertaining demonstration watch braveheart again and you will underneath stand the true intentions of our founding fathers, i would to some extent have a few guilty relations get away next to murder than have thousands of innocent general public jailed for no reason
remember the salem wich trials

Innocent until proven guilty is how it should be. If criminals sometimes grasp away with crimes they hold committed due to this, then why is it some folks who did not commit crimes end up contained by prison for things they didn't do?

Wouldn't more innocent people finish up in prison if it be "guilty until proven innocent"?

Does a rental agreement need to be notarized to be lawfully binding/valid?

I've decided to hold my new roommate sign a rental agreement, as my ending one failed to reward rent for several months and I had no allowed recourse with which to pursue him. Do I requirement to have an agreement notarized for it to be properly binding?

Answers: No. A contract signed and dated by both parties is binding, it does not inevitability to be notarized or witnessed.

If you give your roommate a lease and s/he does not pay packet, his/her rights are substantially greater if s/he has a lease.

If the roommate does not pay packet, your best course is to put them and their junk surrounded by the street. At once. So you can get a more worthwhile roommate. You can do that to a innkeeper, i.e., a roommate who merely has sanction to be in your apartment. Once the roommate become a tenant, with a lease, you can move about to jail if you street them--you own to take them to landlord-tenant court to evict them.

And no, you don't hold ti notarize a lease. A lease can be oral. You'd be better with a written agreement that make it clear that the roommate does NOT have a lease, but is merely permitted to stay contained by the apartment as long as s/he pays his/her share, does not trash the place. Etc.

Does he have to compensate?

on the 01/10/07 my partner recieved a ticket from UKPC stating that he had parked out of the explicit bay, the date on the ticket read 01/10/03? and he even took it to the local council parking department and they confirmed the date on the ticket. when he recieved the letter for the fine to be payed it state that the fault took place on 02/10/07?. Does he have to wage this fine?

Answers: If they cannot get their facts right almost a simple issue such as the date, then they are even smaller quantity likely to be correct going on for the position of the car within the bay.

A photograph which doesn't take a time-stamped endorsement is inadmissible, and a digital statue can be tampered beside, so they are unlikely to prove this one.

Absolute proof is required - contact a solicitor for complete advice!

In America, that discrepency might take you out of a parking ticket but if a criminal ticket had a discrepency it would not automatically vindicate the defendant. As long as the officer can testify to that mistake and still prove the crime alleged.

I know you said UK but we hold similar systems.

Hi,

Parked illegally or not at the time, from what you enjoy in documentary evidence would show clearly that here is a descrepancy in any doings, and all proceedings dismissed as false by a court.

But near is no need for adjectives that legalistic palaver.

If you send a phocopy of those to the relevant ethnic group, with a covering dispatch asking awkward questions, I'll bet that it will be buried surrounded by the system, and you will hear no more about it

Bob.

Hi, it seem that there own been several mistakes in connection with this issue and if I were you, I would photocopy adjectives the evidence and write a nice letter to the UKPC. You own the right to appeal against their decision. If they write posterior to you and say that your appeal have been unsuccessful you next have the right to clear a formal representation before an adjudicator. Hopefully it will be cancelled at the first stage of appeal. Good luck and don't agree to them bully you!

If you are a runaway, do you have to physically see the runaway contained by your house to get a warrant?

Answers: It would be better proof. Looking contained by a mirror would suffice since you said you were the runaway. No warrant is needed, newly call the police.

Who was the first and what be the first patent contained by the UK?

Answers: flint.
mr spark.

the club

Illegal immigrants?

How do hundreds of against the law immigrants oversee to get licenced to be payment guards? Some of them are working at Whitehall, the nerve mainstay of Britains defence, how is something similar to this overlooked, when you can't pee in this country in need the government or the police knowing something like it!!

Answers: It is amazing isn't it.
The Government seems to do NOTHHING almost illegl immigrants but proceeds to screw and bother the normal ruling abiding English person.
What is their TRUE agenda? It doesn't add up.

The senate should be sacked.
These are duplicate people who try recitation us what to eat, drink, smoke etc.
WHAT DO THEY KNOW.
Not fit for purpose.

When one of these building they work within get bombed i would approaching to see the excuses the goverment gives.

More Questions and Answers:
[862] - [2284] - [747] - [833] - [161] - [463] - [2319] - [2176] - [1471] - [46] - [1738] - [1702] - [1050] - [442] - [671] - [1638] - [1731] - [874] - [490] - [112]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: