Law Questions and Answers
What can they take if he my son is person sued in a civil lawnsuit?
My son be in a saloon accident 2 yrs ago. He be driving his friends car for him since his friend have been drinking. He be ran rotten the road and had to soon change lane, hit the side of the freeway and then bounced put a bet on in a hit another sports car. My son was ticketed for breakdown to stay in his lane. My son be also taken to the hospital for back bruises, his friend go as well. Another guy that be involved came running up to my son as they be putting hijm on the stretcher and said you hit my car. That guy be drunk and rude so the cops took him to jail. My son took strictness of his defensive driving and the other boy said his insurance salaried for this lady, whom we never even saw, to procure a new vehicle. NOW 2 yrs later, shes serving my son a civil lawsuit asking for money, dictum she was disfigured, embarrased etc. We never even saw a woman at the accident scene. The papers utter he has 20 days to resond or it will evasion. What all can they bear from my son, hes 23, works but not much moneyAnswers: I'd first find out what the statute of limitations is on civil suits in your state. 2 yrs. seem like an awful long time to finally want to take permitted action against your son! I reckon this woman is trying to make a speedy buck. If the deadline for civil cases hasn't expired, and this does go to court...there's still no guarantee that the regard as being will rule in her favor. Some question I have to ask; Does your son or his insurance company still own the accident report? If so, be the woman listed contained by the report? I'm pretty sure if the insurance company paid to pass her a new sports car, she was tabled in the report. Did she record an injury claim immediately after the happenstance? This is the one thing that I construe will help out your son within this mess...why did she wait so long? There is so much insurance fraud now, no wonder that our premiums are so high! OK, if it comes down to a perspicacity against your son...the courts can garnish his wages, put liens against any property he owns including money contained by bank accounts. Bottom column, hire a lawyer!
If she win, it will be a judgment for money. She can try to collect it by garnishing his wages, taking money from his edge accounts, or making a claim to money he receives when he sell some of his property.
But first she has to win, and that might not be so jammy for her
I know you are worried for your son, but it sounds like he be an adult when the catastrophe happened and is an mature now. Encourage him to hire a attorney ASAP to answer the lawsuit and then try not to permit this ruin your sleep.
When was the loss penalty abolish in the UK?
Answers: It be abolished for murder contained by 1965, but the death cost remained on the statute book for certain other offence (for treason and piracy with violence) until 1998.
The finishing execution was Peter Anthony Allen, at Walton Prison surrounded by Liverpool, and Gwynne Owen Evans, at Strangeways Prison on 13th August 1964.
well ruth ellis be hung in the mid to postponed 50s by albert pierrepoint i believe and after the hanging albert go mad couldn't sleep from adjectives of the nightmares he had and adjectives of the pain he be going through as a result of killing soooo oodles people undoubtedly affected his existence. other people saw that the killing affected him and so they thought then it best to stop killing ancestors - and rightly so
right who's up for a game of hangman??
It be finally removed by Jack Straw in 1998
Edit Hillman Avenger. Pierrepoint didn't travel mad, I've read his story of your life and they are far from the ravings of a mad man.
The lone thing he be 'mad' about next to Ellis was that the world be out to clear a woman who went out next to a gun and shot someone, when at the same time he hung an elderly woman who defended herself from an rude neighbour after she was attacked by their ancestral in her garden, bloodshed one of them with a single blow from the shovel she be gardening with and not a soul, particularly reporters, said a word as she wasn't 'sexy'
I'm not sure when but i do know it shouldn't have be!! There are far to many prisoners languish at the tax payers expense who are serving multiple time sentences so will obviously never be freed. A reliable child murderer who is in Broadmoor, have told staff that he isn't sorry for what he did, he would do it again, and he doesn't see the wrong in it!!!
(I know this as i spoke to an ex psyci nurse from there) apparently the scariest entity is that he is a very, hugely intelligent man!!
When is the death cost going to be reinstated should be the second part of your grill.
And again why were we the British public not asked to vote
contained by a referendum on what laws we would close to abolished,
democracy my foot we vote them surrounded by on false promises, and then they notify us what to do.
ain't it sad.
I seem to remember? That fireworks on a sunday is iffy?
(UK law) did I just dream this up? but I do seem to be to remember that fireworks on a sunday is illegal?? There's a positive artillery going bad where I live tonight!Answers: Yes I thorght they be also. Personaly I do not think fireworks should be on mart to the public. displays should be set up every year in respectively town if so wished and as for the directive regarding firworks not one set off from 11pm and untill 7am all right thats just a prank as at times we have be awoken at 3 in the morning due to fireworks. I estimate they should be Banned or only for public sale for organised licenced displays
No, there isn't any UK regulation banning fireworks on a Sunday as far as I'm aware. The 2003 Fireworks Act does, however, forbid the use of fireworks from 11pm to 7am except of certian night (Bonfire Night and Chinese New Year included).
In the case of clatter, I'm sure you'll be happy to know that like peas in a pod act forbids the public sale of fireworks louder than 120 decibels.
Not in Louisiana, you can blow your manager off any afternoon you wish! Adults purchase the fireworks, but don't other supervise very resourcefully. "Laissez Les Bon Temps Roulez" (let the good times roll). Wishing fireworks be illegal.
Best of Luck to You!
I don't believe it's illegal, but it's awful, my dogs are scared out of your wits also.
Should VIRTUAL Child Pornography be legal? Why/Why not?
Please prove correct your answers using:Harm Principle - the idea that the state is fit in using force to prevent individuals from harm others.
Legal Paternalism - the idea that the state is right in using force to prevent individuals from harm themselves.
Immoral Behavior - the idea that the state is proper in using force to prevent individuals from acting immorally.
Offense Principle - the concept that the state is justified within using force to prevent individuals from offending others.
Answers: OK to much inside the box thinking by the answerers so far.
As a digital media nouns industry analyst, I had the accidental to cover similar ground with a several attendees of a conference of sex criminal treatment therapists the other hours of daylight.
I haven't completely processed the answers yet, but they seem open to the notion that technology could be used in ways they haven't however themselves imagined to enable them to manage their goals - while at matching time being skeptical too.
On First Amendment principles, it seem outrageous, and dangerously akin to creating category of thought crimes. Allowing people to hold ideas, especially adjectives and/or unpopular ones, and to be able to publish them, is exactly what the First Amendment be designed to protect. After all, popular speech does not really want protection does it?
NO...why you ask? Let's see
1. It's sick
2. It's disgusting
3. It can and will lead to damage to children
4. It's immoral
I could verbs with the record, but I think you receive the point.
WHY THA FU*K WOULD THIS EVEN BE A QUESTION???
the answer is so obivious && iiM justifying wit my PRINCIPLES.
its disgusting && ur ultimately messing up that child!!
Damn that kid could grow up && commit suicide because they couldnt cope with what happen to them && WHY?? just because you looked-for to jack off for 20 mins!!
ask what proportion of current buyers of child porn will subsequent try to become buyers of child sex.
deviant behavior, imho, tends to increase contained by individuals over time. thus, virtual cp would leads to TRUE cp buying which leads to attempts at TRUE child molestation [felony sexual battery]
i thus conclude lower than the Harm Principle you cite that virtual child porn should remain a criminal offense.
Sure, go ahead & build it legal. Just as long as the personage buying the game have an electronic chip implanted into them! All users would also need to hold this chip in their bodies to see the game. This would solve adjectives problems in tracking & sort it easier to identify the bodies of the sick minds who abuse children & lapse up found dead surrounded by the alleyways at some point in their lives.
As an grown who has experienced sexual misuse as a child, then I hold to ask just what purpose a virtual spectator sport to abuse a child would serve? It simply enforce & reinforces an already twisted mind to continue have abusive thoughts. It's time general public started to speak out against things of this nature.
I can't relief but notice that you come across to think along alike lines as many of the ACLU "power houses"!
Your boundaries enjoy become blurred if you are equating a game of maltreat using children (virtual chirlden) to things like impossible breath & poor dressing skills. I urge you to seek counseling for some issues that are echoingly buried within your full-grown mind. I don't hate this cross-question or the asker of this question...I simply sense that something is out of whack, somewhere, in all of this.
It is criminal incase you didnt know
The fbi has its own sector for that
Kicking myself out, know about legitimate stuff?
Is there any bearing to.. Kick yourself out of your home legally?Or can I simply like.. Leave and stay somewhere for a long time, and they'll consider that where on earth I'm staying?
ORRR, my brother is 18 and is going to move out when his girlfriend turns 18, would it be legal for me to lately move in next to him?
Answers: How old are you? Under 18? If you walk off while you are underage, most states consider you to be a runaway. You can't go beside your brother unless he is your legal guardian & you have need of to have the WRITTEN & FILED assent of the adults that are your legal guardians/cargivers/parents.
You might want to explore some type of an alternative living arrangement through your local Foster Care system or Youth Counseling Agencies. You nouns extremely stressed out & confused over this matter. IF you get the impression like your duration is is any type of danger, or you own been abused, I strongly urge you to give the name the Police or Child Protection Services to assist you BEFORE you run away & are at even greater risk of harm from the heaps predators & sickos who live in the streets & hang around for a young & confused party to walk by. Maybe you in recent times need some Family Counseling to explore some better ways of living until you can give home safely & lawfully!
Generally, you must live where your parents or trial guardian tell you to until you are 18. To craft your own decisions beforehand that, you need to be emancipated. To become emancipated, you own to convince a judge that you can financially support yourself and hold a sufficient education.
Can a woman legally rape a man?
Answers: Yes, nearby have be several cases which have be succesfully prosecuted.
One I remember from the early 1980's contained by the UK involved a couple who abducted a man and the wife raped him within a car as her husband be infertlie and she wanted to concieve.
There is a small gland within the male anus, which when stimulated can bring an involuntary erection - this is what they did. You should find the case down on the internet.
lady beside an under aged boy?duh!
guy put on drugs because crazy woman wanted a newborn... (i saw desperate housewives. you know bree's new husban 'orson's' and his matured crazy wife.)
whats with the thumbs down? i give a reasonable answer.
I ponder I remember a case where on earth a woman was charged and convicted near raping a man.
i think the man be a mormon missionary
This was within the seventies
Yes
if a woman forces her self upon a man it is rape.
in the eye's of the ruling a woman can't rape a man because a man can't have an involuntary erection.
Rape of males by females :-
Further information: Female on manly statutory rape
Women also can commit an act of rape near force or deception to bring in a man (or adolescent) engage within a non-consensual penetrative sexual act. According to Court TV's Crime Library, women commit going on for 10% of all sexual offenses and their misuse often involves their own child or children, which is incest. Several widely publicized cases of female-male statutory rape within the United States involved school teacher raping their teenage manly students under their consent. A recent example of this is that of Debra Lafave of Greco Middle School and her teenaged student.
Non statutory womanly on male rape:-
For more details on this topic, see Non statutory feminine on male rape.
Non statutory feminine on male rape is widely, but incorrectly, considered impossible because mannish erectile response is seen as voluntary, when, contained by fact, it is involuntary.[2] Though obsession, anger and anxiety, and non-arousal have be cited as factors within being see to obtain an erection.[3] Therefore, mannish victims of rape by females often obverse social, political, and legal double-standards.[4] Female rapists are usually see as less culpable than manly rapists by the courts due to these misunderstandings. In addition, mannish victims of female rape recurrently endure a double-bind because men are considered to other want sex with any woman which ability that female-on-male rape can be seen, by others, as consensual when surrounded by fact the feminine sexual predator uses coercion to commit the crime. In addition, since rape by females is much smaller quantity well set than male-female rape, male victims of womanly rapists often find little support from rape crisis centers.
Due to these reason, and the difficulties and comparative rarity of female on masculine rape compared to standard or statutory rape, it is likely one substantially under-reported in the United States
Not really, no.
PS: Funny press
Arn't we in an age where on earth we dont need money?
deplorably because of money the world is dying, capitalism is the new religion and i can`t bear itAnswers: Money in singular a medium of exchange and it is not dying. It is shifting shape. People use their credit cards and pay the credit card bills beside checks. The money owed is still calculated the same opening and is paid surrounded by different ways.
Your hatred of Capitalism is the problem. You enjoy mistaken Capitalism with greed. Although near is a large amount of greed within Capitalism, there are a few other things to it, such as paying a do price for raw materials and wages. This allows for inflation and the potential of others to buy your products.
Communism failed for a plea. That being the workers saw no reward for doing a better mission and quality control go out the window.
I am not wise saying Capitalism is perfect, but greed is a makeshift motivator for most people. You only just have to look out for your best interests.
Not at adjectives. Even though we are in an age of electronic transfers, etc...
Money will never evaporate. We will just move it within different ways
Actually we probably don't need the "physical" money anymore since we could of late compile money amounts in our explanation and pay for things through computers using a plastic card.
you are too right.
I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately money is our course of life and a necessity. It also fuels the evil greed inside us adjectives. Sucks.
yeah, unfortunatley whilst i sort of agree where you are coming from, i give attention to you may have lost your approach into some anti thoughts about the world.
whilst its great to own these views, near are still bills to pay at home and products to be bought which, believe it or not, ancestors enjoy.
for instance, i love mcdonalds, im going to disneyland, i love shopping sprees and im obedient at making money which leads me to enunciate, errr sorry mate, but money makes ones world shift round!!!!!!!!!!!
Please understand that doesn`t matter what things are like it can other be much much worse.
Without money we'd fall put a bet on onto the less effecient barter & trade discount. The world use to be worse you know, and everyone was poor.
Unfortunately we're nowhere implicit an age where we don't revolve around money. Ur right capitalism is taking over. Everything is nearly materialism, you need money for everything from childhood to food to technology and transport. Its so hard that things are so damn expensive very soon, it makes you worried nearly how are kids will survive.
In response to the previous post if we didn't have money we'd tip out into harder states, i don't feel thats necessarily true. If the worlds discount demand wasn't so giant with technology and strange laws we'd still know how to live as our parents did. Its like our parents and grandparents say-so...things were different support then. Capitalism have just made the world a more complex place.
What are you chitchat about? How do you expect society to function short some means of exchange? Try giving up adjectives your money and see how long you survive. If you do survive it will not be by your own virtue, but by mooching rotten others. Is there any uprightness in that? Also what make you think our age is any different? Primitive cultures traded only like we do, perchance they didn't have currency but it's equal concept. Why would you say Capitalism is the alien religion? That makes really no sense at all, capitalism isn't a hot idea. That's how our immensely sucessful economy have functioned for over 200 years. You say the world is dying because of money, but I ask you tell me how the world would survive minus it or some other means of exchange.
Human beings rely on eachother within order to survive. We inevitability help from other inhabitants but we also need to back other people within order to live. Money is a instrument of making sure that people transport back what they administer to society. In some cases, admittedly, the handling of money becomes unmerited but overall, it is a good item. So, NO, we are not in an age where on earth we don't need money until respectively and every human being is self-sufficient alone.
Will probably never come up, but I would like to see like peas in a pod concept as they have on Star Trek Next Generation. Everybody have all they requirement, no money involved. Our world has adequate of everything to go round!!!!
You must be tomfoolery.
Because of capitalism (Democracy if you like ) general public with money can do what they close to of people lacking it.
you are not living in the indisputable world,,,,,,,,,,,
Do you mean don't necessitate money or don't need currency?
The latter is almost true already - probably a great majority of any day's economic transactions are cashless transfers electronically.
As for money itself, it is simply a agency to allow individuals to have a shared standard for evaluating the effectiveness of like and unlike items and services, so that they can trade.
Not individual that, but the trades of agreed upon values can happen across time.
The solitary real alternative is to enjoy a barter economy where on earth you trade something tangible for something perceptible at a specific time and that is it. Kinda approaching cavemen I think :)
Wow! What world you living on?
Whats wrong w/ this guy?
i was driving home from work around 11:15pm and i stopped at red standard lamp ( a very long red light) and my brother texted me to articulate let him know when i get home (he always worries cuz my work is going threw alot of problems etc) i didn't course book him back only just closed my phonebut the guy beside me start hooking his horn waving his cell phone that be open and have the light on it on at me and yell i didn't put my window down cuz i be kinda scared
what is wrong w/ ppl??
contained by my state it isn't against the law to own your phone out or to be talking on it
Answers: Another silly creature who thinks the world is expected to revolve around them. Do not give it another thought and if anyone else does that a moment ago keep going and do not friendly your window.
Who know what he was doing. You can't trust me especially at darkness. People are people and I hold a feeling that it is going to grasp a lot worse. So,please be on the lookou.
SERIOUS QUESTIOn!!!!?
My school have made community service mandatory for some reason??? Im a senior and adjectives seniors have to complete 15 hours of community service contained by order to graduate!!!! In our Constitution the 13th Amendment Section 1, it say ''Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall hold been duly convicted, shall exist inside the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.".also when I tell some of my friends that dont step in indistinguishable school as I do nearly this they tell me '' Community service.MANDATORY???..thats the biggest malarkey I've ever heard of''...and other folks say like peas in a pod thing when I put in the picture them about this..EXCEPT IN PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME...it say in the constitution, but no senior ever comitted a crime...and as if singular my school make us do this.So my question is.Can I sew my academy for doing this??? Im a 90% average student Im not lazy to do the community service...Just asking TnkAnswers: Your university also has several courses they require that you take. Truancy law require that you attend school.There are no legally recognized or constitutional issues here. They are requiring you to participate surrounded by a civics class. Think of it as reality instruction as opposed to authenticity TV
You should 'sew' your school for your great schooling.
Look. They compel you to be in arts school, they can certainly compel you to do mandatory service.
In Ontario Canada kids enjoy to put in 40 hours of community service. It's so kids revise to give pay for to the community.
It's not evil or bad. Have you ever considered visit a vetrans hospital to help out?
How roughly a children's burn unit?
People own become selfish just about giving back.
Am I my brother's warden?
It is as constitutional as requiring you to take math or English.
It is also designed to in fact teach you something roughly speaking working with others on a squad and developing valuable "individuals skills" that you will need surrounded by the future.
It is disconsolate that you care so little going on for your community that you are looking for an excuse to get out of a couple of days of doing something worthwhile to be paid it better.
I was going to rob you to the club I will get within trouble if you a kid
Quick advice needed for desperate friend?
if a father have never been around not on the birth licence and the child is 6 what rights do he have and if my friend say he is not the father can he demand a dna testing what happens if she say no to her child having oneAnswers: A masculine has the right to ask for a DNA exam if he feels that he is the father of the child. A court will lay down her to have the DNA assessment on the child done. If proved that the child is his, he will probably (unless unfit) receive visitation rights, and will be required to pay child support. IF he can prove the mother as unfit afterwards there is a possibility that he could even procure custody of the child. Either way, adjectives he has to do, is step to either his attorney or the local welfare department (if she is receiving any type of governing body aid) and they will take trouble of getting the order for the experiment. Good luck.
seek officially recognized advice
where on earth has dad be for 6 years?
He can legally request a DNA exam if he is claiming to be the parent. Your friend won't have a choice within that!
The "father" should be required to pay child support... and pay for support for the previous 6 years... A "father" is something more than a sperm donor..
The father would have to apply to the court for parental responsibility (obtain rights as a father)...if the mother denies he is the father he will hold the right to request a DNA test...and if.the court will agrees to this the mother will enjoy no say unless she can prove to the court that the welfare of the child would be contained by danger
Once he have this he can apply for a contact order (rights to see the child) again she can reason but the court will want evidence as to why he should not be allowed
It can take a long time if she fight every order he requests from the court
What a nouns of garbage for answers you've get here!
If the couple weren't married at the time of birth, the father has no rights what so ever, he can apply for rights but more normally then not these will not be granted.
He cannot 'demand' a DNA examination as this would be deemed as an assault on the child.
I assume by the cross-question that the father is trying to make top, don't worry more or less it, after being not here all the child's energy, the courts would take a exceptionally dim view of any claim the father may preference to make, conspicuously as he's not named on the birth authorization.
More Questions and Answers:
[2384] - [499] - [637] - [313] - [1027] - [1818] - [2310] - [471] - [1435] - [1309] - [1727] - [1112] - [162] - [472] - [1884] - [1206] - [2458] - [1182] - [957] - [1654]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
