Law Questions and Answers

Does saying "Bless you" after someone sneezes contained by school violate the separation of church and state?

I live surrounded by California and it's so bizarre what they call unconsititutional. I required to know other's opinions.
Answers: it shouldn't be a ruin... if people certainly knew why society say it.. there's in fact two beliefs.. one is that during the epic black plague, an early sympton of the disease be sneezing.. so, when someone sneezed, people said "God bless you".. as surrounded by, they knew you have the plague and you were roughly to die... the other belief is that it came from an even before time when demons and superstition were more prevelant.. when someone sneezed, relations once thought that left an space for demons to possess the individual... so, when someone said "God bless you" they believed that it prevented demons to enter the body.. a shield, so to speak...

my point is, MANY of the things we do or say have religious backstories.. so, what are we going to do? research everything that is commonplace surrounded by today's society and make sure it wasn't derived from a religion?? that's ridiculous, isn't it?? population just have need of to chill out on the whole, "my rights own been violated" rubbish.. unless it's blatant.. like, if the academy mandated that you HAVE to articulate "God bless you".. that's what the amendment in the constitution is protecting us from.. forceful religious association with management support...
Amendment 1

Congress shall make no canon respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the Fourth Estate; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
People also enjoy their panties in a bunch almost "In God We Trust" and The Constitution being on institution walls.

I think this is the US...you should be capable of say "bless you" and solely receive an eye roll and dirty look.
No.

That is called self courteous.
Assuming the separation is valid, I would say that it would simply be a violation if:

1) The institution enforces a "Bless you response policy" and

2) "Bless you" indicates favor or the encouragement of a particular religious digit.
No.

so..nothing "bizarre" in the region of that !

so sneeze away and be ready to tender and receive those blessings

can you give a indisputable example of something in the Sate of California that's bizarre And unconstitutional ?
Nobody ever said you couldn't voice 'bless you' after someone sneezes. The rules are just that the conservatory can't endorse any extraordinary religion.

I think not allowing kids to form a Bible club, to attend voluntarily, is going too far. I imagine that should be allowed. Wearing crosses or stars of david or crescents should be allowed, or tee-shirts with religious messages unless they are unnecessarily provocative (like 'All Jews will Go To Hell'--something similar to that I don't think should be allowed).

But I don't resembling the idea of teacher leading kids contained by prayer, or even having kids organize other kids in prayer on class time.
Say "God bless you" adjectives you want. If someone is offended by it, that's their problem. They are means of access to sensitive and need to draw from over themselves.

And no, it doesn't violate the separation of Church and State, even if a teacher say it.
Uhhh...no

It must be so hard for a christian contained by a all christian elected representatives? You must feel resembling a minority lol

Use common sence
There are at lowest possible three main religions (Christian, Jewish, Muslim) that acknowledge blessings from a creator.

It's stupid for someone to be annoyed by someone saying "bless you"; you can't pin it to any one religious belief system. Actually, the practice be begun by a superstition promoting the impression that when you sneeze, your heart stops briefly (which it does), and that allows evil spirits to occupy your body. If someone blesses you, the blessing stops the 'demon possession' from occuring.
no it doesn't.

I need to know some forms of speech that are protected but are troubling to oodles Americans ??

i need some forms that protected by first amendment and toubling to oodles american and plz tell me how u have a feeling about those forms and plz explain why ? i have need of to see many diffrent object plz so i can compare between between them and writ about one of them gratefulness a lot
Answers: What's in a minute happening that interesting on the subject of the 1st Amendment concerns the Westboro Baptist Church. (You can google them, but the website is pretty disgusting in my opinion). They shift to military funerals and picket and protest on the weird grounds that somehow our soldiers who die within Iraq an Afghanistan died because the U.S. condones homosexuality. They claim they are protected by the 1st Amendment but a military family have now sued them for protesting at their son's funeral. I give attention to their whole website should be disallowed but I also know that it is protected by the 1st amendment. Google it and see what you think.
Praying outside an abortion clinic sure seem to annoy a whole lot of nation.

If you could get away next to doing something illegal, would you do it?

What would you do and why? If its murder, who would gun down and why?
Answers: I'd erase everyone's credit card debt in the world.
I would elect to do everything within public in the nude.

Can you make sense of this?

The American (United States Justice System) Vs. Canadian. Why is that the American's hold the death cost, more people on destruction row, many population in prisons across the nation. Whereas in Canada, the terror campaign rate is much more lower, no death cost, no death row. And the intensity of crimes is much sophisticated?? Example, A few have gone out and kill there pregnant wives, and immediately they are being wrinkled up to be executioned. How does this make sense??
Answers: The departure penalty is not a deterrant, No one would when they are angry say Oh I 'd better not do that they might slaughter me. Some people reason it makes them discern better to kill another character but I don't know if it really helps. 2 wrongs don't brand name a right, if you are a Christian it shouldn't even be a question, the commandment is Thou shalt not butcher.
Well, the death cost argument goes put money on many decades and the departure penalty is not a deterrent. The departure penalty executes someone who have committed heinous crimes. These people own no place in society and should be removed from society.

Life lacking the possibility of parole is a ridiculous sentence. Those with that sentence own nothing to loose and will put to death other inmates for multitudes of reasons or for no basis at all.

Knowing that they will enjoy no harsher sentence than living the rest of their life incarcerated near free lodging, medical treatment, recreation, civilizing opportunities etc. provides little deterrent to try to escape, possibly injuring or butchery others in the process and if successful, will become a threat to society once again.

I believe those who commit heinous crimes should be sentenced to passing and should be afforded sufficient time on death row to facilitate adjectives their legal reviews and option and appeals. Once those are exhausted, the execution needs to appropriate place.

For Mike F. - The commandment in the artistic Hebrew text is "Thou shall not murder". There's a big difference between assassinate and murder and if you read your Bible, Torah, Tenak or whatever workbook your are getting your commandments out of, you'll clearly see that God was clearly contained by favor of capital punishment and used it pretty often.
America have a more violent culture than Canada. Pure and simple. There are states in need the death cost and they have similar crime rates as those lacking the death cost. The "violence rate" have little to do with the "disappearance penalty" at all.

Would the extermination penalty deter me from a crime? You betcha. Are nearby enough relatives being executed to impact national statistics? Not really.
You don't hold to condone brutal crimes or want the criminals who commit them to avoid a harsh punishment to ask whether the destruction penalty prevents or even reduce crime and whether it risks killing innocent nation.

124 people on release rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller quantity than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent those.

The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher surrounded by states and regions that have it than contained by states that don’t.

We have a well brought-up alternative. Life without parole is in a minute on the books within 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life lacking parole is less expensive than the demise penalty.

The destruction penalty costs much more than natural life in prison, mostly because of the officially recognized process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.

The loss penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants near the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to associates with money. When is the ending time a wealthy party was on annihilation row, let alone executed?

The extermination penalty doesn't necessarily facilitate families of murder victims. Murder object family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that vivacity without parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems near speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from passing row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent creature.

Question for Jim: Can you cite an example where someone serving go without parole committed murder while contained by prison?

Wages garnished i procure public assistance so they not suppose to going to court soon.will i get my money backbone.?

my wages are being garnish they are taking about $70.00 a week ..it hurts alot...in good health i also get public assistance .so they are not suppose to frills my wages.we will go to court surrounded by three weeks to prove this and that..but what about adjectives the money that they have be taking ..can i get it support..and yes i know i should pay my bills
Answers: I can't answer near 100% certainty,but I would ruminate that if these are earned wages,they can side dishes them. Government cash assistance probably can't be garnish but earned wages might be a different story. If you income is low,you are entitled to the benefits you are getting. $50.00 a month food stamps wouldn't even buy me a weeks worth of groceries.
If they determine that they shouldn't be taking money from you because of the assistance you attain,then they should return the money.
If adjectives the money that is one garnished is exempt, next you can contact the attorney show proof to have it not garnish

I assume you have a OSC future. If you prevale the judgment will be vacate and all the money must be returned.

I would scuffle the underlying debt, I cant say much more or less it because I have no info.
They of course can garnish your wages. what you earn will be considered surrounded by the garnishment---not what taxpayer money you recieve.

You had plenty of opportunity to pay cheque the medical bills on a monthly basis and you chose not to.immediately you will pay the piper.

By the instrument, if you are able to work, why are you collecting taxpayer's money? Your live-in boyfriend? Does he receive to take pre-eminence of your food stamps and assistance too?

What nonsense.

Is there endorsed action i can transport against the NHS?

I am 15 and have be waiting for a back operation for more or less a year now and i am still waiting, i hold no idea when i will draw from it. I was refered to another hospital but a mistake intended i wasnt put on their system until sometime after the referal. Then i had to keep on until August to see a consultant about what feat to take. He told me to stop taking my regular twinge relief so i can be taken surrounded by at short notice . My arthritis have worsened due to the medicine i hold stopped taking which was controlling it and have spread to other joints, my spinal column is getting increasingly worse.I have also be prevented from doing normal things a 15 year matured can do, I compete in TKD to a giant standard, i want to train for the 2012 olympics, but i am being prevented from doing this by the keep on i have endure. This has other side effects that also affect me. The affliction gives me depression and my arts school work is suffering, i get incredibly tired through lack of sleep and distress. Is there anyway i can gain compensation
Answers: you want to take home a complaint contact the PALS (patient liaison service) at your hospital. They will tell you how to proceed. That's what my domestic did over our mums treatment. ask your mum to if you she can afford a one off private app some times this speeds things up.
This contact shows you how to complain about the NHS. http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/fami...
My son have had arthritis since the age of twelve and ws introduced to complementary medication in the form of kinesiology. Conventional doctors dismiss this as quackery, but by following the counsel and eliminating foods from his diet to which he be allergic and taking supplements, he improved dramatically within a very short space of time. (If merely he'd stuck to this regime he'd presumably still be winning!) The personage who treated him had dieted himself out of a wheelchair and have a success rate (in alleviating the symptoms at least) of over 99%. I want that this person be still in practice, but he isn't. It would be worth looking up a local practitioner through this relationship. Anything's got to be better than that strain. http://www.holisticpages.co.uk/directory...

Minor name change- documentation for court date? GA?

I call for to know what documentation I need to bring to the court audible range to change a minor's mark. I have contacted the court, and they will not narrate me because it's "legal advice". I tried probing on google, but no luck... Does anyone know or know where I can find the information? Thanks.
Answers: I have this done for my minor son - in my situation the father be not in his existence either, and I have to send a form recounting the father that I am having this done, the father fought it - brought a attorney in- in the shutting - I won. it wasn't difficult to get it done for me.
check the dissertation you filled out - it should update you completely If you need anything else. I cart it you ran it within the newspaper because you could not find the biological dad- am I correct?
Everything you involve should be on the form you already filled out - they own what they need...if in attendance was more to bring beside - they would tell you. If they ensue to need more information they will share you on the courtdate.
If the father isn't in his natural life - and you maybe get married- and the child has your maiden first name - I am pretty sure the judge will be okay near it- you most likely will not find out that same day- they will dispatch you a paper and tolerate you know if it will be changed or not.
best of luck.
You probably need a certified copy of the minor's birth card and proper documentation why you are requesting the name amend. If you are the mother and want to change your child's later name to your latest husband's last entitle you need to win a release from the child's father first.

Death penalty,why so long to fetch it out?

when someone is sentenced to death,why does it lift years to carry the sentence out?a armour in america took 25 years earlier the sentence was finalised.be this not more cruel than his crime,keeping him alive,not knowing if the next sunshine was going to be his final for 25 years?sure the death cost is not a deterent to murder,nore is prison to criminals,that why jails are overcrowded and within are hundreds on death row,but it is a punishment.grasp jail same time when found guilty,of an ordinary crime,why not execution the subsequent day when found guilty of murder???.
Answers: I agree. Supposedly here has be some type of reform put within place to limit the amount of time someone can stay on annihilation row, and limit the number of times they can appeal their sentence. It's still ridiculously long, within my opinion.
The lawyer stop accumulating expenses and fees as soon as their client is comatose.

Next question.

.
Depending on the state, a convict is entitled to various appeals which can take a long time. Also they can try to seize the sentence reduced if they can prove some type of technicalty or if the convict was mentally handicapped etc...

It does appropriate a long time and some convicts have waive their right to appeal because they don't want to drag this out. One way or another, they know they would die behind the prison walls.
Too several ambulance chasers clogging the courts.

Plus you can appeal your sentence - so you appeal wait 5 years for a audible range - Lose - Appeal wait 5 years etc.

Personaly - If you recognize you did it or you know they did it.
Take them out back -------.
The material answer to your question is contained by fact a cross-examine.

Just because someone appears guilty or is found guilty does it in reality make them guilty?

If you examine the news you will see that folks have be FALSLY accused and sentenced to enthusiasm in prison and/or extermination and years later they be found innocent. Just how many family were found innocent but indeed be guilty?
Who are we to judge!
Among the 124 folks released from death row when shown to enjoy been wrongfully convicted, over 50 have already served a decade. Eight had served over two decades including one innocent personality who served 30 years.
If the legal process be speeded up, we would be executing innocent people, for sure.

DNA is also no guarantee we will not execute innocent ancestors. It is available in smaller amount than 15% of all homicides.

Yes, our prisons are overcrowded, but not because of criminals on demise rows. We sentence non violent drug offender to long terms, and we sentence nation with severe mental disorder to prison - people who hold not previously had access to fair care for their illnesses. (In the 1970's America empty out its large mental hospitals and meticulousness for people near mental illness be supposed to be made available at community based services. Subsequently, too few facilities materialize.)
Due process of law prevents executions the year after conviction. (14th amendment)

If you want to petition for the early release of an inmate who would you distribute it to?

Answers: Find out the parole board committee for that prisoner and first write them... afterwards contact the governor.
parole board. look in phone book beneath your state.

Will Stacy Petersons family snuff Drew Peterson?

I keep audible range what a screwed up family this stacy peterson come from about her brother anyone a felon and in intern and stuff. If Drew Peterson gets away next to these murders do you think soeone from her ancestral will kill him? Also, it seem like she have all these concerned relatives comming forward immediately. Where were adjectives these concerned relatives when she was living surrounded by foster care and marry a 50 something year old man?
Answers: Such a circumstance is significantly unlikely in the United States.

More Questions and Answers:
[2260] - [1086] - [1098] - [315] - [790] - [2096] - [2121] - [2203] - [22] - [64] - [960] - [464] - [1031] - [516] - [795] - [2433] - [313] - [2071] - [1868] - [318]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: