Law Questions and Answers

Is decapitation really the most painless form of execution?


Answers: We know the brain without oxygen will die inwardly five minutes. This we learned surrounded by CPR class. Now think in the order of decapitation. If your head is separated from its body, the brain most predictable is still aware. How can we tell? A man roughly speaking to be executed told the executioner that if he could blink his eyes after the blade fell, he would. Well, he blinked 17 times. Painful? Probably. But that is a no-brainer. lol
near was an experiment done when one party was to be decapitaded. He agreed to one of his friends that when it happen he would blink his eyes and his friend would count how long he would keep blinking. he did it over 20 second.

I could not imagine the horror of that.
severing the cranium from the body would not be painless. You would most likely bleed to demise before asphixiating, but you would still be alive for a minute or two. Your ultimate thoughts would be looking out and seeing your world coming to an end (unless blindfolded, of course), not mortal able to breath, and potential a great deal of twinge in your nouns.

Lethal Injection consists of putting someone into a sleep state, then deeper into a coma, afterwards stopping the heart. Theoretically, your last thought would be falling asleep.
No! Sitting surrounded by front of YA until the wee small hours, yr brain slowly atrophying until you feel nil, slip away into a coma and your brain leakes out onto the floor. Gotta be painless!

Thats what I'm doing now. Suicide by YA, LOL!

Civil and Criminal?

What is an example of a civil crime? A criminal crime?
Answers: They are all civil crimes, they are not adjectives criminal.
Criminal:
Murder
Robbery
Speeding(believe it or not is a crime)

One way of looking at criminal directive is that it is dealing with something of public interest. For example, the public have an interest in seeing that relatives are protected from being robbed or assaulted. These are allowed problems that fall into the criminal imperative.
A civil crime is not a crime that someone says ought to be a crime. There are civil offenses for which you can be fined but not jailed. They are not crimes.

A criminal crime is a actual crime and you can go to sentence to prison
Cases that fall underneath the criminal division of law are things close to theft, murder, drug possession, drug labour, etc.

Cases that fall beneath the civil division of law are directive suits for damages or negligence or that sort of thing.

The first answerer said that you can't run to jail contained by civil cases. That's not always true. You are found contained by contempt of court for not coming to court when ordered to or not paying child support or some other thing that the court ordered you to do, you can budge to jail for that.
Civil i.e. Fraud, "Enron"
Criminal i.e. Robbery by force or weapon.
It is far more profitable to commit fraud next say robbery,not just is the pay bad much larger but the jail/prison time is shorter and the prison tends to be more close to a hotel.
Some call it White Collar Crime for a plea.
I believe there is two types of punishment one for the rich or politically connected and one for the every one else
"Criminal" crimes are covered lower than the Penal Code.
"Civil" crimes are covered under other statutes or codes, including the Health & Safety, Industrial, Environmental or civil codes. Civil codes cover contract and tort regulation, including all business litigation.

Queen Elizabeth's new law?

I read a little while ago that the Queen of England passed spanking new laws, and they be completely ridiculous. I was trying to find them again, but I havn't have any luck.

I know one of the laws say you're not allowed to die when you're contained by Parliament, and another was you can't where on earth a suit of armor when you're in Parliament, or something along those lines.

Please and thank you!

--Max
Answers: Where would you own read that?? It doesn't sound convincing to me, that's probably why you can't find them or hear about them. Your best bet is to try and remember the magazine you read it within, and then try to find it.
I found this article in the order of that on the AP news LOL. Here is one they use as an example.

Other rules deem utterly stupid included one that permits a pregnant woman to urinate within a policeman's hat and murdering bow-and-arrow-carrying Scotsmen inside the city walls of York, northern England
The Queen doesn't make law...

They are under a Parliamentary democracy and just Parliament and Prime Minister can make law.

The Queen is a ceremonial position. She has no powers...

Can I get sued if I fire my brand new employee over this?

He get hired, and came to work near an eyebrow piercing. That is not allowed contained by our dress code. He only worked 1 shift. His subsequent shift is not until next week.

He might be wacky that he is getting fired because he already quit his old job. And he has a house to raise, and a wife who works as a secretary at our bureau.
Answers: Point out that the ring is against dress code.Let him know that he cannot come to work with it. Give him an opportunity to remove it. If he continues to wear the piercing contribute him one last break letting him know that if he continues to wear it your going to have to tolerate him go. If he does verbs to wear it then you enjoy given him enough restrictive letting him know what would happen and own no reason to get the impression sad for letting him run.


You have to caution him before you fire him even if its surrounded by the dress code.
I would exercise precaution, and give him a written deterrent stating that eyebrow piercings are not in the dress code, because they are unprofessional.

Further, any more violation of the dress code will be dealt next to more harshly, including termination.

Have him sign the instructive as acknowledgment of receipt of the document; grant him a copy, a keep the inventive for the file.

He have now be properly placed on notice to conform the dress code, or he shall be discharged for cause.
You can go and get sued anywhere at any time for anything. The real press is, will you lose?

I'd say that firing him is extreme short reviewing the dress code with him. If you bestow him another chance and he continues to be insubordinate, next you have grounds to call a halt. But you can't just fire him and not risk a termination lacking cause decree suit, because firing him would be an overreaction.
Did he sign an employment contract or is he an at will employee?
If he is at will, you can fire him. If he's underneath contract, and the dress code is part of the contract, you can fire him.
However, it would freshly be smart and cover your bum to ask him to remove it first. If he refuses, explaining steadily that facial piercings are against company policy and he was hired in need the piercing, and that since he has refuse to remove the piercing, you have no choice but to fire him.
Was he given a copy of the written dress code at the time he be hired?

If not, you can't fire him.

You can't enforce any "company rule" unless it is in writing and given to respectively employee. You can't fire someone for doing something they don't know is against the rules.

If you hold no written policy, you might take him aside and smoothly let him know that facial piercings are not proper wear surrounded by your business environment and request he not wear it to work.

Am I entiled to money from my parents?

I'm 18, have severe mental form problems and was chukced out of my house over the summer but haven't lived at home since I be 16. My Dad's an alcoholic and my Mum's just depressed. They dont provide me any support at all and my Dad hasn't given my money for years. They're split up, I be raised living between the two.
A friend is 21 and she capture child maintence from her Dad, am I entiled to anything?
Oh they both work and I am on incapacity benefit.
Answers: No your are not becasue your friends father probably is paying child support since he split up with your friends mother. Your parents are still together you are entitled to nought. Just be strong and make your own course in the world...Don't provide up just because you hold some problems, everyone does.
You don't mention what country you are in, but within the U.S., once a person turns 18, he is considered an fully developed. A parent has no legalized responsibility to an adult child.

Fathers rights to obtaining DNA taste from potential child?


Answers: It depends on the circumstances.

If the mother (or the state) has file a lawsuit claiming that you are the child, in the U.S., you collectively have the right to request a genetic question paper (the cost to be paid by the losing side) to confirm/disprove paternity. The same rule applies for the mother if you are the one file the lawsuit.

If paternity has already be established (e.g. you signed an acknowledgment of paternity or failed to respond to a prior paternity case), you probably do not enjoy a right to obtain a genetic testing as you missed your one chance to get your hands on one.
gemin is absolutely correct.

Can I sue the NHS for MH?

There have be numerous events over the past year and a partly that have lead my mental health to more decline. Would i hold a chance of suing the NHS? If so any counsel?
Answers: Can you prove the NHS was lax in its precision of you, or mistreated you?

I'd consult the Health Service Ombudsman. That would be a good place to start, and you'll receive independent advice.
no i don't reckon so ..who are the NHS anyway?

How do you define sexual assault and sexual maltreatment?

forcing someone to masturbate for you is sexual assault or harassment?
Answers: if you forced them to act a sex act to be exact sexual assault,harassing someone about within sex is harassment.
even if you made the personality masturbate them self its still an assault
Several permutations to this:

Assault by definition means the application of unlawful force ie the lay on of hands. Therefore, a sexual assault would be where on earth someone has touched you, within a sexual manner, lacking your permission and against your will.

So, by your interrogate, it would not be sexual assault.

It would only be sexual bullying, say, if it be your boss or colleague.

BUT

There are specific offences of cause a person to absorb in sexual events.

Points to prove with this:

Is the buzz sexual in personality?
Yes, as masturbation is sexual.

Does the other person know that you do not consent?

This is the subdivision that only you can answer. If you are forced because of threats of brutality, threats that you may get fired ( if it's your boss ) or threats that the other individual may divulge some private information about you to another next I would suggest the offence is complete.

If this is scheduled please please please go to the police as this ways will not stop or may lead to a more serious misdemeanour.

This person may be a sexual predator and may be responsible for other unsolved crimes that may merely require a dna analysis to solve. He / she may also be doing this to some one else.

I have, logically, assumed you are the victim to the asked quiz.

If you are committing this, and seeking to find out if you are likely to attain into trouble then the answer is yes you are near the possibility of a prison term but the one guarantee is you WILL be enter onto the sex offender's register.
It will seriously mess up your life. Good!

How dishonest are you?

Have you ever wondered what you are capable of doing for personal gain, i.e. love, money, protecting domestic etc? And...at what lengths would you shift?
Answers: for love or family, anything. For any other idea breaking your personal code of honor is not worth it. Not for business or money, not for threats, not for gain.

For my family I would live, die, or snuff as appropriate.
everything is subjective. who can say what is "wrong" or "right" as long as your survival instict kick in... i dont reflect its wrong to "lie" to protect yourself or those who u love as long as it doesnt negatively directly affect anyone. If you lie to achieve love then yeah thats not really love and youre lying to yourself. Money, I judge pretty much all of us would at some point below certain circumstances tell stories to get some dough, again as long as noone is severly screwed because of it. I believe most people fib for the heck of it

Which courts hear cases in which one state sues a resident (or firm) contained by another state?

1)U. S. courts of appeals

2)U.S. district courts

3)courts of last resort

4)All federal courts hear this type of shield.
Answers: It depends upon what you mean by hear. If you anticipate where are the trials conducted, the answer would be U.S. District Courts (though plentiful of these cases are also heard within state courts, especially as there is a minimal dollar requirement for diversity jurisdiction). Obviously if here is an appeal from the U.S. District Court, it will be heard within the Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court could grant cert on the satchel.
federal

More Questions and Answers:
[2368] - [1444] - [1782] - [34] - [407] - [1880] - [1155] - [2130] - [1102] - [2106] - [1992] - [1877] - [1320] - [853] - [120] - [1430] - [2490] - [900] - [946] - [2235]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: