Law Questions and Answers

Why havent my lawyer's firm file all the same?

i have a grip pending and everytime i yak to them they say that they are going to directory but never do. they have be saying this for months. what could be the problem why havent they file? i dont think my suitcase is getting enough attention. What do you come up with it is? please help?
Answers: You own to know what is the Statute of Limitations on your case. If the Statute runs two years from immediately, there is not much you can do to build a fire lower than your attorney.

If the Statute is approaching soon, put your attorney on written notice that he must record by the appropriate date. If he does not, you can sue your attorney.
The lawyer's failure to progress your suitcase indicates that you need a different lawyer. If the grip is a good one, it will be jammy to find a new legal representative. Simply find a new attorney and hold him take over the business. This goes on adjectives the time.

Why did former Canadian Prime Minister take CASH take-home pay as a lobbyist, kept in deposit boxes, beside NO invoices?!?

Former Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney is asking Canadians to believe is that he ... a renowned lawyer and a sophisticated, worldly man ... be na"ive enough to whip cash, put it contained by deposit boxes, keep no proof of his work, own no invoices for his services or expenses, and think that adjectives this was usual and ethical. Good luck with THAT story Brian.

Mulroney admit that he was still an MP when he took his first envelope, packed with $75,000 within cash, from Karlheinz Schreiber contained by 1993. He later took two other brass payments for a total of $225,000. This was a retainer charge, he said, to lobby foreign governments to buy peacekeeping armoured vehicle from Thyssen. He said he put the money in safety-deposit boxes contained by Montreal and New York, not in a hill.

A parliamentary ethics committee beneficiary replied that people usually do that to pelt money, avoid taxes, or both.

Mulroney said he had no contract near Schreiber, no receipts, no invoices, no accounting sheets for his expenses and no written reports on the work that he said took him to Russia, China, Europe and the U.S.

Former MP (member of parliament) and PM (former Prime Minister of Canada) Brian Mulroney claimed that Schreiber was the ONLY client beside whom he functioned in this bearing, as a lobbyist with the federal govenment, after his public service work was over.
Answers: I enjoy a great respect for Canada, however, son, your politicians are just 'chips sour the old block' when it comes to ACCEPTING BRIBES --oopppps I AM SORRY, I MEANT 'cash deal, political campaign comtributions !!!
YOU NEED ONLY LOOK AT HOW, WHO, WHEN, & WHERE THE PROGRAM CAME FROM, to infer the 'cash' condition.
No honest person go into politics; or if they do, they don't remain honest for long. They get remunerated for *talking.* Note the fact that most politicians are lawyer, they are used to manipulating the law for their own gain.

And you expect them to be honest about money??
possibly Love(God) of $
In $ they (law ppl) trust.

We trust in His Grace.
Grace is sufficient.

Grace --> Mercy --> Peace next to you all. Amen.
the answer is perceptible

Do you think it is wrong to execute a potential apposite person?

To execute a murderer who say all the time(8 years) sorry for the things he have done is not right?
Because the murderer can turn into a good soul and if you execute them you would kill a potential correct person and to be exact wrong because the murderer killed a moral person(Victim)
Answers: It is wrong to execute anybody..who are we to say that a man should die for his crimes? Remember apparently god made us adjectives equal so it is his job to regard as being not a fellow human being's.
No, everyone has the potential to be dutiful.

Destory all monsters.
It depends on how brutal his crime be.

If he is a potential good party, then I do believe it would be wrong to slaughter him.
Just because he says he's sorry, it doesn't penny-pinching he is.

It really depends on the crime. Was it premeditated murder? Probably was if he's on departure row. If somebody has the facility to plan out a murder and follow through with it once, they own the ability to do it again and are not a well brought-up person.

If it be a crime of passion, where on earth, say, his wife be getting it on with the mailman and he walk in and kill them both, then hey, crap happen and then I discern bad for the guy.
This adjectives depends on why and how we punish people. If we punish inhabitants for what they done, then it doesn't concern that this criminal is sorry or even changed.

But if our system is not a PUNITIVE just REHAB system, consequently the criminal should be set free once rehabilitated. Our system is somewhere in the middle. We convey criminal to jail / prison for crimes done. But we reward them for "honourable behavior" and early release when the human being seem to be no threat to the society. But after there are correct crimes so heinous, that we (the society) feel must never be forgiven (like multiple murders). And the society feel that even letting the murderer live out their life surrounded by prison is still too much reward.

Think of it this way - nearby are many rapist who are NOT serial rapist. So given after the first rape, the non serial rapist will NEVER do it again, should the rapist be set free? Of course not.

So this individual you mentioned is NOT being executed for human being a bad individual. He is being punished for the crime (no concern what he has become).
===
One writer below say that if a person is forgiven by God he should be forgiven by man. I am also a Christian but this is a wrong apprehension of the Bible. Jesus did NOT free the thief on the cross who be being executed beside him (even though one of them believed). Jesus also said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's". That was said contained by the context of the tax but it applies to other parts of our social responsibility.


Good Luck (and upright question).

P.S. This isn't necessarily what I believe. This is what was explain to me once by a attorney.
You execute someone for their crimes not if their good or not.

How do you receive it right for killing someones daughter after raping her?
How do you be paid it right for taking away a childish boy's mother.
How do you make it right for taking a husband away from a childish mother?
How do you make it right for slaughtering an elderly couple because they are hoary?


You keep truism "potential" good being. why? Potential means that they may be some light of day? If a person murders later that is a certainty not a potential. Locally, we had a woman name Lisa Montgomery. She drove 200 miles, murdered a young pregnant woman, and cut the infant from her stomach. The baby be rescued two days later and she is fine. This woman have been planning this for a few months. She have told everyone she was pregnant, have made fake sonograms, and gain weight. She have been within contact with the young-looking woman on the internet but the woman got spooked. So Lisa created a exotic identity on the net and be able to bump into this woman again on the net and get her physical address. She died 3 weeks before she be to deliver. Should Lisa not be executed because she could POTENTIALLY repent in a few years? You cause the call.
Well, if he said he be sorry that is different.
If he would own said that at the trial they could have freshly let him jump home!!
I think that state sanctioned execution is wrong. I muse way too tons people hold been murdered by the state already. Regardless of whether or not they are guilty or a "accurate person", I think if you are repentant and believe contained by Jesus, you are forgiven. If God will not make you suffer, why should man.

I am not proverb this without ease. My father has 3 existence sentences. I know the pain, but I forgive everyone and everything. I honestly surface that if you are truly sorry, and the family have forgiven you and you have be Saved, no matter what happen to you, you will be okay.

The death cost is WRONG!!!!!!
An Eye for an Eye, A Tooth for a Tooth.
Do on to others as You would have them do on to you.
This Say's it adjectives, The victim isn't competent to kill this personage back, so presently someone else has to execute them and to me that still leaves a object, The Executioner!
if you take another time, truly by accident later you should not lose your life for that mistake...contained by any other instance, you take a go, you loose yours.

Ireland question. why is ireland more expensive.?

Please aid. why is ireland so much more to buy things such as cars groceries etc.
why are cars in uk much cheaper than ireland. why is the vrt still payable.why do vehicle dealers never put the price on here cars. whats the story here.
since the euro, everything is hiked up.I bought some clothes and on the price lable in euros ireland have a hiked up price than spains price in euros.
I conjecture irish people are man ripped off.
anyone else infer the same.
Answers: No, it is the Irish ethnic group who are doing the ripping off. They hold never had it so correct.
Ireland = Island
Transport costs
We have a greater VAT rate than the UK does, we're have a 21% rate compared to the UK (is it 17%??)- this make everything you buy more expensive.
Also, the taxes on new cars (VRT) is better, much higher.
The honest news is that a litre of Petrol or Diesel is profusely cheaper than in the UK, currently in the region of 1.20 Euro.

And yes, the country has earn the name ROI - Rip-off Ireland.
Business is business.

If relations will pay it, later the price is reasonable.

I am living within Japan at the moment, so I can relate to a discrepancy of costs.
Blame the Brits.

Why does Sheriff Joe of Arizona have to save from harm his actions?

He is salaried to do his job and he apparently is doing it relatively
effectively to get national attention, don't you consider?
Answers: He shouldn't.
Sheriff Joe for President!!! Finally, someone who is doing something about Criminals and Illegal Aliens.
Sheriff Joe have my vote!
some locals don't like his attitude and are determined to 'bring him down'
they might close to what he is doing just not the mode he does it
welcome to politics
We have a Sheriff in Florida that give prisoners their basics and he come under fire too. No one required to add taxes for more room contained by the jail so he set up a "tent city".

Is Britain losing its way? only just we have have numerous stupid rules employed that would have cause a riot

20 years ago. Imagine primary schools not have a nativity play, pantomimes not allowed to throw sweets for kids to scramble for, fun it is call. Police being taken to court on robustness and safety issues. A system that has removed itself from unsophisticated common sense decision and appears to run with anything they believe is the flavour of he moment simply to curry favour beside the population.
What daft things do you think have been made compulsory by this shower over the closing 10 years of government?
Answers: Your grill makes no sense. Britain isnt losing its track, there is no "way". These are adjectives seperate issues. if you want kids to have a nativity play afterwards send them to a religious conviction based institution, or have one at home. Schools that own dropped nativity plays "might" be trying to avoid making non christian children feel overwhelmed beside someone elses religious views, i close-fisted they are kids. Health and safety may engineer enforcing the canon more difficult but too many cases hold come up where officer of the law own exhibited incompetance or even corruption, so maybe have them follow procedure isnt so bad within the long run and the government merely want to stay in power and will read aloud anything. Most of what they say is any a outright lie or information to misdirect your attention. This is not a undeclared, its a glaringly deliberate fact we adjectives know.
It is as though there is a 'fifth column' working from inside to
push us all to the confines of going ga-ga.and confused.
Pantomimes cannot throw sweets into the audience lest it maims and kill.
It's not just Britain. The same craps going on within the States.

Our schools here can't even own a "Christmas break" any more - it's a "Winter break" so as not to offend non-Christians.

There's even a lawsuit be filed to try to force the State of California to remove crosses from the seal of all cities.

Many of the cities contained by CA started life as Catholic mission outposts, and these cities - such as Los Angeles, San Jose, San Francisco etc - own city seals that imitate this historical reality - but the anti-church groups want them removed.

Richard
Parents not one allowed to take photos at university plays because they might be perverts. (Even though official college photos are available from the photographer for general purchase.)

Trying to forbid imperial measurements from anyone present on packaging and force product sizes to tuning to fit metric standards (eg must be sold in partly kilos, rather than 450g/225g which is roughly equivalent to 1/1.5lbs) Luckily that one fell through, but it get too close for comfort!

Changing fire extinguishers to all red beside the type written on, rather than using the infirm colour codes - with a smaller amount and fewer English speakers within the UK, this is ridiculous. Also in darkness/smoke and madness how are u supposed to read it?

I might come back following if I think of some more.
Successive government have have us walking down the yellow brick road, cobblestone with gold ingots they would have us believe,
we survived for over two thousand years beside just a small needed immigrant populating ,working near Europe,
then some twats or other contracted to form the common flea market and then the EU, consequently the British twats decided short a referendum that we needed to be in the middle of this diarrhoea concoction of second rate toss--p-ts who couldn't agree on the colour of sh-te,
and Britain be mortally wounded, England is dying in front of our eyes Wales and Ireland will follow, Scotland may gain Independence and hold on for a bit longer,
adjectives sense is a no no word, your question drops hints of the truth, this country will not integrate or integrate we will be out-breed by our middle eastern Asian Islamic guests helped by the father smaller number delinquents that roam contained by gangs and appropriate over the streets at night,

God stockpile us the politicians wont.

I stand corrected, what i should have said is that Ted Heath back heavily by the tabloid press, lied through his back teeth roughly the virtues of joining the EEC and tricked a very ill-informed and gullible British public into reluctantly finance him, thanks PH for your polite correction
bonee hit and miss Mon Ami, korky.
hang on Tony Blair taking us to period of war with Iraq be hardly the flavour of the moment be it.
can you explain why this government does not own common sense, i surmise your just going beside the flavour of the moment and jumping on the decoration waggon. give us the facts to support up what you say not nouns bites
Fascinating and irritating isn't it, this headlong insistence on "political correctness" which seem to sweep all adjectives sense before it. Personally, I'd similar to to know two things:

a] What has it to do near politics?

b] Who says what's correct?

We hold some Muslim friends, very devout, who are disappointed at the local school's insistence on effectively outlawing reference to Christmas - they vote it takes some trickery away from the season for the little children, including theirs.

Mind you, we recently have a newly elected councillor, a pushy woman of adamant opinion, who wanted the council to rename manholes as "operative access apertures". She get shouted down by the entire remainder of the council who effectively told her not to be so damned silly. She wasn't re-elected.

Then, when you buy a new kettle and it comes next to a label stuck on it which say "Caution - may become hot in use" . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HGzo313j...

Con-Compete Employment Agreement?

I have a non-compete employment agreement next to my current company for which I have worked for days gone by 4 years. The agreement only covers the city and surrounding nouns, of the office that I work contained by. Recently the company has contracted to sell the bureau to another individual that will be changing the company autograph and become the sole owner of the business. My question is: Is my employment agreement / non-compete transferable to the different company?
Answers: you need to speak beside your HR department about your non-compete clause surrounded by your employment agreement. I don't think it will verbs. Every time, this has happen to me more than once, we had to riddle out new paperwork once the company be bought out.
You could ask the current owner. When sold, the new owner may transformation the way things are done and require tentative paperwork to be signed by all the workers.

Is there a different min. wage for minors?

A 14 year weak bagger should be making min. @ 7.15/hr shouldnt they or is there a different wage for them? She get paid 5.85 an hour.
Answers: In Michigan, employer are required to pay 85% of the minimum wage to organization under the age of 18. However, 5.85 is a low number, and it should in actuality be $6.08 (85% of 7.15)
there are different wages remunerated to minors this website gives you answers to question about minors person employed in Michigan.
Michigan dept of labor & monetary growth:
http://www.michigan.gov/dleg/0,1607,7-15...
max wage to start out is 5.85 thats y i am only starting out as that

What do u think nof my essay relief changing?

How would you discern of you were within a public place with pubescent that had committed a serious crime. Who at any moment could verbs out a knife an shoot you, or pull into a foggy corner and rape you, but they were simply tried in juvenile court. Uncomfortable right? Wouldn’t you grain much better if teenagers that committed serious crimes were tried as adults surrounded by cases like murder, sexual irritation and hate crimes. Would you want them to carry off glib. Young offenders infer that they can get bad easy because they are eighteen or younger and would solitary be tried a juvenile delinquent. Right now the California imperative says that teens between the age’s of fourteen to eighteen can be tried as adults but it is up to the pass judgment and/or attorney.
If teens are surrounded by crimes they are most likely to commit crimes themselves and play a part it. Statistics show that teens growing up in home or nouns with severity they will grow up and become violent most of the time. Lets read out Bobby gets a hold of gun and
Answers: If this is an essay answer, stop asking question. Rephrase these into statements. It is okay to ask a question at the formation, but you go too far.

Next, I believe you are over generalize a bit. The tone of your essay is clear; violent teens should be treated more roughly. However, I think you could include within your answer some of the reasons why children are treated similar to children in the courts. I have a sneaking suspicion that that you will find that there are far more one time offender in the courts than furious offenders. Like KS (where I live) several states do not consider juvenile cases to be true criminal cases. They are in reality civil cases. The offender is not given indistinguishable rights as an adult. That is unless they are tried as an grown. So unless we as a society are ready to tender children their full rights (including jury trials), then we will verbs to start small (juvenile court) and then move to the big time.

Finally, don't use cliches. If your closing paragraph is you last paragraph, the enunciate so. Do not say "later but not least". Say, "finally" or "in conclusion" or something else. It is impeccably fine to arrange your paragraphs contained by a list, similar to first, second, third and so on. Then complete your essay with a solid conclusion.

Good luck
You own several spelling mistakes, left out words and the withdrawal of proper punctuation...
You also need to put it surrounded by proper paragraphs.

you are asking too masses questions and not answering them or supporting them...much more detail is needed..
Your facts are wrong. Most states have law that call for teenagers to be tried as adults within serious matters such as rape and murder. 18 is cinsidered the officially recognized age for purposes of criminal prosecution, but murder and other violent crimes enjoy special treatments. Age 25 does not expunge records, and within fact, juvenile documentation are not expunged. Re-read your essay to be sure you are using complete sentnces and punctuating properly. In the first sentence, for instance, you use the word teenager in need the article a. It should read "with a teenager", not "beside teenager". The second sentence is really a continuation of the first. Who, in this satchel extends the first sentence. It does not start a new thought.

Finders keepers tenet?

I just read give or take a few the 182,000 found in wall.Now adjectives of sudden theres a finders keepers canon?excuse me but last week a woman found a huge diamond surrounded by parking lot and took it to pawn shop and get arrested??charged with noble theft?how is this different ?because I would right to be heard if its in someones wall of their home its theirs.
Answers: There's other been those sort of law but they vary from state to state. Usually its a valise where you are supposed to put it surrounded by the newspaper that you found it, for ex "undisclosed amount of money found within wall in west element of town, call to identify" or something. Then if nobody responds within 2 weeks or whatever the statute states than you can keep it.

So that woman with the diamond should've turned it surrounded by, waited, afterwards pawned it. Or she should've gone to a jewelry shop. You trade in diamonds you're just gonna return with ripped off. :P
Open to interpertation and that's what this is adjectives about..but I agree beside you; Only difference is that apparently the homeowner didn't actually "Own" the money any.

I'l try and find the rightful owner and if not available, split it between the 2; found money after adjectives
I believe you have to report what ever you found, and they own 30-90 days to claim it, laws may severely state to state. If you were to find a massive sum of cash and pocket it, you would be fine as long as you cleaned all the money and wipe the finger prints sour. In the case of the woman finding the diamond ring, she shouldn't hold sold it. She should have newly kept it had home, wipe finger prints off, and continue at least five years or past the statue of limitations are up before selling it.

More Questions and Answers:
[1153] - [684] - [1868] - [1358] - [1866] - [2124] - [2355] - [2364] - [1620] - [1861] - [1223] - [1513] - [1619] - [1793] - [1813] - [627] - [1094] - [1097] - [404] - [831]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: