Law Questions and Answers
Can you get sued if you write some lyrics to a song on clothing and get rid of it?
Answers: Yes. Everything is copyrighted these days. Thats if the lyrics come from an artist who owns it. You can't steal their work and sell it. You requirement permission first. Thats the drawback. However, you may bring back away with it if the entity who owns the lyrics doesn't know about it. Like basically selling the shirts to a couple of people. Whereas, if you sold thousands of them. Then its explicit that the owner will catch on and hear roughly it. Then you'll have lawers barge within your doors suing you. Remember, rightful owners want part of the profit too. And they'll thieve every penny you made... or even more.
Technically, yes, but it's unlikely to happen unless the revenue from this clothing is making more money than it would cost to database a lawsuit. If you made $5 on a shirt with some lyrics on it (which could technically be copyright infringement), it wouldn't kind much sense for an artist to file a $2,000 lawsuit, would it?
Also, it would depend on the extent of the lyrics. The phrase "I love you" is a lyric contained by countless songs, and too generic to be copyrighted.
My doctor sexually harassed me? (He groped my balls)?
My daddy brought me to the doctor today and to my dismay moved out me there to do some errands. When it be time for my appointment the doctor asked me to pull down my pant... I ignorantly complied and he started groping my balls, afterwards tweaked my nipples as well and massage the buttI'm only 17; is in attendance anyway I can press charges?
Answers: Umm, you DO know they do a test of your groin and the bearing they do it is to feel down the testicles ... that whole "turn your organizer and cough" thing? Are you sure that wasn't piece of the exam?
You are 17 years old hon, why did you allow it?
Yes, First you have need of to tell your father around it, no matter how embarassing it may be. And next go to the local police station and folder a sexual harassement suit. This is probably not the first time this doctor has done this and if you don't come forward after he will continue doing it to other boys.
Do you think the mart of fireworks should be banned to the standard public in the UK?
It is within many other countries. It wasn't so bleak when it was with the sole purpose focused around Guy Falwkes Night, but now it seem to go on forever. Is it too much?Answers: Oh my God yes!!!!
Fireworks, which are explosives surrounded by a handy cardboard tube!.should only be sold to expert display ancestors and not spotty, mono brows with a benefit cheque worth of fun contained by their bum bags.
Hahaha. I've already asked this query tonight.
I do think that fireworks should not be available to the common public.
I think that they should be available with the sole purpose to licenced professional pyrotechnicians.
YES... it is illegal to totter around with explosives surrounded by your pocket, unless of course it is the completion of Oct or begining of Nov and they are in the shape of a rocket that'll be pretty contained by the sky, then it is ok.
They are risky and should only be used by professionals.
If you don't want them, don't buy them.
If you want them, buy them.
Just stop trying to trademark decisions for other relations. It's gonna get to the point where on earth we'll have to ask approval to fart.
No.
There are laws within place that can be used against those that misuse fireworks.
By banning fireworks another company of public servants would be created (or an expansion of some existing government body.)
Those that savour the freedom of the seas around the coast of Gt.Britain would no longer be capable of purchase "Flares;Rockets"which are extremely important within times of distress and for collision avoidance.
No. People would only brand their own. And they would make big ones!
Another point. Animals do not concern. People do.
I am sick and tired of people who progress on about animals.These are alike people who foul our streets. It is cruel to hold animals in towns.
The guy within Murcia should go to Valencia, where on earth I'm sure, the locals will probably burn him as a heretic! ( see Las Fallas on youtube and be amazed!)
I gotta diesel car an it is rigaressly tested 4 emission,an yet contained by a single 2 months i hear the constant bangin of morons blastin out these fireworks ,watta bout their emmissions ,how many tons of co2 are emmitted by them ,its a loada crap
Do you consider exploiting a "loop hole" the same as cheating?
Answers: Legally no. Moraly and ethically yes. But I'm not a advocate so i have those two virtues.
Absolutely not!
When you can, you "take advantage" of a loophole.
When you can't but someone else can, theyre ' exploiting " a loophole.
To nonspecific of a question. Some holes are too close to cheating and some are to an authority.
What is the highest rate of interest that can be charged on unpaid accounts receivable?
Answers: I am not sure but it would be worth your while to look into it. For example if the interest rate lawfully is one number and someone is charging so much over the legal rate, explicitly considered usury-loansharking- which means you can carry all the interest taken rotten the loan. Also, in some states you can attain the whole loan forgiven for violate this law.
If you are a loan shark, the sky is the constrict.
Usury was at one time punishable by extermination.
Shari'a court question?
Whats the settlement with that Shari'a court? I see on the news that alot of ancestors dont want it in Canada. What is the operation with that court? Is it impossible?Answers: It could prove detrimental to women and children because of the religious connotations taken from the Quaran <sp?>.
Here's a short article on the subject.
http://www.newsandletters.org/Issues/200...
And I also concur with the poster above me on the subject of it being used as a replacement for Canadian ruling.
in sharia court, thier equality will base on islamic morals.
What is porn?
In my Ethics class we are discussing Pornography. We are not discussing the morality of it but if people should enjoy a right to view and produce it. The problem near discussing it is that no one can appear to agree on what exactly porn is... Some of my classmates say any form of affection to be precise recorded and some others utter it is nudity. Some vote it has to do near the intend of the viewer and the producer... So I thought I'd draw from some feedback on people that aren't within the class to see what you guys think.Answers: any movie where on earth it shows you the reproductive organs of people
porn:
1. sexually explicit bits and pieces: films, magazines, writings, photographs, or other materials that are sexually explicit and intended to rationale sexual arousal.
Porn is a recording of associates having sex
It is anything that appeals to the prurient instincts of an individual. Since this is subjective and respectively person react differently to imagery the exact definition have never been agreed upon.
I would speak that pornography is any type of picture, video, etc. that is sexually explicit.
I believe the courts collectively consider porn to be sexual imagery lacking socially redeaming artistic value.
sexual diversion with the aspiration of sexual arousal and/or sexual relief. I believe the difference to be erotica, which is the use of sexually-arousing representation for mainly artistic purposes.
When pictures are not explicit I presume they are more artistic and I refer to that as erotica.
I think of pornography as individual explicit in outlook, not just show genitalia but also showing sexual contact next to the genitalia, as in masturbation, oral sex, intercourse etc.
Of course show through some atmosphere like pictures or video, etc.
I didn't pass a dictionary definition because I think you are wanting varying opinion. I do not think porn showing adults surrounded by consensual situation where no mar comes to anyone is that bad unless it is an love. Many people use it to enhance masturbation or couples to enhance sex and even swot up some different things.
Used in moderation i mull over it is acceptable for adults.
One of the best creations ever? Abso-freakin'-lutely!!!
It is the depiction of charm leading up and involving sex. Viewed for pleasure and for full-grown education.
Like adjectives things, however, it can be corrupted, and child porn is a result of this when adults abuse children sexually within violation of the law and also against the child's will or knowledge. The pricks who do this are evil, and they usually know it.
obtain real even 10 year olds kno what porn is its nked pictures or sexually contact taken or record
Question about those popular DVD rent by messages services?
A co-worker of mine gets DVDs from a post order rental manacle. He normally burns them using software and after prints labels for them that he downloads from the net. He puts the DVDs back within the prepaid envelopes and sends them back. He sent rotten his envelope today and was putting away his "copy" disk and notice he mailed the copy and kept the productive. The mail character already came. What will arise?Answers: IF they notice they most feasible will terminate your -- er, your co-worker's -- picture.
Interesting. maybe it won't capture noticed. if it doesn't procure noticed, keep hold of on doing it and see how long it takes them to observe.
Is the removal of an ectopic pregnancy the same as an abortion??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071105/ap_o...Although this happen in Nicaragua, are we facing this if the conservatives muddle through to pass "no abortions" legislation?? Women are dying because of the government's frozen line on "no abortions," even to set free the life of the mother. Any comments??
Answers: No, it basically reflects the anti-woman policy of the Roman Catholic Church, and it's a crime against humanity. It's not even that the doctors assume it's an abortion: the RCC is so anti-women that the docs are afraid they will be charged with murder if they treat an ectopic pregnancy. And the Church go on its out, proud and certifiably insane policy.
NO
ectopic pregnancys put the mothers life at risk and MUST be taken effort of asap.
the rest of your question is not even an argument for this...as it is a medical time saving operation.
polite luck :)
Yes, it is! Save the children!! Even the ones growing where they shouldn't & would probably execute the mother, that isn't important, simply save adjectives the chldren, whether we have room to put them, or food to nurture them! We can't sacrifice any unborn zygotes, they may grow up to be republicans!
Thanks for the thumbs down nuts, this was sarcasm, pure & simple...
No, because it would come below a "life of the mother" exception.
Also, the law in the US own specific exemptions for ectopic pregnancies.
No ectopic pregnancy can make it, the newborn always dies anyway. The exception person one in the belly, but requires the baby to be taken out rash and most don't make it any.
One in the fallopian tube is doomed from the start as around half of adjectives of them end inherently, as if in a miscarriage, the others own to be surgically removed.
So this is a moot point for pro-lifers and abortionists alike ... this isn't a baby, it's a mistake.
No. In the US, in that would never be legislation that would consider treating an ectopic pregnancy an abortion. In fact, I can never conjure up legislation that dictates- "no abortion for any reason" ever passing surrounded by the United States. The article seems to suggest that women are dying because of the doctor's misinterpretation of the topical law to some extent than the law itself. Obviously the Nicaraguan governing body needs to clarify the treatment of ectopic pregnancies. Although they are somewhat scarce, they happen frequently adequate that not clarifying the issue could result in heaps deaths.
In Texas, can an injured person attain compensation for med bills that exceed the insurance policy limits?
In a backside end collision contained by Texas, can an injured person be compensated for medical bills that exceed the policy edges? I suffered a concussion and nerve mischief and don't feel I get adequate official representation. How can I find out what the insurance company actually rewarded my lawyer?Answers: There are plentiful parts to this answer:
1) When you make a settlement (it sounds similar to you did) you sign a paper axiom that you give up any further claims. Therefore, you will not be capable of make any more claims.
2) Your attorney's agreement be with you, and so he would enjoy kept whatever percentage of the total settlement you agreed on (35% or whatever). You should return with in touch next to the attorney and ask how much you settled for and how mush he kept.
3) Yes, in Texas, you can bring back more that the amount someone is covered for. Otherwise, everyone would get the cheapest minimal coverage. It's not your idiosyncrasy someone was not enough covered. However, the insurance company is only liable for the chunk they were insured for. Anything else, you would enjoy to sue the other driver for. The way that this works is that you can;t enter into a settlement or sign anything. Mostly, this isn;t done bcause the personality won't have satisfactory money to pay.
I hope this help you. You asked the question a while ago and get no response, so I don't know if you are still looking to see if anyone responded.
You cannot get compensated for more than the policy borders of the at-fault driver if you already settled the case against the at-fault driver. (Even if the bag is not settled, it would be difficult to do if limits be tendered by the insurance company).
Ask your attorney to see your contingency fee agreement and the settlement documents (you are entitled to them).
You might own a claim under your own insurance if you enjoy personal injury protection (PIP) and/or underinsured motorist protection.
If you signed a settlement and release, you cannot go after the at-fault driver anymore.
More Questions and Answers:
[1415] - [2572] - [1123] - [561] - [495] - [644] - [858] - [2081] - [1489] - [653] - [1813] - [972] - [348] - [2021] - [298] - [150] - [2091] - [2434] - [2135] - [1279]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: