Law Questions and Answers
If I plead guilty to a criminal offense to help a friend, can I enjoy the conviction lifted?
My friend and I be in his sports car and I was the passenger. A gun be in his trunk and we be both arrested. He was on probation at the time so he convinced me to bear the charge so he wouldn`t go to prison and lose his domestic. I felt sorry for him so he hired a advocate for himself who said it would work and that lawyer completed up getting me probation.Answers: You have a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Here's how this works: the advocate can and should be disbarred for selling you down the river. He should have refuse the case, self paid by someone save for your client to sell the client down the river is disbarrable everywhere, even Alabama.
In masses states, you have adequate to vacate the conviction, but you're going to need to own an attorney on your side...someone who's not being salaried to screw you into accepting a felony conviction.
Good luck.
The lawyer he hired be representing him, not you. You shouldn't have done that. Lawyers are required to be trusty to their clients.
I don't know what, if anything, you can do now. Definitely hire your own attorney and find out.
What a sap, you now hold a felony on your permanent narrative. You will probably regret this stupid act for the rest of your life span.
This is a law press.?
My mother recentley recieved a U.S patent.The exclusive rights office give her a number and is also listed as the inventor below the U.S patent.Once to be exact recieved can anyone reguardless of anything that happend as far as a contract, with another creature to jeapordise the situation?It was my version that once something is patented that is it.Answers: That is it, but your mother may hold to sue someone for patent infringement if she can prove someone else is using her rights without approval.
Your question make little sense, but I am guessing you are asking if it is possible for someone to infringe on her patent. The short answer is yes. It happen every day. It is up to her to protect her rights rights as no one else is going to do it for her. The upside is that someone else might lift the patented product to market when the inventor lacks the possessions to bring it to market himself, and next the inventor can sue to recover the profits.
Do Juries actually examine forensic evidence?
Before finding someone guilty, or do they purloin the word of the Forensic Team?Answers: forensic investigators gives the result and adjectives finding of the case so the jury will addjust its judgement to that its up to the forensic result
It would be unusual for a jury to physically handle forensic evidence - contamination might, for example, prejudice a retrial should one prove basic.
However the judge may approve such an distraction if he deems it considerate in the check out for truth.
Juries sometimes visit the scene of an alleged crime.
Much forensic evidence could not be practically handle - e.g. DNA specimens - nor could one imagine that such a procedure would be of benefit.
I would muse you have to rely on the expertise of the forensic troop. How many jurors would comprehend such complex procedures anyway. They may be shewn it but that would be as far as it goes.
I enjoy been a juror twice and one time was allowed to pedal a knife used within a stabbing, on that case nobody died.
No, they dont physically examine the evidence...the scientist give his verbal evidence and presents any exhibits, and is cross examined and as contained by any case it is up to the jury to establish how much weight to place on that evidence, and whether or not it is truthful..but physically examine the evidence no.unless it is something the layman could see near his own eyes.
The real answer to your question is yes (to both). Juries do get to see the evidence and examine it. If forensic conducting tests has be run on the item, then an expert witness will testify as to what the experiment entails, what it proves, and the results. A jury may choose to believe or disbelieve the expert, as they would any witness.
I'll endow with you some examples:
1) Drugs: the actual drugs are entered into evidence, and the jury get to examine them, handle them, etc. They can even nick the drugs back into the jury room during deliberations. However, we enjoy to prove that the drugs are really what we allege (marijuana, cocaine, etc.). For that, we can the expert come to court, explain the tests and the positive results.
2) DNA: The jury get to see the bedsheet, clothing, etc., that the DNA sample be taken from. Since this has biological situation on it, it is usually in clear plastic and they wear gloves when handling. Then the expert take the stand to interpret the results of the testing.
Hope this help. It's the most accurate answer you've gotten so far.
It depends what you mean by 'examine'. Most of the expert evidence given by a forensic scientist will be base on detailed and complex laboratory analysis on materials that have be recovered from a scene of a crime, victim's and suspects.
It can also include examinations made at the actual scene, For example, bloodstain distributions and fires. When the expert is called to bequeath evidence he/she will present the results and then tender an expert view or view on what they mean. Only expert witnesses can provide an opinion within this way.
The jury are composed of lay population. Of course, they could not do the actual laboratory examinations thenselves and they cannot form an experty opinion give or take a few them. Thus the jury do not examine the evidence.
However, they will have copies of the expert witnesses report contained by the form a statement. This can include diagrams, drawings, photographs and sometimes models. They will also see the items (exhibits) that have be examined.
An expert witness has to present evidence within a form that can be understood by the jury. This is sometimes difficult because of the complex scientifc outlook of what is involved. Barristers questions will ensure that the expert forensic facts and opinion are understood by a jury. Judges also intervene next to their own questions to ensure this happen
By the very disposition of forensic evidence a lay jury has to adopt what an expert says. However, experts do not other agree. Then they must decide whose feelings is correct.
It is always harmful for a jury to decide a baggage on one or two pieces of evidence, whether that is expert evidnce or
not. A deem will address this when he sums up a case previously a jury retire to decide.
Sometimes an appeal aginst a guilty punishment is made when too much weight have been given to forensic evidence. That is exactly what is scheduled in the Jill Dando overnight case at the moment.
Hope this has help.
A jury can always ask to look at the physical evidence if they option, but as it is usually just a blob within a jar it won't mean anything; that's why expert witnesses are used, to explain what be found and what it all vehicle.
Does an employer?
that gives remunerated sick time and also gives remunerated vacation time, own the right to take 8 hours of your leave or sick time and also give 1 occurance which next to enough occurances termination follows?Answers: what doe the policy read out
do not know of any company that takes a daylight away if I understand you
want more info
Contacting Dudley Laws?
Hi, a friend of my mom is trying to find contact info for Dudley Laws, Canadian Civil Rights Activist. I tried running a quick explore but I couldn't find anything. If anyone knows how I can contact him, please permit me know ASAP. Thanks.Answers: For more information please contact Brother Power at
(416) 657.8889 or e-mail info@dudleylawsday.com
Al Qaeda is a coward. They depend on youths younger than they are to fight for them? How sick and cowardess is
Answers: Yes it is, but consequently Al Qaeda are no fools, they are not prepared to die for their cause, adjectives they are interested in is political power and the success it brings with it, adjectives this crap about Jihad is rubbish, they are an insult to their culture and their history.
I am afraid I`m going to sit on the barricade with this one and say aloud that one man`s freedom fighter is another man terrorist, I try to remeber that I don`t walk within the shoes of others and I know what a lot of you may voice but can I remind you that Nelson Mandella spent twenty years in prison accuse of terrorism before the so call developed countries of the world decided to put satisfactory pressure on the goverment, he was released and become president. Steve Biko on the other hand died surrounded by prison. Can I also take this oppertunity to retract over 500 indians gunned down by british troops who were also accuse of terrorism albeit over 100 years ago. Also `Bloody sunday` 1972, peace protestors gunned down by British soldiers, there are those who will speak that these protestors fired first and to those I would point out the investigation by the met ( who were comisioned to investigate the affair) be met entirely by rufusal to co operate, arson, files destroyed, uncovered a British intelegence collusion with knkown unionist dread organisations and ultimatly told, by the British Goverment, that the investigation would hqave to be stoped in the interests of national protection.
Family Law: Conflict of interest?
If the judge assigned to the luggage personally know the petitioner would that be grounds to request a different judge to reside over the defence?Answers: The judge may recuse him/her self from the overnight case since it could be considered a conflict of interest.
If the judge doesn't do this your attorney can variety a request for him/her to do so.
Yes.
The judge must recuse himself.
Any decree he makes can be overturned due to his personal involvement.
absolutly resembling you said its a conflict of intrested because the judge know the person intuitively he may judge of the agency he/she feels in the order of the petitioner
What would convince you that your government have too much control over your life?
Answers: i am already convinced that the parliament has too much control over everybodies lives and i want to know how can we exchange it
life.
simply satisfactory.
Nothing, i am already convinced.
If I could be put in detention centre for not having money to reward taxes.
Currently they do, as my fiance is military and has to stir out to sea every other month. We exceedingly much live our lives around the government. I also work for local system so it has it's own effects on my go.
I'm already convinced and have be for a long time.
when you have to pick up your dogs poop.we're surrounded by trouble now.
when i try to elevate my children the way i want.when they one-sidedly don't like the mode i raise my children and use their power to threaten me to do it their route.
I have be convinced from the moment I understood what the rule was. I a moment ago wish others would carry convinced. It seems populace can not give it away swift enough.
I am okay convinced ...Big Brother Brown is always watching
emperor nepoleon brownapate have convinced me years ago..
They are in the phase of mind control through mass medium propaganda , suppression of information the dumbing down and subverting with indoctrination the coaching system and the use of false flag terror attacks following by financial guarantee 'clamp downs' and 'emergency measures'. only when that cease to be effective on big swathes of the population will the mechanisms of autocracy which are being put surrounded by place become obvious.
I come up with most people are already convinced that Government have too much control over your life, but they are not alone.
The Financial Institutions also control you contained by many ways.
Non Governmental Organisations are another lot.
Governments except your own also have control -
the bigger the Government, the greater the control.
For example the US Government controls the UK surrounded by many ways - and so does the EU, which is arguably a sort of Federal Government.
I'm not arguing for the Libertarian 'I want to turn into the wilderness and take no notice of everybody else' point of view.
I regard as that Government should go posterior to running areas like the NHS, public transport, etc. properly and next to adequate funding and stop trying to increase control over their citizens.
It wouldn't do any wound to curb the powers of NGO's like the World Bank and lessen the impact of the Financial markets if near is a sensible way of doing so.
if i be having a w@nk and a parliament stamped artificial hand come in and took over as my paw got tired, and later left me next to an on the spot fine for having not hoovered the bedroom hearth rug.
What do you think of this sexist regulation?
In Australia there is a unknown law surrounded by which if a drunk guy and a drunk girl have consentual sex and the subsequent day the woman settled to say she might own not agreed, guy is held accountable and is a rapist. WTF?Answers: Yeah, there's law like that surrounded by specific states of the US too...like Montana ( i feel it's montana) where a guy cannot own 3 beers, IN BED, then enjoy sex with his wife because it's considered rape. Rediculous ruling!
lol... Silly aussie!!! It's been resembling that for years in the US.
Have fun!!!
That's really stupid.
If the endorsed beagles want to get involved at adjectives, they should charge both the man and the woman with public drunkenness.
People necessitate to take responsibility for their own appointments.
The sexist part, is to assume that the woman have no will. That's a slam against the judgement of women. Where are the feminist protests against that??
Whatever happened to Australian sportsmanship?
Perhaps they should toss a coin to want whether or not they have sex, i.e. Heads he's on top, Tails she's on top. Then neither of them would be adjectives.
that happens whether they're drunk or not.
i guess their date have to be filmed and near should be several people watching if they own sex. everything has to be record. all the dialog and adjectives of the action, consequently posted on the internet.
i do not trust these bitches.
That's not correct.
There have be some changes to the court definition of consent in one state of Australia, so that if a character is unconscious or asleep they cannot be automatically assumed to own given informed consent.
Additionally, a jury will be allowed to consider the effects of drugs and alcohol when deciding question of consent.
These changes bring NSW into procession with adjectives but one of the other Australian states and are considered to be generally mirror prevailing community standards.
The imperative applies equally to allegations of rape against men or women and there is no *automatic* assumption of anything, the charges still own to be tested in a court, usually beforehand a jury.
It's interesting to me that *some* (a minority of) men scream long and loud give or take a few this stuff, while denying they would ever do anything wrong.
The only other race who are 'concerned' about the change seem to be lawyer, who make seriously of money out of people defending these charges, contained by some cases even though they know an early acknowledgment of guilt will get sentences reduced by up to two thirds of time to be served.
Stay away from sex next to drunk, sleeping or unconscious those and you should be fine.
Cheers :-)
Speaking as a woman, no woman deserves to be raped ever. It is such a horrible crime of violence.
That sounds resembling a pretty bad decree to me. What is this world coming to.
The only route to protect your self from any accusations is to not own sex with some one that have been doing any drinking. What a stupid regulation! I think that they are going to hold a lot of problems next to that one.
Who ever wrote that law should enjoy given it a lot more thought than they did. Pretty unhappy!
why would you even ask tht??? ur gayy... PERVV!!
A Question about Debt.?
A recent grill on yahoo answers dealt beside reparations for slavery. I answered the question next to my understaning of debt which is a debt is owed until it is either compensated or pardoned. Not till the disappearance of the one owed. Families of people who died previously a debt was colleted enjoy been awarded settlements even though the untested complantant was long gone. Can passing eliminate a debt owed or does a unpardoned debt verbs on even after the death of the personage owed.Answers: The debt goes onto the deceased's spouse from what I hold heard. I'm for a while confused by your question though...
When the personality owed dies, the debt still exists in hypothesis, but since there is not a soul to pay it to, the debt is resolved.
In the casing of slavery, I'm not sure I agree there is a debt within. It was a horrible, horrible piece and thankfully it stopped, but nearby isn't a "debt" there to be rewarded. In my opinion.
If you are trying to find a evidence for reparations to be paid to the descendants of slaves, it wont take place.
The parties that benefited from slavery, and those that be enslaved and aggrieved, are no longer arrive. No punitive damages have ever be awarded, and are therefore not collectible. Slavery be not limited to blacks and the USA. Slaves own existed from Biblical times. The Irish were enslaved by the British, Jews by Romans, Chinese nad Koreans by Japanese.
Fortunately, the history of chattel is over.
How almost the death of the being owing the debt? If there is money within the estate the debt should be paid, but you can't run to the children of the debtor to collect. That would be kinda like charging a departed murderer's children of their crime..
More Questions and Answers:
[1553] - [1785] - [803] - [2451] - [487] - [514] - [205] - [473] - [1397] - [642] - [1536] - [2074] - [939] - [759] - [2269] - [2290] - [1193] - [1632] - [327] - [559]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: