Law Questions and Answers
Who says women don't enjoy rights in Islam?
not adjectives the MIDDLE EASTERN countrs follow the right rules of ISLAM, sum countrs follow their own interpritations.1. The right and duty to obtain instruction.
2. The right to have their own independent property.
3. The right to work to earn money if they entail it or want it.
4. Equality of reward for equal deeds.
5. The right to express their opinion and be hear.
6. The right to provisions from the husband for all her requests and more.
7. The right to negotiate marriage jargon of her choice.
8. The right to obtain divorce from her husband, even on the grounds that she simply can't stand him. (pls transcribe that God deeply frowns upon divorce as a solution unless in attendance is hardly any other alternative but it does not have it in mind that men have more right to divorce their wives than women do.)
9. The right to keep hold of all her own money (she is not responsibleto continue any relations).
11. custody of their children after divorce.
12. to refuse any marital that does not please
Answers: umm is this really a QUESTION? or are you just vent? lol either passageway, i wouldn't mind. yea i feel sometimes race judge other relatives like arabs and stuff and influence they always trounce their women and stuff and i just speak "that's BS!"
but why is the man allowed to have multiple wives while the woman can't hold multiple hubbys?
and why cant the woman marry a non muslim, but the man can?
Determined to be simply argumentative, aren't you? You still haven't provided any source for your claims, the simplest being which countries you refer to.
Let's see, your 'rights' appear to be arbitrary and conflicting. #2, the right to have their own independent property, but #6 the right to provisions from the husband for adjectives her needs and more, not to mention #9, the right to save her own money?
Your knowledge of 'Middle Eastern' countries seem to be predicated upon rumors given to you by others. It's obvious that YOU don't live anywhere implicit the Middle East.
My step mother is a Muslim, lives in a Muslim country, have an education and runs her own business. Her sisters are even more experienced than she is.
How come the show Cops used to blur out people's faces and in a minute they don't?
Answers: some people sign a release to be on tv, some do not.
They didn't blur the face, that's how the people truly looked.
LOL!!!
My guess is that if it is the "criminal" they get away next to it because of the disclaimer at the beginning Suspects are innocent until proven guilty. They used to block out passer by face but I noticed they do not anymore. Maybe they distribute them something for being on nouns.My guess is they can now do it officially or they would be open to masses law suits.
How about US governing body grant offer?are they legal?
Answers: YES organization grants are existing and legal.
However near are many companies distorting what grant are, and spread the lie that anyone can receive grants for anything which is primarily false.
You can go to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) http://www.cfda.gov and Grants.gov http://www.grants.gov - these are two sites created by the federal elected representatives to provide transparency and information on grants. Browse through the listings and see if you can find any give in that would support your purposes. Once you find a grant where on earth you can qualify, apply for it at Grants.gov
Even if you buy books on "how to get grants" or chronicle that supposedly has information on grant -- all of them are mere rehash of what CFDA have, albeit packaged differently.
Note though that these grant generally support non-profit organization, intermediary lending institutions, and state and local government. Most of the federal grants are given to specific target groups beside specific requirements (e.g. minority business owners involved in transportation related contracts emanate from DOT - Grant#20.905 Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Short Term Lending Program. Individuals especially for personal purposes are not eligible for federal grants.
Grants are also recurrently given to non profit groups or organizations involved contained by training or other similar activities (grant 59.043 Women's Business Ownership Assistance that are given to those who will create women's business center that will train women entrepreneurs
they are probably allowed but if you get a elected representatives grant they charge you out the yen yang for interest. and you hold to pay that wager on to them too. sometimes the interest is higher than the loan.
Relisting in Ebay for unpaid item?
Should I relist an Item that be not paid for previously the 7 days waiting period for final expediency fee credit start. If i'm going to receive the final value charge credited back, might as ably relist now anyway right?? appreciationAnswers: This is a question for eBay to answer as an incorrect response here may jeopardize your credit tax. Also I believe that you may be able to re-list for free if you follow protocol, but don't quote me on that.
Contact the "winning" bidder to variety sure something has not happen to prevent them from making payment. If they cold-shoulder you, report them as a non-paying bidder and then re-list the item. Sometimes associates have things develop that make it seem to be like they are not going to salary (family emergency, death surrounded by the family etc.). Give them a unsystematic before re-listing.
Does HIPPA protect child molesters in the workplace?
A friend of mine saw a set child molester working at a local Truck Stop near our home as a janitor. When she confronted the superintendent to ask if he realized this man be a child molester she was told he be not able to ask question like that due to HIPPA. This man have access to children and bathrooms.Not all parents monitor their children as carefully as they should. Has anyone hear of this or know where I could find more information?Please serious answers simply...there is nought funny about this interrogate.
Peace.
Answers: That is a load of crap. Any medical information is private, so if that soul attended therapy, etc. it would be protected by HIPPA. If someone have been convicted of child molestation, after any information about that conviction is public information. They are also required to register as a sex criminal, and all of that info can be looked up on sex wrongdoer watchdog websites. I'm not sure what the manager's problem be with sharing the information, but he is full of it. People close to that really piss me off!
To the character who wants me to verbs my head out of "my cop husband's butt," I don't know if you own any children, but I sure would like to presume that it would be of some concern to you if there be a convicted child molestor who was working near the public where they could come into contact near your or someone else's children. If you heard nearly the things that I get to hear roughly speaking on a daily justification from my "cop husband" about what happen to innocent little children, it would make you sick. I am not insinuating that a 16 year prehistoric sleeping with a 17 year frail is any great danger to society. I am truism that HIPPA laws do not protect sex offender, plain and simple, and the manager be not honest when he said he could not answer that question. It is public information. Anyone can look it up and see what the personage had done. If the woman asking him that question know what he had done, after obviously she thought it be serious enough to ask the administrator about it.
The individual response I can make legitimately to your post is that the response you were given be correct.
The personal response would be regarding your statement "not adjectives parents watch their children as with care as they shoud."
And that sounds like an excuse, not a foundation. Unpopular as it might seem, even sex offender have the right to earn a living.
IN RESPONSE TO STARR:
If explicitly your response and you believe it, then I pity you.
Or are you clich¨¦ that the 17 year old who have sex with his 16 year infirm girlfriend and was convicted of 'fornication' surrounded by virginia and who is now a sex-offender have no right to a productive life?
Pull your pave the way out of your cop-husband's butt and live in the genuine world. There are more than 15,000 registered sex offenders on mixed state lists whose one and only crime was something as menial as public urination.
I don't really know but I believe they should make a perspective check before employ someone.
Have the 'wingers found a home in this venue?
A while ago the porn bots found a home on the Yahoo chat lines...that venue finally have to be taken off vein until the porn people could be deal with. This venue come across to have attracted ditto-heads. I doubt if anything can be done something like that without getting involved surrounded by 'free speech'. My sense of this is that after awhile there will be no material questions that require thought...freshly ditto-head propaganda and leading question centered on some sin committed by the 'liberal' strawman. Any ideas on thoughts on this subject?Answers: Personally I similar to seeing the wing nuts on either terminate of the political spectrum making fools of themselves. My views though they may enjoy a liberal slant lay somewhere in the middle.
It have lost its appeal to me. I'm tired of the same hoary rants that I be aware of have no relevance or truth to them. I am not even tempt to answer them anymore. There isn't any point.
The political questions are regularly attacks instead of any desire at finding out the basis of different opinions. Some inhabitants have literally closed their minds and become conspiracy theorists next to the objective of showing their love of their country by recounting others their opinions reveal to them that they can`t bear it. Huge turnoff and very undemocratic.
First, "this venue" is Yahoo Answers; Politics is one category.
Yes, in that are a lot of really retarded non-questions from the ditto-head crowd; and a few from the moved out. But there are also solid questions.
If you're strange with the Guidelines, you should read them; observe that hate speech, insulting other participant, and posting statements as questions are adjectives violations and should be reported.
For things that aren't really violation, either respond or discount them.
If you get burned out on this category, within are many others on this site; heaps with closely of really interesting questions that require thought to answer.
All of the controversial category have their trolls and their question that have be asked gazillions of times; it's easier to avoid burnout if you spend time in more than one category.
Your grill is the epitomy of what I find strange about America:
The United States consumes more porn and drugs than any other country all the same we spend more time and energy combat it.
Unless I'm mistaken and the same 10 guys are doing it we enjoy alot of "conservatives" using and abusing and at indistinguishable time condemning it. Look at that "fine upright" Congresman Larry "I'm not Gay"Craig. The jerk get arrested and pleads guilty to trying to pick up a man in an Airport and nonetheless he votes for family values and anti-gay crap. There are several more lying cheating gay porn watching coke snorting elected official and everyday people out within spouting family values and traditions. Whose values? I don't know plainly not theirs.
I think it's time America puts childish crap aside and focus on big stuff:
The dollar isn't worth 2 cents. Bush is obviously lying around the economy doing in good health and the stock market and foreign investors agree. In a fitting economy interest rate cuts are unnecessary.
We own a moron president who has created more enemy than we have ever have.
We have an ineffective FDA that allows drug companies to peddle unwanted items drugs at high prices as very well as tainted food near recalls on both every time I turn around.
We complain roughly speaking illegal aliens but cheerfully love the cheap labor.
We don't bother to gossip to their respective countries about problems in attendance and ultimately keeping their citizens home.
Americans moan and groan about gas prices but buy the biggest damn coup¨¦ truck we can find.
Both democrats and republicans are arguing about "past the worst subjects" with one side axiom "I'm for it" with the other "I'm against it" In my assessment both sides are doing this for the hell of it and no other reason that make sense.
Porn is the least of our concern turn the damn PC sour or don't watch it. There are lots of filter available to block it. Obviously enough associates are buying porn and drugs to make it worth producing. So confer us a damn break with the "Holier than thou" cast-offs. JEEZ!!
TO: ugotthat. You are the epitome of "american hypocracy and stupidity" (your words). The preview button is more than a step to posting your rant.
It's intended to be used to read your words,and make corrections.
I find it astounding that one character can take both sides of issues within one statement. According to you,nothing is accessible to discussion,it's only drivel.
Using your example: Senator Craig,he may be adjectives you say. BUT he did vote for domestic values and against gay agenda's. In the final analysis he did the right thing. That's individual one example, i'm not wasting my time with the rest.
Instead of complaining and surrendering,why not whip action to row back against that which you meditate is wrong.
You chastize Mr. Bush for having other countries hate us. Here's a news flash for you..Mr. Bush have the guts to do what every Country was afraid to do. After the sanctimonious Congress,former Presidents(who's tenures moved out alot to desire,and their part primary up to the situation at hand) and a VP who claims to be the father of all things,adjectives the other pc's that trashed Mr.Bush,is there any wonder that some countries piled on too. They also have to protect their dirty little secrets. I become aware of with ephoric self-righteousness that some of the biggest one are no longer in organization.
Enough...I've more than made my point...
What rights does my mom have?
mY MOTHER IS LIVING WITH My terribly sic Grandparents.She is thier house keeper , cook , pays their bills, take them to chemo,hospitals ect. The problem is, my Grandparents have permit my 40 yr old uncle move contained by -who is a former felon, and a drug addict. Does drugs contained by the house leaving spoons, and plenty .He verbally abuse my mom,dosent work and has severe tantrums for money. The problem is , my grandparents dont want him to move. Im scared for My mom. What rights does my mom enjoy?Answers: Your mom has the right to MOVE. She also have the right to report her brother. IF her parents are NOT legallly under her charge by court lay down, then nearby is nothing else she can do.
I would vote it's not a matter of rights. Your mom should relate her parents, "It's him or me! Choose." If they choose the druggie, then your mom should move out and see how the druggie can bar all the great things your mom does. My guess is they will see the error of their ways and convey him packing.
She should do this immediately up to that time it drags on any further.
Tough love has get to be just that. Tough!
No parent requirements to turn their kids in, and adjectives they want to do is help, if you mother doesn't want her brother to budge back to reformatory, moving is an option, if she is the perfectionism giver of your grandparents, she wants to talk to her parents and ask them why they are allowing that behavior, if for some principle their house is raided, your grandparents can loose everything they own and also possibly capture arrested for having the drugs contained by the house along with paraphernalia contained by home, no matter the strength of your grandparents. This is a risk that needs to be brought to their attention. I would suggest your mother looking into treatment services for her brother, that are longer than 6 months that can also help him to rehabilitate himself and when he get's out also find a situation. If this is not an option, and things keep hold of getting worse, the only other way out is to go to the police and tolerate them know the situation. Either way it's a thorny choice to make, and I whish your mother the best of luck.
Help much?
kay what rites does a person hold under the 6th ammenent?&& what isuues concern the 2ed ammenet?FINALLY
how are civil overnight case different from criminal cases?
Answers: Sixth Amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accuse shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an equitable jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have be committed, which district shall have be previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the outlook and cause of the arraignment; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to enjoy compulsory process for obtaining witnesses within his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his security.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/const...
Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, one necessary to the surety of a free State, the right of the people to hold and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/const...
(The primary issue beside the Second Amendment revolves around discerning the original intent related to private gun ownership.)
http://www.guncite.com/
Civil armour vs. criminal case:
Generally, contained by terms of rights and due process, near is a lower threshold of proof and procedure required in a civil covering. For example, a criminal case requires evidence beyond a defensible doubt, while a civil case merely requires a preponderance of the evidence contained by order to prevail.
Should the fence be removed?
Should it,I regard it should because people are still coming within no matter what,I also devise there should be a obstruction from canada to u.s & the new ireland to u.s border.Close the border chain by the statue of liberty.What do you adjectives think?Answers: Idiot
You plan that torn 5 foot chain relationship fence by the river? The one that adjectives the news stations use for their stock shot?
It will be removed and replaced shortly - by a big honkin' wall.
at heart i quality that its really stupid.
i mean its gone so overboard that they've granted to fence stop? i mean what is this coming to ? it give a bad symbol to this place .. its so stupid. and nearby are other ways to solve it.
There's a right way and a wrong channel to enter this country... illegally is criminal fence or not. WE inevitability more patrol at the mexican border. Are Canadians really coming over? They are allowed to visit, as we can stop by them too.. New Ireland? I don't know much about.
I don't focus people who enter this country illegitimately should be permitted to stay here. I don't think ethnic group who enter this country should start out on welfare and such. yes, you got it, I'm a conservative!
Physical barricade or not, there have to be a way to protected our borders. Anyone can go into Mexico usually lacking any trouble. Try coming back into the US. Why do so abundant people try to find into the US? Because it is the greatest country on earth. People complain here, but why don't those complainers step elsewhere? They would stop complaining if they had their freedom taken away, as so oodles citizens of other countries do.
I am against illegal immigration, I am also against the obstruction it is shameful and wrong of the US to have this barrier, It should be removed, the fence is nought more than an a sign of our poor thinking elected official, and their inablility to do the right entity. If our laws be enforced, i.e illegals not allowed to work, no welfare benefits, no arts school for their children, then they would adjectives go home, it is not inhumane for the the US to enforce our law, these people can other go fund to where they come from, for example the Mexican government is feeling like to stand up for the illegal surrounded by the US, then they can do the right item for them if they go posterior to Mexico, which I am sure they will (ahem! not). enforce our existing laws and remove this horrible stain on our country "the Fence"
I am Canadian, and trust me.we are not trying to 'get hold of into' the US.LOL LOL LOL ...you crack me up! Build your fence...wall...or anything else...we don't attention to detail...you will only be alienating yourselves.
I suggest a fence will do even smaller number good contained by thwarting the inevitable invasion of leprechauns.
Besides, as long as they bring their lucky charms, they won't have need of to draw off our welfare system.
I read aloud, let the little green guys contained by cause they do adjectives the mischievous magic tricks that Americans won't.
As far as letting Mexicans run America, nobody will want to come here, and none of us will enjoy a reason stay. Their system of command is 100% corrupt. That's why they want to come here in the first place...
I enjoy no idea what country you are from, but if you start to have a world map or a sphere, then I would resembling to suggest that you take a fitting look at it. It should be quite plain that Ireland is nowhere to hand the US border. I live in California & the Mexican border blockade serves a very biddable purpose of keeping out abundant UNDOCUMENTED people that use Mexico as a instrument to enter th US illegally. Not adjectives of these illegals are Mexicans. The US is currently at war & we necessitate to secure our borders better. Someday you might infer this better.
Btw, the Statue of Liberty sits in the Ocean. What could they possibly do to close an nouns of open sea? That idea lately borders on silly & far too expensive to accomplish.
People die every day trying to cross the deserted stop that takes them to American soil. If the fence make them guess twice about putting their lives at risk, later they have served a fitting purpose in self there. Many are exploited by COYOTES & this is solely one small part of our border problems & issues.
NO. THAT FENCE SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED. IT SHOULD BE EXPANDED & MAINTAINED.
What is the New Ireland border? As far as closing the border by the Statue of Liberty, especially few aliens are illegally entering this country by stowing away on ships.
I know Border Patrol Agents on the US/Canadian border. So few ethnic group are illegally entering from the northern border that they individual catch a handful per year, compared to several hundred thousand on the southern border. The 9/11 terrorists rightfully entered through Canada. In reality, Canada has drastically loose immigration laws, making it easier for terrorists to naturalize within and legally enter the U.S. A blockade isn't going to stop people crossing through established ports of entry.
As far as illegals crossing through Mexico, you may argue that anyone should know how to come here who wants to, but do you honestly consistency that we should have to collectively settle for the healthcare, education and public housing of everyone who enter? That's what's happening. Yet, illegals transport $24 billion back to Mexico respectively year. That's money earned immorally, with no taxes remunerated on two-thirds of it.
In the meantime, 43% of food stamps in the entire country are distributed to off the record aliens, and 41% of all welfare recipient are illegal aliens. 60% of public housing is for unconstitutional aliens. Over 40% of students in California school don't speak English, meaning American children can't revise as much as they used to because the curriculum has to be modified to accomodate the children of illegitimate aliens.
I'll spare you and not even delve into the criminal aspect.
Personally, I'd rather reward a few cents more for fruit and get rid of the financial burden the illegals hold placed on Americans. The southern fence may not stop adjectives illegals, but it will inarguably curb the influx.
You receive fraud with logo amalgamated nation?
Answers: Even if it was physical it would still be a fraud.
More Questions and Answers:
[406] - [1508] - [2053] - [675] - [686] - [425] - [1051] - [6] - [1627] - [1560] - [688] - [871] - [2299] - [351] - [2366] - [1937] - [1658] - [1574] - [1800] - [2497]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: