Law Questions and Answers

Should we compensate people who are wrongly enslaved for a crime?

Here's my theory. We should money them but look at what they were rightfully doing for income when they were incarcerated, adjust for typical advancement and wages and inflation, and reduce by for past crimes. Your thoughts?
Answers: They should be compensated. Think of the ones that in truth have family that could have provided for them but couldnt. That one guy that get out a year or so ago that was surrounded by prison for years and years and he actually have a kid and wife. If they had a living before they get incarcerated I think that their income should be given according to what they be paid and for raise that would have gotten too.
if someone be wrongly imprisoned consequently they were wronged - they should be fully compensated and their transcription expunged in relation to the crime they be wrongly accused and convicted of.

it is pretty serious to enjoy a chunk of your life ruined and human being locked up.

most of the prisons are full of people guilty of man black and that is in the order of it.
Many places already do this.

I guess it's fair.
Most inhabitants in Canada who are wrongly locked up for a long period are compensated.

I focus that is right. Who else is going to foot? It has to be the policy. How would you feel if you be locked up for murder for 10 years, you were innocent adjectives along, and then it turns out someone mishandled the evidence? You would want compensation, and surrounded by my opinion, you deserve that compensation?

Even though you come out innocent, you hold that stigma of an inmate, and how are you suppose to get stern on your feet for something that wasn't your condemn?
If you or someone you knew be imprisoned deceitfully, and I'm talking for a great extent of time here, you or someone you know are later found to be innocent of any wrongdoing are going to call for variations of compensation.

A great time of life is stolen and potentional opportunity such as career or home taken without mercy.

Essentially, you are a sufferer. Victims almost always want some variety of vindication.

How else would you begin to correct this wrong?

My 2 cents.
Sorry, I estimate they should not only be compensated for mortal wrongly imprisoned, but be compensated for every moment of distress, affliction, suffering, loss of frreedom.

There is not enough to compensate them sort of...there is nought that can replace being wrongfully denied your freedom.
Absouletly Yes,
My inference is $3000/month for a lifetime, and
They (who wrongly's been imprisoned) should hire attorney to folder lawsuit against dept of justice and regulation enforcement for additional compensation beneath emotional distress.

Is it legal to hire ONLY convicted felon?

Courts have ruled that refuse to hire or terminating the employment of someone base on their criminal record is not unconstitutional discrimination. Ergo, would it be legally recognized to refuse employment to anyone near no criminal record?

Specifically, if you started a business and you singular wanted to hold out employment to convicted felons, could you rightfully exclude anyone who is not a convicted felon.

Why is not important, but it is a social experiment to see if convicted felon are more or less productive and reliable than family who are not convicted felons. The view being that since polite jobs are harder to seize, that they will be more appreciative if they have one.
Answers: Maybe, but you are irrelevant to willfully exclude any 'protected class' individuals, such as minorities, women and disabled people. You can be sued for nouns. Convicted felons are not considered a protected class, ergo as long as you recruit among convicted felons while not discriminating against any protected class within the process, I believe you will be able to proceed minus punishment.

kitty - Whether it should or not is not the question. The law are very clear as to what constitues nouns. Only protected class citizens can sue for discrimination. Anyone else may sue, I suppose, but the statute does not even recognize them as a class that is to say eligible to sue for discrimination, and they will so not win. But, I suppose if they have the boatloads of money required to affray something like that, they could try.

For Joe's answer below: Black those are a protected class. If your workforce consists of 100% protected class citizens, you will be fully compliant with any criticisms that may be raise. Reverse discrimination imagined would NOT apply here.
the government have programs for those companies to hire felons they make a contribution you tax write offs and everything I used to use them within my company for over two years I was the solitary non felon there be and I owned the company.

wow I got a thumbs down you guys are against helping ex con bring a new start?

The answer to your grill is yes (fact) like I said the affairs of state actually have programs set up for employers who do do it i know I did.

so you can listen to those answers underneath me who know absolutely nought and are just speculating their planning or guesses would be more accurate or me the one that has in actual fact done it legally
You could but if someone lacking a criminal record found out, I'm sure you would hold a lawsuit on your hands ~ and all right you should. If it isn't right to discriminate one way, it sure wouldn't be right to discriminate the in front of way.

Is this considered discriminatory hiring practice (based on your religion)?

I saw this in a career listing at the following relationship:
http://www.jobtarget.com/c/job.cfm?str=3...

"The Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology at Brigham Young University announces the availability of a continuing status track faculty position in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. Review of applications will instigate December 14, 2007 and continue until the position is jam-packed. Applicants should be certified in Clinical Laboratory Science by NCA and/or Medical Technology by ASCP. A graduate point is required (Masters or Ph.D.). The successful applicant will be expected to develop a strong teaching skill in the CLS program curriculum and mentor undergraduate students.


This is the questionable part of a set:
BYU is an equal employment opportunity employer. Preference is given to qualified members within good standing of the sponsoring church, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Seems contrdictory, and criminal to me. Is it?
Answers: It doesn't say that you can't be hired as long as you are feeling like to be a church member within good standing. But the testimonial for position appear to come first.

Are you saying that you can't receive a molecular biology job anywhere else but Utah? Teaching the Mormons is Brigham Young's primary function, so you'd own to be able to adopt their faith. Are you also suggesting that non-Catholics should be constituent of Notre Dame's faculty just on equality issues? I presume that's oversimplifying equality.
It may be discriminatory hiring practice. There is a caveat. This is a private university, and if it does not accept federal funds (or other toll monies) it probably should have the right to exercise it's own freedom of religion.

So, you enjoy some constitutional questions---the right to associate at your own choice, the freedom of religion, and the inherent right to be treated equally.
Let's turn it around.

You have a Baptist college, and you own an opening for a guru, are you going to hire a Baptist teacher or a Mormon trainer?

Car dealership lied about used vehicle sold As is, do I still have a suitcase?

The dealership where I purchased my saloon usually always have the buyer sign the carfax report. it was unpaid and dark. When I purchased my motor from them, they did not have me sign this document and here is why.

1. I asked how frequent owners the car have.
Response: One owner, local car, trade surrounded by for new coup¨¦

2. Has it ever been surrounded by any accidents (asked this twice)
Response: No accident of any kind.

The saloon was sold as is, I did sign that one, but this should not make a contribution them the right to intentionally mis-lead and lie.

I return home, become aware of a huge crack through the bumper. I go online and verbs a carfax and the car be wrecked and had 5 owners! The grease was spout black and overfilled too. The bumber was structurely destroyed and the body shop it needed to be replaced. I contact salesperson, they say, to discouraging, as is. I tell them they lied and lied some more.

I want the bumper fixed at lowest possible, if I take them to court, do I hold a case at adjectives?
Answers: This would be real iffy. The reality that the paperwork said "as is" may well boot you out of court. You can other file surrounded by small claims and take the extra paperwork of what you discovered (definitely save it for your records) but by not getting the questions and answers contained by writing, it is pretty much their word against yours and you know they are going to say they didn't explain to you one owner, no accidents.

Do you enjoy a witness with you that can testify contained by your behalf about what be asked and answered? If not, you would probably be wasting money by going to court so all you can do is report a complaint with the Better Business Bureau so others who check within will know what happened beside you and this company. They may check it out if there are other complaints but once again, the paperwork is against you. Sorry.
No, the lemon motivation will not cover that and its not mechanical. If it runs right and you feel you salaried a price you can live with, after search the salvage yard and get a foreign bumper.
I hate sports car salesmen and I hate even more when they bring over on me, but sometimes its that way, grasp over it and move on. Get that grease changed, like 3 weeks contained by a row and that should clean the engine, return with new radiator hoses,thermostat and drive belt, thats the first things to break on used cars.
Have you get anything in writing, because they enjoy a paper signed by you that says"as is". Sorry you get taken.
Well, the other are right, but they forgot to tell About the Better Business Bureau (BBB). And you can report a complaint with The Bureau of Motor Vehicle something like misrepresentation by the sells entity. Put it in writing and they will database the complaint in their history, that might cost them in the adjectives when the need a special license or something.

How much do I legally own to pay contained by a civil lawsuit brought against my mom, dad and myself?

The lawsuit was against my mom, dad and myself. My mom have died less than a year previously the lawsuit was file, but the lawsuit still had her cross on it. Although we are not guilty, our attorneys suggests we settle out of court. Are my dad and I responsible for her share of the settlement or can we just respectively pay 1/3 of the judgement?
Answers: When you settle out of court, the settlement is negotiate. So you could offer to recompense only 2/3rds, but the other shindig could reject the offer, or variety a counter offer. My first proposition would not exceed 1/3rd total of what the other party is asking for within their lawsuit. Then, negotiate from there.

Why can non-profit agencies discriminate against the public?

Some non-profit corporations (such as Churches) discriminate against women, for example, the European Catholic Churches say women priests are evil (aka incompetent) due to sexual category only (they are women, not men).

Some non-profit corporations will censor ad from other non-profit corporations or ask their members to not do business near other non-profit corporations.

In America, why is this so?

Why should corporations which actively discriminate against American citizens be given tax-breaks and be allowed to discriminate under a non-profit status?
Answers: Freedom of Religion, Seperation of Church and State
first rotten, YOU need to infer that their is a difference between an agency and a corporation. An agency is a relationship in which an agent works for a principal!!! Whereas, a corporation is a trial entity, not an actual person, a business!!! Corporations can be sued, if you grain like a corporation is discriminating against you, you can sue them, you would want to find out which administrative AGENCY handles the type of grip in which you are seeking a remedy for.

Iraqi violence; still toxic...but has it cease being political...?

...save, can it be twinned with the current situation surrounded by Ulster (albeit smaller, with paramilitary violence). More local and criminal than political?
Answers: It have never ceased one political, although the present goverment would rather play the issue down at the moment.
We should not forget we still own soldiers being mamed and kill in Afghanistan and Iraq. Also, various innocent citizens are are casualty of this situation.
they have gone to period of war for 2 millennium it wont stop now because the so-called super powers are involved you cant overthrow an invisible foe.

If someone posts a video of you (in your home) and there be no permission can you hold it to court?


Answers: send a give up and desist letter (or email) to youtube, it will be down surrounded by half an hour
it depends on who they are.
asking in words often works, if they dont abide by ask again.
The third time write an offical letter.
If they still discount your requests try taking it to tribal court (if your city has one) or wish legal direction
If the video clearly shows you and the person RECORDED the video short your permission, next yes, you do have grounds to give somebody a lift him to court. However, it sometimes matters whether or not the camera be a security camera, or if it be focused on only you, or if in attendance is sound near the video.
Keeping in mind that legalized battles can cost $1000s
As for removing it, consent to the person know that the video is surrounded by violation of you privacy, and you want it removed or you will be forced to clutch further legal doings. If he doesn't respond, contact the site he posted it on (presuming he posted it on an internet site like Youtube).
why rubbish time in a court?

profile a DMCA request with youtube. I am sure below their TOS or someplace there is instructions on how to do that.

what is dmca? see www.chillingeffects.org

How does an arraignment proceed?

I got an dui something like 3 weeks ago, and I was wondering how the arraignment for this charge go - and how any arraignment goes for that issue. I am not going to get a attorney, and I plan on pleading guilty (I was over .08 @ .09), and I have no aggravating factors.

After the arraignment are at hand any more court dates, or if I plead guilty am I free to move about and pay my fine?
Answers: An actual arraignment is where on earth you are formally charged by the judge or magistrate. Then a bond will be set. Since you openly weren't held in reformatory, you will probably be given ROR (released on on recognizance) and told to show up for a scheduled preliminary audible range and then court. If you're referring to the preliminary audible range, it's a hearing next to a judge or magistrate to determine if the evidence is plenty to be bound up to the Court of Common Pleas. Either way, you better get hold of an attorney for this. These days, even a first offense is punishable by jail time, even at the "just over the legal limit" results.
If you plead guilty at the arraignment the believe to be will almost certainly sentence you to the maximum time contained by jail, fine and license suspension. And you will travel to jail right later and there. Find your local pro bono program and get hold of some free advice.

I have breached my court charge twice for not attending commuity service, what will happen?

I am bad back to court for 2 breaches or my court command the reason i be on this for aggravted t.w.o.c and drink driving, i didnt attend commuity service, i had a pretext but wasnt good enuff i live 15 miles from the probation department and the nearest bus is 5miles down a main road, so i missed the bus, and here not very polite bus services either i'm from york, so can anyone bequeath me an idea what will arise i have no serious previous, thank you
Answers: You already know the bus route so I don't get why you did not give up earlier.

I dont know what aggravted t.w.o.c is but I do not what drink driving is. The courts give you punishment for a reason, it is up to you to gross sure you attend. If you know you are going to be late, afterwards surely you had money for a phone hail as, you could of rang your probabtion officer and permit him/her know.
The judge might dispatch you down for a while. Good luck
The attitude of the community service officer will have some impact on what happen next. You may simply be fined for respectively breach (or have other hours added onto your sentence) and be ordered to continue beside the Community Service. On the other hand, the court would be entitled to revoke the establish and sentence you to a term of captivity instead for the original misdemeanour.

I think that the former is the more feasible of the two. Be as abjectly humble and apologetic as you are able. Promise that in that will be no repeat of this. It is your best chance.
GO TO JAIL.
do not collect lb200
hopefully you attain hanged drink driving twice you fool

More Questions and Answers:
[38] - [82] - [381] - [2519] - [1784] - [1477] - [1222] - [208] - [991] - [260] - [451] - [1925] - [2138] - [592] - [1656] - [1548] - [363] - [801] - [1519] - [2349]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: