Law Questions and Answers
Does freedom of speech occur contained by America?
Answers: Sometimes, but you have to pay attention what you say.
Of course and here is why:
Amendment 1
Congress shall net no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the race peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Although I notice it say nothing going on for "Executive Orders" :(
Are wills printed on legal sized daily?
an odd cross-examine. i'm in show school and shooting a movie this weekend. are ultimate wills and testaments commonly printed out on legal size newspaper, or standared 8 and half by 11? in attendance will be a "prop" will sitting on the table ... i.e. a cover page, and 90 blank pages beneath it. any info on what would info would be on the cover page would be productive too. Thanks!!Answers: If you want to make the will look "legal" for your prop, print it on notification or legal sized serious newspaper, cotton bonded, with an "behind the times school" font header that states: "Last Will and Testament of ________".
Staple the will across the top. Just put regular font and text below the title and a place to initial on the bottom right side footer next to a page number.
Letter size paper 81/2 by 11. At least possible in this era.
There really isn't a cover sheet, it have a title "Last Will of "Name "" and then the actual will starts.
Although individual one person get it exactly correct, for your situation, there is NO correct answer.
how a will is written within your film depends entirely on the state within which the plot occurs, the circumstances of the group writing the will and a host of other things we don't know.
if your film is in the region of a bum who leaves Millions to his children and the will was written contained by Texas, then it is rather plausible to have it written on the backbone of a soup can label and within ink with two of his 'buddies' as witnesses.
If your motion picture is about Park Avenue, afterwards it would be more germain to the story to have the will prepared on legally recognized paper near blue covering and executed as per the Probate code of New York.
For purposes of a film, you could print it on legal-size rag, but most law firms today are opt for 8 1/2" X 11" . Another thing that make a Will distinguishable from any other document (at first glance) is two red lines, close together, along the left border and one red line along the right outside edge of the pages. The blue "cover" others are chitchat about is habitually called a "blue-back" or "approval sheet" in court circles. In a Will, about partially and inch of it is folded over the top of the document and stapled there near three staples along the top. Of course, the words "Last Will and Testament" should be prominently displayed as a title on the first page, above the text of the Will. Those words should also be displayed on the blue-back. If you fold the document and blue-back within three sections similar to a brochure, the words "Last Will & Testament" would be displayed in the middle third of the middle fold (landscape mode). Hope this help! Good luck with your show!
Is my son entitled to any money from his deceased father estate (UK)?
My son is 17 his father (my ex husband) was kill by a vehicle whilst on holiday in the USA 3 and partially years ago. my ex husband re married and adopted her son and have a child together with this woman.What i am asking if any insurances be paid out to his existing familial upon his death is my son entitled to proceed beside a claim for a share of it .. and if so how long would he have to claim.
Answers: If his father programmed him as a beneficiary in his will or contained by the insurance, then he can directory a claim. If not, then in that is nothing to do.
yes
your son is rightfully entitled to one third of your husbands assets. tell him to claim thru a worthy lawyer!
virtuous luck oh and claim as soon as possible
It all depends on the will ... if he is not name then no
If in attendance is no will then you can collide but i am sure that there is a time on contesting
Yes, unless he be written out of any will that was written and adjectives the estate is given to other people.
If no will is written, blood children do find a certain percentage.
The adopt son doesnt get a penny unless he be written into the will or your ex husband specifically took over in ruling the responsabilities of the father, which isnt the same as commonplace adoption.
Speak to a solicitor.
You seem to be asking specifically going on for insurance payouts - and the answer is that generally the payouts form chunk of the estate unless they are made out to named beneficiaries.
I'd disagree beside previous posters as regards the will/ no will issue - your son will ONLY hold a claim if he is named surrounded by a will. If there be NO will, then ancestors are telling you blood children hold a claim - that is UNTRUE - adjectives the benefit oes to the next of kin (the unusual wife). there is no claim for your son.
It depends upon what his will said. if in that is no will the rules of intestacy apply and your son may well enjoy an entitlement.
If there is a will and your son is gone out, I would not try to contest the will because it may well cost more than the benefit received . Leave that bit to those near very vast pockets
My father died without a will and as he and my mother be not married we were told that everything he have went to his "legitimate" daughters from his marriage ceremony to his wife (who he left beside be with my mum).
Not sure if this be correct or not. The stucking point with us seem to be that my brother and I were "illegitimate" whereas his other daughters be born in married state.
If there is no will the spouse get everything, hopefully she will realise it is only reasonable to give your son a percentage when she dies.
Update - Can you walk out of a store minus them checking your reciept?
Yesterday I bought a $200 Vacuum cleaner at walmartthere be 4 people contained by a line to exit the store waiting for that out-of-date person to check their reciepts.
I didnt enjoy time to wait contained by a line to exit a store after I bought something.
"I entail to check your receipt sir"
"no you dont"
And I walk right out.
No one followed me.
No one took my plates.
No security guard come my way.
Because I didnt steal anything.
But this yahoo user LISBETH, emails me exciting to try it and see what the consequences re.
Why do people hold on to argueing when they dont know what theyre talking roughly.
IF THEY DIDNT WITNESS YOU PUT ANYTHING IN YOUR BELONGINGS...or in your purse.
They cant do anything.
If they choose to harrass you...you can sue them.
End of story...proof is contained by the pudding.
there you step LISBETH.
Answers: Yes, that is correct. Not one and only can you do it, you should do it.
What they don't trust their cashiers? Then post someone to watch the cashiers?
What they expect you stole stuff since the cash register? Then don't put stuff between the dosh register and the door!
Bottom line is they are allowed to ask, but they can't stop you, return with in your style, or follow you.
My GF didn't believe this at Fry's either when I first met her (giant computer store) and I have to do it many times back she caught on to the game.
If they own probably cause that you are nouns, then they can and should stop you. But treating respectively of their paying customers like a criminal is not polite business unless people don't know their rights.
Stiggo below is wrong - they can't turn out your bags, and since you hold paid for the items, the property is not theirs anymore. That the store is does not contribute them grounds to search your oodles absent not bad suspicion. Otherwise they would want to see your purse or backpack every time too, and they don't.
Sorry, you were BOTH wrong. It is NOT dishonest for them to retain you and ask for a receipt.
And it is not ILLEGAL for you to answer no.
Simply put, if you reject they will simply let you jump or call the police. It's a civil issue until such time as it can be proven that you are stealing the item.
Mostly true but not completely. A store can put a sign up at the entrance that says they may hunt your bags and that's it, consequently they can.
I still don't understand this checking account crap , most of the time they don't even look at what you have or the stuff on the receiving??
You are okay. Don't worry. I devise the user Lisbeth is just unfolding you her opinion.
More possible than not nothing will come up to you. Besides, why worry just about this? You paid for the vacuum and you enjoy a receipt beside you, there's nothing to verbs about.
right, they can't query you but they can detain you and call the police and they can furrow you, they don't need to witness anything, they merely need to suspect it.
a moment ago cause they didn't bother you doesnt scrounging they can't
thats one point for LISBETH and zero for you
A store is a private place. There's a socialist perception that stores open to the public are public spaces. They're not.
It's a private place and it's entitled to have their own rules.
Hardly a store will ask you to catch handcuffed and gag to enter. They try (most of them) to make your stay as comfortable as possible, they want your business.
But there's an implicit contract within the middle. They give you products and services and you salary for them and accept their language.
It would be reasonable to enjoy the terms of agreement available to read beforehand but unfeasible. If you get into a store to take a pack of gum it doesn't make sense to spend one hour reading official babbling.
In your situation, they asked you other for your receipt. They be right in asking and they be extremely nice to let you be in motion away. You were wrong.
You be entitled to refuse to shop in that and request your money back (although that method you'd have to show your receipt).
Now if you walk back to impossible to tell apart store, you're not longer entitled to refuse to show your tally claiming ignorance of the terms. You know in a minute that they ask to see your receipt.
This is not in the region of your "RIGHTS". The point here is that your pushing the line counting on them to be nice. Most stores won't face you for refusing to show your delivery (unless they have evidence that you're stealing). But that's not the point. The point is that they're entitled to ask for it. They own the right to do so granted by you when you decided to shop near them in their store below their terms.
Let them know that you don't resembling that. They may or may not change their policy. If you don't agree, shop some place else.
I agree mostly next to Hex...they have the right to ask to see a account. However, you can refuse and they enjoy the additional right to detain you if they 'suspect' that you may hold something questionable in your picnic basket.
Usually, it is a large un-baggable item. Such as a TV or stereo; something resembling that.
Two weeks ago I bought a TV at Wally-world and it was not surrounded by a bag. I be asked, at the door if they could see my receipt. They be polite, I was doing nil wrong, I complied with respect for their position. No impair done.
It is, afterall, the thieves who hold become so brazen as to walk out beside these big ticket items that have brought these more stringent policies down on the innocents. And, they are the principle we pay an arm and a leg for everything we buy.
Store 'watchers' no longer own to 'catch you surrounded by the act' as it once was.
Bottom procession - why make great side over something like this? If I saw someone stealing, I would point the SOB out to someone who worked at the store, within a heartbeat.
This answer may sound approaching a rant, it is not. I, for one, am sick and tired of thieves getting a slap on the wrist while the price I discharge for things is NOT coming down one cent.
The store watchers' request, IMHO is benign enough. They solitary do this during the xmas shopping season here where I live.
It is not done every time. Only when within is a basket full and a super massive item. One that I could have popped on at hand anytime after I checked out. I despise a thief and I am no longer insulted when I am asked to show a account. If I owned a store I would do the same entry.
Sure, when I was 20 years younger I would achieve all kind of attitude and say something smart-assed to them. That be my problem, not theirs. Back then I didn't resembling any kind of authority and NO ONE recitation me what to do.
Times have changed however and I doubt if it could be labeled harrassment at the moment, let along be grounds for a suit.
Oh, as for taking up some stranger's dare to do something close to this, that is your business. You should ask question pertaining to things which may or may not violate your own rights, in your evaluation, not those of someone who obviously have such frail standards that she/he cannot do it herself/himself.
Sorry.
My paycheck bounced. It is illegal to go by a paycheck with non sufficient funds contained by Maryland?
My paycheck bounced. It is illegal to pass by a paycheck with non sufficient funds surrounded by Maryland, or Delaware (my home state). How should I handle this?Answers: Call the department of labor. A company writing bleak checks to their employees is not ok.
It's iffy anywhere to pass a check beside insufficient funds.
Call your boss and ask him what the !@%^ is going on.
Find out what is going on. They will probably make it up to you fast.
More Questions and Answers:
[627] - [1788] - [1646] - [275] - [1875] - [362] - [1639] - [2291] - [997] - [1852] - [810] - [2313] - [1290] - [556] - [1100] - [969] - [1087] - [303] - [367] - [1632]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: