Law Questions and Answers
Is the patriot act singular to prevent terrorist attacks, or can any law enforcement agency use it for any crime?
I know the Patriot Act is a powerful weapon to prevent terrorist attacks, which appreciably any reasonable character would support. My fear, however, is that it can be extended to any ruling enforcement agency to catch anyone who commits any crime no event how insignificant, which could lead our rule down the road of fascism.Answers: I think when they line tap, they are line tapping nation that they feel are threats. We own the C.I.A. who get information. Also if you are not doing anything unfair anyways then at hand should be no problem.
The Patriot Act permits the FBI to conduct so-called sneak and peer searches - where on earth the FBI can search someone's home or bureau without notify them until weeks or even months later - surrounded by criminal cases, including cases having zilch to do with terrorism.
It allows the FBI to do "sweeps" of business files without have to name what (or who) they're looking for.
ISPs, university and network administrator can authorize government surveillance short judicial notice up to that time or after the fact.
It permit, without any nouns to anti-terrorism efforts, sensitive personal information roughly speaking U.S. citizens to be shared with local and state decree enforcement.
So yes, I think the first steps hold been taken down that road. Here's a adjectives extended list:
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/172...
And I'm so sick of audible range "if you've done nothing wrong, what are you afraid of." If we hold done nothing wrong, after there is no necessitate to be spying on us, is there?
Here's a nice quote from a guy I'm surprised I'm quoting...Ron Paul: "I'm afraid of losing the ultimate vestiges of privacy that a free society should hold dear. I'm afraid of creating a society where the burden is on citizens to prove their innocence, to some extent than on government to prove wrongdoing. Most of adjectives, I'm afraid of living in a society where on earth a subservient populace surrenders its liberties to an all-powerful system."
If You are doing nothing wrong You don't enjoy anything to worry give or take a few. That has zilch to do with the constitution. I hold looked for it and can't find it. Big brother is not supposed to spy on You unless they have a intention to.
Its hard to preserve track of all the violation of the constitution by both sides over the last 40 50 years. 1 2 4 5 at lowest
ACLU is not a friend of the constitution
I believe it is restricted to national security cases , but the definition of national protection can be stretched for cover things that have simply a vague nouns. Anti racketeering laws be passed to give senate a weapon to fight organized crime, and is immediately being used to prosecute teenagers who flog pot to their friends.
What is the punishment for stealing???
I am doing my social studies home work, and cant find any info. on google.com or ask.com! I need it beforehand Monday November 5th!!!!! HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!Answers: Here in the US, a couple of days within jail for the first offense. You can check your state law on the web for specific detail. In Saudi Arabia they cut rotten your right hand.
In Google turn upside down type in the state you live within then criminal codes. I live within California so it looks like this for me:
California State Criminal Codes.
You'll find exactly what you entail with the scour results.
Should sex selection for medical and non-medical reason be available for parents?
Answers: I might be inclined to utter yes. If they have the money to do so later go for it. If they couple be dead set on have a particular sex after they may just own abortions until the sex of the child is what they want. Which option is better?
God no - that's adjectives we need!
FP
I don't give attention to so - "Natural Selection" and all...
But it's better than bloodbath infant girls in China because they're the wrong sex. (Assuming you wouldn't enjoy to wait for a fetus to form to find out the sex - you know, pre-determine the sex in the past fertilization).
What medical reasons?
No, shouldn't be available.
Not if you believe within God. I'm no bible thumper or anything, but i do believe in God and i believe that he decide the sex of children. Isn't it a miracle to have a child within the first place?
Legality of posting signs around city?
Hello,I want to know what the legality of posting signs approaching these: http://www.yardsignwholesale.com/images/... advertising a website more or less the city?
I see signs around town about a singles website for the city, so I assume it wouldn't be a problem?
The city is Keller TX
Answers: You will want to check with your local municipal code to see if near are limitations on posting signs, i.e. what the content can be, where they can be placed, etc.
Polygraph Tests --- what is your opinion?
Have you have one? Did you pass and story? Do you believe in them if you haven't have one? When are they used in court and admissable? What is your feelings of them (any experience is good)..JUST CURIOUS..
Answers: Just to answer your main examine: They are very adjectives for certain purposes, but because they can be conquered their use in court should be, and is, treated beside much caution. Also, the flair of the person administering the oral exam is crucial to the accuracy of the audition. A good hand can usually tell if a party is trying to "beat" the test, and vary the sequence of questions to overcome this. Finally, some populace are so nervous that no expressive reading can be obtained. Hope this help. Have a nice day!!
they are not useable surrounded by a court of law where on earth your personal freedom is at stake, but they are used in an investigation to build a suitcase, and can be used for security clearence and so on
Why do we drug test population to get job, but people on welfare can go and get money without a drug testing?
Now I am not saying that everyone explicitly on welfare is on drugs and I do agree that it can be helpful to those who use it correctly, but I seize tired of working in a hospital and man drug tested to make money to live when individuals on drugs on welfare end up surrounded by the hospital because of drugs and then I hold to pay for that too. And as expected employers don't want druggies at the work place but I don't want them on welfare any. We need a imperative that all those receiving welfare must pocket drug tests to receive an income, otherwise how are they seriously getting out near and looking for jobs. Minus the few job that don't drug test.Answers: wow", yes i would be for trialling everyone ,not just welfare relatives . lets start trialling: the president, congress, the richest americans the poorest yes get everyone>i ponder if you live in the u. s. you take tested.then we will hold 5 honest american people to the mexican border beside cameras rolling,board any truck that we choose, follow the contents to its destination,see whos writting the check,maybe we can turn the tide within the drug war???
Well, if you are a drug user than you have a handicap, so you can get the welfare. And here contained by Massachusetts the welfare health insurance will settle up for your methadone "treatments". They also pay for birth control, but that doesn't event because the pills are then sold for drug money anyway. You'll love this: you can hold kids, not get married, get hold of your girlfriend to get an apartment and welfare will income for it. The non-husband can earn all he requests and just show that he lives somewhere else. Oh yeah welfare will also pay cheque for the daycare for the kids as well.
How do I know this roughly speaking the apartment scam? A guy at my work has have a girlfriend for 20 years. They have 3 kids, she's on welfare, he works and shows that he lives at a different address. He drives the following vehicle: Blinged out Honda, Lincoln Navigator, Chrysler Concord, and a minivan.
I can only yearning that our country would enforce welfare and monitor the people that are on it. I'd love it to be that druggies would not be capable of allow to recieve it.
In my state if you have a felony drug conviction after you cannot receive food stamps. As for drug tests at work, I am not against this practice. Using drugs is an anti-social behavior. But for bygone felonies, I'm a short time upset that you can be refused a clothed job because of ancient mistakes.
Does Swiss Penal Code recognize 'Conspiracy' as crime or not?
In U.S. if two individuals speak on the phone "let's explode a car" and government archives it, they can sue you as a conspiracy act. This behavior is matching on the Switzerland country and under Swiss Penal Code? Thanks!Answers: First, almost indeed yes. Most countries have law against conspiracy. It's pretty fundamental.
That said, conspiracy is more than saying 'let's explode a saloon.' It is planning, not just unexploited talk. Here is a definition:
"A combination or confederation between two or more individuals formed for the purpose of committing, by their joint pains some unlawful or criminal act ..." From Black's tenet dictionary.
This is something I looked up on the web which compares and contrast Swiss, German and English (US) regulation:
"The description of criminal preparation in German canon is mainly confined to some forms of attempted accomplishment. The most substantial forms are (attempted) incitement (versuchte Anstiftung) and conspiracy (Verabredung). These forms of attempted accomplishment can only be punished if the intended wrong is a severe one.
The fourth chapter concerns the Swiss criminal law. The concepts of criminal liability and association in Swiss and German imperative are almost identical. The statute on criminal attempts in Swiss imperative is more subjective. In Swiss law, the boundary between preparation and attempt is drawn at an rash point, in comparison beside Dutch and German law.
The Swiss decree on criminal preparation provides an excellent opportunity for comparison with the Dutch regulation. Article 260bis of the Swiss penal code (StGB) resembles an earlier Dutch draft bill. It penalises some act of preparation, aimed at a limited group of stern offences. Despites it’s remarkably wide-ranging range, it attempts to preserve the penalisation of preparation restricted to acts which are close to the stage of execution of the intended wrong. This prevents an extension of criminal liability to very rash acts of preparation. Chapter 5 is something like criminal liability in English directive. The English criminal law system, which is formed by both adjectives law and statutory ruling, is highly different from the continental systems. It is, contained by particular, smaller quantity dogmatic and more pragmatic.
In English criminal law, a distinction is made between primary party (perpetrators) and secondary party (accomplices). This distinction is, however, of minor practical importance. Another primary difference between continental and English criminal law regard mens rea. The distinction between the most important mens rea within the continental law systems mentioned contained by this book - ‘opzet’ (Vorsatz) and ‘culpa’ (fahrl"assigkeit) - is drawn in adjectives three in almost indistinguishable way. The distinction between the most impressive mens rea in English regulation – intention and recklessness – differs from the continental approach. The word ‘intention’ within English law requires a difficult standard of certainty depending on to the risk taken by the defendant, than the equivalent words ‘opzet’ and ‘Vorsatz’ contained by the other countries. These differences have great rush for the mens rea in the inchoate offence.
English criminal law contains three inchoate offence: attempt, incitement and conspiracy. The mainly subjective rationale of the attempt surrounded by English criminal law have only little influence on the distinction between attempt and mere preparation. Conspiracy is the prime ground for punishment of acts of preparation within English law. According to the ‘Criminal Law conduct yourself 1977’, conspiracy is the agreement between two or more persons, that a course of conduct shall be pursued which will necessarily involve the commission of an wrong." http://dissertations.ub.rug.nl/faculties...
My car be stolen by 2 juveniles should i file suit against parents i own no transportation now?
Answers: Well you receive it sound resembling they were arrested so I assume that your motor was recovered?
Yes, I would have a sneaking suspicion that that the parents were responsible for their children.
Best of luck to you.
First, you should notify the police and consequently your ins company.
Ripped off by helm guyz?
I purchased a set of rim and tires from these ppl in August. I be told they were out of stock 3 weeks after I purchased them. I enlarge a credit account withcar fastidiousness one and was approved. I get tired of waiting so I canceled my order beside these ppl. I was told that I will recieve a settlement. I also called the credit card company to dissolve my card and I also told them that I canceled the rim order. A month then I get a bill and the amount I owe is 1,200$. I be fired up. I call these thieve and they do not pick up, their website is down. I have the credit card company on my tail. I dispute the amount after giving them this explanation. But I am still individual victimized. I am being charged in arrears fees and constantly called by the credit card company even though they deduce that this is in dispute. It will hold another month or so to be resolved. I wish I can win these bastards for what they have done to me. My credit is going to be ruined. I also live out of state.Answers: And the interview is what?
You learned a lesson, if you can you should buy locally. When I necessitate special tires, I ask my local shop to order them and when they come contained by I pay for them, they enjoy NEVER asked for a deposit, or charged me before the tires come within.
It won’t ruin your credit, you may need to post an explanation of what happen and most bank and business will not hold it against you. If they do you could enjoy action against the CC company, ie you could sue them.
Should I seek the services of an attorney?
I am 55 years outmoded and in questionable vigour. I have be an employee of a voluminous corporation for 15 years. During the last seven I own had a boss who made sexual joke about me. Made ethnic slurs at me (I am biracial). Despite that my work journal was devout. I have taken a slouch detector test and enjoy the record, I hold some voice recordings, and I have some company memos detailing sexual and ethnic intimidation although not directed at me. I kept files of his swinging his fist in front of my obverse, threating me with termination, setting me up surrounded by meetings to manufacture me look incompetent. I have memos of my contacts near personel regarding these incidents.I just now took a transfer to another facility contained by this corporation to get away from this convulse. On the second day I witnessed a severe safekeeping violation and be told I had not done satisfactory to prevent it was told to pack my things and head off the premises ASAP. I was told I would be contacted by phone if and when I should return to work. Three days hold passed and I have hear nothing.
Should I contact an attorney on Monday? How should I run about select one? This company has closely of power in my state.
Answers: Yes, look for a attorney who specializes in employment and labor regulation. Contact your local bar association for backing in locating one.
SUE HIS A**! If obligation be get an attorney from another member of your state or out of state.
More Questions and Answers:
[1582] - [1168] - [2573] - [1954] - [1963] - [249] - [2356] - [1652] - [1552] - [2484] - [1225] - [1615] - [1994] - [1964] - [1413] - [1137] - [608] - [896] - [973] - [1983]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: