Law Questions and Answers
Get real answers from millions of physical people.?
Can I press charge against a 17 year antediluvian boy who having sex next to my 15 years old daughter?Answers: YOU can't press charges -- the prosecutor would press charges. And whether the conduct you are describing is unendorsed or not depends on the state.
My question is does anybody believe that marijuana will be endorsed in the US anytime soon?
Me individually I believe that it should be. I think that alcohol is bearing worse health clever and marijuana could actually minister to our economoy. If it was endorsed the government could rates it similar to alcohol, they can use hemp for many different things(rope,clothes and frequent other things too), and correct me if Im wrong but I even heard that cannabis even puts out more oxygen later trees. Well please share with me your opinion on this.Answers: Whether is should be and whether it will be are two completely different questions. I agree beside your argument on the legalization. Makes perfect sense to me. But we live within a Christian society and the war on drugs have been going on for far too long to basically do a 180 and decide to make conform it. It would take a MASSIVE propaganda assault to convince the common herd of our views on this issue.
I agree that it should be officially recognized, but I doubt that we will see it in our lifetime.
The problem is that the political affairs can't regulate it when people will grow it at home. If the management can't get their sticky corpulent fingers on all the duty money, then they might not bother.
There have a hard adequate time getting medical marijuana passed in states.
should be legally recognized? yes
WILL be legal? no (not surrounded by my lifetime)
MJ has be demonized for so long that the likely hood of it ever self legal surrounded by the US is probably slim to nil.
People have be indoctrinated into thinking it is a step on to harder stuff. And there may be some truth to that, but so is alcohol.
I one-sidedly do not use either, but still dream up that legalization of most drugs could free up resources to fight indisputable crime. It would also allow regulation, and bankrupt plentiful criminal organizations who use drugs to fund their other operation.
I'm sure that Yahoo will delete this question and transport you a violation become aware of, and may even scold adjectives of us who answer, but here goes anyway:
No, it's unlikely that marijuana will be legalized, or even decriminalized soon. There's too much of a stigma attached to it, as those who freely imbibe alcohol and smoke cigarettes suppose of marijuana as a "hippie drug."
If you think more or less all the money spent on interdiction, arrest, prosecution, and incarceration, you'll come up near many billions of dollars save by decriminalizing this plant.
If you think around the billions in sale taxes that could be collected, as well as the secondary income to farmers for growing it, it sounds even better for the financial health of the country.
I don't chew over any intelligent person believes marijuana is suitable for you, but you are probably correct in that it's absolutely no worse than alcohol or tobacco.
I wish.hey even the governor Arnold said he doesn't consider it a drug 'cuz it grows on a fern.lol
I agree!!
Can I sue a business that refuses to stop reporting a symmetry owed on my credit report 3yrs after bankrupcy?
Wells Fargo Bank still says I owe them over 40K. The productive amount on my bankrupcy was around 30K. They are still charging behind fees and interest. I've called them every month for olden times three years to tell them that they be included on my bankrupcy and plaese stop reporting it as a balance owed. They said respectively time they would take trouble of it. To date they have not. What can I do? What's my officially recognized recourse?Answers: Provide documentation of this debt being included (and discharged) contained by your Bankruptcy, to each of the 3 Credit Bureaus. They are required by ruling to remove erroneous entries or you can sue them for $1,000.00 (each) for non-compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
Provide impossible to tell apart documentation to Wells Fargo (certified mail), along with your assertion of your right to notify the Bankruptcy Court of the creditors' continued betrayal of Federal Bankruptcy Laws, which can result in the issuance of a $10,000.00 fine.
Inquire next to your attorney about YOUR personal option for litigation against Wells Fargo as well.
Good Luck.
You can pocket them to court yes. If they weren't present at your bankruptcy audible range to enforce their claim against you. Then the debt was forgiven and that would hold been noted within the bankruptcy paperwork.
If they constantly throw out to do anything about it. Then your best bet is to contact the court and hold them deal beside it.
You can put a correction/explanation in your credit report. Contact the credit agency and they will report to you how to do it. It must be in writing. Phone call will only gain you so far. Put your request to Wells Fargo in writing including the valise number of the bankruptcy and relate them that you are putting an explanation in your credit report.
Hwat kind of attorney would I need to find if i needed to sue over unlawful eviction?
Answers: A dumb one. If the eviction was unlawful, why didn't you retain an attorney to shield against it?
Probably the time to have deal with the lawfulness of the eviction would own been when you be evicted in court.
Now it sounds resembling you want to appeal on procedural grounds, and that is going to be a really very long shot.
If you want to do it, next just start calling lawyer in your local pallid pages. But probably not the one that represented you surrounded by the first case :)
One that handle landlord and tenant directive. They are listed contained by your local telephone book. Sometimes it is lower than Real Estate law.
Suppose that a local businessperson, McDougal is a good friend of Krunch ,the owner of local candy store .?
Suppose that a local businessperson, McDougal is a devout friend of Krunch ,the owner of local candy store . Every day on his lunch hour McDougal go into Krunch's candy store and spends about 5 minutes looking at the candy. After examining krunch's candy and conversation with krunch, McDougal usually buys one or two candy bar.One afternoon, McDougal goes into Krunch's Candy shop,looks at the candy,and picks up a $ 1 candy inn. Seeing that Krunch is very busy, he catch Krunch's eye, waves the candy pole at Krunch without adage a word, and walks out. Is within contract?*(Express versus Implied Contracts)
Answers: From the situation, its an implied contract
Who cares? They are friends and Krunch know that McDougal will pay Krunch the dollar the subsequent day. Krunch is not going to christen the police or charge interest. McDougal is not going to stiff Krunch and force him to sue. Therefore, there is no possible "satchel or controversy" that a court could consider.
Being Harrassed by former Landscapers?
We had a Landscaping Company doing our courtyard work for a while, but then we fired them and hired a different company because they weren't doing the charge they promised to do and were overcharging us. When they disappeared, they were rewarded in full.Now, they hang on to calling us at least three or four times a week asking to "diary the next appointment" and I share them every time they call that we no longer want their services.. they wait a few days and send for again.
It's getting very annoying. What can be done nearly it?
Answers: You could retain a lawyer and win the lawyer to distribute them a letter of representation relating them not to contact you anymore.
You could also send them a epistle yourself telling them to stop and desist their contact with you.
a. Change your phone number (and do not tender them the new number)
b. Get caller-id and do not answer the call from them
c. Put your number on the do-not-call list (which does not apply to them WHILE they hold an existing business relationship with you) AND end their business relationship with you, within writing.
d. Complain to the BBB.
e. Schedule the appointment for sometime at least 120 years after when you be born. Since you will be dead by afterwards, it will be someone else's problem.
Can i get harrassment charges or a restraining demand???
my husbands ex's are harrassing us.they put dog poop in his truck they enjoy broke into our bedroom.they follow him around.they threaten to have me whitewashed up.the cops won't do anything what can i do???Answers: File a criminal case of unreasonable vexation and grave threats against the ex of your husband by narrating adjectives the irregularities that were made against you and your properties so that appropriate performance will be made by the Police and the Court.
restraining order most likey...
The cops HAVE to do something...
Considering they treaten you.
ooh tricky situation!! try cops within another town/ city. see whta they say and if they read out you can then describe the cops in your town/city that they should be doing something or take the other town's police to tell them for you
hoipe i help x
I would move..Far, far, far, far away.
FILE A RESTRAINING ORDER AND BEAT THEIR MOTHER FREAKIN BUTTS
consult an attorney. file for a restraining lay down, by law they enjoy to issue one if you have any evidence. I'd start carrying a video camera to capture them.
if all else failsl, a short time ago kill the biatch
Way too much drama for me
You plainly need to database for a restraining order, and he does as economically.
I don't do drama very powerfully, but if you're willing to stick it out, silver the locks and invest in some surveillance equipment. You can also phone a security service to patrol your house when you're not nearby.
Write them a letter outlining everything that they did and emergency they stop. Make sure it is polite, but tell them that you no longer want anything to do near them and that you will turn the matter over to a permitted source if you have to. Have it sent certified communication and get proof of service.
Should they preserve this up, you can give a copy to the police and a legal representative.
Whats the difference between assigning and sub-letting?
I have get a 10 year lease on a flat but i want to go travelling for 2 years but i'm not sure whether i will come stern or not. What would be best to assign or sub-let the lease? Uk lawAnswers: Assigning ability you get someone to appropriate over your entire lease with adjectives liabilities.
Sub-letting process that you are still the record lease holder, but you negotiate next to someone else to live in your space for a spell less than your remaining lease. Hence, you would be looking for someone to sub-lease.
However, cause sure your lease agreement allows you the ability to sub-lease. Some lease require the consent of the lessor.
You must check your lease.
To assign is to pass adjectives the benefit of the lease to someone else who then become liable fot adjectives the tenants obligation. Most landlords don't like this and may charge to make available consent to the assignment.
Landlord probably also has to agree to sub-letting. This finances that you let to someone else but hold the liabilities. So if your sub tenant does not money rent or damages the flat you will be liable which might prove difficult if you are 5000 miles away.
You also need to check if your lease have any value - discuss to (real) estate agent.
In a sub-let, the original tenant is still the direct tenant -- and allows someone else to lease from them -- mode of a two-stage lease. But the original tenant remains "on the hook" for the lease amount, and the sub-let is simply for a portion of the time.
An assignment is a one-time transfer -- the current person take over the lease, and the previous tenant is (often) off the hook. But more specifically, the previous tenant transfers (assigns) their entire remaining lease permanent status. The previous tenant doesn't take the lease rear over like they do at the appendage of the sub-let.
The whole lease is assigned to a third delegation for the remainder of the term the assignees taking over the intact responsibility for the lease. The property is sub-let and the original lesee is responsible for ensure that the terms of the lease are honoured by the sub-lettee. unless the canon has changed I give attention to that if the assignee fails to take out his responsibilities like income the rent the original lessee is still responsible. i guess this may have changed
A Government hospital, did a unauthorized surgery. Can the person sue, due to complications?
Answers: Depends.
1. Is it a military appendage? No; barred by Feres doctrine.
2. Was this emergency lifesaving surgery surrounded by which a civilian was incapacitated and not sufficiently expert to consent? Yes, but probable loss.
3. Was this just a baggage of a doc working on a civilian patient and maxim "while I'm in here, I'll snip THAT" and complications developed within "THAT"? Yes, with a more promising chance of repossession in court.
If this is a federal hospital, you must first database a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act using an SF Form 95.
If this is a state hospital, you should look at whether your state have waived sovereign imperviousness to permit such suits.
There's not adequate information in your request for information for an answer to be given. A Government hospital could be a County hospital, a VA hospital, or a "on base hospital" When you vote "unauthorized surgery" do you mean not a soul signed a consent form? Complications, infection something minor or something major? What be it caused by?
Death Penalty?
I am in a debate class currently. We are deabting the issue of the Death Penalty. She put me on the side arguing the angelic. i need to know every righteous thing possible going on for the death cost. And i need sources please.Answers: If they are on demise row they obviously did something unbelievably atrocious and heinous and should be put to disappearance, by the way i agree beside the death cost, and if this country has ample money to go to time of war then it should plenty money to put someone to death.
You don't stipulation a source for this one, just plain logic would do:
It finances fewer criminals surrounded by the penal system, which means smaller quantity $$.
I'm against the death cost, by the way, so I won't administer you any more.
Shayna is wrong. The death cost does not save money. It in actual fact costs more money for all the permissible proceedings and appeals involved in executing someone that it does to hang on to them in prison for energy.
The best reason for the passing penalty is that prisoners sometimes escape and commit more murders. They cannot do that if they own been executed.
A terrific resource for students and student debaters is at
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.
You enjoy the harder side of this debate if you are supposed to base what you right to be heard on the facts. Good luck.
the good is that these a**holes that shift and murder people are mortal killed and setting an example that individuals who kill will infact be kill. in my point of picture, it's a life for a energy.
More Questions and Answers:
[703] - [1009] - [2114] - [2426] - [1305] - [1702] - [807] - [1653] - [1826] - [1208] - [2314] - [2145] - [727] - [258] - [768] - [231] - [1023] - [2077] - [1365] - [448]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: