Law Questions and Answers
How do you drop charges against someone?
I don't want any judging I basically need answers. If you file domestic abuse charges against someone but discern the cops pressured you into it is it possible to drop the charges? If so, how do you go in the order of doing that?Answers: Don't go to court. It's your choice I know this first foot. Just don't go.. This will solve that problem but, what just about the real issue.
Good luck and stay out of danger..
It is a common misconception surrounded by American law that the target or complainant can "drop the charges." This is untrue. In a criminal case it will be "The State of _____ v. Defendant," you will never see within a criminal case Victim v. Defendant. The Victim is not a celebration in the overnight case, and therefore they can not drop the charges. They can ask the prosecutor, (called a District or State's Attorney) to drop the charges. This is the with the sole purpose wholely legal instrument to do it. If you do not show up in court the intermediary can issue you a bench warrant and/or hold you in contempt for defy a court order. If you flop on the stand you can be arrested from perjury. These are not highly predictable scenerios, but they are possible. If you do not come to court what will happen the first time is they will reschedule the armour, then you are probable to have a completely angry District Attorney call you and want to know why you be not in court, and possibly threaten you. You have to receive your decisions.
Good luck.
MIP in Texas & wrongly charged?
Over the summer my cousin and I have went to shift pick up our other cousin from a party where on earth alcohol was present. We couldn't find ahold of him so we got out of the saloon to walk up to the door, and as we be going to the house the police had showed up. They told us to travel inside the house, and we tried to explain to them that we were individual there to pick someone up, but they still told us to budge inside.. We even asked for a breathlyzer test, but wouldn't pass us one. So, along with everyone else in attendance we got tickets for MIP.Is it feasible that I can get this dismissed and removed from my account? What should I do exactly? I have witnesses but one is my cousin who also received equal ticket and my other cousin used his brothers ID to get him out of trouble so I couldn't use him as all right as his friend who did the same. I go to a lawyer and he recommended a polygraph examination. but he also told us to go to someone else because my cousin is his partner client, and that can conflict.
Answers: Be honest about why you be there - do NOT plead on the defence. Call as witnessed others at the party to say aloud that you weren't there. In the lapse, it is the prosecutor's job to prove beyond a sensible doubt that you committed the offense, and it doesn't seem resembling they'll be able to.
Good luck.
Assuming you're one honest, plead "not guilty" and ask for a trial. If you have money, hire a advocate to represent you (NOT the guy who recommended a polygraph...I'm not even sure if I believe that part of the post since polygraphs are not admissable and a advocate should know that). If not, represent yourself in a bench trial (no jury).
It's a outstandingly minor criminal charge, a class C misdemeanor, but the state still has to prove you guilty beyond a justifiable doubt. In other words, the prosecutor will have to ring the officer(s) to testify that he saw you in possession of alcohol. It's unlikely the officer will even remember who you are.
In your defense, testify as to what happen and call your friends to the stand to testify on your behalf (you don't enjoy to ask questions as to why they didn't return with an MIP...so avoid the fake ID issue altogether). If you're recounting the truth, then you should hold no problem getting a "not guilty" verdict. And ALWAYS stay respectful.
How long can lawyer hold the money within trust account as adjectives bills were settled?
My dad passed 01/06/07 its very soon 6/11/07 , i sold the house as will stated, that settled 30/10/07 he said interim payments will be sent until a notice is put within paper, no distinguish in newspaper YET, he makes mistakes, have a week off for conservatory holidays, wont answer phone then 2 weeks after i sent email for the cost of myself and partner cleaning house and travelling 320km every weekend to verbs and remove rubbish says it couldnt approachable it and to change email to word doc.$3000 plus contained by fees so far and no end surrounded by sight.Thanks to anyone who know my legal rights for any lend a hand,
Cheers
Answers: See here:
http://www.lawsociety.com.au/page.asp?pa...
http://www.lawsociety.com.au/page.asp?pa...
...
Contact the Law Society in your state (search the web)
Anyone ever had a couple of employer ruin a good reputation and how do you build it put a bet on. ps how do you find?
how do you find out what new perspective employer find out. I would like to step for a civil service or non civil service job. Ps I own worked with current company eight months next to no problem. One employer said I was wrong and another said I lied when I reported sexual harassment and said I made indecorous comments which were never made. Help please I am a terrifically good personality and a sunday school don.Answers: I had my rep messed beside due to a juior executive whom mainly be too lazy to find the truth and freshly gathered info from the slackers around me. I might hold made them look bad due to my "gung-ho" spirit , but It wasn't intentional, and I of late can't squelch my ambition to do the right thing.
What I concluded up doing was take home an official statement on account then vanished and joined a better company.
I would guess that if that new company finds something out, you hold every right to find out where this come from, that you have a right to "frontage your accusors" and at which time you should be able to bring officially recognized action against your previous company if they have a hand within trying to sabotage your art.
That is of course if near isn't any documentation that is provable on their side of the arguement.
If something be put in your work directory ,you had to sign it...so ask for a copy of the facts.
Can a Commissioner deny a request to have a Judge hear a traffic speeding infraction going over 100 mph contained by CA?
I was arraigned within the San Bernardino County Courthouse and requested an actual elected Judge (not appointed commissioner) to hear my speeding case. The commissioner denied my request even though the record message explaining our rights played in the court prior to his arrival said we have a right to a trial before a deem or commissioner. Is this legal to deny my right to a rational trial in front of a Judge? Did the Commissioner overstep his authority contained by denying me this request? Are there any California Codes or Laws address the right to have a Judge hear a traffic infraction of speeding over 100 mph on the Interstate (BTW I be NOT speeding but doing 70 mph).Answers: In California, court commissioners are authorized to hear all traffic infraction matter without a stipulation. (Branson v. Martin (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 300.) The record advisal may have be somewhat amigious, but it was in actual fact correct. You had a right to a trial, and that trial could be since EITHER a judge or a commissioner.
idk let's ask the panel ...hogan...page nick hogan!
Is it legal to enjoy a "banana" car?
In the state of Arizona, is it trial to have this munificent of car? Not that I want this type of saloon but just wondering.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elpk2MDUc...
Answers: zilch illegal
I enjoy seen similar cars.
There is one shaped as a hotdog which is sort of prominent. I have also see ones shaped as a roller skate, a fish, a canoe, a pickle, and a dinosaur.
All were legalized to drive --- although I'm not sure if they would survive a long-term freeway excursion.
ADDED: Watch the movie "Dumb and Dumber" --- there is a van made up close to a sheepdog.
Do you think that Eric Harris's classmates be to blame for Columbine?
Supposedly Eric Harris and his friends were bullied, and that's why they did it. They claimed their classmates brought it upon themselves. Do you ruminate this is true? Do you think it ultimately could hold been avoided?Looking for personal view here, I've got my own. I want yours.
Answers: No. If we carry like that, every kid who draws something wacky could acquire locked up, every stupid threat that kids make to respectively other would get them surrounded by trouble and most kids who run their mouths would never actually follow through and do something close to that.
I do not think we can know what is going on contained by someone's head or heart. Unfortunately at hand will always be mentally sick and emotionally unbalanced inhabitants in the world, in attendance is no way to destroy that.
The classmates did not bring it on. Though perhaps if one is bullied for years, yes that would rationale someone to snap. The parents really should have be watching what the kid was up to, and getting him counseling if he needed it.
I do not judge we can or should monitor people to that extent, if we do that we would turn into something approaching the "thought police" of 1984 the book, or like Nazi's. We will not be capable of complete rid ourselves of all psychotics, serial killer or mentally ill population for many years, even if we found the genetic penchant and had a instrument to correct whatever be wrong in their brain. Hopefully parents can instill correct morals in their children and tend them as they grow contained by good race.
We just hold to accept that we will not be capable of control others and that the world will always be full of risks.
To wipe out all risks is to do away with all duration.
i definatly think this could've be avoided
if not by the classmates by the reachers or the parents, who seem to be absolutely withdrawn from their kid's lives
if they be girls they would've told someone about their troubles but they're not and didn't
i know it's a horrible entry to say but i have a sneaking suspicion that the country NEEDED this tragedy to raise awarness on the seriousness of bulling within adolecent schooling
There is no question that the bullies be wrong. But this type of thing have been going on since light of day one --- and probably will continue.
The problem be that Eric (and his friends) were not qualified to be strong by their parents (and other associates). They were not up to scratch in their own social nouns and couldn't withstand the bullying without snapping.
These finicky bullies were the catalyst. But if it hadn't be these bullies, it would have be others. So I'm doubtful that the incident (or a similar one) could have be totally avoided.
This is not in any means of access excusing the bullies. And this may be a good lesson to bullies of what could conceivably surface in adjectives instances --- God forbid.
This House Would Sanction Countries That Allow Child Labour.?
I’m working on a new debate motion. I'm the govt. First of adjectives, sanctioning completely doesn't work in small countries as they are poverty-stricken and child labour is their just means of survival. Developing nation like India make children as workers in agriculture sector which contribute the most for their monetary growth. Child labor in developed nation like US is not an issue at adjectives unless to mention illegal sweatshops. The help of becoming the government is that we can set a parameter. Meaning we can diminish down the scope and not debate beyond it. Opposition will enjoy to adhere to it. I be thinking of sanctioning developed countries that allow child employees. But then again, I'm afraid I'm not address the issue. Concerns are more for the 2nd and 3rd world countries like Myanmar where on earth children are made to become soldiers.PLEASE HELP! S.O.S
Answers: I don't think limiting the topic to developed countries is surrounded by the spirit of the topic because a) developed countries don't use cild labour as a rule anyway and b) they would enjoy the economic cargo to not care around sanctions OR the diplomatic counterweight to not have them enforced. So here is no moral or practical imperative to sanction developed countries.
You are just going to own to find some arguments for sanctioning developing countries.
If you appeal a court case and win and the regard as being will not do what was ordered, what do you do???
Answers: what are you asking? more information please what you hold here does not make sense. a negotiator won't do what was ordered? is this criminal, civil, appellate? i hold never heard of a mediator who could refuse the judgment of an appeal so please give some info.
If you appealed a grip, you likely have a lawyer. If you did not you entail to get one. There are multiple option, and all are reality specific, they will rely on you needing to inform the pass judgment, or the appeals court of what was going on. Without more facts its sturdy to say, you satchel was not "won" on appeal it be reversed, meaning it will be sent fund down to the trial it came from for another trial not inconsistent next to the holding of the court. But you may have one on a enormously narrow topic of directive, that is not person used in the strange trial. There is not enough information but I'll afford you an exampe from criminal law.
If the state convicts someone using a confession that be not legal, and the appeal say the confession should not have be used, they will reverse and remand. Now the state can try the case again, basically without the confession this time if they enjoy enough other evidence. The entity appealing's case is not over, newly changed.
What laws do you meditate are immoral or unwarranted?
the patriot act?immigration law?
gay marriage?
Answers: drugs smaller amount addictive than cigarettes
and less poisonous than alcohol
should be legal
since when can a govt of a free country throw empire in detention centre for getting high
i agree near xialiou.
the level of incarceration for things approaching marijuana use is an outrage.
I think the paucity of real, knotty time served and the pathetic 'slapping on the wrist' for chronic criminals is completely iniquitous while victims aren't getting the justice they deserve!
First past its sell-by date, I think dissolute and unjust are two totally different things. lustful is something I don't agree with. Unjust is something that contradicts the imperative. I think that Gay conjugal is immoral, because of the reality that it is un-natural. Anything that is not beneficial is extra. For example, animals do not engage within any relationships that they do not benefit from, why should we, higher beings be so not cognizant?
I believe that all law in our affairs of state are just, otherwords we would vote to translation them. If the masses do not agree beside a law, consequently they should change it, or it really isn't affecting them THAT much. For instance, 18 year old's complain roughly speaking not being competent to drink. The idiots do not realize that they can vote, and if they wanted to, they could a moment ago vote to allow themselves to drive "justifiably".
Nuff Said.
More Questions and Answers:
[2140] - [652] - [392] - [127] - [164] - [264] - [307] - [1607] - [1786] - [1902] - [1190] - [1840] - [901] - [913] - [371] - [566] - [69] - [104] - [777] - [1927]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: