Law Questions and Answers
Is conversation recording within QLD il/legal?
if 3 people are chitchat, two of them is recording their conversation to backup the 3rd person's content won't transfer the next time lacking the 3rd person's permission, is that dubious?the 3rd person found out the others are demo so s/he wrentched the recorder...can those two persons phone up the police or sue her/him?
Answers: It is illegal to text a telephone conversation, unless they relay you before appendage that way you are aware that the conversation is mortal recorded. Check your local phone book for that issue or beckon your local law enforcement. Also cassette a converstion on the phone requires a a warrant from a judge. So what the other 2 ancestors did mat face a cost or jail time for violate a federal law.
I am pretty sure it is wrong and would most definitely be considered an invasion of one's privacy.
How can a feloney 4 got to a feloney 2 and i hold not even been to court nonetheless i dont gets it?
Answers: Sorry But I don't win your question
Excellent query for you to discuss with your attorney.
Sounds like the they discovered some superfluous evidence that shows the crime was worse than originally thought.
It doesn't appear to me that you know how to do your research. Try probing on legal websites. Call a university canon department. There are many students surrounded by those programs that will help you out for free. Give it a shot and see what you come up next to. Also, use spellcheck every once in a while.
What are some ways that US law enforcement can operate with border crime, smuggling and murder?
Today's Mexican narco-gangs beside a $40 Billion drug "trade" with the US beside a JOIN or DIE philosophy.Small wonder we see enemies of narco-traffikers going to penal complex one for pushing and shoving AKA Putching and chuving drawing two years in prison.
Two heroic border agents received ill-concieved and poorly carried out prison sentences for the "flipside end shooting" of a convicted smuggler who promptly returned to his "trade" although he could not sit down for moderately a while. Bush attempted to galvanize the good guys by ignore the issue so the bad guys would do something more or less it and anger the narco-maurauders and gangsters?
The logic is tough to follow...
Answers: The "logic" is so very simple --- $$$--Money--$$$ --- and tons of it .
1st
Legalize pot. It'll give somebody a lift the cash out the smugglers hand.
2nd
Make a federal felony to hire any one with out a check on their imm.staus. If the company hires them intentionally,the compnany is dissolved and it's owners or managment thrown into jail.
3rd
Support the reasonable treatment of citizens of other countries so they won't be trying to come here. We're to blame for the 3rd world economic conditions, through the schedule of our banks,corporations,and affairs of state.
What is the difference between a restraining order and an injunction?
Answers: A restraining lay down is a kind of injunction. It stops you from performing some exploit. Usually, it has to do next to being around another being, place or function. You are restrained from being inside 500 feet of a institution, 100 feet of your former spouse. You know that drill.
An injunction surrounded by the generic sense prohibits many things. You may be enjoined from building a blockade. Or from painting your house a pernickety color. Or from performing any action that you might otherwise enjoy the right to do, pending a full audible range on the matter. Typically the initial ruling is short-term and is granted "ex parte." That means the human being against whom the injunction is sought is not present at the audible range. An injunction can become permanent or enjoy the time frame defined upon a full hearing.
An Injunction is used surrounded by connection near preventing a sale or publishing textile until a full court hearing or dispute is resolved.
A restraining demand is used when contact could result in damage or damage.
Injunctions are as a rule associated with civil matter where restraining instructions are enforced by police.
Torture does work.we used it quite successfuly surrounded by the early days of our Nation...we even used a type of ...
torture using sea. When it was Witches we be looking for,it was only as terrifying as looking for terrorists today. A suspected "Witch" would be tied to a long pole,and repeatedly dunked into wet. If she she lived,she was plainly a "Witch" and then be burned at the stake. Thousands of "Witches" were found! Right immediately we have hundereds of thousands of relatives on the "Terrorist Watchlist" ! If we torture all those suspected terrorists,would we find any more?Answers: Dear friend ,
You are intensely right .all Terrorists should be punished . But agree to us see the defination of Terrorists.
Who is a Terrorist ? Who is a Criminal ?
One who corrupts the Mind and values of our women are Number one Terrorists
one who promote .vulgar values are Terrorists
One who believe only within the culture of
Drunken lifestyles are Terrorists
one who Do not Offer sincere Prayers are Terrorists
One who - occupies others lands are terrorists
One who spreads values that promote AIDS ARE terrorists
One who Makes Medical System and Hospital System .Systematic Exploitation system ...are Terrorists
One who variety and promote ...
IR-RATIONAL FAMILY LAWS.are Terrorists
One who Change The words of Scriptures ...suiting their own lifestyles are Terrorists
Ones Who believe in sticking to Basic Fundamental principles of tenant of Ethical values .are FUNDAMENTALISTS
Sticking to basic fundamentals of Ethical values
Those who allow their Daughters .to Go partly Naked are Terrorists
Those who .Believe in .Making money by Selling Drugs , Weapons .are Terrorists
Those who .Use Nuclear weaponry on civilians are Terrorists
Those who .Occupy other people's Nation .and make it their Nation are Terrorists
Once upon a time
Muslim Rulers be Terrorists
Now
Western Rulers are the Real Terrorists
Today’s Muslims ...
are Mostly Slaves .who have no other ways of living except .being SLAVES OR BEING CRIMINALS
Governments that do not thoroughness for its poor citizens are Terrorists
Government who loot Money from people within the form of Taxes are Terrorists
Governments which give .meaningless .worthless Costly Education are Terrorists
Promoters of Prostitute Culture among almost every Woman world general are Terrorists
Promoters of vulgar Film songs , Films with dirty values and dirty dance , Serials with worst cultures - are Terrorists
Promoters of Courts ...beside exploiting -Meaningless. Rules and Sections are Terrorists
Traffic Police and Governments that .torture innocent Poor people are Terrorists
Governments which do not supply Guidance and Support ...to its suffering people re Terrorists
Destroying other People's Cultural values and ethical values and ethnic group values are Terrorists
Those who make Marriage as an institution of prostitution are Terrorists
Those who coppers name of ISA into Jesus ..and Many Original Names into English name are Terrorists
I hope you all will agree to the Definitions of Terrorists
By pointing fingers at other people's false lifestyles we can not stockpile our faults and our crimes
This is a purely Objective statement
I Respect lot values of Non-Muslims too
But we hold to see what all
Terrors who adjectives is doing as well
No outsider have time to Harm you dear
But if we do not do our duties properly
our own family member , society -will attack us
So first Let us attack the
Flaws in ourselves
Before we .Correct or Punish others
You enjoy a point there.
I voice let's give it a try, only just might work.
Nothing ventured = nil gained
Funny to see the answers that missed the biting wit in your post!
Personally, your post reminds me of a confident episode in a Monty Python show.
Deroy Murrdock of Scripps Howard pointed out within the "Bucks County Courier Times" yesterday that torture saves lives. He wrote, contained by part:
At lowest possible three major al Qaeda leaders, most prominently Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) who directed the 9/11 attacks, which killed 2,978 empire and wounded another 7,356 and continues to kill or disfigure those who first responded, was waterboarded. KSM have also claimed to Al Jazeera in April, 2002, that he give money to his nephew, Ramzi Yousef, who materminded the February, 1993 WTC blast that killed six and wounded 1,040. He and Yousef planned the foiled 1995 conspire to explode 12 American jetliners above the Pacific. He also said, "I decapitated with my blessed right appendage the head of the American Jew Daniel Pearl surrounded by the City of Karachi, Pakastan." He refused to speak for months, but after 90 second, he talked and it organize authorities to arrest at least 6 principal terrorists.
+Ohio trucker Iyman Faris pleaded guilty May 1, 2003, to providing material support to terrorists. He secured 2,000 sleeping heaps for al Qaeda and delivered currency, cell phones, and airline tickets to its men. He also conspired to derail a train near Washington DC, and use acetylene torches to sever the Brooklyn Bridge's cable to try to send it into the East River.
+Jemaah Islamiya (JI) and Rusman Gunawan be convicted of transferring money to bomb Jakarta's Marriott Hotel, killing 12 and injuring 150.
+Hambali, Gunawan's brother and ringleader of JI's October 2002 Bali nightclub blasts that kill 202 and wounded 209.
+Suspected al Qaeda agent Majid Khan, provided money to JI terrorists and plotted to assinate the Pakistani President, planned to detonate US gas stations and poison American Water reservoirs.
+Jose Padilla, who trained with al Qaida, be convicted of providing materal support to terrorists and conspiring to kidnap, spoil, and murder people overseas. He be suspected, but not charged with planning a radioactive "dirty bomb" attack, reportedly literary to incinerate residential high-rises by igniting apartments pack with automatic gas.
+Malaysian Yazid Sufaat, an American-educated biochemist and JI member, reportedly provided hijackers Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi housing within Kuala Lumpur during a January 2000 9/11 planning summit. He also is suspected of employing "20th hijacker" Zacarias Moussaoui. The 9/11 Commission Report (p. 151) states: Sufaat would spend several months attempting to cultivate anthrax for al Qaeda. surrounded by a laboratory he helped set up close at hand the Kandahar airport.
Imagine how many innocent relations these six Islamo-fascists (and perhaps others) would enjoy murdered had interrogators not here KSM unwaterboarded and his secrets unuttered.
"In short," Murdock ends and I totally agree, "within is nothing 'repugnant' around waterboarding."
Of course you would. Using torture everyone breaks. You could get Hilliary Clinton to convey you she was Osama bin Laden's father. Doesn't create it true. So what are you really asking?
Are you asking if we should use torture on terror suspects? With your witch trial mention, I don't think that's what you're after. It sounds more resembling a condemnation of using torture.
So the next interrogate is if you are making a cautionairy statement about what we could do, or a damning one just about what you think America is doing? If the former, I salute you. Torture thoroughly rarely produces substantial results (just for the record I hold no practical experience here), the victim will share you anything they think you want to hear. If the latter, I would suggest a carefull look at the definition of torture.
I won't budge into that right now, but I will right to be heard that I am not naive ample to beleive that the American government have not used it. I would similar to to beleive that apart from very isolated incidences that it is not individual used to gather information on terrorists. I am indisputable that our upper level conclusion makers are intelligent plenty to know the possible hazards of using torture.
So, my final answer to your cross-examine is yes we would find terrorists and information about them, but it would be of no value. First because none of it could be trusted, and second because it would make us no better than the terrorists themselves.
Why and why shouldn't 16 year olds be given the right to vote?
Why and why shouldn't 16 year olds be given the right to vote? This is mainly discussion about the UKAnswers: coz they're stupid
We are aloud to hold children and get married at 16!
it make me sick that the gov. says its alright for us to look after a infant, an actual human at 16 but not vote for who leads our country!
Cause they can't procure drafted.
Don't pay taxes.
Most 16 year olds can't report their head from their @ss, hell most 30 year olds can't any, but supposedly with age comes experience.
16 is too young.
Because 99% of them hold pea brains!
Thats why and why!
Fair enough 16 year olds can return with married, have children, but it doesn`t whip brains to do either of these. Can you really voice all 16year olds in a minute about politics, most 18 year olds and over know nil about it and of late vote for someone who looks good. I don`t vote coz I construe they are all as bleak as each other. I leave your job it to people who do know what they are doing
We already hold too many incompetent general public (i.e. getting pregnant at 16) who don't know how to educate themselves on politics voting. Why and why would we want to tag on more?
Because and because they're probably too steeped in alcohol to find their approach to the polling station.
Yes, good point. If 16 year olds be good plenty to fight and die within WW-One in the trenches, they be certainly weak enough to drink the country's beer and even vote at an see.
Back in the foggy mists of time when I was a youn man surrounded by the 1960s actually, Yeah Yeah Yeah, etc. the voting age be actually 21 for men and women.
Over the mount came a batty looking mob calling themselves "The Monster Raving Looney Party". They were head by a mad monk of a Rocker call Screaming Lord Sutch. This new political gala demanded, among other things, that people be allowed to vote at 18.
After a long few years of squabbling, the after Labour PM, Harold Wilson saw that it was totally much to his advantage that 18 year olds should win the vote. After all he mused, teenagers do ultimately tend to be more left wing than the elder generations. Ha!
Yes, I muse it's time to give 16 year olds the vote. Why not?
If 16 year olds be given the vote, I doubt if many of them would. Unfortunately not copious young relatives are aware of the fact that the Government runs their adjectives and the only true agency to have a influence in the method the country is run is to use your vote. If education contained by schools roughly political matters be better (I don't necessarily mean in the order of which party to vote for, lately the importance of what voting system to their country.
I agree, it is ridiculous that we can send childish people sour to fight a time of war and let them kind a lifelong commitment to another person contained by marriage but will not agree to them help contained by making important decision about the country they live contained by.
Some would argue 16 year olds are too immature to vote, but I know 26 year olds who are too emergent to use their vote wisely and probably nation older than that. Generally contained by this country we need a touch more education on such matter, before voter apathy get even worse.
Taking into account that newly about everything is have the age raised to 18 why should the voting age be dropped??
At 18 it will be within line next to - drinking, leaving academy, driving, buying tobacco products and dying for your country.
If all the so call adults in Britain can't win it right at election time,
what randomness do you think that 16 year olds will enjoy,
They have no experience of life span or its corruptions,
hang on conceivably we should let them hold a go,they cannot do much worse.
KORKY
The majority of teenagers that I see around show no parenthood at all. All they want to do is breed resembling rabbits so they can get money from the establishment AND council housing.
They also just want to sway around the park, town centres and street corners getting drunk and glorious and verbally mishandle passers by and/or beat them up for no adjectives reason.
They do not own the intelligence to be able to vote when they can't even speak within a language that's discernable.
What do you want to vote for anyway. The same cronies go and get in every time a short time ago under a different guise.
Can she take my fiance to court?
My fiance offered to assist a friend with an outstanding cable bill. He didn't and they are not friends anymore. She contacts him everyonce contained by awhile and asks if can still help, he is too soft and other says "I'll try" Now she is threating court..can she. He never signed anything and zilch is in his cross. Just curious if anyone has every be through this. Thanks.Answers: Court for what? Because he didn't pay her bill? No, your fiance is sheltered from court. Well, of course, she could try to run him to court, but the case would capture tossed out.
Nice "friend" - tell her to obtain lost or call her bluff. She is responsible for her own bills, not him.
She is bluffing.
That neither of you know this without delay makes me conjecture she has found a well brought-up mark.
how give or take a few he just does not answer her call anymore.
either she is attention seeking and trying to stir up trouble
or
he like to have this helpless women calling hil adjectives the time to make him be aware of needed.
either track all communication should stop.
marci
everyone here is correct...your fiance is not responsible and is not dangerous.
but the friend is a "BULLEY" and either stop taking their call or block their number or tell them they are individual a bulley.
good luck :)
sooooOo, she asked for a favor, and he didnt do it and very soon she wants to sue him!!?!?! lol. this grill wasnt even necessary, its adjectives sense!!
what a pathetic womanly... tell her skanky @$$ to be in motion find a sugar daddy else where, and report to ur fiance to grow some b@lls and tell her bad! =)
Can someone collect a debt in human being at your home?
Someone from our homeowners association (a legal corp) come to our door in the middle of a deputation and demanded payment of a 2 mo behind the times past due bill. I said I needed to look at it when I have a moment, to verify. However he said he would just stand nearby until I gave him a check. Being surrounded by the middle of having company I have no choice but to pay this stranger and carry on with the event.Answers: Do they have the right - sure, but do you hold the right to tell them to catch off your property - categorically!
If I had a house full of guests I would enjoy said I will look at this and compare it to my records when my guests be off and then asked him to exit. If he wouldn't leave I'd enjoy called the cops- that simple.
Can someone collect a debt within person at your home? - Yes, during probable hours. You however had the choice to earnings then or describe him to leave. If you could not verify the identity of the creature you should NOT have given him a check.
Help for Friend in South America?
An elderly friend of mine sold adjectives she had and go to live with her daughter contained by South America. She was converted to hand over the money from her house public sale to her daughter who has placed it surrounded by her own account. She is in a minute desperately unhappy, due to mistreatment, and wants to return to the UK. The daughter will not return her money and says she have enough near her pension to live on.Does anyone know of any style she could get give a hand to get her money pay for.
Answers: Go to the embassy, it's a sure way to help out or tell you how to go and get help.
I agree, she should consult beside the local embassy or consulate for advice.
What are my rights if I have to go off my job ,and its not my scorn??
I was working for one company for the later five months,and they told me one day they own lost contract for the job what i be doing .They offered me other job ,what is different to what i be doing,and is not suitable for me,and I will have to take off.
Could I get some compensation? I didnt grasp any notice,i lost my brief from one day to another.Ok they hold offered me another job,but its not pious for me ,so what can i do in this suitcase?
Answers: Sometimes, companies have a severance bundle. In this case, probably not.
What around collecting unemployment?
That's energy.
Unless you had a written contract stating otherwise, you are hired "at will" - purpose you can quit at any time with or minus a reason, and they can tolerate you go beside or without a origin at any time.
Sounds like they are trying to turn the extra mile to keep you.
Good luck. If I be you I would take the duty offered at least until you find something more suitable to you.
As far as your option? Sorry, but I do not believe you have much recourse here. They are offering you something and explicitly about as upright as it gets. If you reject for whatever reson, afterwards it is on your head.
sorry.
Surprise, surprise! You immediately have the RESPONSIBILITY to be in motion out and find another job. They offered you something else, you chose not to adopt.
Welcome to the world of downsizing and plant closings. You weren't fired, but your job be.
I believe the terminology for what you are going through is call a CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL.
that is, they are violate your contract by offering you another posiiton that has nought, or very little to do near what you were hired to do, commonly to get the individual to quit. Its usually regarded as bullying and an unwarranted.
Do you have anything within writing as to what your job duties be? Is there a susbstantial stop in salary? If so..then you could be entitled to compensation. Talk to your company first...ideally your human resources department and inform them that you wer hired as such and such and and you touch that what they are doing constiitutes a constructive dismissal, and as such, you are entitled to be compensated.
Dear Friend,
5 months on a job system you are still in a probation time of year. They do not owe you any compensation, or notice. It is nice of that Company to at smallest offer you another position. If it is not suiting you, to be precise not their fault. My push for would be to try out the new position. You might a short time ago start enjoying it more than the later position. Good Luck.
Sorry, at least they own offered you another job, I would transport it if i was you, at smallest it is a job and you tend to take to know about other job when you are already working. You won`t be able to draw from compensation but if you do stay with that firm examine for the job you hold been doing coming rear legs, if it does and someone else takes it you may own a case.
Well as they offered you a unsullied position doing a different job, consequently they have officially done what they are supposed to do.
The choice was yours to prohibit the job and therefor check out of the company.
For that reason, you moved out the company at your own will and therefor not entitled to any form of compensation.
you would have need of to check if there is a variability in your employment contract.
The required permitted minimum notice is one week if you own been employed for at most minuscule one month but less than two years.
You involve to speak to an adviser at your local CAB.
More Questions and Answers:
[1379] - [1035] - [1859] - [915] - [2057] - [743] - [1039] - [1262] - [1502] - [86] - [2134] - [2207] - [1145] - [2388] - [2548] - [814] - [9] - [355] - [2438] - [933]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: