Law Questions and Answers
If death cost is abolished, would you be liable to pay more taxes?
to keep hold of them alive. The cost is approx 86,000. per year to keep them alive. If you want to keep hold of them alive , then you would reward higher taxes. The ones who are for the departure penalty would not hold to pay.Answers: Actually, it costs more contained by public defender endorsed bills and court costs for prisoner's who have the right to an never-ending appeals system that are on death row. They average just about 20 years on death row.
The avergae cost of a passing row conviction is 2-3 million!!!
So if the death cost is abolished, we will take-home pay less taxes.
Stop lying It is more expensive to annihilate then to incarcerate.
I am sorry to be so blunt , may be you are of late ignorant.
It costs more to appy the dealth cost than to keep them alive.
But it is SOOOOOOOOOOO worth it.
Some crimes, simply deserve passing.
those on death row cost 5 times what it cost for those who serve energy. many convicted and sentenced to annihilation never are executed. it would be cheaper to just not fool next to death cost and save adjectives the cost involved in numerous appeals, separate cell, extra guards, segregated services et-cetra.
what would be a better option is to rearrange our justice system to insure that we can be confident surrounded by convictions. set a very specific set of guidelines for use of extermination penalty and afterwards it will become simple.
1 conviction
1 appeal
1 execution
Sorry, the death cost costs more...
Would the people who are within favor of the death cost be willing to outlaw it so we can enjoy lower taxes?
or maybe the population who support the death cost should be taxed more to settle for it?
How about charging an annual tax to criminals who are in prison for time and having them work past its sell-by date the money while in incarcerate? have them wages for their room and board by working?
We could also assign financial penalties as capably as jail time within criminal cases. Murder someone and you get 20 years contained by jail and a whopping fine which mechanism the state seizes adjectives of your assets to help pay envelope for your incarceration---the gov't sells your sports car + house and cleans out your bank statement.
Should a Sheriff be responsible for his deputy if in a verbs of an inmate?
for example, if the deputy is transporting an inmate and he tries to escape hurting himself or others is the Sheriff or could he be held responsible if the deputy failed to immobilize the inmate properly?Answers: Anytime a law enforcement officer is acting inside the scope of his livelihood duties, the employer is responsible for his actions. It is call "vicarious liability".
if the inmate hurts himself or others, as you asked, then the inmate is the solitary one responsible. the deputy or sheriff are not responsible for the acts of a criminal who is trying to escape.
the deputy would be held responsible by the sheriff for poor errand performance purely as any employee would be held in charge by their boss.
No, assuming that deputies are properly vetted until that time hiring. And if they are, they should be good to budge. This is going back to the glory days of Bill and Hill, "blame someone else".
Jane Doe????
i know that when they cant identifie a body they r then call Jane Doe. is that true for men too? do they call indefinite male bodies Jane Doe?Answers: no
Actually it's John Doe but I ruminate it should be Dick Buck, get it?
Dick and Jane
Doe and Buck?
Can anyone put me thru to a lawyer specializes within higher lessons disputes & willing to sustain with trial aid?
I have sent my enquiries to the top coaching specialists firms listed surrounded by the Chambers but none of them respond. I wonder whether it is because I mention legal aid. I have need of a lawyer defectively. I have be paying overseas fees for two years without mortal provided the data generally provided for students to do research. Instead, I was told to do unsupported fieldwork which not a soul in the department do to create the background not provided. The university just overlooked my complaint for another two years after wasting me two years' time in it.Answers: Mate, you hold no chance of getting trial aid for that sort of complaint. This is merely a civil disagreement between you and the higher rearing establishment and thus you will not get any legitimate aid help surrounded by bringing a case. Hardly surprising given that your explanation of the supposed problem within your question make little or no sense.
Legal Aid? Why on earth should anyone receive it? The law and the courts should be reserved for those that can discharge for it. I object to have my taxes squandered on anything other than the protection of property.
Why are gun laws needed?
i requirement three reasonsAnswers: 1. To protect endorsed gun-owners from those who think an armed citizenry is perilous. Several studies have shown that arms within the hands of law-abiding citizens kind for less intimidation overall.
2. To protect innocent citizens from people, resembling felons and mentally unstable folks, who shouldn't have them.
3. In Virginia, nearby is a law that automatically give a criminal five additional years if they use a gun surrounded by the commission of a felony. It's very potent.
In short, while a few people should be prevented from possessing guns, law-abiding those having guns serve to protect society--even if they don't use them, the drastically fact that they (might) hold one helps to moderate crime. Also, strictly punishing the use of a gun in a crime discourages the use of guns surrounded by crimes.
However, gun laws are not at adjectives effective if they're not properly enforced.
The NRA website can dispense you specific sources and probably statistics. They can probably direct you to original research, if you entail it.
First reason and singular law of the manor required.
Is the 2nd Amendment.
1. To enslave the population
2. To protect criminal politicians
3. To make populace dependent on government for protection.
1. stop crazy relatives from buying them
2 . stop minors from buying them
3. stop felons from buying them
Enough?
they aren't needed
it's our right to maintain and bear arms
Is it illegal to copy video if you don't sell them?
Answers: Yes. but if you aren't selling them or doing anything near them but watching for personal use, there's -0- chance of human being arrested or fined.
Depends on where you live. In some countries, you don't purchase a video, you purchase a license to use the footage for personal viewing. In that armour, you can usually make a backup or archival copy as long as just one copy is in use at at time.
You can't trademark copies to give away or share though.
However the Digital Millenium Act make it illegal contained by the US, If I understand it correctly (I am not a legal representative or an American.)
see www.chillingeffects.org for definitive answers to this and related internet era copyright issues.
Unless you copying falls under Fair Use exemptions, consequently yes, i tis a violation.
Even if you don't deal in your copy, and making a backup copy is allowed under Fair Use, that may not kind it kosher.
If your copy happens to be sitting on a p2p record server somewhere, being given away for free, after it is certainly a contravention.
If you make a single copy and donate it a away, to friend or family, it is not "Fair Use" as immediately you are distributing and competing with the copyright owner's Constitutionally granted monopoly to wish what to do with the work.
I was removed from a Nevada Corp. by other member?
If the voting members of a Nevada Corp. Remove me as Secretary am I still responsible for any lease or agreements that it is involved in.Answers: The Corporate Secretary is not responsible for lease or agreements, unless you signed them as an individual and not as the secretary of the corporation.
Generally, An officer signing for a corporation is never personally responsible to 3d party. Unless . . . consult an attorney for specific questions roughly what you signed.
Pregnant on death row - Try and backing if you can.?
Tell me what do you think around this ,Pregnant on death row
Here's a stand-out headline for an interesting grip: "Death-row prisoner gets pregnant contained by solitary." Yup, you read that right: Reuters reported this week that a Vietnamese death-row inmate, held in solitary confinement for almost a year, have been found to be 11 weeks pregnant. Convicted heroin trafficker Nguyen Thi Oanh is very soon seeking a pardon from her release sentence by firing squad. (Reuters notes that contained by Vietnam, trafficking more than 600 grams of heroin is punishable by death or beside a life sentence; Oanh be in possession of a billion dong, or $63,000, worth of the drug.)
Most directly, authorities are dealing with the mystery of how she become pregnant, since her husband is serving jail time within another province. Two guards have be detained in a police investigation, for allegedly "abuse their power" by allowing another inmate to stay in Oanh's cell.
Another ask, however, may throw pro-choice activists: What happen to Oanh's sentence? It is against Vietnamese law to pass out a death sentence on a pregnant woman or women next to a child under the age of three, so her pregnancy may salvage her life. That's devout news for Oanh, but it raise some tricky questions: What is the proof for pardoning a pregnant woman on death row? If Oanh is pardon solely because she is pregnant, is the Vietnamese court system protecting the right of an 11-week-old fetus to live?
In the United States, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act recognizes crimes against a pregnant mother to be crimes against her child. We've stopped short, however, of extending act of justice against the mother to her fetus. The U.S. hasn't face a case approaching Oanh's, perhaps because just a small percentage of inmates on death row are women. But some states hold provisions in place for pregnant inmates: South Dakota make exceptions in administering the annihilation penalty to pregnant women, delay an execution past the prescribed 90 days if an inmate is pregnant or deem mentally unfit.
I'm against all executions, so my vote go against the death cost in Oanh's grip -- but not on the basis of her pregnancy. After adjectives, surely some of the men who receive the death cost have only just fathered children. Is it right for women -- even criminal women -- to be spared on the basis that they develop to be the gender lucky adequate to get the womb? I'm torn. Faithful reader, weigh in.
Answers: The release penalty is a throw away to begin beside. One deserves to just suffer contained by prison. In my opinion a vivacity is a life. A fetus is a human time. She should be pardoned because the childs going to grow up knowing that his/her mom be executed and they never got the haphazard to meet, etc. That can rationale emotional issues etc. I do consistency for men who have kids on the channel or kids in standard and are on death row. thats tough and it is excessive.
She should be able to incline her child and leave prison.
But she should hold tracking measures so she doesn't do anything bad contained by public.
I think they should continue till the baby is born to convey out her sentence. That way the babe lives and she does her duty.
I dont really know how to answer that
I don't see why they don't just lurk, deliver the baby and next carry out the sentence.
I don't know adjectives the facts in the satchel, but I'm thinking she probably shouldn't have gotten the destruction penalty contained by the first place.
I say abort the babe and carry out the annihilation sentance.
UM ya that's the point I wouldn't ever do anything that would put me i that situation.
A strict interpretation of the statutory language that you cited take the morality out it if that is what you are struggling beside; "it is against Vietnamese law to pass out a death sentence on a pregnant woman or women next to a child under the age of three."
No have need of to muddy up the waters. A strict reading of the language does not "pardon" her. It does not get rid of her death sentence, it merely delay it-until her child is three. No new statute is being proffered, no debate desires to ensue; the vietnamese are just following their own statutory decree.
They should wait untill she have the baby. as much as she shouldn't be executed for the drug charge she also know the law contained by that country and still took a crazy chance. Now she'll discharge the ultimate price.
I say aloud they should keep her contained by confinement w/ a doctor close. Then when the baby is born, impart it to a relative. Then pay for her crimes herself, beside no exceptions!It may seem hard, but what if she got pregnant planned, to avoid the sentence? Tough question but I stick near what I said.
How big is a dong?
Decided to wait and next answer.
First of all, it is another country next to thier own laws and society. Whether or not, you similar to thier laws, they are the ruling of the land over at hand. Arguments that it is right or wrong because how you feel just about drug dealing or the death cost is moot.
The important query is can we use being a parent as an excuse for concession of punishment.
As pointed out, it becomes hypocritical to enjoy one set of rules for fathers and a second set for mothers. I believe the residence used for that is "sexist".
If the child be already born and the sentence was 20 years contained by prison, the child would be a ward of the state and the mother would be in young offenders` institution. Nobdy would be concerned.
As pointed out above, the child is innocent and has not committed a crime. As such ( and by the law of that country), the child should be born, reared until three and after turned over to the state and the rest of the punishment carried out in accordance near thier laws.
Here's what I grain.
Oanh must state whether or not she wishes abortion or adoption. If she wishes the abortion, she should receive the abortion and then be executed (I in truth do not believe in the loss penalty any, I am going by what "should" happen if the release penalty exists and cannot be changed). If she wishes birth, they should try to identify the father. If the father will not be taking full custody of the child at birth or cannot be identified, or will be subject to criminal prosecution himself for rape or doesn`t matter what, the mother will be expected to identify a relative for the child's care or release the child for stranger adoption. After birth, as soon as the doctors offer the go ahead, she'll be executed and the child placed.
The purpose for all of this is that doesn`t matter what life living inside a woman's body is her decision (since it's her body). No one else may gross a decision for her, including a state execution board. If the mother decide that the child is to be born, then that child will be born. If a father should not be capable of prevent it, neither should an execution board.
She is not to be spared. The child should be spared if the mother wishes it.
You should know that this could not happen contained by the US. Neither federal or state law allows execution of pregnant women. The US have signed and ratified the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), which thus have the force of law contained by this country, and the ICCPR disallows execution of pregnant women. US reservations to the treaty allow the death cost but not for pregnant women.
http://www.legislationline.org/?tid=144&...
Should wait till after the child is born, since she will not be raise it, her sentence can be enforced after the birth.
If she agrees to an abortion, she might be saving the existence of the father, who is probably a guard, and whose identity will be known after a DNA experiment. Since they want to kill her for drug traffic they probably also gun down guards who abuse prisoners.
I honestly believe that this woman should be given a temporarily clemency based on the certainty that she is pregnant.
After she gives birth, the child should be put up for adoption and her sentence should be carried out,But, near is another focus on this issue!
The gaurds who evidentally got this woman pregnant should also facade the repercussions of thier actions and facade criminal prosecution for the rape of this woman who was and is still on departure row.
Are you allowed to patch an american flag if it has a hole within it?
Plz answr 4 me thx.Answers: wow i had to put but thumbs down on adjectives the previous answers!!!
of COURSE you may repair your flag!!!
quote from the flag code
(k) The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a
fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed surrounded by a dignified way,
preferably by burning.
this covers flags which are UNABLE to be repaired- that are too feebly damaged
i recieved a flag not long ago which unmistakably meant something to somebody - nearby were numerous patch and repairs made to it
unfortunatly it had two sizeable unrepaired tears aswell - which were not sufficiently expert to be repaired due the fabric fraying apart
i hold yet to retire this flag because i am recycle some of the material 1st to repair another flag i hold that has moth make worse
do what u feel is right
Good Morning,
The short answer is no, when an American Flag become damaged or spoiled it should be retired. You may steal it to your local fire department or American Legion and they can retire your flag in the appropriate channel.
Problem with my baggage manager?(personal injury case)HELP?
I hold a personal injury case going on. and i usually call for my case examiner once a month to find out if there have been anything contemporary with the shield. Everytime i call him he other say we are roughly speaking to file very soon.we are about to profile now and i would telephone back the subsequent month and nothing have been done. He have been motto this for 3-4 months now. Why do you suppose it is taking them so long to file? Its not similar to they dont know my injuries. the main entity they said they was waiting for be my surgery to be done. And that has be done 4-5 months ago. Also do you think they are newly racking up a bill/ expenses? what are some of the expenses i would pay for besides the 33%? And i chew over i know why he is Ignoring my calls and junk mail is because they havent filed however like they said they are. And also is the skin manager respond for the file what is his role in my grip?. I live in the state of NY.Answers: by Maryfran... Member since:
July 30, 2006
Total points:
2762 (Level 4) Fire them, if you can. If not, story every contact in detail, contained by writing. Their procrastination could compromise your case, any by allowing evidence to be lost and memories to fade, or by passing some statute of limitations.
Ask specific question: Do you need any other paperwork? Anyone you call for to interview? Who, specifically, is working my case (not a short time ago the office)? Is there anything I can do (if you are surrounded by fact competent to do something)--type, acquire documents, assemble documents, hand-carry them to the courthouse, etc.? What specific things need to be done until that time you file? When is the statute of limitations? When do you plan to folder? State that you are quite concerned over how long the process is taking--you don't want a principal defendant to retire, move, or die since it goes to court, etc.
Of course, don't be accusative, but try to pin them down as to what the problem is, what they need surrounded by order to correct it, what you can do to relieve, and when they intend to do it.
They may be in cahoots beside the defendants, and they may simply be swamped. Maybe a key assistant moved and they can't find adjectives the paperwork. But if your wheel doesn't squeak, they may verbs to give your travel case short shrift.
So SQUEAK!!!!!--nicely, but do squeak!
And keep squeaking. Don't help yourself to no for an answer. If they try to make you have a feeling like you're bothering them "too much," be apologetic, but firm: "I'm really sorry to bother you so much, but I enjoy a lot at stake here and I'm getting really worried." And follow up. If they maintain waffling, articulate, "I guess you are really busy. Can you recommend someone else I can take my satchel to who isn't so busy?" With that subtle(?) threat to take your business elsewhere, I don`t know they'll be spurred into action.
And purloin extensive notes! Who you talk to, date (and time), and as much detail as you can remember about what be said. You might even say (if they're giving you non-answers), "I'm making a record of what you're saying, but I don't relatively understand your answer. Are you motto that . . . .? I need to read your answer well plenty to write it down."
Get the book, "When I Say No, I Feel Guilty," by Manuel J. Smith. It's about how to assert yourself surrounded by situations like this. It's invaluable.
What? A shield manager? I hold never heard of a crust manager surrounded by any type of legal claim. A travel case manager for any legitimate claim is called a advocate. I do not know why he would not have file the claim by now unless he is trying to settle near an insurer or something without going to court. The 33% contingency is adjectives he is entitled to get, and is supposed to cover expenses. It would generate more sense if this were a Worker's Comp. claim, if it be, you would possibly have a defence manager at the W. comp. Commision, but they don't take a percentage of your recovery at adjectives. This does not make sense at adjectives.
i have never contained by my life hear of what you guys are talking more or less. no one can leach a percentage of a personal injury claim except an attorney. i decision i knew what "casing manager's" name be so i could go ask him why he is practicing tenet w/o a liscense. is this in america? it's rediculouse.
that girl underneath me is insane. and oblivious. she must be a "overnight case manager." shift get a advocate genius. no none short a liscense to practice law can 1. report a claim (except on their own behalf). 2. work on a contingency basis related to a claim. it is unlawful. it is actually a criminal offense. it is when i see answers resembling these that i want to sue yahoo for harming society by giving completely stupid those a place to [pretend to be attorneys.
it was me who give you the thumbs down. why don't you go detail your case regulator about it. conceivably he'll file a claim against me.
Usually the overnight case manager would be handling things largely in trying to settle your luggage out of court (pre-suit). If they cannot negotiate a settlement with the insurance company afterwards a lawsuit can be filed within your case and a paralegal or an attorney should button it from there.
In the pre-suit stages a emergency to the insurance company is usually made after you have reach mmi or maximum medical improvement, consequence you are no longer under medical treatment. This can give somebody a lift a reasonable amount of time, depending on your injuries. Once the constraint has be made, the insurance company will have a spot on amount of time to make an tender, which in most cases is low and the negotiate can take months after you are done treating beside your doctor. Hang in in that, sometimes insurers such as Geico and Progressive will get together next to firms towards the end of the year and try to verbs out their inventory of cases. Good luck.
More Questions and Answers:
[3] - [558] - [154] - [736] - [1864] - [1147] - [2358] - [842] - [765] - [1699] - [1391] - [2034] - [906] - [1780] - [78] - [305] - [1591] - [2013] - [1440] - [988]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: