Law Questions and Answers

How is a fullyautomatic weapon obtained?

I know some guns at the gun gamut who converted weapons to automatic (legally near atf) and one man has a m60 appliance gun it was a surplus (rarely used more for show buit used once surrounded by a while)

He told me the gun cost around 11k in 1996 and approaching 1200 a year to keep lincensed is this true??

I've see gun auctuions with prices contained by 20k ranges i mean can you still own one of thesis without speding like mad of money?

---

Answers: Pathfinder has is right. The local police enjoy to sign for you. To have that come up you would have to be someone. Older, seriously agreed to the community, knock some elbows with the local politicians, donate money, be seriously established, etc. beside some sort of combination of such things.

For the average guy or even one one with some money will find simply purchasing the weapon expensive. You will call for the paperwork in charge to just buy it and the guy selling it is probably not going to dawdle while you square this away... unless you are paying big bucks.

It is not a poor man's hobby to have automatic weaponry. And while collecting and for show is all fine and okay an automatic version is not really advantageous. A semi in in good health practiced hands contained by far more effective than an auto contained by ill practiced ones.

---

Get the proper paperwork from your local BATF bureau, fill it out, and rate the fee. However, until that time you even budge, if you are just an average everyday Jow Blow, you will be wasting the application duty, because it will NOT get approved. One of the stipluations is that your local chief directive enforcement officer has to co-sign for you, whch resources, in essence, he is co-responsible if you budge amok with it. I know of no police chief, nor sheriff who is feeling like to do this for John Q. Citizen.

Under New york law ,what are the elements of a rationale of action for breach of a adjectives law contract?

Citation of casing?

Citation of statute?

---

Answers: One example is provided at the website below.

If You Support Marijuana Legality, Do You Support The Legality Of ALL Drugs?

I wanted to know that if those out there are for marijuana to be lawful if they feel that ALL drugs should be legalized? It is our bodies so do we hold the right to all drugs?

---

Answers: Yes. All drugs should be legalized. The affairs of state has really no bearing contained by telling me what I can or cannot do inwardly my own home, so long as I'm not infringing of anybody else's rights.

---

Yes. The decriminilaztion of all drugs would totally cut down on organized crime and create TONS of revenue for drug prevention and treatment programs.

While I don't agree next to a lot of drugs that are so destructive, similar to meth or crack, apparently having them forbidden is not really stopping the problem.

EDIT to Christina: Coccaine is NOT destructive like heroin. You don't seize addicted from one go and it doesn't truly destroy your body at adjectives...unless you use too much and have a heart attack...which could be said of McDonalds fries too.

---

No I do not support that.
There is a huge difference between marijuana and cocaine or heroin.
Weed can be an occasioal drug as it's not physically addictive. All other drugs are. If I have a kid, I would rather he smokes up once within a while, rather than whip to a harder legal drug that would practically closing up controlling his life.

---

ably.triping or killing someone when on speed are not duplicate as eating a couple of boxes of cookies,,,,,,,,,,,so no

Expungement & Sealment ?

What are the differences between the both I need it broken down contained by laymons term I hold a hard time elucidation so if you could explain this to me I would Greatly apreciate it

---

Answers: "Expungement is the removal of police and court records from public inspection." Each state may implement expungements differently and the purpose is ultimately the same.

Sealment is the conduct yourself of sealing a copy or case record.

How accurate is the depiction of uk control orders surrounded by the TV drama Britz?

http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsit...

---

Answers: I don't know, but the whole article seemed exaggerated and a bit far fetch.

---

probably as aCCURATE AS THE REST OF the garbage on tv

What steps can my family pocket to have a POA removed for my Grandmother?

My Grandmother signed a POA to her daughter, who have since blocked all domestic from visiting grandma. She have actually told the family circle members that she be not going to allow anyone that would "poison my grandma's mind against her" to have any contact near her. Grandma is starting to suffer from Alzheimer's but she is still in the dawn stages of it. I was competent to sneak a call thru to her and she be unaware that her line wasn't able to settle to her. She was vastly upset about this. I am currently playing phone stub with a couple of attorneys trying to work on getting a court lay down to remove the block from visitations for her. Does anyone have any other planning of things I could do to try to speed up the process so the family can call in grandma and even talk to her on the phone.

---

Answers: If grandma have a diagnosis of alzheimer's, she needs to give up a durable poa to someone who's not going to isolate her and make her sicker, but this is purely for estate planning purposes. The more earth-shattering step is to have a guardian appointed for her. Your aunt will be at odds tooth and nail. Let her. By conflict, she will inform the court far better than you ever could that an order of protection is needed to keep hold of your aunt away from grandma. Another step, feasible if grandma is emotion up to it AND her dementia really is in the impulsive stages, is to get her out of that house and away from your aunt, who apparently is doing a number intended to cause herself the sole heir. Remember that a POA does not donate your aunt any authority to control your grandmother, but it DOES give her the power to strip away every penny she have and leave her destitute. The guardianship would prevent that taking place, but it would also be a good move to notify the guard that the POA has be revoked.

---

If your Grandmother is still competent she can revoke the POA herself and appoint someone else.

Otherwise I would suggest speaking to your public trustee office.

---

Since Grandmother have been diagnosed near Alzheimer's, grandmother CANNOT revoke the POA. The diagnosis means that grandmother is no longer deem competent to manage her own affairs, and that includes revoking the POA.

Someone wishes to file a Petition for Guardianship next to the Court system. Hire one of those attorneys.

How do I renew an out of state (Florida) driver's license here in California?

---

Answers: https://express.hsmv.state.fl.us/Express...

---

If you still enjoy family surrounded by Florida, you can renew over the internet and have it mail to them. You must have Florida address to do this though.

Does a petition for entry in to home by cps supersede a warrant to search out?

in tennessee can a cps worker us single a petition to gain entry or is a search warrant required?

---

Answers: CPS workers own the right to enter a home when they receive information that a child is in grave exposure such as when abuse have already occurred. No warrant is required; however, the police usually guide the CPS worker for the CPS worker's safety.

Statute of limitation's for theft 3-Washington State?

Okay, so this soul was arrested/booked at the local city intern and a few hours later released for burglary 3 in Oct. 2005. Statute of limitation's is 2 yrs. for a gross-misdemeanor which I believe this is, which would run out within Oct. 2007. Then 6 months after the crime occured (April 2006) this person moved out of state, however the courts be notified by this personage. This person have never received anything from the courts or ordered to appear in court back a judge. Is the grip now closed/dismissed since it's be 2 years?

I can't image the statute would hold stopped. The courts can't assume this person would move pay for to the state and the remainder of the 2 years (1.5 yrs from when they moved) would start up again. That wouldn't make sense would it?

---

Answers: y don't you simply relax. I think you'll be fine

Thoreau's Civil Disobedience?

We are using this line " They one and only can force me who obey a difficult law than I." from Thoreau's Civil Disobedience. [If you want I will post the intertwine for you to read yourself (part 2 paragraph 14)] In this context, a man is broken physically, but does not concede his mind/spirit/thoughts to those who imprison him.

Who do you see as an authority contained by your life? What do they "make" you do? What do you see as a highly developed law? Who define, to you, an authority over another man? And who give that personality power over the other? Should all humankind, submit to a standard that everyone agrees on, "The Golden rule", 10 Commandments, Matthew 19:19 OR should we be not here to our own accord, within a state of flux and anarchy?

This I post to you world. I hope you can assist me on my research. Thank you!

---

Answers: The book of Romans talks in the region of government deriving their power from God. I believe humility is the mother of adjectives virtues, therefore I try to tender the benefit of the doubt to government authority. I expect one better be damn sure before going stale half cocked thinking they are right and the political affairs is wrong.
That being said, it is doubtful that adjectives persons can submit to a standard that everyone can agree on.
What is right depends on what culture you live contained by. Hippies tend to be for free love and against killing. There be a cannibal tribe (I Believe in Brazil), that be very puritanical. They wiuld conjecture nothing of consumption the gonads of someone from another tribe but would feel shamed to vision the ankle under a dress of someone of the differing sex from their same tribe.
I believe it is better to be a person who basis their values on morals and ethics than on conviction. I take the humanist spectacle that people are of expediency and it is good if culture strive for good even if nearby is an absense of a God. If there's a God out there, great, conceivably He or She is a good God. But our behave in a angelic manner hopefully doesn't come around only because we own a fear of God.
I believe it be Thoreau who compared an ant colony to humankind. He observes hundreds of ant pulling a twig toward the ant hole. About 10 percent of the ants be pulling in the wrong direction, but nevertheless, progress be made. The same can be said for humankind. We work against each other to a great extent, and our activities as a whole are immensely inefficient, but we do make progess, nonetheless.

---

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

---

Answer question:

This question has already close!