Law Questions and Answers
California Law about Stop Sign contained by Front of House?
Okay...so, here's the deal. I live at the intersection of a three method stop. In other words, there are three stop signs (one at the curb surrounded by front of my house, one at the curb of the house across the street to the right of me, and one directly in front of me across the street). Confusing...I know. Just dream of that you're sitting at a four-way stop, but instead of your stop sign being a sign...it's my house beside three stop signs surrounding you.So, my question is this...when I verbs out of my driveway, am I supposed to stop by law...and if so, am I supposed to backbone up all the agency to the stop sign to do so?
Anyone who gets this put somebody through the mill is very smart. Anyone who can answer it is a ace! ;)
Answers: You are entering the street from private property. The law provides that surrounded by that situation you must yield right of process to all traffic close ample to constitute a hazard. (Veh Code piece 21804.) In other words, legally it is as if within are three stop signs on the street, and a yield sign at the closing of your driveway. You need not stop unless nearby is other traffic (or, obviously, pedestrians) nearby. (For safety's sake, I would recommend always stopping, however.)
I see no object for you to pull out of your own driveway any differently than the subsequent person. Since you can never transmit if any other car is going to pick this moment to run a stop sign, I meditate you should stop at the foot of your driveway, before your coup¨¦ enters the street, check adjectives three streets, then finish approval out and go on your path.
There's no reason within the world to back up farther, until you're at one of the stop signs.
You don't spinal column up to a stop sign.
You back out of your driveway, put the sports car in forward and start traveling contained by the direction you want to go. If nearby is a stop sign in front of you, facing you, when you start traveling forward, you stop for it. No event how close or far away it is.
If you pull out of your driveway contained by forward, you stop at the first stop sign facing you.
You should not be backing out of your driveway departed a stop sign into the intersection. That is dangerous and dubious. It is considered running the stop sign. When backing out, stay out of the intersection.
What age do you have to be to panorama Porn?
Is it true that its legal to estimation internet porn at any age? Because i heard on a documentary it is!Answers: any age
most associates start when entering puberty though so age 12-14
no it aint
u must b 18 or older
oodles children watch porn on the internet because near is no way to convey if your a child online because many pretend about at hand age
however, it is illegal to scrutinize child porn
Porn in itself is a social sickness that have become deep-rooted since the sexual revolution. Over the decades porn became legalized near restrictions and an age limit be set to prevent corruption of the young minds. As it seem, it was approved that over 18 is a safe age to picture porn, and thus selected porn be given a legal status in boundaries.
There are numerous surveys out there that clearly show that individuals who divulge contained by this social evil are far more from the younger generation, consequently the older one as the curiosity to know the contrary sex, is at its highest during the teen-age.
The curiosity go down as the individuals get ripened and have access to more actual relationships rather than 2-D screen.
It would be better to totally disallow viewing of pornographic material at any age. Since it does not promote any benign of mental or creative development of the mind.
Well, most sites enunciate you have to be 18, at lowest in the U.S.. But i.e. probably to protect the sites from laws governing them.
Not sure if at hand are any laws specifically target minors for viewing porn on their own.
If there are, they would not be adhere to anyway, and I have never hear of a minor being prosecuted for viewing porn, which would be somewhat ridiculous since next to impossible to monitor.
I'm not going to try to BS you or preach to you similar to some are, and or comment on whether it should or should not be done.
What is interesting is that countries with historically a better availability of porn (Netherlands, Sweden) have not as much of sex crimes. And Japan who is big into the rape fantasy porn have the lowest sex crime rate in the industrialized world.
Wikipedia have an interesting post on porn in standard, which is interesting, and comments on several different aspects.
So, my answer is that I really don't know. Ha.
But frankly, probably not that of a big deal, unless someone make it into a big deal.
Well the methodical legality will depend on your location.
The practical authority will depend on if your parents catch you or not --- AND whether they do anything roughly it.
All of my boys had porn of some sort or another starting at around age 12. I a short time ago ignored it.
Victim of Hate Crime?
If I am targeted by a black male mugger because I am a "rich" white guy,am I the sufferer of a hate crime?There are protests going on to strengthen the application of disgust crime laws,aren't the law supposed to be color-blind?
Answers: Another debate that will take a longstanding form at the head of the table for years to come.
You do enjoy a point that the "HATE CRIME" issue should be color blind, but the difference in this issue is some people won't forget history, and adopt that times have changed in connection with color and matters also connected to discrimination.
Also surrounded by my opinion AL SHARPTON won't adopt that he not Martin Luther King JR.
We have to look at the facts of these issues at mitt, and even though long winded and maybe a controversial answer, I enjoy every right to my opinion. I will state my peace, regardless of what someone else may believe. First off, I am a White American Woman, FYI
I will switch on by saying, that Hate Crimes develop everyday, and it's shouldn't be just a black /white or a gay/ straight, etc. issue. But some populace will always form it a black /white and/or a gay/ straight issue because of the history within these arguments.
It's also a certainty that some may not be able to differentiate the difference between "Hate Crimes" and "Discrimination" within the United States.
Even the words United States at this point, is such a fickel statement, because of the divided state this country has become on not one but adjectives issues to date.
If not a problem with Discrimination and Hate Crimes, it's the problem inwardly Governmental Leadership, The War in Iraq and Afganistan, the issue of general public starving within other countries, but not noticing the adjectives american's in the streets of our american cities.
One issue after another, the actual point to this and other matter is that "WE THE PEOPLE" requirement better leadership and guidance for the years to come. The nation is stirring because we are strained between adjectives of our issues, not just "Hate Crimes" but everything within currunt standings within the nation.
Sooner or next something has to impart, we need to carry back to bare bones and stop bringing up matters of former times to get a point accross.
The article with constantly bringing up the mishap within JENA LA, is something people use as their leaverage to undertake more, those people contained by JENA, (really did not) want such a gathering within their peaceful town but, sure adequate. AL SHARPTON, stepped in and made it more of a black /white issue, and discriminatory issue, than it really have to be. In turn straining the fabric of the nation even more and dividing it's nation. THANKS AL!
Now even more, people are pressing these issues, when surrounded by all authenticity, some may have forgotten their point of their argument and are a short time ago going with this issue to construct the news and stand for something.
Our age group is not from the 60's, The True Time of Movement and Change. The time when people if truth be told realized that correct needed to happen and did come about, and stood up as a people, as "ONE NATION" to engender change ensue.
Now is not the time for inner conflict within the nation, very soon isn't the time to say, Hate Crimes and Discrimination are like, which in adjectives honesty they are altogether different things and should be handled as such.
We shall not stay divided, or more dark times are ahead. If we are a nation that is discriminating, or approving "repugnance crimes" then, SHOW ME YOUR CONCRETE PROOF.
Show me that two Basketball Stars, ONE BLACK AND ONE WHITE, sort exactly the same amount of money, not because of talent but because of color. Show me the TV or Movie Star, black or white that make more money because of color and not talent. Show me the business man, white or black that makes more of a commision, because of color and not their sale! Show me, the PREIDENTIAL Canidate that is surrounded by the running because of racial issues and not for the want to back change the country and product things better for the American People.
SHOW ME THE PROOF, that we need to m¨ºl¨¦e about this. This should not be a BLACK OR WHITE, GAY OR STRAIGHT, CATHOLIC OR ATHIST, SINGLE OR MARRIED ISSUE.
Stick next to the program people, one article 9/11 should have qualified us is that "WE ARE UNITED, NOT DIVIDED!" , the sad member is even our own people are forgetting this to procure in the word and make their voice hear, even if this is something that makes us quiz and conflict with respectively other.
This is sad to me that we own let are nation win so out of hand, and not bear control of a nation made "BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE" should we remember those's words and hope that the madness of dividing the Country for careless issues stops so we can focus on more important issues, Like getting our American Men and Women home from the WAR. Conserving on consumer product consumption, for the better of the nation. The gas prices, and steam issues people are going to own this winter, while the Oil Companies, backed by our President and Vice President, brand record sale margins. The lingering FACT of Global Warming, i.e. taking a back burner, because it's a moment ago not as important until it's EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
These are the issues I'm thinking more or less, ARE YOU!
(Arene: I respect what you said and appericate your input, thank you and many blessing)
:-)
First of adjectives, your economic class wouldn't play a factor within a hate crime. Therefore making your interrogate not make any sense. If it's a mugger, and your rich, than he desires your money.
If a black man targets you because you're white and that justification only; than yes, that's a detest crime. It does happen.
You hold to prove that any attack is motivated based on your skin color. Someone wanting your money is not sufficient plenty.
People who say that solely WHITES get charges near hate crimes are WRONG...it is not true. Black race do and have be charged with repugnance crimes along with whites and other nationalities/cultures. I did a weekly in a psychology class, and if you do research on string, you will find cases of it.
I would punch the Al-Magher in his frontage...and it wouldn't be because of his race, it would be because of his intelligence.
no.
newly because you have some identify feature, does not show that any action directed against you is due to that specific feature.
possibly he just needed money?
or is that too far fetched?
you might hang on to in mind that if you're black, the likelihood of you being a object are greater than if you're white.
and every crime committed is not a hate crime.
If it can be proven that you are targeted lately because you are a white guy it should be considered a hate crime. If it can be rpoven that the black guy is prearranged to hate white guys, it should be considered a dislike intensely crime.
GE I must share with you as a black woman in that are many times citizens say things that are fairly offensive to me and they do not realize they are one offensive but it solely takes pretending impossible to tell apart thing is man said to them.
Example:
1. You are pretty for a black woman (am I being compared to another see to justify if I qualify for exquisiteness?)
Very small children who have not be instructed in thier parents prejudices are competent to appreciate true diversity in others.
As more become less and associates fear losing their sense of self worth surrounded by a world of intolerance, we will continue to see these so call hate crimes.
Take vigilance GE,
Arene
Can someone who goes to regulation school surrounded by America and passes the dowel here practice law within other countries?
I was wondering because I've other wanted to live surrounded by england. But I'm in college and want to pick a highest and job that would allow me to live contained by another country if I decided or to travel.Answers: You would necessitate to get an LLM after regulation school- a masters degree within law. You could achieve it in international regulation or abroad if you set yourself up resourcefully in imperative school.
No.
English decree isn't the same as US statute. Heck, some states don't even acknowledge other states bars.
Child support info please?
my ex got leukemia at the bring to a close of last year.he get his bone marrow t.p. this year i filed for child support in the past i knew he have this.at the end of 07 he have been not there for 4 years then presently 5years he only contacted the kids contained by Jan 07 when he wanted the kids to be tested to see if they be a match.my child support go through in motorcade 07 and in may 07 he file for it to be reduced.he is on some kind of aid because he be sick and they were taking 420 from that sorce.he go to court to have it reduced because he be not working anymore.i figure it would be lowered.but not to Z E R O .my question is if he is on some aid ssi or disability etc. are the kids eligible?is in attendance a way to find out if hes on anything?i live surrounded by california.what do i do? thanks for your time.Answers: you know.I'm trying to find that out too...so ailing be watching! my daughter is on ssi and is mentally disabled and Ive raised her son for 11 years beside NO financial support from her in adjectives that time. i make almost nil with my employment...and they said(ssi) that you cant appropriate support payments from ssi. also - don't count on social services to help .. they simply want to know all of your business within exchange for a few measly food stamps. is there any even-handedness out there and how can they be made responsible for THEIR children! she get all her money lacking the responsibly of rent , food , utilities or any living expenses. she lives with some grotesque drunk family who use her for her income. according to the ruling...its OK for them to have her income, and to choose where on earth her $$$$ goes but not for her son. the statute is really made FOR the criminal!
Probably not much you do about it.
Not to be morbid but if he dies, you children will achieve Social Security of like 700 a month per child.
Here is a social shelter site that gives info more or less getting support for your kids. good luck
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/dibplan/df...
Do you think owning the Liberty dollar is lawful?
Here is an article on the Liberty Dollar.http://www.thestreet.com/s/raid-on-ron-p...
The FBI raided the headquarters of the Liberty Dollar company and seized adjectives the assets.
What is your take on the authenticity of owning the Liberty Dollar?
Here is the link to the certified Liberty Dollar web site near an article on the raid.
http://www.libertydollar.org/ld/legal/ra...
Answers: Do you reflect on owning/selling a 2003 Subaru vehicle is legal? Of course it is! The lack of restrictions Dollar has NEVER be printed with the logo, "LEGAL TENDER"! What's subsequent, the fed outlaw personal ownership of gold ingots & silver? Are the feds NOW telling us what we can both COLLECT & SELL? My answer is YES they are! Folks WAKE UP here!!! This issue is NOT something like taxes to keep our policy funded for operation. This issue is about folks CONTROL, nothing else!!! This pernickety issue is why I keep describing folks on Y/A to vote for constitutionally based REPRESENTATIVES, NOT POLITICIANS! Again here folks, WAKE UP!
I am guessing that at hand is a freedom from taxation ring to this... saw it this morning too, haven't had a hit and miss to dig deeper even so.
Sounds like a closed barter system to me though at best. who wants an discount with a fixed total amount of currency/value? I'd a bit have the competency to innovate to create value far above the amount of money surrounded by circulation at any given time.
I don't know for sure yet, but I will probably be more surprised after not if there isn't a tinge of "Idaho separatists" heavily involved here.
Absolutely nil illegal around it at all.
What is bent and unconstitutional is the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. Reserve Bank notes are positively worthless and backed by nil. All your hard-earned money is nothing but pieces of worthless quality newspaper or electronic numbers in a computer. Its with the sole purpose value is by rule and can be made worthless by decree.
Wake up America. You've be conned. Your fathers owned the topography, now what do you own...? Worthless broadsheet money? Who now owns the ground, which is the only item that has any TRUE value? Your policy is giving your land to the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking corporation, to furnish the national debt owed to the Federal Reserve for the interest it charges on lend you your currency.
The Federal Reserve system is enslaving YOU.
Owning the Liberty dollar is not unauthorized. However, minting the Liberty dollar and telling other folks to use it as currency is illegal.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 486 states:
"Whoever, except as authorized by directive, makes or utters or pass, or attempts to utter or pass, any coins of gold ingots or silver or other metal, or alloys of metals, intended for use as current money, whether in the resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries, or of untested design, shall be fined under this title or incarcerated not more than five years, or both."
Technically, all money is if truth be told property of the government. That's why it's unjust to destroy it. So no.
Can a suspected terrorist buy a gun in USofA?
Without any surroundings check?Answers: yes.
They could also buy fertilizer and diesel fuel. do you think we should require circumstance checks for that too ?
This is going to depend on what state they're attempting to purchase a gun in...
And as long as they're solely a "suspected" terrorist and hasn't been charged near anything -- they have no criminal story and can pass a surroundings check... there's no reason they couldn't properly obtain a firearm.
(Not sure if a setting check is required in ALL states within the U.S.)
Probably easier than a law-abiding citizen. But fortunately we have our gun-control law to stop that. Since terrorists and criminals will obey those law.
Is there one statute that you would like to translate? Is there a regulation that you'd like to see enact?
Answers: i would like to move the child molestion law to rape and fashion the bastards do 50-60 years not 2-4.
All drugs should be legalized. That will ruin gangs, maffia, even terrorists. A few junkies will die and later they will learn to stay away and handle their addiction.
Billions of $$ could be saved from reducing by 80% reformatory population, law enforcement, courts, legal aid etc
Prostitution should also be lawful and protected as any other business. would save lots of lives.
I would similar to to see speed limits removed from adjectives leagistlatures.
I would like to see a nation yawning smoking ban for everyone surrounded by exsistance.
I would like to enjoy the statute that prohibits the US government from assignating foreign head of state repealed.
I would like a statute instituted that a designated foreign guide of state that is declared an antagonist of the US that is kill by any US citizen be awarded a one million dollar bounty.
That goes for respectively member of his troop as well.
A Law to Be Changed: for the cut rate in the average sentence for a crack cocaine offense by 15 months to be applied retroactively.
A Law to Be Enacted: Stiffer penalty for hate crimes.
Australia's view on...?
anyone kno wut australia's judgment is on the following topics??Right of Indigenous People
RIght of Self-Determination
Inhumane Punishment
any and all back is appreciated
Answers: This is a very intricate question to answer. The clamber of the topics can and already has jam-packed volumes of books on the matter, next to quite a settlement of emotion and controversy.
Indigenous Australians own the same rights as any other citizen of Australia. Under the constitution they also hold a specific protection where no detrimental tenet to their well person can be passed. Australians are great believers in everyone have a "fair go" but not at the expense of one group over another. Australia's Indigenous folks were treated irrationally in days gone by, sometimes even with the best of intentions. Australia at federation started near Indigenous Australians being disenfranchised from their territory, their history, the right to vote and even each other. Over the ultimate 200 years we have have to come to terms near a bloody history and the sins of the past. We chose by a common vote to grant Aborigines full citizenship and full rights within line next to every other Australian. In recent Years the court system has also recognised Aboriginal custodianship of the manor, and granted native title rights.
Right of self-determination should have it in mind the right to decide ones own adjectives and follow the pursuit of one's own happiness. Australian's are smiling for this to happen, but not at the expense of dividing the nation by apartheid. We are adjectives Australians.
I think Australians surrounded by general abhor inhumane punishment. This is why the demise penalty is very soon banned across the nation. The punishment should fit the crime.
Libel and email can a person be sued if...?
I sent and email to a personality, this person forwarded it to a third soul. Now the third person is threating to sue for libel for what I stated to the second soul in the private email to them roughly the third person, which be private and not intended to be forwarded to anyone. This was not made public.Sorry to nouns confusing. Can I be sued for libel?
Answers: I'm pretty sure libel involves PUBLISHING negative remarks around a person, so you should be surrounded by the clear.
Well,you did publish a letter,and sent it to someone bar the person you be talking something like. In other words if you would have sent it directly to the third person(in your case) no,not libel. It might be horrible to her,but no harm done,because it be between you two.
Now did you say what she did to the personage you said she skewed over true? If it was,no damage.
However,if it was not true,and you know it wasn't. You might have a problem. That would fall over into the realm of slander.
My advocate is wait and see what she does. the burden is on her to prove you did harm to her character.
You could hail as a Lawyer or call official aid. Either one will explain the intricate legal standings.
Anything you do on the internet, including email, become part of the public pervue. That's why you should be completely careful what you write or read aloud.
Not only is it public but it NEVER GOES AWAY.
More Questions and Answers:
[2476] - [885] - [531] - [1597] - [89] - [1541] - [1424] - [1731] - [169] - [41] - [773] - [1212] - [81] - [2331] - [1593] - [436] - [1213] - [1723] - [1851] - [398]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: