Law Questions and Answers

If you work for a man and he promised to pay more the subsequent pay and didnt,can you sue?on top that hes in words?

and hes verbally rude
Answers: The short answer is yes.

The realistic answer: don't spend foolishly your time.

Sure, you have a spoken contract. It's your word against his word. Maybe the court will side with you, I don`t know not. The costs and time and energy it'll similar to take from you should be worth the difference your are war for.
The best place to go for this type of information is your local workforce commission. When contacting the DOL (department of labor), they will direct you to your local department. If you have an employment agreement (offer memorandum or a variation of an grant letter) and a payday schedule, next yes, you can seek legally recognized action. Find an attorney that specializes contained by employee ruling and wage and hour claims in your state. Your attorney can restore your health your wages, damages (punitive and realized) as well as their fees for representation.

I'm a Dem 'cause my business depends on the middle class...lots of family that can afford what I sell?

the top 1% have 21% of the wealth surrounded by the U.S. The bottom 50% has 12%. I'm gonna' run out of business if only a few enjoy wealth. Why don't Republicans see the reduction improves near a strong middle class?
Answers: God bless you ! Whatever god you believe in! (and if you do not believe contained by God then ... anything you say "bless" you)
republicans arent great thinker.
the middle class is being destroyed surrounded by this country.
they are in debt to the hilt.
and in that is little future hope as public training is being starved.
A strong middle class is a strong America.

Vote democratic if you want a strong middle class.
Since Most race are middle class most Republicans are middle class of course. I spawn about 33,000 a year and I hold always be a Republican. I know many middle class Republicans as resourcefully as wealthy ones and heaps wealthy liberals. The rich Republican entry is spread by liberals to turn the poor against them.
If you are middle class the liberals are your worst enemy as they want to due you. If you are rich they want to tax you and if you are poor they want to convince you that they are your "friend" so they can control your vote.
The top 1 percent of taxpayers rewarded 33.9 percent of all individual income taxes within 2001.
For a strong middle class, cut their taxes. Eliminate some useless government programs to do so. If you bring to the fore the taxes of the rich some other sales individual will complain that he can not sell his yachts or jewelry.
Because they are the one percent beside twenty - one percent of the wealth.
Pure Liberal Greed.

Don't earn a living, don't expect someone else to.

Just rob someone that have earned it.

Thieves!
Republican - Libertarian - Democrat.

I don't diligence who gets contained by office as long as they are fiscally conservative and don't want to support more and more excise funded social programs that end up supporting the bureaucracies that conduct operations them and not the people designed to receive their support.

One that can separate him or herself from religious issues and not spend more and more export tax dollars trying to legislate (debate, lobby, sponsor bills, raise money or muster support for) individual value systems and decision. Non issues. The ones they all run on.

A black hole of spend. It's just a disgusting ceaseless cycle that's so enormous contained by scope that it's mind numbing.

It isn't the Republicans that do it - it's the insufferable mob of mindless individuals that constitute the majority of the American voters.
Amen, my brother. I know their was some judgment why I added you as a contact. I hope to someday be a fan of yours. We more population like surrounded by the Politics category here. I now one party can make a difference and explicitly why I am trying to fright the good scuffle for all us liberals, but even the conservatives can be overwhelming and we obligation all the sustain we can get.

Is democracy the only feasable process?

Answers: No, but it's the best of the worst. It has its problems too. The problems near other arrangements is that the public is wholly at the mercy of those surrounded by power. Sometimes they might have someone great within power. But often not, they don't, and later they have little recourse.

So overall, yes. It's not model, but it's the best we have.
Benevolent dictatorships hold done well economically. In the US, democracy is transforming to corpratacracy (rule by corporations) and that does intensely well economically for those earn their incomes from their wealth.

So it depends what you show by feasable.
Of course not but it's the best one we've got so far. Problem is it's not true democracy but an undercover tyranny.

In crimainl litagation, motions may be filed?

A singular after the trial actually begin
B when the judge rules that motions may be presented
C following the exchange of discovery by the defense and prosecution
D solely when each side rests its suitcase
Answers: E--None of the above.

A--wrong because many motions can be file before the trial, such as motions contained by limine or a motion to withdraw as counsel.

B--wrong because attorneys do not entail permission to wallet motions.

C--wrong, because motions can be filed earlier discovery (and, the defense may never even have any discovery to present to the prosecution).

D--wrong, see A. Motions can be file long before the trial starts.
it depends on the type of motion to be file

Is this unfair?

If your principal take away your grad trip, clap out and school trips? Also in that was a petition on the internet and the parent is very soon being sued!
Answers: yea that's excessive cause grad trips other be fun. so now you are missing out on the fun. ever one make mistakes and a petition should not insult no one should procure sued.
I'm not sure "fair" is the right term. Why be the trips canceled? If there is no money, that make sense. If he is being spiteful, pilfer it up with the board.

How much will i pay for music copyright ?

i enjoy finished my student film only just,and i wanna send it to some picture festival,but i use some music for my picture,does anybody know if i buy the copyright only for motion picture festival,how much will i remuneration for every single one?(around how much),and my friend said i can just foot after i have win,is that true?
Answers: A work is protected as soon as it is put into a fixed form (manuscript, print, sculpture, film, win, recording, net page) - the author does not have to apply for copyright straight away.
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ9.htm...

If you are using someone else's material - you hold to have blessing to do so BEFORE submission or use.
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ9.htm...
Search the records and find who holds the copyright for the matter you wish to use and contact them.
Are you clich¨¦ you want to copyright your songs, or are you saying youre trying to use music thats already copywritten?

Contact or check the U.S. copyright Office website.
They'll own prices and regulations for it.
I know for a film the cost is $35-$45.

Now if youre asking how much can you buy the RIGHTs toa copywritten song...that depends on the song and the artist or studio.

AND if you are discussion about using a copywritten song later paying them after the contest...well...they could sue you for not getting authorization beforehand.
In reality they will sue you.

So id be extraordinarily careful roughly using other peoples works without their say-so, if thats in reality what you are talking just about here.

Best approach the artist or label and ask them.
Some are immensely nice about it, others are extremely rigid and expensive

What are the consequences of sex in a coup¨¦?

My girlfriend and I just started have sex so naturally we want to do it (ALOT) more regularly. After taking her to dinner or another outing, we get for a while frisky and want to pull over somewhere for some motor sex. I'm not quite clear on the consequences if we bring caught.. Here's the facts..

We find the darkest place to park at night , usually little to no buoyant. Usually its an empty parking lot near foot traffic rarely crossing it.
We hold most of our clothes on, just surrounded by case
My put a bet on windows are tinted.
It get to 40 degrees here at hours of darkness and the windows frost over so virtually not a soul can see in.

If we be to get caught, are these facts something I could argue against within case I be arrested?
Answers: The frosted windows are similar to a neon sign to world that someone is inside heating things up.

What you describe is sex within a public place. You can both be charged with a misdemeanor. There are other sex related offenses depending on where on earth you live. A misdemeanor carries a fine and possible put in prison time of less than a year.

Things could be worse, depending on your age and your girlfriend's age. If you are 18 or elder and she is not, you can be arrested and charged with statutory rape. That's a felony and a lifetime sex wrongdoer registration.

That's my legal answer.

My practical answer: People, especially teenagers, enjoy been have sex in cars since cars be invented. Some night, a cop will spot you and knock on the window and you will be panicky to death and totally mortified.

But you will probably get zilch more than a lecture if you are both contained by high college.

This doesn't mean that you should be doing it. No issue how careful you are (and I pray that you are using a condom every single time), your girlfriend can catch pregnant. Even with condoms. Even on the pill. Even on her time.

So cut it out.
You will get this girl pregnant. If you do, will you stand by her and your child similar to a man? Are you a man or a boy?
You are playing with fire!
you are an idiot
There are also consequences of a cop driving by and seeing the coup¨¦ and deciding to check it out. And if you hold a gear stick shift there's a chance one of you could accidently receive it out of park and the car would start moving.
Never mind roughly speaking some sneaky snooping cop spotting you - even the really dirty ones like Sgt K (Larry Craig's nemesis) don't shift wandering around in -40 weather. It's more expected to be a Son-of-Sam type killer.
BUT remember, someone is other watching you :
THE GREAT COP - GOD ALMIGHTY. (the thought of that should shrink your digit and send you home repentant, you foul sinner !!!)
Sour put money on and dislocated shoulders. Why the heck do you two want sex in a coup¨¦. Never heard however of MOTELS or the house of your girl friend?

I think you both are adventurist, so to speak. Some die of these. The leading martial art superstar afterwards BRUCE LEE died of misadventure, then 10 years ancient his son BRANDON LEE die too of the same vocation like his father.

Estimation of 10 to 1, you won't return with caught with these circumstances, beside the snow, tinted windows, darkest place you could ever deduce, why not go to the mountain apex in Nevada, climb the mountain next to your girl friend, then when you both arrive at the peak, remove both of your cloths and do the standing and sitting position at hand. If that is not satisfactory, go to a resort where on earth they cater the scuba diving, dive with your cute girl friend nearby, go to the deepest section of the resort or the ocean for that issue, and make love here together with the fishes and the barracudas. It is also nice if you both hold a camera with you down nearby, if video could prove to be useful in attendance, this is one of the souvenir you both could cherish until the end of time.

What is "fair"?

Define the concept of fairness.
Answers: equallly equitable to everyone concerned.

A question of turning our clocks put money on this weekend? So I work over night, and rumor is?

that we will not capture paid for that extra hour we enjoy to work. The rumor is pretty legit due to they did this in times past. The reason human being is because we will get that hour vertebrae in the spring time, but I don't even know if I'll still be on dark shift by then. Is this officially recognized or illegal by decree? I would asume it is illegal but freshly throwing it out there for anyone that can clear it up. Thanks
Answers: It's TOTALLY against the law!!

Here's the link to the US Department of Labor's ruling regarding this. Copy it and show it to your employer. You bring back paid for the total hours you work THAT sunshine.

http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/hoursw...
No. They must pay you for adjectives hours worked. And, if you work across the time change, you will hold worked the same hour twice and must be rewarded for both hours.

The argument that you will get it posterior in the spring is bogus as you may not work at hand then.

If the extra hour puts you surrounded by an overtime situation, then they must foot that also.

This assumes you are an hourly worker in the US.
I'm assuming you're not salaried.

I believe they enjoy to pay you. If you're that invested contained by the hour pay (or surrounded by the principal) you should look into it. If it's going to cause you more headache to do so, you should let it walk.

Good luck.

Here you go. Here's a place to start:

Daylight Savings Time
Most states contribute in daylight reserves time. Those employees working the graveyard shift when Daylight Savings Time begin work one hour less because the clocks are set ahead one hour. Those human resources working the graveyard shift when Daylight Savings Time ends work an extra hour because the clocks are set back one hour at 2:00 a.m.

For example:

The programmed shift starts at 11:00 p.m. and ends at 7:30 a.m. the next daylight, your employee works an eight- hour shift and receive a 30-minute lunch break.

On the Sunday that Daylight Savings Time starts at 2:00 a.m., the employee does not work the hour from 2:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. because at 2:00 a.m. adjectives of the clocks are turned forward to 3:00 a.m. Thus, on this day the hand only worked 7 hours, even though the agenda was for 8 hours.
On the Sunday that Daylight Savings Time ends at 2:00 a.m., the hand works the hour from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. twice because at 2:00 a.m. all of the clocks are turned subsidise to 1:00 a.m. Thus, on this day the hand worked 9 hours, even though the schedule simply reflected 8 hours.
The FLSA requires that team must be credited with adjectives of the hours actually worked. Therefore, if the hand is in a work situation similar to that described contained by the above example, he or she worked 7 hours on the day that Daylight Savings Time begin and 9 hours on the day that Daylight Savings Time ends. This assumes, unsurprisingly, that the employee in fact worked the scheduled shift as surrounded by our example.

For more information, please contact your local Wage and Hour District Office.

http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/hoursw...
No.NOT... you get remunerated by the hour for the number of hours worked.. so the time on the clock doesn't matter.. don't listen to a bunch of bullshit. if your work 8 hours you win paid for eight .. PERIOD.. if you work nine..DITTO.. if your employer give you any grief go see the wage and hour inhabitants.. they will straighten them out.
HTH,
Keith
My employer pays me 1 hour overtime when i work and the clock is turned back, surrounded by the spring when the clock is turned ahead we get compensated for the full eight hours even though we only worked 7.
If you work this Saturday dark into Sunday morning, your employer by law is obligated to salary you the extra hour, or sometime within like pay term, gave you an superfluous hour of time off or vacaction time.
An hourly worker is entitled to be rewarded for the total of numbers actually worked. If you work 10 to 6, which is customarily a 10 hour shift, but the time change make real time elapsed 11 hours, you achieve paid for 11 hours.

In spring, the time shift will aim that actual elapsed time will only be 9 hours, so that's what you carry paid for that shift.

Employers don't take to adjust a current paycheck for something that may or may not happen 6 months from in a minute. What if you quit or were out of a job? They wouldn't give you your extra hour afterwards, I bet.

If they don't pay you for actual elapsed hours, wallet a complaint with the labor board.

How do u feel roughly speaking all TV broadcasts mortal required 2 B done in digital format by sometime within 2009?

Doesn't this restrict the access of news, weather, national alerts, etc. from the poor? Does this conflict near every citizen's right to life, nouns and the persuit of happiness?
Answers: The interrogate should be WHY are all TV broadcast human being REQUIRED to go digital? There is a much bigger picture here than scientific advancements. Think...so your viewing traditions can be monitored, if the govt. doesn't like what's mortal broadcast, they can flip the kill switch, "they" will know how to control what is broadcast, can you say Fictitious News Conferences. It also will move out all amenable to interception from hackers and online "terrorists". And that's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure most will play the paranoia card, but here is more to it than that.
The government is issuing coupons to cover the cost of digital converters so, no, I don't deduce it hurts the poor. How does TV come into the "right to life, independence and the pursuit of happiness?"? If that be so, wouldn't we be required to issue every citizen a TV and antenna where they could take reception or cable or satellite system where they couldn't?

And since we don't own TVs in most cars we adjectives have a right to radios contained by our cars. Satellite and FM and AM so we are certain of reception.

And since we aren't other in our cars we obligation personal radios we can carry on us. Satellite and FM and AM as expected.
All TV stations are converting to digital. All of the stations you have mentioned are going digital. The cost of TVs are dirt immediately. Anyone can switch out without much trouble.

And if TV be the only contribution to a citizen's right to natural life, liberty and the pursuit of jubilation, then those citizens obligation to get a existence. I mean seriously.
No, in attendance is no constitutional right to a television, analog, digital or otherwise.

There are tons sources for news, including inexpensive radios. People can also get together at places where the technology is available. For example, lots of culture access the Internet at the library.

Not only that, but in attendance are a lot of "poor" beside televisions. A few years ago, an operation I belong to was distributing holiday baskets of food to family selected by the university district as being among the poorest contained by the area. We go in to one small apartment and saw a huge flat eyeshade TV hanging on the wall.

I guess it's a issue of priorities
I dont think anyone have the right to try to force you into buying/using what they want you to. This will cost people $ -who dont own it to spare. And folks around here aint heard of no coupons to set free them $, or to pay for the cost of varying over. Thats alot of $ for the tv companies to put out-alot. It should be each individuals choice to do or not do it.

More Questions and Answers:
[1061] - [62] - [1257] - [2560] - [1370] - [2093] - [1000] - [672] - [1913] - [1442] - [1663] - [779] - [838] - [489] - [931] - [1404] - [1972] - [2569] - [1698] - [687]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: