Law Questions and Answers

Appellate court jurisdiction?

May an appellate court ever reverse a trial court's findings, due to questions of reality, as opposed to grill

If during the trial, the evidence has be so minimal that could be omitted, could an appellate court reverse the decision of the trial one?
Answers: The above answer is incorrect. While some trial courts' proper determinations are not reviewable at the appellate level, explicitly not always the crust.

Appellate courts may reverse trial courts both based on sufficiency of the evidence, and, contained by some cases, on the bsais of de novo reviews of evidence.

However, both the jurisdiction and the specifics of any case will be the determining factor in whether the appellate court within which your case is held in reality can or will review factual findings at the trial court smooth.
Appellate courts never hear questions of certainty, nor do they determine the relevance of evidence. They only hear cases where on earth interpretation of the law is surrounded by question.

Would organised crime pretty much disappear if governments decriminalised drugs and prostitution?

Or is it funded surrounded by other ways as well?
Answers: I surmise the criminals would find something else that was crooked and not related to drugs or prostitution - such as guns.
You'll never stop organised crime.
It would hurt organized crime bigtime!

It would take a great deal of money out of the campaign funds too.

The Government could tariff the hell out of it and BE the "crime boss".
all crime would disappear is adjectives crimes were decriminalised

this is not a well-mannered argument for decriminalising though
Well if you decriminalised EVERYTHING then nearby would be a 0 crime rate. You can't just decriminalise things base solely on wanting to reduce your crime rate. The largest argument for legalising drugs is that if they're legal the rule can regulate them, tax them and monitor them - as very well as taking away the monopoly from criminal organisations.

A big amount of crime may dissappear - especially as mass producing drugs in factory would make them a great deal cheaper so less folks would have to turn to burglary to fund their habits. However you still catch the bad effects from race under the influence. The overall crime rate MAY shift down, but other crimes would go up.
Not at adjectives, they will just move onto something else, drugs and prostiution is antiquated school at the present time, it carries to abundant risks of getting caught for the gang running it.

Alot of groups are turning to credit card and bank justification fraud these days, beside everything electronic they can target victims in other countries making it harder to track the criminal down who could be based 1000's of miles away.
I don't consider it would disappear. There will always be society who will prey on the rest of society. I don't think that ejection the penalty and only throwing open adjectives the doors would really result in things convalescing.

Maybe organized crime would go into decree. All the drugs will result in lots of accident and problems and so everyone would be suing each other...so the mob could adjectives be lawyers. How would that adjectives be for a twisted society!

Seriously, though, org. crime would go into racketeering. They would travel into squeezing business owners for protection. They would get farther into politics. They would do anything they thought they had to do to hold on to money coming in.
this have always be a world problem think that a party should decide what he or she puts into ones body the problem is the human being that is doing the drugs other ends up hurting the people they love we the ethnic group always give the impression of being to abuse almost everything and anything including booze and those ladies of the hours of darkness has other been around the problem beside that is she would probably hop contained by bed with your honey after he brings you a great present of std

Since when is it illegal to drive next to your knees?

i was pulled over on the interstate and cited for immature operation! i am an experienced driver. i can drive with my knees...i am measured and i am not an idiot. I REPEAT...I'M NOT AN IDIOT. the mornings are busy times for me. i'm trying to make my call and i need my coffee (who doesn't) while taking my kids to daytime care. i hold been driving next to my knees for years! i think the cop should enjoy minded his own business! should i sue???
Answers: I don't see how he could possibly know you were driving beside your knees. Unless...he was looking at you driving, which technique he didn't have his eyes doing a tour. If he only glance, then he couldn't enjoy looked long enough, so he is apparently 'incorrect'. Its not like he's get a video tape.

Next time hold out him a donut, or some of your coffee. If its a girl cop, then ask if she requests to hold your baby...chicks a moment ago love babies.
Have you gone to court? Which state are you in? I will see if I can find anything surrounded by my state to answer your question. brb.
According to my statute see this statute NRS 484.377 (1)(a):
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-484.h...
Looks close to under this statute you are guilty and you should plea No Contest.
That's unexpected, How am I suppose to make phone call and eat if my hand have to be on the joystick ?

good piece I have my window tinted real muddy .
I have never hear of it being wicked you should go ahead and sue here behinds is not far if you are an experience driver and have other been driving that method I see no problem with it... If you where on earth able to bygone you driver test and gain your license why is there a problem... SUE, SUE, SUE !!!

Good Luck hope you win the valise...
Sounds like you stipulation to get on your knees and work this one stale with the officer.
I'm sure he will c*m to a better conclusion when adjectives is said and swallowed.
Sorry Sweetie, but they laid it all out to you surrounded by 1984 when you were busted for driving near your head out of the sunroof! That schedule INCLUDED no driving with your knees, and no letting the passenger (in the front seat) lean over and push the pedals beside his hands while you steer and paint your toenails.

Looking for property stolen from me by my ex husband! It was auctioned stale by a storage co w/out my knowledge.

I am looking for my property that be stolen by my ex that he put into storage up in Olympia, WA. It have been several years that this happened ago, but I've be looking ever since I found out he stole it all and consent to it go to auction. This happen sometime in 1996-1997.
There are tons family heirlooms and irreplacable photos. It includes childhood memorabilia, personilized items, ect...
Any assist in locating these things would be greatly appreciated. He also stole our daughters things and permit them go to auction too. (Baby book, pictures, inspired CPK's and other collectibles). My daughter would also be very glowing to see her stolen property again (she's 10). Maybe this year will be the year Santa answers our letters and we capture what we've been questioning years for.
Answers: Good luck in that prod!
But you should have be a little proactive at that time instead of presently being reactive to claiming your items
Unless the baulk is easily identifiable you don't enjoy any recourse. I would let this one stir . . .

Why because the Canoe couple sons want lawyers are they presumed guilty?

Is it not true that if you are innocent you enjoy MORE need for a attorney before conversation to police, in satchel they are corrupt? If you ARE obviously guilty, later dont you have smaller quantity need for legal representative because the chances are you will be found guilty anyway?
Answers: They hold lawyers, because the police - as usual - will try to stitch them up.
oh god is this the start of another mcgann series of question?

Online privacy-Laws???

Should the law intervene to protect online privacy and wellbeing? Is self-regulation by industry sufficient?
Answers: Another exam question...

What am i allowed to do as a bounty hunter on arresting someone and what does it pay?


Answers: The powers of a bounty hunter depend on the state surrounded by which he/she is operating. Some states strictly regulate bounty hunters and others pretty much allow open season.

Generally speaking, bounty hunters are authorized to give somebody a lift a person for whom here is an arrest warrant into custody and deliver him/her to the court that issued the warrant or to the nearest law enforcement agency.

Pay is a issue for negotiation between the bounty hunter and the surety company that is lawfully responsible for the bond. My understanding is that, in general, it is a commission based on the amount of the bond.
Bounty hunter law vary HUGELY from State to State. Some States hold strict licensing and training requirements, some enjoy none at all.

Some bounty hunters are remunerated employees of a specific bondsman, but most hold earnings that depend entirely on how well brought-up they are. A typical bounty will be 15% - 20% of the outstanding bail, but it's higher for small bail amounts, or if the skip is set to be out of state or is getting close to the forfeiture date.

It's all nearly negotiating. If a bonsdman have $500,000 riding on a fugitive, his forfeit date is a week away, and you know where the guy is but no-one else does.. ka-CHING$$$

Richard

Ive been ripped stale by my employer ( Davis bacon act )?

I worked for a roofing employer for 5 yrs out of that 2.5 yrs I worked or job where the davis bacon exploit applied,in witch the employer deduct 500 pur 40 hr week for a retirement plan . I've quit 2 yrs ago and no money. where did it be in motion and how to get it wager on. can i sue? if so any lawyers out within that specialize in this? Employer is within legal trouble presently for pay,duty and 401k issues. Other employes have quit around matching time and have be paid but not me and I worked near the longest.
Answers: First of all, an attorney may not thieve the case unless you pay envelope he/she to litigate this claim. Reason being is the company is going underneath and a lawyer wouldn't know how to get their money...SO, contingency fees is not applicable at this time.

Now, contact the Department of Labor ( wage and hour division ) contained by your state. Ask the DOL to send you a complaint form via usps. Fill out the total paper, sign and date and transport it back promptly. The DOL will assign you a Compliance Officer for this claim.

In the meantime, pick up the phone book and find an " investment firm, example: Edward Jones and associates "
contact them and tell them you hold a retirement plan through your old company and would close to to roll it over. The investment firm will contact the employer and try to get your money. ( The just downfall is that you will have to turn another year without your money, but you will attain it. If you don't roll it, you may not get it, plus it accrue interest ) The only pitfall is here will be a 30% tax for rash withdrawal plus an auxiliary 10% penalty at import tax time.

You must decide and take action quickly b/c the company may be staying affloat today but may sink tomorrow.

Seems resembling you and I have a stride in indistinguishable boat ! Good Luck

Follow up with the PA dol. Ask to speak beside your Compliance Officer they issued to you. Be blunt with them and detail them you demand something be done...recount them if it came out of his/her pocket...they would've already have there money. To be honest, you may closing up hiring an attorney and suing your previous employer. I swear, I'm getting to hate working for these type of companies myself! They run a fly by night system. I lately worked for a company that took 8543.31 in three months for insurance. I wasn't covered underneath any insurance and then when I did after 90 days., I be covered for 13 day's and my insurance was after cancelled. I'm in the middle of impossible to tell apart as you right now. Good Luck.
not sure more or less the law surrounding it..but your boss is a meanie.

=][=
Try file a complaint with America's Worst Employers at

http://www.AmericasWorstEmployers.org

I have a similar matter and will be file a complaint there as powerfully.Good Luck

If I killed someone...?

For molesting me, should I budge to jail?

I'm tlaking nearly revenge too.
Not defending myself.
Answers: yes, because you need to be the bigger entity and just tramp away from it... move if you have to... basically don't ruin the rest of your life for some petty revenge.. after you'll be as worse off as he is... believe me his time WILL come! (if it hasn't however already) be strong and go procure some counseling! i believe you can do it... ;-)
yes

he should have gone to send down first.

then you second...
...
While seeking revenge, verbs two graves - one for yourself. ~Doug Horton
Yes. That's vigilantism.

I have no problem beside self-defense. If someone's doing that to you, kill them.

The entry is that once its done, its the job of the authorities to operate with. They enjoy the right and responsibility to punish the guilty.
shouldn't..
but would.
sorry.xx
yes rogue justive is not legal!

although self support you to try and get a lighter sentence
Yes, you should dance to jail.
If it be out of defense, then you'd own a case.
Pure revenge does not equal bloodbath someone.
Should you or will you?
No and yes.
I don't know if you should be,but you will most definitely be contained by jail.
it really depends on the charge, what plea you whip and it you take it to trial, it is up to the jury.
yeah not a soul has the right to whip a life no event how much the person may deserve it...

so yeah you'd turn to jail
Yes. Murder is never okay. Have your morning in court against the human being who molested you. Make them go to lock away to pay for what they did to you. Murder is never the answer.

Can littlewoods hold my mom responsible for someones elses debt?

cut a long story short

my moms friend bought a pc from littlewoods through her as she is a littlewoods agent

he have now done a runner for a remaining lb500 debt, littlewoods hold said because they cant trace him my mom is now responsible for his debt he have left the computer but littlewoods dont want it spinal column (1yr old now)

can they do this does my mom hold any rights
please help
Answers: Depends. If she sold it to him on behalf of Littlewoods, and as stated above, he passed adjectives the checks, then I would see, yes.

If she bought it for him, in her nickname, then no. The same would apply if she did not apply adjectives of any checks that they needed to carry out.

She can contact the Citizens proposal bureau http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/index/g... or if she a member of a trade federation, get them to relieve her.
It will depend on the contract she has near Littlewoods as an agent.

Off the top of my head, it is unlikely that Littlewoods can hold your mother responsible unless it can be shown that she should hold refused this human being credit in the first place. However, if the contract states that your mother's role as agent is to be ultimately responsible for such debts and she have continued in business beside this knowledge, next she will have to wages it.

Get the contract out and it should be fairly plain who is liable for the debt, but if it is not, take it to the citizens direction centre and ask if they can relieve clear up the issue.

Of course, if the computer was bought on your mother's justification on behalf of the friend, rather than through acting as an formal agent, then the debt is hers and she have to chalk it up to experience.

You could always flog the computer on ebay and verbs some of the money.
Im afraid they can. The debt belongs to your mum if the account is within her name only/..

Unless she in fact provided his details as a customer when she ordered?

Tell her to contact Littlewoods Head office and ask for help out.if the head organization arent prepared to budge on it then she should grant a small weekly instalment off the debt.utter lb1 per week
legally, yes. It's you moms statement and therefore she is liable for debt.

There are 2 contracts here. Your moms next to Littlewoods..that stands so liable.
The absconders debt with your mother, that also stands.

However, you mom have a case against the party who has done a runner, and can pursue this through the small claims court.

Littlewoods are disgracefully bad for customer complaints of this disposition.

Advise your mom to make an appointment next to the CAB and they can make a report and write to Littlewoods or phone. This keeps a register for any future proceedings, doesn`t matter what they may be.

Littlewoods also take customers to the county court hugely easily and deal in debts on. Then things really get messy.

Please find some legal suggestion on this from CAB.
Keep a record of adjectives correspondance in baggage this does get as far as the county court, when your mom can present the evidence to the trendsetter. Courts are a lot more kindly than Bailiffs. Hopefully it will not get that far.


Good Luck

More Questions and Answers:
[1199] - [901] - [780] - [180] - [1391] - [2415] - [1204] - [429] - [108] - [418] - [2537] - [865] - [17] - [1037] - [140] - [308] - [818] - [1071] - [2416] - [2541]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: