Law Questions and Answers

Does this sound right?

A personage is hired for a job, thrown into another near 3 days on the job, to "steep in" and gets fired because she cannot do the other person's available job.

Then it turns out she got fired for not kissing the foot of some woman who comes in periodically, who happen to be in control of the funds that wages the employees.

The girl be able to do HER assignment well, she be pleasant to work with and be always at work.

Are in that not laws against firing a party (In Texas) just because you enjoy an issue with their removal of subservience to someone who believes themselves to be a "goddess"?
Answers: Happens. Unfortunatly, you work at the will of the employer. THey make desperate decisions.
One qualification for a brief is the ability to take along with other force. When you start calling the person who is within control of the funds, a "goddess", that is walking on scraggy ice.
The "goddess" have that position for some reason. Either she have shown herself to be competent over the long term, or she may even be division owner of the business (or related to the owner).
No one is entitled to any job, anywhere. A business decide who to hire or fire.

Is there any legal representative sue ebay for me for removed feedback?

I bought linux ebook from seller. I rewarded and received. pozitive feedbacks left. Everything is OK. Couple of days subsequently, ebay suspended this seller picture and remove last feedbacks. My feedback removed too. I want my feedback wager on.
Is there any brave attorney to sue ebay for me free of charge.
he/she charge from ebay anything she/he wants. I individual want my feedback back
Answers: Sue them for me to.I bought an item from butterln83 on October 23, 2007 for $150.95 including shipping. I sent out recompense on October 29, 2007 and they recieved payment Nov. 1st 2007. Today is December 13th 2007 and I still hold not recieved my item. I filed a complaint beside ebay and " NOTHING ".I did recieve a negative feedback from butterln83 for file a complaint with ebay and disappearing feedback that said I still have not recieved item after one month. I enjoy emailed and emailed ebay stating I have not recieved my item and I want the unenthusiastic feedback removed.

Ebay suggested Mutual Feedback Removal. I contacted the seller and they disconnected their phone. Butterln83 have done 3 other ebayers the same process since me.

EBAY MUST LOVE THEM.cuz I bet ebay is still getting their money from them.

Butterln83 is selling items and not sending so BUYERS BEWARE

Good Luck, but your pizzing in the snake

P.S. We could team up against ebay and split adjectives profits.lol
i'd just forget roughly speaking it and move on. you can slickly make another portrayal and get tons of feedback super in a hurry. (for under $1) ... i merely found a website that explains it in better detail. that's why i don't verbs anymore when people quit me negative feedback. i only make a hot account :)

Does the legislative branch make law?

anyone know if the legislative branch in the constitution make laws?
Answers: Yes, next to a caveat. The constitution established three branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the laws), the judicial branch (interprets the laws) and the executive branch (executes and enforce the laws).

Although it is the legislature's role to make law (called statutes), it can't possibly think of every possible situation that a imperative must address. Even the Internal Revenue Code which is many volumes doesn't address every situation. If a situation have not been directly address by a statute or a statute is vague, the judiciary will interpret it. The cases contracted by the judiciary form a part of our decree called adjectives law. If the legislature doesn't resembling the courts' interpretation, they will change the decree. Also, if a statute that the legislature has enact is determined to violate the constitution, the judiciary will declare it unconstitutional and it cannot be enforced. Finally, the agencies of the exectutive branch issue regulations, which can be thought of as the details of a statute. Thus, the import tax code enacted by the legislature may speak that a particular statute will be enforced according the regulations promulgated by the IRS. The IRS, an agency of the executive branch, will after issue regulations (on which the public can comment) regarding the enforcement of such statute.

Debt Collectors and My Rights?

I live in Kansas and I only found out a week ago that I owe money to a place but never knew just about it until they turned me into a Debt Collector, who's actually be calling my daughter and not me. Anyway I called them and they told me I owe such and such money to so and so and that they would with the sole purpose accept $100 payments minimum. I told them that I don't mind payimg for my debt but I can't do $100 payments I could merely afford $50 payments at a time and then they get really rude and pretty much called me a storyteller countlessly from there on within the conversation. I got upset and told them that they have no right to treat me this way and that if $50 is adjectives I can afford then they will own to take it or hand down it...they said leave that they will newly start garnishing my wages!!!!! Can they do that without taking me to court? It's not close to I won't pay it, it's merely that I can't make the payments they are asking for!
Answers: If the debt is truly yours, then they can verbs to call and constraint payment.

If the debt isn't yours, next they have to stop.

You enjoy to approach them the right way, though.

They cannot side dishes your wages without taking you to court, and within some states, they can't garnish your wages at adjectives, except for child support. And there is a cap--they can't side dishes above a certain amount. Look here:

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/cred...

** Note: This answer have not created an attorney-client relationship. This is a general discussion of the subject thing of your question and not official advice. Local law or your particular situation may adaptation the general rules. For a specific answer to your press you should consult legal counsel near whom you can discuss all the facts of your overnight case. **
If you make regular payments to them, no issue the dollar amount, they cant do anything to you.

heres what you do, you can send them checks or monye directions, mail them "return receipt" from the post bureau, this ensures that they hold to sign for it and you get proof rear legs that they did sign for it.
contact these people they will know how to answer your questions roughly speaking debt collectors. This is a syndicated radio show and the help is free

http://clarkhoward.com/cac/
Contrary to the first two answers, even if they adopt lesser payments, it doesn't preclude them from suing you. They can sue you presently because you breached a contract by not paying the original bill as you agreed to, and zilch short of a new contract will diminish that right. What the first two are imply is that, after having breached a contract, you achieve to unilaterally dictate new expressions which they are bound to honor. Absolutely not.

Search for 'fair debt collection' or go to this website. It will let somebody know you what they can and can't do.

Under no circumstances should you give them access to your edge account for automated withdrawls. EVER!

www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/fd...
They cannot enjoy your wages garnished short the order of a go-between in a court of directive.

But, you need to settle near them...they will ride you til the end of your duration.they WILL take you to court and return with a judgement against everything you own. Plus, you'll end up paying THEIR courts costs too. Everyday that pass that you don't pay make the penalty and interest better.

Just send them the payments...or your go will be a living he11...
Yes, they can start garnishing your wages..You should get some loans or debt settlement company to backing you out of this debt.

What type of lawyer do I requirement to file a lawsuit against a automotive repair shop?

Answers: Look up 'small claims limits' for your state. If you are suing for smaller number than the max (Ma. is like $1500, and Tn is $25,000), you don't obligation a lawyer at adjectives. In fact, most states don't allow lawyer in small claims cases.
probably none...if you are suing for a small amount (i.e., contained by California, under $7,500.00), you will requirement to bring your claim to small claims court, and you do not need a advocate for that

http://www.ncsconline.org/wc/CourTopics/...
I think you inevitability a small claims court kind of attorney,.

Always make sure that you own everything documented and receits saved, plus video and photos of the coup¨¦.

I say fitting luck and be ready for a m¨ºl¨¦e!!
I dont know the answer to this question but I hope you guys didnt seize hurt or anything geeze. Your over there file lawsuits and stuff..Im kinda worried. lol Call me. Im finally on a break.

ttyl

Is it against the law for a Peramedic, nurse, firefighter, etc...to donate a patient a blessing on scene?

I know someone who works within the medical field and have had several occasion where one of her co-workers who is LDS bless patients on scene and hold even asked her and other Non-LDS employees to leave your job the room. Her coworkers are all mostly LDS and she have mentioned her discomfurt in these situations to her bosses and they merely ignore her complaints as they are LDS. Is nearby any laws contained by relation to something like this...possibly something to protects or tries to prevent these situations? I was thinking Religion contained by the workplace...but i have no IDEA...Im lately trying to help her out. THANKS
Answers: The co-workers who insist on a blessing might keeping to think in the order of the effect upon their licenses. If the time spent blessing could own been spent using medical skill to liberate life or appendage, there would be a defence for arguing negligence. That may turn into your friend's problem. If she does leave the room when, medically, she should enjoy stayed, that may have reprecussions for her license.

It seem to me that your friend might need to look elsewhere for employment.
There is supposed to be a seperation of religion and employment - and to be honest as a tolerant I would be pissed to be blessed. As a nurse I have be asked by families to pray beside them - but to have someone forceably bless someone is wrong.

If the merciful is LDS and wants to be blessed more power to them - but an knocked out patient cannot grant consent.
Blessings should be asked for. Paramedics, nurses and firefighters should not be giving blessings unless they are asked.

And why the heck are they not doing their job instead of giving blessings?
If the patients are not requesting these blessings afterwards this I find to be extremely inappropriate (and possibly infringing on the rights of these patients).

I'm an LDS surgeon and I hold never given a blessing to any of my patients. There have be three occasions when they hold requested them but I didn't feel comfortable performing them (due to my position as an hand of the hospital). In these three instances I have call other LDS priesthood holders who didn't work for the hospital to perform them.

What would be the practice of an Attorney that deals beside Kidnap/ransom cases??

I need a Attorney that deal with Victims of Kidnapping and Ransom. MY Question is What practice would this be call?-- Litigation or Criminal Prosecution?? - Which is it?
Answers: What do you need an attorney for?

Are you suing someone? IF so, that would be litigation.

Have you be accused of kidnap? If so, then you want a criminal defense attorney.

I can't reflect of any other reasons a attorney would be involved in a kidnap case.
There are a few answers depending on your goal.

If you want to prosecute someone underneath the criminal laws and dispatch them to jail (or otherwise punish them criminally), you requirement the state involved (the district attorney's office would pedal this. The attorney handling the criminal prosecution from the DA's office is call the prosecutor. A criminal attorney would represent the defendant, the person charged beside the crime.

However, you can also bring a civil lawsuit against someone for damages caused by the kidnap and ransom. That would be called litigation.

For example, surrounded by O.J.'s case, he be held not guilty in the criminal prosecution but found guilty and ordered to discharge monetary damages in the civil trial.

Can you lie within..?

You know how like when you are sworn contained by as President or go to court you swere on the bible.

What would start if you're Atheist?
Could you lie?
Answers: I enjoy testified three times within a Federal court and once in a pretrial proceeding. No Bible be used.

I simply advised the official beforehand that I am atheist, and they used a modified oath (affirmation) with "do you affirm" and omitted "so assist me God."

That facility does not have a Bible at adjectives. They either swear you or affirm you.

You could still recline, but you run the risk of a perjury rap.
Very few courts use Bibles anymore. You swear upon penalty of perjury (which is criminal). Presidents swear to uphold and look after the Constitution, not to tell the truth, although not relating the truth in some matter may also be criminal.

The fact that a human being does not realize that he or she is violating the canon is a valid excuse?

please help me this is homework and icant find the answer surrounded by my textbook.
Answers: It's False. Ignorance of the law is NO excuse. I have a sneaking suspicion that you got it backwards or hear it wrong.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse!!


"I didn't see the sign officer"
Usually not, you are presumed to know the decree because it is available for public inspection.

If the person is insane in that might be a reason that they do not know the directive, but those type of issues are up tot he defendant to prove.
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse." This is an outmoded, tried-and-true saying. There are constant offences that are self-explanatory--you can't destroy someone or rob a bank and them claim that you didn't know homicide and armed robbery be against the law.

On the other mitt, the law is not other clear. Being intoxicated in a public place is a misdemeanor within the US and Canada, and usually the police will leave you be unless you're cause trouble. On the other hand, one drunk is a very serious sin in Saudi Arabia and other Fundamentalist Islamic nation. Anyone going to those places should find out about the local customs and law before the setting bad.

My wife and I live in Taiwan. There are big signs at the Arrivals gate at the airport near Taipei, and they say aloud "THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA HAS SEVERE PENALITES FOR NARCOTICS OFFENCES, INCLUDING DEATH." There are a few Americans and Canadians in young offenders` institution over here, doing years, because they thought that marijuana is not considered a narcotic, or because they thought that foreign laws do not apply to Americans and Canadians.

Let's facade it. We have a duty to inform ourselves, and anyway I assume that when someone breaks the law the entity knows that anything he or she is doing is illegal.
There are some awfully limited exceptions.

For example, contained by white collar crime, some courts have settled that lower ranking employees (like secretaries) cannot be held in charge for aiding and abetting their employer crimes unless they knew it be illegal at the time.
Ignorance of the imperative is not an excuse.
If the violation is not serious, it can be
a 'mitigating factor` at sentencing.
Ignorance of the canon is no excuse.

Ignorance of the facts is an excuse.

Example: My boyfriend, Slime, asks me to take some oregano to Smash, who is preparing some homemade spaghetti sauce. As I approach Smash's wad, a cop stops me, tests the oregano, and arrests me for possession of marijuana. As it turns out, Slime have given me marijuana, not oregano. But, I had no opinion. I've never smelled marijuana, and it looked like oregano. For adjectives I knew, it really be oregano. Am I guilty of possession of marijuana? No, because although I was carrying marijuana, I be ignorant of the reality that the substance was marijuana.

Do judges name-calling their power?

I believe Judges sometimes abuse power. I once have to go to court and the believe to be asked where I worked. i said I wasnt working. He berated me, and later REFUSED to deal near why I was in attendance (open container), told me I had a week to bring back a job, prove to him I have one, and then he'd business with my ticket. I did it, but to this year I feel similar to he was anyone predjudice, and going beyond his power. True or not?
Answers: absolutely. look at the idiot who sued a dry cleaner for 54 million dollars over a two of a kind of pants. he be using his position as a judge to try to influence the outcome. fortunately, he lost his position as a intermediary, as well as the court suitcase.
Yes, they do abuse power.In your baggage I think he considered necessary you to be more responsible in your go and they are not unreasonable to require certain behavior from you as an on-going ticket problem.

More Questions and Answers:
[2147] - [925] - [1662] - [2439] - [1109] - [2456] - [50] - [346] - [2421] - [544] - [1561] - [755] - [2235] - [2237] - [84] - [2429] - [2570] - [1638] - [423] - [2058]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: