Law Questions and Answers

Is this statutory rape?

Here's what I did. I was a senior, 18, she be a sophomore, 15. we dated for a couple of weeks. we never had sex, but we made out, chops, ear, neck, tongue, the unbroken deal. here's what I wanna know. Is this statutory rape a short time ago because we made out or not?
Answers: No, while it was sturdy " petting" that is not considered sex and accordingly there is no statutory rape involved.
No! Unless you hold intercourse no rape!
But seriously you don't want your whole vivacity to be screwed up having to register as a sex guilty party for some underage piece of a**. It isn't worth it!
No, don't worry to constitute statutory rape in that must be some kind of sexual amusement. This includes oral and actual intercourse.

Hope this helps! :)
no physical contact

but come on 18 and 15 not much difference to verbs so much about.

look up your state law they all extraordinarily
No rape, no criminal penetration.

But near may be some 'indecency with a minor' type ordinance (that will unlikely be enforced, even if they are on the books) that you violated.

.

Should we force everyone to submit to DNA tests so that we can locate potential young of Adolph Hitler?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/new...
Answers: No. The sheer effort and time involved within such a task would not result surrounded by anything meaningful. If Hitler have offspring, we should agree to them be. It's not their fault he be a bastard.
Of course!! And we can look for decendents of Christ also. And the Gipper. And Nero...and ...and

Who cares?
Last I heard---and in that is a book out about this.
There be three remaining males related to Hitler. Nephews and cousins.

I believe all three live or did live surrounded by the USA and have changed their name they are very behind the times now.

All settled a long time ago not to have children and to get sure that the Hitler family completion upon their deaths. I regard as they agreed not to have their graves stained even with their alien names.

It's concerned of sad really. To be quality so persecuted for the sins or a relative to the point that you agree with your other relatives not to sire brood and end your line of your entire family.

logically there is other the possibility of cloning in the implicit future.

But what is the point--why would you precision to locate a person base on the atrocities committed by a relative 70 years ago.

Are you going to egg their house!
What purpose would that serve? Offspring aren't responsible for the sins of their fathers. 2D

Ple bargaining wrong?

Resolved: In the United States, plea bargaining within exchange for testimony is undue.

Hey. I need backing on my aff case for debate (proving it is unjust). I necessitate to know how i can fabricate a link between my contention "Criminal Testimony is unreliable" (which i also requirement evidence to support it if u can help next to that) and my criterion is Egalitarianism. I'm wondering if i should drop the contention (which i don't want to do, and if i should, i need another one) or perchance bypass my criterion and link it to my core pro of Justice, or come up with another utility that encompasses "Criminal Testimony is unreliable" "Plea bargaining=unfair treatment underneath law" and "Plea bargaining punishes ppl who want to exercise their right to trial by jury"

Thanks!
Answers: You really enjoy two different issues. One, is whether plea bargained for nouns is reliable, and, two, is whether the use of plea bargaining is itself open-minded.

Regarding the use of bargained for nouns, the jury is tasked with determining the credibility of adjectives witnesses regardless of the circumstances. Therefore, plea bargaining for nouns doesn't really matter, except for its effect on the second point.

In the cases where on earth the prosecution has more than one witness to choose from, it will probably pick the one that "looks" the most credible. Consequently, nearby is a strong possibility of racial disparity contained by the availability of a plea bargain contained by exchange for testimony.

As for your ending point regarding, the coercive effect of plea bargain, the Supreme Court has address some of that. At least surrounded by the case of release penalty cases, once the prosecution decide to seek the destruction penalty, plea bargain are off the table. The rationale is that a human being might confess to a crime he or she didn't commit if death is on the rank. This rationale applies to a lesser level to non-capital offenses as well. However, within the interest of speedy administration of sprite, plea bargaining is vital to keep the court system moving. The alternative would be to decriminalize a great deal of behavior, or build a lot more courts.
I'm sorry, I can't minister to you because I completely disagree.

I agree that sometimes criminal testimony can be unreliable, but the jury can use that information when decide how credible their testimony is against the accuse.

What do you think of a 30 year frail woman who forced a home intruder to escape?

I did that a few months ago.
Answers: I think it's great. If adjectives intrusions ended resembling that we'd have a better society. Good luck. 2D
I conjecture that since you did that a few months ago and you bring it up now you may be have some problems with what you did, not if it be right or not, but possibly feelings in the order of your own safety and vulnerability within your own home.
Even if it wasn't a successful break in, you may have a feeling compromised in some approach, and need to confer to a professional, for just a few sessions to seize a grip on whats bothering you.
You don't give the whole story so I can't say how I imagine about what you did, I'm not even sure what you aim by 'forced home intruder to escape", but I am thinking you mean you made him give your home.
When someone breaks in you are justifiably able to use secure force to keep you and your son not dangerous, if you use deadly force you hold to think you or he be in incurable danger. Truthfully, if hes within the home, if you kill him, put a wound by his body and you are home free.

Mandatory birth control for Welfare women?

Shouldn't birth control be mandatory for women on Welfare? I'm so SICK of seeing pregnant women with overweight kids using food stamps to buy junk at the grocery store.
Answers: I regard this is a very well brought-up idea. Too heaps times have I see a woman barely feed herself because she has approaching 5 kids. You would think they would hold more common sense than to budge around "doing the dirty" with ancestors when they're starving. Star for you!
Wow. No at hand should not be mandatory birth control for women on welfare. What because you are poor you are not allowed to own a family?

Maybe you should be merry that those "fat kids" truly get to chomp through and are not left to starve to annihilation as many contained by this country would let them do to "pare down the welfare rolls"

Since when did a human life span become so worthless to people?

Yeah "adjectives your hard earn money is going to these woman" you do know that welfare is a whoping 3% of our budget (meanwhile Medicare/SS/Medicade is 40% of our budget and defense is 15% of our budget), so because you want to save 3% on your taxes you are ready to take a person's GOD GIVEN right to enjoy children or better yet merely take it away and tolerate the "loser" starve to death.

Makes me longing that your parents were forced to hold birth control.
And, I'm tired of seeing all my tricky earned paychecks individual handed over to them. I discharge a load surrounded by taxes so they can take profit of the system.

I rather basically pay to hold them fixed. One time deal, next no more food stamps, b/c expenses, etc.
Here's the thing, not adjectives women on Welfare plan to stay on it. So by you saying mandatory birth control for women on Welfare, you be determined all. I approaching the way you stereotype though...hmmff. (rolls eyes)

Fact is, no thing what there are going to be citizens that know how to work the system. There are loop holes. Making a women get sterilized is not going stop the use of welfare. You might as all right say you want to stop paying taxes for Medicare because those ripened people didn't retire or gather money the right way. I take-home pay taxes..but there be a time I needed use of foodstamps, medicaid and yes...that check, which was scarcely anything. Don't sit too high on your pedestial judge these women, because believe there are women who work their behinds rotten...to support their children, who's goal isn't to prolong a lifestyle off of Welfare.

Its appropriate thing you know everyone one-sidedly to judge why they want help.

[EDIT] I'd resembling to note...not every birth control works for every single being the same instrument. So temp. BC isn't gonna fix a person from not have children. Even sterilization won't stop it, I've known moderately a few women that still got pregnant after a tubal ligation. And as mentioned, nearby is a time limit on the benefits you receive. Weither it be for foodstamps, medicaid or TANF checks. And yes, you enjoy to be out looking for a job w/ the local worksource centers...reporting every week w/ where on earth you applied.
Most of these children are over weight due to the certainty the parent has to buy cheap foods close to ramen noodles, mac/cheese and other pastas which are very fattening, can soups, soaring in brackish.
What if you were pregnant, lost your mission or husband did and had no where on earth to turn but welfare. What right does the welfare have to produce you go on birth control because of a out of work or loss of job.
Also they own to work their assistance off or run to school for another training. There is working family out there that also receive food stamps which is also welfare. Every bag is different. Don't judge empire because you never know when you might walk within their shoes little girl.
There is a time limit for assistance that President Clinton contained by forced in the redeployment bill.
No, the courts have previously held within cases that the choice of contraception is one of a private individual and that the laws of the rule can not interfere with those private rights.

Beyond that, I am sick of inhabitants posting questions on here to complain and moan around what they don't like minus a single intelligent response to a real issue.
That is categorically tyranical! People have an unalienable right to enjoy children. Just because you are poor shouldn't mean you steal away that right. If you are for these kind of law, China would be a good place to move to that shares your view. This is America for crying out loud.

Not to mention some of the birth control methods are against people's religion and can mete out long-term health risks.
Good grief!

Forced sterility.

Sounds hitlerian to me.

That what you're looking for?
This is a great perception. Why should this women be able to preserve popping out baby after infant? That's more and more welfare that we tax payers own to fork out. The average American family have 2 children. So welfare should only pay packet for 2 kids. After that you need to acquire an IUD or get your tubes tied.

What are my rights as a student?

I would appreciate court cases, sites, etc. I really want stuff on Freedom of Speech. I need links for respectively answer please. Thanks.
Answers: You have the right to sit up, shut up, and do what your parents expect of you, so that you will bring back a good instruction, and not sponge off of them for the rest of your winy miserable existence.
Look up the code of conduct for whatever college or university you attend such as on their website. Whatever documents you sign are whatever rules you must abide by. Any rules they do no supply you or you do not sign to are legitimately irrelevant if you breach them.

Where is al sharpton?

There has apparently be another bus beating on an MTA bus surrounded by Baltimore.

WBAL-TV reports that two men aboard the #64 bus in Brooklyn claim they be attacked by a group of 7 black teens. The two men say they be attacked because they were white. They also claim the bus driver refuse to call police for them.

This comes smaller quantity than a week after a white woman was conquered on a bus. 9 black middle school students enjoy been arrested contained by that case.

where on earth is the reverend al sharpton, the defender of EQUALITY? why is he nowhere to be found contained by these racially motivated beatings?
Answers: Don't you see, here is no fun protecting the majority. These poor oppressed inner city youth must have be provoked by the crackers..Sarcasm intended!
Ha!

The racist that's legitimized by the left is lower than FBI investigation.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5inhEb...
He's in the pits of Hell consulting beside his Father. 2D

Expunging a juvenile record?

hey guys, I'm 19 right very soon and awhile back when I be 17, I was airsofting wiht some of my friends below the bridge and we were arrested by the sheriff and get some misdemenor charges. However, the sheriff felt nice i guess and didnt convey a sufficient evidence to the court system to charge me, so they just dropped it. However, my copy is still there and I want to erase it once and for adjectives for the immigration purposes. So I was wondering if I would be eligible for the expungement? appreciation so much for help!
Answers: If you be not charged, then you enjoy No criminal record, and here is no need to verbs.

The question on most immigration forms is, Have you ever be charged with, or convicted of a criminal offense?

Your honest answer is NO!

Married, in wisconsin, child support agency harrasing us?

husband I separated for 2 months, get back together. Child support agency dragged us into court to establish a child support responsibility. we informed them we are living together again, got memo in e-mail with chronicle of rules we now must follow, from providing them beside tax documets, both parents must work, ( i am a full time student) why are they contained by our lives and how do we get rid of them?? please lend a hand. is this what our tax money should be used for??
Answers: Jezz, if they would bring back involved with my ex mortal a deadbeat and not paying his share. Anyway I would think that you call for to speak with an attorney or step to the family court and database a complaint with the agency. You inevitability to get within front of a judge.
Good luck
This is even so another example of Government intruding into our lives. If you like this sort of entity, vote for a democrat/socilaist in the 2008 elections

How long does is take for a ticket for marijuana possession to clear my diary?

I got a ticket for .5 of a gram (yes a partially a gram) of marijuana in the spring of 2003. I purely applied for a job at a ruling firm, and they're going to do a background check. I said on the application that I have had no misdemeanor convictions within the last 5 years. Are they going to see that ticket? I remunerated all fines in half a shake. This is in California.
Answers: First, possession of smaller number than an ounce of marijuana is a misdemeanor punishable only by a fine. It cannot be a felony.

Second, you should own had representation, because an attorney would own been competent to counsel you on ways to avoid the conviction, because the collateral consequences are worse than the fine. It is too late for that very soon, however.

Third, you can, and should, have this "expunged," which does not really steal it off your diary, but does allow you to tell private employer that you have not be convicted. This site will tell you how (you don't obligation a lawyer for this).
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/oth...

Fourth, you are not going to be capable of get this done previously your employer potential employer makes a check, and they are probably going to be more concerned around misrepresentation than about a marijuana ticket. I'd write a memorandum correcting the mistake, and telling them that you forgot that even though it is punishable by lone a fine, a violation of H&S 11357(b) is a misdemeanor (which is probably true, isn't it?).
It's on within forever if you got it after you turned 18. The simply way to draw from it off of your transcript would be to hire a lawyer and enjoy it expunged. You can do it on your own but it's a complex process.

If you are applying at a lawfirm, they are attorneys, all they enjoy to do to find your ticket, is make a phone call for. They will appreciate honesty more than trying to conceal it.

When I applied for law institution, the schools asked for adjectives things including speeding tickets. They didn't care if we get one, they just considered necessary to make sure we be honest about it.

EDIT: I would phone up them and explain the mistake. Just say that you be hurrying through the application, and thought your ticket was a "sacrilege," not a misdemeanor because you just remunerated the fines.

It was a misdemeanor right? If it be only a infringement, then technically you didn't recline.

In CA it is a misdemeanor. I just checked, but sometimes if you steal diversion and pay the fines urgently, they dismiss it. Did they dismiss it?
What are the penalties for possession of marijuana?
Possession of marijuana can be treated as any a Class A misdemeanor or as a Class C felony, depending on the person's prior criminal history and whether or not the marijuana appears to be for other than personal use. If a soul already has a conviction for Marijuana, Second Degree (misdemeanor offense), afterwards any further arrests for marijuana will be charged as Marijuana First Degree, a felony.

The misdemeanor can result in a maximum of one year contained by jail and a $2,000 fine. The Department of Public Safety also suspends the drivers' license of individuals convicted of this offense for up to 90 days. The felony can result in a prison sentence of one year and a year to ten years and a maximum fine of $5,000.

Sentences including formal probation may also be used in misdemeanor marijuana cases. This can enjoy important implication for a student who is looking for summer or permanent employment outside the Mobile nouns. Regular reporting to a probation officer and random drug screening, along near fees and costs, can make finding keeping a post difficult. Many job applications require applicants to report any arrests on their transcript; failure to disclose this information on an application can head to further legal problems between the student and an employer.

This overview be designed to give students a credible picture of the impact that drugs can have on their lives. No terrify tactics be used; all of the information comes directly from the Alabama Code, shield law, and courtroom experience. It is hoped that adjectives USA students will have an lovely and rewarding college career that does not include private drugs.
Did you receive a deferred judgment? If so, there's a possibility it wouldn't come up during a generic employment conditions check. Also, you can't be accused of lying because a deferred pronouncement is not a conviction. I was charged beside a class 2 misdemeanor and received a deferred judgment, and it wasn't revealed during a employment situation check. Of course, it might have be different if I was applying for a Homeland Security work or something like that. Or it could be at variance in California. I'm not really sure.

Also, another mode of know is if they fingerprinted you. I'm assuming since it was singular a ticket they didn't. One police officer told me that if you are fingerprinted that is when you know its segment of your criminal history, otherwise you should be in the clear.

Altogether, I assume it wont come up since it be only a ticket and it be several years ago, but that will depend on how thorough the search is.
Marijuana would nose-dive under a criminal charge, even if it's a misdemeanor. I suggest you run your own account and if it shows up, hire an attorney to expungment your record. Meaning they'll wipe your collection clean.

More Questions and Answers:
[2196] - [438] - [1380] - [1241] - [2533] - [1462] - [844] - [1338] - [252] - [1969] - [2302] - [596] - [992] - [2138] - [1242] - [85] - [2323] - [1311] - [1079] - [1307]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: