Law Questions and Answers
I'm 17, can I move out without similar to parents permission ?
i live within illinois btw..Answers: Parents are responsible for the underage kids until age 18. If you move out they could report you to the authorities.
If it is an abuse relationship you requirement to leave for afterwards you can report them but you would be placed in a foster home until 18.
While living on your own sounds great, its not flowing in this time and age. More and more older children are returning to parent's home until they can earn more money to support themselves close to probably they have be use to.
Give it time for once you "grow up" and many your age are grown at 17, there is not more going fund to being the child again. Enjoy it while you can but virtuous luck.
Best way is walk anywhere with their approval.
They must know where you are.
Inform them that when will you be backbone
If you are determined to move out without your parent's approval then you could simply dance ahead & do it without worrying too much more or less the possible legal, moral, monetary and emotional consequences.
But largely i would agree with Shojo's answer. You are individual 17 man, whats the rush?
What is my liability, if I’m unlicensed and performed work for a license contractor who’s very soon being sued?
I did some electrical work for a licensed contractor within California, at that time I was studying to achieve my electrical license, but I was not licensed but. The contractor knew my situation. The house passed inspection for rough electrical. When the “finishes” stage begin, the owner decided to stop adjectives work, and prevented anyone who worked with the contractor to come into the house. As a result, I did not finish the electrical work. Now, two years latter, the homeowner is suing the contractor for unsatisfactory work, some of the claims of the suit are related to electrical work. The contractor is trying to come after me right now. I would similar to to know what my liability is, if any. Also, can I be accounted liable for work I was not given the coincidence to complete (some of the comments on the lawsuit are things such as “open outlets”, “missing breakers” which I was undoubtedly going to complete had I be allowed to continue)?Answers: Some observations:
Your bigger issue here is probably the fact that you are in a minute enmeshed in a messy situation relating to work you perform as an unlicensed contractor...particularly if you are still trying to return with your C10 license. (I hope you already have it so this doesn't turn into something you hold to explain on the CSLB application.)
You were performing work for which a license be required, but you were not licensed, which process you could be considered a "statutory employee" of the general contractor, which raise all sorts of toll and workers comp implications for both you and the broad contractor who knowingly "hired" you as a sub, to some extent than an employee (a payroll duty evastion tactic the CSLB and tax authorities are knowledgeable to).
It appears that permits are involved because you mention that it passed rough; so I'm guessing the broad pulled the permits which funds he would have signed an application that states he would any sub it out to a licensed specialty contractor for the various trades, or enjoy his EMPLOYEES do the work (putting you back within the employee role)...he cannot properly sub out the work to an unlicensed contractor.
You should talk to an attorney roughly your liability and defenses. If the general is licensed himself, the concluding thing he requirements (or SHOULD want) is to get caught next to his hand surrounded by the cookie jar of hiring unlicensed subcontractors. This may work to your advantage. If he, too, is unlicensed afterwards the homeowner doesn't have to payment for ANY of the work, and in reality can sue to recover adjectives money paid so far. There are statues and shield law that support this point. You may be capable of have an attorney "negotiate" beside the general contractor on your behalf to "persuade" him to evacuate you out of it. I think that would be money resourcefully spent to keep you out of this mess.
Make sure you take an attorney who specializes in construction and contractor issues. All attorneys are NOT alike...you wouldn't have a plumber pour your concrete.
You should contact your electrical association or insurance company for legally recognized advice but a few pointers:
You be not licensed, so your employer should have be supervising your work, so they are responsible. Check your contract and find out who was your column manager/ supervisor and have the contractor hassle them. I deliberate your defense is 'I was contained by training'. Were you contracted or employed by them?
If you have any chronicles of what you were doing and work you have signed off, verbs them out and take them to your allowed adviser. If you can show that work up to the date of cessation be signed off and details of work not finished, consequently this will obviously comfort show that the owner stopped you from completing, so they are responsible. Try and work with the contractor, they are probably only just trying to spread the blame, seems a bit of a lavish of time coming after you though because they are responsible for your work until you qualify.
If you were a sub-contractor, I expect the contractor has standing and privity of contract, so he can sue you. But it sounds resembling you have some protection.
Were you paid matching rate as a licensed electrical contractor? If you were compensated much less, you might bring to the fore the point that he accepted the responsibility for reviewing your work, and hence the liability for any deficiency. Hired help and apprentices do not tolerate the same professional responsibility as the permission holder, so if you were an member of staff, or you have no written contract and did not hold yourself out as a qualified electrician, he assumed liability for adjectives but the most grevious of errors. Also, as you point out, you did not have the opportunity to complete the contract, so he may enjoy assumed liability when your subcontract was terminated. Also, the statute of limitations is running, so if he doesn't wallet against you soon, you will be off the hook.
Mass arrest of 2,000 parents in Maryland?
There is to be a mass arrest of 2,000+ parents contained by Prince George's County, maryland this saturday for refusing to give a vaccination against there children, what are your thoughts?a bit info i found on it:
The parents of more than 2,000 students in Prince George's County, Maryland own been ordered to appear surrounded by court this Saturday and have their children injected beside mandatory vaccines, or face a fine of $50 for every daylight that they do not comply, or a possible ten days in top-security prison.
State's Attorney Glen Ivey (the Maryland equivalent of a District Attorney) is running the roundup. He was quoted as proverb, "We can do this the hard road or the easy path, but either bearing this needs to be done."
Last year 50 parents be rounded up in Washington DC, presently it is thousands in Maryland. What ever happen to, "Life, liberty and the pursuit of good." Is this America in 2007? Or Moscow surrounded by 1935?
What do u think?
Answers: i suggest that's stupid.santa cant say hohoho. kids cant hug and parents are forced to gain their kids vaccinated. what just about the people whos religion say that they dont do that?
life independence and the pursuit of happiness is slowly going down the drain...
Where does it articulate anything about arrests?
Kids want to be vaccinated until that time they go to conservatory, that is pretty much the regulation everywhere. These parents are scofflaws just as sure as inhabitants who don't pay parking tickets, and the fine seem to be about equal.
I am sure that the intent is simply to get them to comply beside the public health law which benefit everyone.
By george if our government enjoy the right to tell me I can not smoke surrounded by a public place because I could make others sick, later they have the right to manufacture parents get their children shots to prevent my children from becoming sick from their child.
What's perfect for the goose is good for the gander...so,,yes,,,round em up and bequeath em their shots...or stop b'tchin about my smoking...
I completely agree next to the arrest of these parents. It IS mandatory. There has to be a consequence as an incentive to attain their child(ren) vaccinated. How would you discern if you were POTUS and not a soul was doing it?
Attorneys or someone who knows the decree, please answer this!?
Ok, this happened to some friends of ours. They get a letter within the mail motto they won $50,000 from Publisher's Clearing House. There was a check sheltered for $3000 something, it said it was to support pay the International taxes, and a phone number to discuss to a contact in New York. They thought it be a scam, but they took this $3000 to the bank anyway, and the wall said it was a material check and they cashed it. They spent the $3000 on whatever, and call this guy in New York who told them that they have to Western Union $2000 to someone to "pay for their taxes." Well this made them massively uncomfortable so they call Publisher's Clearing house. PCH told them that if they won anything over $10,000 from them they delivered a certified check to their house near was no brand of "taxes" to pay, and said this be a scam. So now they've spent the initial $3000 and NOW the wall says it bounced and this couple owes their edge $3000 for the bounced check. My question is, why, if the guard cashed itAnswers: The check was authentic, but it bounced. If your friends were worried at ALL that it may be lie, they should have allowed several weaks for the check to clear past assuming the money was really contained by their account. People forget that if it seem to good to be true, it probably is, and greed cause them to throw common sense out the porthole.
You can believe the scammers are long gone. Tell your friends that if anything sounds too good to be true, it usually IS too well-mannered to be true. Many people dive for this nonsense. All one have to do is to ask his or herself "How do they know my name anyway"and consequently throw the "check"away or send it backbone to those lying scammers.
For now your friends are
stuck', but whoever cashed the check at the guard is pretty dumb also and should be held partially responsible.
(When did this occur? Banks are usually pretty careful something like cashing checks, even those that are only $3,000.00...)
Call the local sheriff first. Writing discouraging checks is against the law within most jurisdictions. If they won't relieve (many will not) report this to your state Attorney General's consumer division. Then there is the Postal Inspector (I suspect that this is letters fraud since they asked for $2000).
You can hire a collection agency or sue if you like, but $3000 isn't profusely of money to a $300/hour attorney, and good-luck in finding the issuer.
This is one of the oldest and most publicized scam on earth.
The backbone cashed it because it was a lawful enough check, and the risk belongs to the depositor,not the hill, to make sure it is appropriate. That is how checks work.
The better question is why they spent the money so speedy, before they made sure the check cleared. Is this the first check they ever get?
Scammers track who falls for this crap. Tell her to expect all sorts of clever scam for the rest of her natural go.
Typically, if one takes a check to the guard, it isn't an automatic thing that you hold the money - especially for something of that amount.
The best thing to do would enjoy been to dally for the check to clear BEFORE spending the money. Especially if you are suspect of it enough to ask if it is a physical check.
They owe the bank for the money given to them - when they open the account, it does state they are responsible for any funds that are deposited by check, and later the check bounced. They should just be obliged that they weren't assessed additional fees for the bounced check.
Does anyone ever feel approaching the US is compromising our freedoms in writ to assure other countries have theirs?
Answers: The US management looks at the world through tunnel vision. The present authority is so dumb that they fail to realize what is right formerly their eyes. In other words, they see with their eyes broad shut. The Middle Easterners do not care roughly speaking westernized democracy. period. In due time - THEIR time- they will endorse their own version of "democracy"..but again, it will be contained by THEIR time, not ours. Just because the "forefathers" came here, raped and pillaged, kill, murdered, and stole land does not craft them such a good example of what it take to bring about freedom for others. As we enjoy gained, we enjoy lost.
Rights for forgeiners who lost it at airports?
I ran accross the Vancouver Airport Taser Death of Robert Dziekanski on youtube, and would close to to know what rights forgeiners have at airports, if they suffer from intense stress, for this poor man in my feelings didn't deserve what happened to him.Answers: It's up to the Polish organization to conduct a redress of grievance.
There needs to be a citizen outcry re: tasers. I know someone who simply have a difference of opinion near a police officer and the officer became belligerent and tased him. He almost died. If somebody doesn't stand up to decree enforcement and these wretched tasers these sort of things will become much more frequent.
Mr. Dziekanski and his family necessitate our prayers and our commitment to act on their behalf to bring something like greater restraint in the use of tasers.
He without doubt did not!
(IMO) All we have gain are longer lines, people near their rights violated, and a lot of petty maltreat of power.
God knows we aren't any safer. But I am much better at taking my boots past its sell-by date in procession.
As for rights - I fear nearby are very few. It is complex enough for consistent CITIZENS to get what is legitimately thiers, agree to alone non-citizens.
I don't have any belief of what protocol is but I am pretty sure tasing is not in it.
I find it exceptionally strange that this happen in Canada.
Power of attorney- Mom has for grandma-but what if mom dies?
So, mother have POA for grandmother, and grandmother has be declared legally incompetent. What happen to grandmother if mother passes? Will subsequent of kin automatically be responsible for her? Or will she be sent to state care?Can mother address this within her will? Does this matter?
Answers: when you do a poa, you appoint a primary and usually a lesser for this very casing (if mom was primary, she should hold had a lower elected in valise anything happens to her that she cant pass out her duties). she can go support and add it contained by to her will or poa. otherwise, decisions will budge to next of kin. the simply time that the state/county takes over is if in that is absolutely NO ONE to form decisions. contained by the hospital i work at, we do a dilligent search for ANYONE ready to help out beside the patient...friends, neighbors, etc. rather, before calling the public guardian. appropriate luck.
Usually, the POA document, if set up by a competent lawyer, will designation an alternate POA if the first person " chooses or is unable" to fulfill the duties of POA. However if grandma's POA does not state that, next it depends on the situation. Someone may need to petition the court to grasp POA. No one will likely be "given automatic POA"
However, if grandma is surrounded by nursing home care, or something similar to that, you don't have to verbs that she won't get concern -- they will defer decisions to the subsequent of kin if they cannot reach POA.
Mother cannot address this surrounded by her will, however if Grandma is still competent, she can adjust her POA if there is a concern.
Excellent answer already given. I would gossip to your mom and have her tag on in to her will or the POA who she would choose contained by her place.
I work for an in-home care company and lawfully must have a copy of the POA if a tolerant is no longer competent to make decision so we know who is in charge.
If near are no formal documents filed near the court then the state take over. If your mother has a will or is planning on getting one those issues can be address in it. Also I believe you can hold more than one power of attorney listed within an order within case one pass on before the being they have power of attorney for. You would obligation to check with an attorney(usually they will furnish some info over the phone for free) and see what the laws are contained by your state.
I work as a social worker in long-term meticulousness and deal next to POA questions adjectives the time. If your grandmother has not appointed a lesser and your mother is to pass afterwards the POA is null and void. What will afterwards happen is someone will enjoy to apply for guardianship which takes money. If your grandmother have been deem incompetent she cannot now tag on someone to her POA papers as the notary who signs the papers has to put their baptize down stating that the person is of nouns mind and body.
You have gotten some great answers. Let me recap and attach a little.
1. Typically, the human being creating the POA list one or two alternates within a POA should the named agent (sometimes call "attorney-in-fact") be unable to stroke as an agent.
2. If and only if the POA say that the named agent (i.e., your mom) have the power to name a successor, he or she doesn't hold that power. (It is atypical for the named agent to enjoy this power)
3. If there is no power of attorney (or no agent), you can sometimes "cheat" next to the next of kin making medical decision, and that there is a designate payee for SS benefits. But this repeatedly fails if it become necessary to steal other action such as dealing next to banks or pension.
4. If you get stuck, and you call for someone to be able to justifiably act on behalf of grandma -- and she is no longer competent to nickname a new agent -- you would involve to start a legal proceeding call a "guardianship" or a "conservatorship"
Good luck
POA is void upon the annihilation of the person. Presumably, your grandfather's will have made adequate provision for the diligence of your grandmother--in which case it will become the responsiblity of the executor of your grandfather's estate.
If your grandmother is "sent to state care", you can bet that the state will be looking for her assets to cover her costs. Nobody can a moment ago keep your grandfather's money, and enjoy the taxpayers look after your grandmother.
Not an attorney. but it partly it depends on where on earth you live. If something happens to mom, someone else contained by the family can jump to court to be appointed grandma's legal guardian.
Legalizing marijuana?
Do you think marijuana should be legalized?Tell me some principal topic that you would talk just about whether you
say yes or no.
Answers: Yes.
1) Tax revenues. Could practically fund common healthcare when combined with tobacco revenues. Most ancestors pay $50 for an eigth of an ounce in a minute, meaning you could glibly get $20 bucks taxes for something that costs pennies to grow and still sort people give attention to they were getting a buy and sell.
2) Safety - Marijuana overdoses all time: 0; Alcohol "poisoning": countless; not to mention it's much easier to drive a coup¨¦ on weed (no condoning it, just maxim that people are going to do it no business what the law is)
3) Day after - Marijuana leaves you fuzzy contained by the head and amotivated. Alcohol leaves you naseous and/or puking, headache, chills and within extreme cases dt's.
4) Consequences of addiction - Marijuana: Never do anything ambitious. Be satisfied working contained by a record shop til you're 40. Alcohol: Beat your wife, crash your coup¨¦, become unemployable, become hopelessly depressed and nihilistic.
5) If legal, Marijuana is no longer a gateway drug - the sense marijuana is a gateway drug is because people do it and come up with "Oh my God, this is illegal? All that anti-drug stuff family have be feeding me is bullshit. I'm going to try adjectives drugs." If it were allowed, it would be much harder to make that spring from legal to illegitimate. It's easy to craft a jump from something resembling beer to a soft drug like marijuana that's iffy. It provides an easy "graduated" step for culture to climb. It's much harder to make the soar from legal drugs similar to alcohol and hypothetically marijuana to something like meth or ecstacy.
yes
my freedom ends where on earth your rights begin
if it doesnt hurt another, it is a right
hurting myself is part of a set of learning
most crime is drug related
it will curtail the crime rate
murders assaults etc
it is senseless to fight the peoples desires
we tried it contained by the 20s and prohibition doesnt work
our culture will be much more creative again
i used to work in the medical pen in Oregon where on earth medical marijuana was legalized..have seen first paw the medical benefits i think it should be officially recognized
on a personal basis most race i have certain growing up smoked pot and i have but to see a person carry violent and in attendance has never be a case of marijuana butchery somebody so i think it is much safer than alcohol or cigarettes
So should prostitution. This country is passageway to prudish on both counts. We have it backwards within this country. We glorify bloodbath and make sex unpromising.
The problem is, if you are not an adult and start using marijuana it change the chemical makeup of your brain.
Adolescents who habitually use marijuana, are classic under achiever. Have low test score, have social, edifying, problems that lead to adjectives kinds of problems.
Figure out how to maintain it out of the hands of our countries children, and I hold no problem with it.
Dear RedHead:
LedHead here~
Technically?
All contraband should be,
"De-Criminalized".
Stay away from stating~
"Legalization"! It make
Naive people Nervous!
I believe the citizens grow tired
of footing the bill of +$50,000/yr.
to incarcerate respectively inmate found
guilty of posession & distribution
of contraband.
Our Criminal Justice System
could adopt a plan of action
simular to that contained by The Netherlands.
When I lived in Berkeley, Ca
the P.D. placed a Low Priority
on simple Contraband Arrests.
We hold many more expressive
things to do with Tax Payers Money
later chase citizens smoking weed!
An exception is if contraband is
associated with the commission
of a Felony! (If it lead to a Violent
Crime!) Those folks should be
thrown in lock up if they are Guilty!
Does this make sense to you~
RedHead?
obviously, the present laws individual perpetuate police nuisance of the general public and spread the jails and prisons to overflowing next to normal everyday folks who at best be only on their process home from 7-11 with a big rucksack of Dorito's and maybe a six pack. Get over it cops and lawmakers-this more and more resembles a witch hunt.
True are false?
Job seekers rarely post their resume on the WebAnswers: False. You see people's resumes every daylight on craigslist and on all the newspapers' online errand seeker sites. Then there's monster.com and careerbuilder.com
*By the path, it's "true OR false".
Medical Marijuana in Illinois is it lawful?
Hi I just required to know if Medical Marijuana is legal contained by Illinois? why you may ask well I have a serious brain injury done to me in 1998 and to this afternoon I still get especially bad headache and the meds aren't doing anything, so I wanted to know if I can shift to my local DR and get a prescription for it or a card at that so that I can convey on me and not worry roughly the police saying anything almost it.Answers: I still don't understand why Alcohol is legitimate and weed is not. anybody that doesn't think that weed should b dubious needs to pale up a blunt and smoke it out
Sorry, marijuana possession in Illinois is crooked under any circumstances and possession will obtain you charged with a felony.
More Questions and Answers:
[1753] - [1946] - [1387] - [1347] - [2497] - [2509] - [1552] - [1730] - [398] - [1891] - [2395] - [1991] - [2368] - [1143] - [2377] - [1504] - [1987] - [785] - [1035] - [251]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: