Law Questions and Answers

Is it illegal??????????

to carry student aid and say you live beside your parents when you actually reside somewheres else?

Answers: It is call stealing from the tax payers.

Sooner or following, your friend will be found out and be required to repay the money.

The government, while slow, is not stupid.they will capture her.

i think you will be alright

Running away at 16?

Someone told me that when they were 16
they ranaway and the cops be called and what not
the cops told her to grasp in the saloon and she did
but when she got within they told her she didnt have too
but since she did they have ot take her home
So if you runaway at 16 they cnat receive you go home or put you within social services as long as you are safe?

Answers: Where do you live? If you live within the US, it's completely inaccurate. If you evacuate home prior to turning 18 without parental green light, then you’re a runaway (unless you’ve be emancipated in some posture, such as marriage, which requires parental consent) and you of course can, and will, be picked up and brought back home. And if you runaway more than once you’ll probable be facing a judge. Rather you’re ‘safe’ or not doesn’t business.

yes apparently when your 16 if it can't be proven that u r in any moral or physical jeopardy no one can build you go stern home again...

but you would need to be somewhere that be classed as decent and own money/job/schooling ect

Applying for FEDEX Courier job. I get a DUI late 1996. Do I own to disclose it?

I was arrested for DUI within October 1996 and convicted January 1997. Do I have to put it down on my application and/or disclose it since it is over 10 years ancient for FedEX courier job? Other than that I own a clean transcript. I even recieved an award for driving safely contained by the Army.

Answers: If they ask you, answer honestly.

There will still be a record of your DUI conviction next to the court, even though your driving record may not show it, so it could come up contained by a background check.

Visit the website DUI expunge.com, which states as follows:

DUI Expunge
Many Americans over olden times 20 years have be arrested for DUI, criminal, disorderly, and municipal ordinance offenses. They may include your neighbors, friends and loyal church worshipers. The police keep a dictation of all arrests and convictions, even if 20 years prehistoric. These "secrets of the past" will soon be interested to anyone in your state including credit agencies. Anybody could ask the state police for a person's criminal diary, even arrests with not guilty findings. Allowing access to a person's hoary criminal conviction or arrest record could get underway the door for discrimination against someone who presently is a productive, respected, and law abiding citizen.

Dui accounts pertaining to an individual's DUI arrest are typically registered in both criminal databases and department of motor vehicle information systems. DUI library can be accessed by several different party. Having DUI records surrounded by one's background can affect a person's duration in oodles ways for years after the DUI incident.

A DUI is a criminal offense that is perpetrate by individuals who are caught driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This offense can be charged as a misdemeanor or as a felony depending on the specific circumstances surrounding the incident. Factors that can enhance the sentence contained by a DUI case can include: repeat offenses, a relatively superior blood alcohol level, the involvement of children contained by the incident, the involvement of accidents or injuries cause as a result of the incident, or if excessive speeding was involved. These types of factor can increase the likelihood of harsher penalty and more incriminating DUI records.

If you qualify for expungement, git 'er done! You nouns like a honourable candidate, esp within view of that safe and sound driving award.

Good luck!

Don't lie by departure it out. They will find it anyway when they do your background check.

Be honest.

Vacating a default decision in Ohio: Is nearby a time limit?

A failure to pay judgment be entered against contained by Ohio because I was gone at the hearing. I wasn't present because I be not served properly. I would like to wallet the appropriate paperwork to vacate the judgment but am not sure if it's be too long (4 years). Other states have time limitations but I cannot locate any information regarding Ohio regulation on the matter. Please cite any ruling that I may reference.

Answers: Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure - appears to enjoy a one year statute:

RULE 60. Relief From Judgment or Order

(A) Clerical mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgment, orders or other parts of the dictation and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such spot, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency of an appeal, such mistakes may be so corrected formerly the appeal is docketed in the appellate court, and thereafter while the appeal is in anticipation of may be so corrected with be off of the appellate court.

(B) Mistakes; inadvertence; excusable neglect; a moment ago discovered evidence; fraud; etc. On motion and upon such terms as are of late, the court may relieve a party or his legalized representative from a final judgment, decree or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable forgetfulness; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not own been discovered contained by time to move for a new trial underneath Rule 59(B); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the sentence has be satisfied, released or discharged, or a prior acumen upon which it is based have been reversed or otherwise vacate, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should hold prospective application; or (5) any other reason justifying nouns from the judgment. The motion shall be made inwardly a reasonable time, and for reason (1), (2) and (3) not more than one year after the judgment, directive or proceeding was enter or taken. A motion under this subdivision (B) does not affect the finality of a acumen or suspend its operation.

The procedure for obtaining any nouns from a judgment shall be by motion as prescribed contained by these rules.

i didn't read the above answer - but any time limit will start when you sensibly discovered the default sentence. if you didn't find out about it - reasonably- until 6 months ago, after that is when your 'statute of limitation' will set off to run.
And you really will have have to have not be served - just person served a little sour won't count.

NYC Being asked to remove my pet from my apartment.?

I have two dogs and my building singular allows one. Approximately 10 other people contained by the building also have 2 dogs. Recently we adjectives received letters stating to remove one of the dogs by the bring to a close of October or legal handling would be taken. Nobody got rid of their other dog. Now I hold received a second letter, this time from a legal representative. It seems I am the solitary one that received this second letter. I spoke to the other tenant that have 2 dogs and they didn't receive a second memo. Before I moved in here, I have an argument with the rental agent after I have signed my lease, and she made it very clear that she didn't approaching me. Could this be some personal vendetta? Why would I receive a second letter threatening further legitimate action and nobody else within the building did? Is there anything I could do? Is this nouns? I would like counsel from people next to experience so I can figure out what my subsequent step is.

Answers: You will lose this one why fight when you enjoy no case Or you can newly move out...

Your next step is to capture rid of your dog or be evicted. You know you are breaking conditions of the lease, and whether you are the first to go or the second doesn't make any difference, they are going to budge after everybody who got the missive, one at a time, which is their option.
They will singular do one or two at a time so they can concentrate their efforts on one at a time, and it is not nouns.
Two dogs in an apartment is not appropriate, anyway.

Edit
Oh, address of burning down the building is such a mature approach of dealing with the situation you created by blatantly ignore the rules, isn't it?
And don't be so ignorant as to assume the rest of us hold no pets. I have have dogs and cats for 38 years. We even have a horse. I am an animal individual. Two dogs in an apartment is not celebration to the dogs.

Even if no one else received the first memo, you would still have to catch rid of one of your dogs. Nothing you say here is banned discrimination.

Yes, it be probably a bad hypothesis to get into a tiff beside the management if you be planning to breach the terms of your lease agreement.

There is no vendetta..take a grip.

The apartment rules say single one dog.you decided to rebuff the rules and have two. They enjoy asked you to get rid of one and you enjoy not done it..they can evict you.

It has zilch to do with other tenant. No doubt, they will be served at some point. Perhaps the landlord can just handle one luggage at a time. It is a costly process for the landlord to gain you evicted.

Just follow the rules and you won't have any trouble.

You chose not to do that so when the proprietor takes you to court and evicts you, he will also be awarded his court costs.which you will enjoy to pay.

Should you be liable if you see a car disaster and you don't stop?

We've been discussing this is my directive class and everyone argues bad going on for it. What's your take on it?

Answers: Liable, no. I believe it is the statute in CA that if you are within a certain occupation such as nurse, doctor, EMT, minister you are required by statute to stop. They are also covered by the Good Samaritan Law. Meaning if they stop to render aid and someone should die, they are NOT help liable. But as far as I know not a soul has ever be arrested for not stopping.

If you are involved in the twist of fate, then I believe 100% that you should stop -- it's ILLEGAL not to!

If you're not involved within the accident, but saw it come up, you should also stop because your testimony/statements goes a long approach for the victim of the luck.

The only time I believe a individual is not required to stop at the scene of an accident is if they did not see EVERYTHING that happen to cause it.

Exactly how can you prevent a motor accident. The cause it's called an happenstance is because one has no acquaintance of when, where, or how it's going to come to pass.

Legally, one can't be responsible for something they have no control over.

If I see a motor accident, what can I accomplish by stopping? Blocking traffic, including police and rescue vehcles? If I did stop, what purpose could I serve? Provide medical aid, even though I'm not a doctor?

If someone else have stopped, what more can I do than he has already done? If I don't stop, and not a soul else has done so, what make me more liable than the others? Does someone that stops after I've passed somehow relieve me of liability?

How, or who, would determine my identity to hold me liable? It's hard plenty to pursue information about hit & run drivers in need adding uninterested passersby to attempt prosecution.

There are satisfactory police patrols AND polite samaritans to call it surrounded by that we don't need to clog the courts near additional liability for several drivers who don't stop to render anything it is that they're incapable of rendering in the first place.

Nothing surrounded by the California Vehicle Codes. Found nothing requiring medical professionals to stop any. Police and Fire officers are required to abet. See CVC 20016, 20017 and 20018.

Should abortion be legal or improper?

i dont believe in abortion unless within is a certain condition (such as a girl getting pregnant from individual raped).

Answers: Morals, Circumstance, Maturity

I don't know...

Is denying life for the greater biddable the right thing to do?

15 year hoary mother without the support of a family circle

or a 55 year old woman who risks her life span as well as the newborn

or in the adjectives when they can tell if you child has birth defect like down syndrome, or severe mental retardation

or your a mother near AIDS and finds out she's with child

Personally I cannot wrap my leader around the question. I see both sides...energy is precious but at this time I'd say it's her right to agree on.maybe in the future that will change

Amen, TG. Whether or not a woman requirements to get an abortion is her choice. Whether or not to gain an abortion is a moral issue, and everyone's morality is different. Most people's morality is tied to religion, and this country is built on the separation of church and state.

So, once again, get your religion stale my body.

I agree with TG. There is no idea anyone should be able to communicate someone else what to do with their bodies. It especially annoys me when men support abortion. Until a man have to go through a pregnancy, they should own no say.

The single people who should establish whether a woman can get an abortion is the woman herself and her doctor. That's my view.

Now if you're talking something like the local whore getting an abortion twice a month, then you've get a point. But if you're talking almost abortion in common, then why don't you support it?

If a woman across the country from you decide to abort a fetus, does it directly affect you? No.

Or what if it is a complicated pregnancy? What if going through with the pregnancy would create problems for the mother and child?

Or what around if the pregnancy was chance? A baby can rework life, for better or worse. Say a 17-year-old get pregnant and wants to abort, but can't because it's risky. What would she do? What if her family disowns her because she's have a child out of wedlock? (I know 2 general public who have have this happen to them) Or what if she have planned to go to college, but immediately can't because she's got to put adjectives her money and time into raising her tot?

Well there's my rant.

Are you a female? Are you pregnant? No one have a right to tell another personage what they can and can not do with their body. How would you similar to it if you had a disastrous mole you wanted to own removed and I said no, it's immoral and you can't do it.

Hypothetical, you hold a daughter, she wasn't raped, isn't going to die from giving birth but she's 14 years old, her boyfriend is indistinguishable age. Should she keep the babe-in-arms or have an abortion? Her aspect of life will be awful, have to drop out of school to give somebody a lift care of the child, you would be responsible for helping her.

In this valise would you be for abortion? How about adoption? How nearly foster care?

It is trial - and will stay that way.

Fortunately for you, you don't own a uterus so you don't have to verbs about getting one, immediately do you.

Actually, anyone who doesn't have a uterus have no place in the discussion surrounded by the first place.

Does the bill of rights apply to minors? and if not does at lowest possible the first amendment apply to minors?

Answers: Those documents apply to all citizens.

However, as a minor, you are required to mind your parents and listen to them. When you are a fully matured fully fledged and turn 18...then you don't enjoy to mind them anymore if you move out of their house, find your own place, support yourself.

How was denying the vote to non-home owners reasonable in Northern Ireland?

In the days when those contained by Northern Ireland who did not own homes, the vast majority of them Catholics, be denied the vote, how was this understandable by the authorities? Presumably there must hold been some statement or allowed answer for this, and/or the issue must have be raised at some point? What charitable of things were said?

Answers: It's worth pointing out that the property-based franchise contained by 20th century Northern Ireland applied to local government (councils) to some extent than the parliament in Westminster or Stormont. For Stormont, near was grown suffrage, with some further representation for university and business. Westminster elections in Northern Ireland used indistinguishable rules as in the rest of the UK.

It's adjectives part of the slow evolution of democracy contained by the UK. The rationale for council elections and local taxation in the first place may hold been that those who be taxed (the local taxation be a property tax) elected the body which oversaw the spending of those taxes, or rates. It wasn't so much that votes were denied to those short property, as that male property owners over a clear in your mind age were unhurriedly given the vote.

The rest of the UK moved more quickly than Northern Ireland to wide-reaching adult suffrage for local elections. While contained by national elections women and adults under 21 be gradually given the right to vote, and within the 1940s councils in England solitary the ratepayer franchise, it was not until the hasty 70s that local government within NI caught up, and citizens, to some extent than ratepayers, elected the councils.

Undoubtedly, some must have feel that the disproportionate effect on potential catholic votes was a positive benefit of the restricted franchise - but others would have argued against a broader franchise on financial grounds, fearing that "the poor" would simply vote themselves greater benefits, funded by taxing the property and businesses of the more moneyed.

A further justification (if you can hail as it that) for the status quo at each stage contained by the process was across the world "we've never done this new entry you're suggesting before". Even today, there are lots of things that you wouldn't do if you be setting up a new society from score, but which are there for historical reason - from 8 types of banknote in the UK, to a moderately elected, partly appointed, moderately hereditary upper legislature.

In the adjectives, no doubt, this will give the impression of being as quaint and mature fashioned as top hats and tail, the Beatles, flares, and Eminem.

When Hammurabi established his written Code of Laws, how did it impact the people of Babylonian?

how did the inhabitants of Babylonian react to the law?

Answers: No change contained by how the law be executed.

More Questions and Answers:
[2233] - [732] - [474] - [781] - [382] - [1717] - [669] - [973] - [1156] - [197] - [2117] - [875] - [1640] - [2269] - [567] - [1688] - [753] - [487] - [2344] - [1301]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: