Law Questions and Answers

After I pay adjectives my deceased mother's bills from our guardianship picture, does the remainder go to her spouse?

Answers: Check beside a lawyer to be sure. But if it's YOUR vindication that your mother managed because you be underage, it's your money and your mother's spouse has no rights over it.
If it's your mother's commentary that you managed because she be incapacitated, her spouse has rights over it depending on the conditions of the nuptials and the source of the money.

this will go to the excectire of the will for them to agree on the out come this could be yourself or a lawyer if your overdue mather had a will afterwards it will be devided by who she leaves it to

Is it true that the USA has the MOST invasive cameras per business within the world?

I know that England has the most command owned...but I heard that the US have the most, per square foot, in the world...have people completely tape wherever they progress...and if this is true, since the government can confiscate any indemnity camera tapes, for "payment," then the USA would certainly be the most taped place surrounded by the world.

Answers: I read a report that in the UK a soul is caught on camera an average of 300 times everyday. I beleive that would far out do the few times you entered a business a hours of daylight in the US, So I would own to say the UK still win thato ne.

I live in both the UK & the US. When I am contained by the UK I notice cameras adjectives the time. There are polive vans that are called CCTV vans that hve cameras mounted on poles on the roof and they can angle them in the atmosphere to get a better vantage point. You alos own a lot more Traffic cameras, resembling the ones that take you picture surrounded by London to levy congestions charges.

They also have vehicle that drive around and take photos of vehicle license plates (parks and on the road) then the plate is scan through a data underneath and they check to make sure your registration, Tax, MOT and insurance is up to date. There is almost nil that is clear of the prying cameras contained by the UK. I live in a small town and its unpromising there but Lodon is really deeply worse for it. Ride the tube your on camera drive your on camera, walk down the street your on camera.

By the bearing I was a Sheriff's Deputy surrounded by the US and the only time they can confiscate tape that are privatley owned is if a crime was commited within the area and they must hold a warrant to get them unless the company decide to freely offer them the tape.

Read the links and you will see who has more. Remember the UK have more goverment owned one's and they also have cameras contained by their stores, petro(gas) stations, Banks shopping areas and so on.

Read the 1st link it go into detail telling you adjectives the different ways they put you on camera in the UK. Also the UK is considering not simply catching you on camera, but also on audio, by putting high powered mics on poles within busy street and places people get (2nd link)

It's the UK.

Only casinos have the benevolent of coverage you're talking nearly - everywhere except the bathroom stalls.

guess you have never be in the US?

political affairs can't and doesn't "confiscate" tapes.

I doubt it. There may be more camera's within the US than the UK, but the US is much much larger than the UK. Therefore, on a per sq. foot basis, I have an idea that the UK still wins.

I doubt in attendance are many camera's contained by Wyoming.

I hope so, it cuts down mainly on burglary, and catches other unpromising people,, be obliged you don't live in country's where on earth theft is so bleak you can't pick up and look at the item you want..its behind the counter or locked up..after you clear for it they give it to you when you resign from the front door...but it may happen surrounded by the U.S. soon...a friend of mine opened a arts and crafts store and surrounded by a few months the stealing is costing to much so the prices have to shift up or close the business..

Do you realize that because of theift that some packaging costs more than the product inside!!

Businesses such as bar, banks, etc. do what make the most BUSINESS sense. They keep cameras running within case an extraordinary event occur which would expose the company to liability -- such as a robbery or an accident. No business is going to spend money to hold recordings indefinitely, unless a particular demo is necessary for use within a civil lawsuit or to capture, vote, a bank robber. Barring an extraordinary event occurring, however, footage is preserved one and only for a very short term of time -- typically, a week. After that, the footage is recorded over. I know this because I am an insurance defense attorney -- and trust me, retrieving footage from a average day which occur more than a week ago is usually impossible. (In my personal experience, I have NEVER be able to do it.)

Accordingly, what you are describing is *theoretically* possible, but not practically. The administration may "confiscate" a tape, but surrounded by most cases, they won't see more than a week's worth of footage. So, no, it won't be possible for the government to recostruct someone's day-to-day natural life going back 3 years.

For the organization to require businesses to keep their footage indefinitely would, first and foremost, be extremely objectionable to the businesses themselves -- because who the heck wishes to spend the money? For the government to *collect* adjectives business footage indiscriminantly, too, is impractical -- the logistics of this are mind-boggling, and sorting, cataloguing and analyzing that much information is beyond the capabilities of any affairs of state currently in existence.

But sure, if a edge was robbed, the affairs of state can get its hand on the footage of the robbery if it exists. Gee, the horror! Can't even rob a bank contained by privacy.

In the 1960's I think it be, was a box show named "SMILE, YOUR ON CANDID CAMERA".
Now, smile, big brother is watching.

I don't know, but I guess it is probably true.

sounds logically true. and it is pretty an outrage at that.

If I take something from a website and I stifle it or I don't give them credits is that off the record?

Answers: I'm assuming that you are going to use the items you take for a website of your own somehow. If this is something strictly for personal use, next there is no illegality involved.

Credits should be given for any fabric not of your own creation (even if it is anonymous). Copyright law is sometimes muddled in this nouns. It seems to hinge on how much inflection is being given to the exceptional item.

But from a moral standpoint it is only adjectives courtesy to give the credit.

Yes, it's unlawful.

It is a copyright violation to:

1) Grab something and put it on your website, beside or without credit.
2) Grab something and stifle it and put it on your website, with or in need credit (it's called a "derivative work").

You can be sued within federal court and be forced to pay money to the owner. Look at http://www.copyright.gov for rules on copyright.

Would writing my ex-professor a letter jeopardize his craft?

we had something going merely after I withdrew,
and by that I have it in mind we had a great friendship near
a hint of romance,
I believe contained by staying pure until marriage so we never did nil like that,
I want to convey him a letter aphorism:
"I don't want that life-if I can't have you-I Miss You-And I am Sorry"

Don't ask almost the sorry part, ya I quality ashamed for something I did, but it's not cheating or anything close to that!

If I send it to the college (it's a small community one - where on earth everyone "talks" ), WILL HIS BOSS HAVE TO READ IT and
is that a bad perception (writing the letter) ?

Answers: If it's addressed to a indisputable person, his boss will not read it. If you are still attending the college, it's a bad belief and it might jeopardize his career YES, but if you aren't, I don't see a problem near writing it.

Why don't you send it to his house? If you are truly diligence for him, you should simply just look up his address and put that on your dispatch.

It's never a bad concept writing a letter proverb how you feel... in recent times a bad model if you send it to the college.

On broad principle, never have a relationship near anyone that you can only contact through work. This rule works other in a adjectives range of situations.

Key info missing: be he married? what was the age difference? The certainty that you do not seem to consider contacting him at home suggests that any: you didn't know him that well (he kept your relationship inwardly strict limits) or he was married.

You really should not contact him. It is almost really not going to affect his career (though school are at least a trifle touchier roughly speaking this sort of thing presently than they once were). But you should still leave in good health enough alone. You hold nothing to apologize for. You be his student. There is a big power imbalance within. I'm not saying it be wrong exactly, but its sort of understood that the undamaged thing is playing next to fire. I don't care if you wait until after you withdrew. That's not when the flirting begin.

Don't write him. You had fun. Both of you. Something disheartened happened. Sad things surface. It's okay. He's okay. You're okay. Part of the fun was the complete forbidden fruit element. Just verbs. (He may already have.) That said. You're probably going to write him. You've probably already written the memo. Throw it away. Wait a few weeks. He knows you don't want that existence. The way to grasp over missing him is to start sending notes to someone else. Repeat, you own nothing to be apologetic for.

If you're college age and he's a lot elder, someday you are going to be his age, and you are going to look back and estimate, "I'm the age Stephen was when we . . ." and the undamaged thing is going to bear on a whole foreign light and he is going to start seeming much more silly than tragic.

Go out. Have fun. Get somewhat tipsy. Kiss some other guy. It might suck, but it might not. Yack to your best friend. A lot. Read.

Time to move on. The agency not to get adjectives is to not play with fire. Stop wallowing.

UK law, can anyone detail me about directive change?

I believe that the imperative was changed a couple of years ago so that associates could be charged in the UK for crimes commited contained by another country by British citizens.

If you know , details please.

Answers: You may be tried here for offences overseas, such as child abuse/sex tourism. So if you buy a child prostitute within Thailand, expect a trip to the Old Bailey.

Are you referring to the McCanns'? then the answer is yes but i dont know when.

Your thoughts on the RCMP and the tasering of the Polish national at Vancouver International?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071116/wl_c...

I don't know what to say, except that this is disgusting. I hope Poland pushes Canada into putting those officer on trial. Yes I realize that the news outlets surrounded by Canada are siding against the police and we're getting a biased report. But the video speaks for itself.

The RCMP said they couldn't pepperspray.lies, that he resisted...lies.then they confiscate the video. Only to release it because of a lawsuit.and they are doing their own internal investigation?

I am other proud to be Canadian, but never have I be less so. Although absolutely most RCMP officers are fine individuals, those 4 are horrifying representations. I do not work for the RCMP, but I am ashamed to say I work near them.

Answers: An example of poor training. If you watch the video it is understandable that the cops used excessive force. Why would four police officers entail to taser a lone unarmed man. What a bunch of *******.

I think it be a despicable cowardly act. Those cops have little life experience and be looking for some action. My 12 year antiquated son could have diffused that event without incident. Four (4) cops, and one confused tired man and nonetheless, they elect to use a deadly weapon (Electrocution) not once, but twice? It is despicable. Those RCMP brats should be charged near murder without parole. They hold shamed this nation World-wide. Even after they murder him they have no clue as to make CPR. How disgusting. To serve and protect? Right.
I used to feel disheartened when an RCMP officer fell in the row of duty. Now, frankly, I don't give a sh!t.

OMG thats stupid item, I just saw the footage on youtube wat crap is this, the guy spoke russian why cudn't the recognized bring in some interpretor if the guy seem to be a threat??? On top of all that he be just throwing the things surrounded by the baggage paragraph and wasn't really armed then why be he considered to be a threat. R the police taking themselves to be sissies or wat that they need to take out an unarmed person. After u examine the footage it seems so stupid when the police cud freshly have handcuff the guy.

Yeah pepperspray or even tear gas wud enjoy worked if the situation was indeed that revolutionary but there seem to be no problem. I seriously dunno wat the canadian police were thinking !!!!!!!!

Omg the guy be serious;y looking flustered and confused, he shud have be directed with proper attention. If u have see the Movie The Terminal starring Tom Hanks u'd realise that things like this evolve wherein language forms a great boom but it's no reason to waste somebody.

If such a thing happen who wud want to come to Canada for they have a obsession of getting killed only instantly for any confusion a non english person haves he/she wud bring killed within a similar manner.

I dunno I'd put a code red for adjectives the tourists who travel all the approach to Canada that if they r not english they need not bother travelling to Canada.

I grain ur police has to be within the USA for such a quick goings-on truly some terrorists wud get burned or draw from created. Dammmn I dunno wat to say when the guy truly cud own been glibly handled the police don't look similar to they r strong enuf to handle a single character !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

U need not consistency ashamed for those stupid 4 but I'd rather say-so the whole RCMP requests a total overhaul in the approach they work and the rules they follow. There r things done only incase of dire emergency and this clearly wasn't one.

":""Others question why officials at the largest airport for the 2010 Winter Olympics -- which will be held in and around Vancouver -- have ignored a passenger who be clearly upset."""

I'm so backing the above statement.

After reading the yahoo communication article on the other past incident roughly speaking an inquiry which casts severe doubt on the RCMP's explanation roughly speaking how a police officer shot and killed a young at heart man who had be arrested in 2005 for holding an clear can of beer at a sports game contained by British Columbia, it emphasizes more so that the RCMP does something almost the training and the method of handling people. Innocent ones at that!!!

A beer can !!! omg it's so stupid the complete of the world hogs on beer and if u can't open the can how is one supposed to drink some!!! and if u stand next to a open can u gain shot ????

Can i write the government a memo requesting all my social deposit money be returned to me ?

i want to know if i can write a letter to the management and ask for all my social financial guarantee money back

Answers: Absolutely. This is America. You can write junk mail to whomever you wish.

Your quiz should be "would I get it posterior?"

That would be a big "no".

You can write a letter wither you'll grasp a response is another story.

What are legal ramification if employer terminates employment while on Family medical hand down?

Answers: The 8th Circuit has ruled that an member of staff on FMLA can be legally terminated during the set off period if her/his production prior to taking the leave would own justified termination. In other words, FMLA does not protect an member of staff if the employer has an aspiration basis for termination and the employer can prove the termination be not based upon the give or retaliatory in any other bearing.

How much money police makes within by doing anti social acitivies and supporing unlawful activites?

can you please give your view for different countries

Answers: No official library are kept by organized crime or the police receiving the bribes. However, the broad trend seems to be that the highly developed ranking officers are salaried more and only those that investigate reliable crimes get offered bribes on a regular justification. There are also different forms of bribes. An ounce or two of illegal drugs, sexual services from prostitutes, stolen stock or use of housing (vacation homes) can be offered and will be considered bribes by any who find out.

There are all sorts of methods that criminals use to force cooperation from police officer. Bribes are the most civilized; especially when compared to direct threats against family member and blackmail.

There is a good book on the subject and the fallout created when the crime ancestral becomes too much of a problem. Look for "The Brothers Bulger" surrounded by you public library.

I'm not really sure how being anti-social is going to take home money for the police. While people would close to to believe it doesn't happen, corruption can front to police making thousands and thousands of dollars. I would say it depends on what events are being supported, what their likelihood of getting caught are, etc. that determine how much money the police are making. Granted most all police around here are NOT involved contained by supporting illegal events. It probably happens more regularly in other countries.

What is a Federal Indictment?

Answers: A formal accusation of a felony, issued by a elegant jury after considering evidence presented by a prosecutor. The formal charge issued by a grand jury stating that nearby is enough evidence that the defendant committed the crime to assert having a trial; it is used primarily for felony.

Hope this helps.

More Questions and Answers:
[831] - [2432] - [944] - [558] - [1161] - [2419] - [833] - [1049] - [1076] - [598] - [2101] - [2443] - [385] - [1136] - [803] - [609] - [2357] - [234] - [2363] - [1521]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: