Law Questions and Answers

DOES ANYONE KNOW EXACTLY HOW CHILD PERTECTIVE SERVICES REALLY WORKS?? I HAD ANOTHER ?? Up GO READ IT AND IF U?

CAN TELL ME HOW IT WOULD WORK IN MY CASE. GIVE ME WHAT EVER NUMBERS THAT YOU HAVE FOR CALI. I DONT WANNA DO THIS IF SOME WAY I CANT HELP HER BY CONTINUING TO BE HER CARETAKER!
Answers: If I were you, I would dance to my local police station and tell them what happen. Show them the abandoned child and let somebody know them that you don't have the resources to whip care of that child. Then they will hold to respond by calling CPS who will get that child into a home.

What is the difference bettween Permanant Legal Guardianship and Temporary Legal Guardianship?

Answers: Umm One is permanent and the other is intervening! sheesh
One is temporary the other is durable.

Are people guilty of copyright infringement if they use photos from a depiction search on Yahoo for their own use?

Example: Searching for photographs of automobiles using the Yahoo! Image Search tool.
Answers: Only if used commercially, as I take to mean it.
This would depend on the particular photo. Some photos may be copyrighted and others may not be (or may be contained by the public domain).

The only means of access to be sure is to contact the webmaster of the site hosting the photo and ask.

If the photo is copyrighted and you use it without concurrence, then that would be copyright infringement.

Naturally this also hinge on what "their own use" means. If it medium creating a website available for viewing by the general public later copyright infringement could come into play as mentioned above. If it is something they are compiling for their personal use which is not seen by the public (for example: a pictorial collection of miscellaneous cars to enjoy privately or next to friends and family members), next there is no infringement.
yes unless it falls beneath Fair Use exemptions.

"personal use" might, but you didn't say what you anticipate by that and it matters contained by the specifics.

see www.chillingeffects.org for definitive info.

A.D.H.D and Discrimination?

I have a friend at work who have ADHD and he is being bullied and harrassed. Can anyone communicate me if ADHD falls within the Diability Discrimination Act?

Thanks
Answers: Yes it does. It is known as a medical condition by the American Medical Association. Now proving the discrimination is a touch harder, since most states are a right to work state and can lay you off for almost anything. Its a frozen case to prove and even harder sometimes to find an attorney but anything is possible.
It does come inwardly the Act, certainly if it is the employer or management doing the bullying, but it might fluctuate if it's a co-worker.

Muslim in scarf sues over salon living?

Oh dear what can i say why does she enjoy the right to sue if the employer does not want to employ her after so what we have adjectives been rejected at some point at interviews.She say it is her beliefs but im sure they wear them to wind us up if you remember not so long ago at hand was 2 pictures within a newspaper 1 of england next to the muslims all dressed within scarfs and things the other picture was taken surrounded by there country and adjectives the girls were within jeans and t/shirts.Discrimination was not a issue back we had a influx of imigrants here.I know im going to find bad answers to this but i bet i know who from.Cheers adjectives
Answers: Are there no Muslim pelt salons? Probably not as thay believe have it covered is a sign of modesty. As stated earlier why within that case would she choose to be a hairstylist? For the umpteenth time..The Qu'run does not dictate the wearing of a veil, just that women dress modestly. The certainty that she was turned down at 25 previous interviews suggests she cannot be totally well qualified. Lets be honest here if a middle-aged personality went for a career as a stripper or lap dancer influence, could they claim discrimination if they did not gain the job? Given that we own outlawed "ageism" in the workplace. Would we hire someone grossly overweight to run a fitness club? Of course not, the thought is ludicrous just as ludicrous as expecting someone who keep their head covered to be a perfect advertisement for a fleece salon. This is not about racism or nouns its about hiring someone who have the right image for the profession. This woman is claiming lb15000 for hurt feelings. boo hoo I must be owed millions contained by that case. Wake up Britain!
I suggest that the whole situation is appalling, and stinks, not a soul will be able to voice no they don't want to employ a faddy person, who can play the see or religious card, in baggage they get haul in front of a see tribunal or done on religious grounds, as this salon owner is, no wonder people are disappearing this country in droves. What it doesn't read aloud is that the girl had be turned down 25 times already, so perhaps she be just pissed at no 26 and contracted to get her own pay for.

As the owner said and i think its right, tresses is her business and anyone wearing a scarf in the salon is not a honourable advertisement for that place.

And to join that many are very soon dictating the rules in shops as to what they will serve, close to alchohol, and the supemarkets are allowing them to get away beside that. People should be outraged that this is happening, we are not a muslim country, at lowest possible not yet, and i would reckon that if you are part of that country and it's community you should at smallest adhere to its law and regulations.
I cannot see how wearing a headscarf can stop her from doing the job. Did she enunciate no to people who enjoy really bad spine too? They cannot be very moral advert for her shop.

On the other hand, this woman claims to have be turned down for many other hairdressing job. Is she going to sue them all?
This situation 'highlights' one piece
You can make any amount of law about see etc, but you have to recognize that some groups of people freshly don't like other groups of ethnic group.
That's how it is and that's how it always will be.
you enjoy said it well. i own seen equal thing within person, i believe it adjectives to be a scam so they get their method and not have to work to unyielding or obey like peas in a pod rules we do.

they are making this country like their own, poor run down and despicable place to live. sooner or later they will try it on the USA and boy will they be shocked when they get thrown out as they should be.

not given everything similar to this country does
The most common point of landscape I have hear from indigenous British people is that immigrant want to observe their customs etc., over here even if we deem them iffy but are not prepared to reciprocate when we visit their home countries.
I own no objection to Muslim women wearing headscarves (or whatever they give the name them) after all it used to be the loftiness of fashion here but I do intention to face mask and the hoods they wear (with the little mesh to look through) especially where christening is an issue and in outlook of the fact that their menfolk are invariably dressed surrounded by jeans and jackets close to any other European.
All religions or so called beliefs are used to varying degree to excuse things that may not conform to the accepted standard but may within reality enjoy nothing at adjectives to do with the exceptional religion.
If immigrants are not jubilant they have a course of accomplishment not open to the rest of us - move about home.
I haven't seen this surrounded by the news, but I'll comment anyway.

Of course she have the right to sue. And if the court thinks she is wrong the luggage should be thrown out. I have no agency of knowing whether her case is permissible or not, and nor do you.

If she has be discriminated on grounds of her religion, I hope she is successful. If she has be rejected because she is a useless hairdresser, she should get nil.

"Discrimination was not a issue beforehand we had a influx of imigrants here" is almost the most stupid statement I've heard contained by some time. Do you think nouns is something invented in the recent surf of immigration?

Are you saying that near was a time, back immigration, when there be no discrimination?

And immediately there is nouns?

And it's the fault of the empire who are being discriminated against? That's some pretty sick logic, you've got nearby!

EDIT: Porn and cartoons? Please don't regard as being me by your standards. My apologies for not watching the same TV News as you - I did look surrounded by the news slice on the BBC website, but found nothing. Can you provide a reference?

My point be this.

None of us know the truth of this case.

If she be a genuine covering of racial nouns, and it happens, she is entitled to sue.

If she interviews poorly or is a poor hairdresser, but is claiming nouns where nearby is none, and it happens, her luggage should be thrown out of court.

If you don't want your intelligence insulted, then use it.

Your assertion that nouns was not an issue until we have an influx of immigrants - we own had nouns throughout history.

What do you think the suffragettes be doing at the start of the 20th century?

What was going on to Catholics in the 16th and 17th centuries?

Might the slave trade enjoy been a slight example of nouns?

Just because something is your opinion, doesn't product it sacred and immune from criticism, especially when it doesn't construct sense. Do you really believe that Muslim women wear what they do just to meander you up?

What do you feel is the CAUSE why general public will slander others...with?

vicious words???..The poor human being has to shelter theirself by saying .."i.e. false,,,why would someone say that give or take a few me?"...Tell me your situation and what you did about it???
Answers: because society can be mean, or overprotective, or petty.

I got a stop sign betrayal ticket?

I did stop but officer said it was not long ample. Is there a karma to win at the court? If I don't win, can I go to traffic conservatory? I don't have ticket surrounded by 8 years.
Answers: Nope, if the officer says you didn't stop long adequate, then you didn't stop long plenty. I got one too and I lost. You can stir to court with it...but if the cop shows up, you lose pretty much automatically. Just suck it up, remuneration the fine, and do traffic school. Driving is a privilege, not a right.
"Can" you win? perchance, but don't count on it. Traffic courts almost always hold the cops word over the drivers.

Traffic school will depend on your States law. In my State you could, yes.

Richard
In answer to your question, yes, nearby is always a randomness to win at traffic court. As a former municipal prosecutor I can tell you, "dud to stop" cases were among the easiest to bring convictions. However, there are several things that you can do to relieve your chances. First, don't brand any offer to plea to anything, unless and until you visually verify the police officer who wrote you the citation is surrounded by the courtroom. As I'm sure you are aware, only the officer that wrote the citation can testify. If you don't see that soul, you are perfectly free to inquire of the prosecutor whether his/her witness is present. If not, a short time ago sit tight and wait for the adjudicate or prosecutor to dismiss.

If the officer is present, you must cross examine him/her as to where they be located in relation to your vehicle. What be their duty assignment at that time, and ask lots of specific questions central up to the fact that the officer could not testify beyond a all right doubt that he saw your vehicle fail to completely stop. Oh, and most importantly, don't testify that you made a "California" stop or a rolling stop. Stick to your guns. If you stopped completely, utter that!

With regard to your cross-examine about Traffic college, that depends entirely upon your jurisdiction. However, most likely, if you hold not received a moving violation within 8 years, you should be spared that expense and injustice. Best of luck!
This will be considered a "judgement" call on the officer part. Not expected you will win and then you will also be paying court costs. Read the ticket as far as driving arts school. Some state that you can only attend if you plead guilty and settle the fine without going to court.

Are Community Police Officers allowed to use more 'reasonable force' than public?

When I tried to protect myself, my loved ones and property against a gang, I was threatened beside arrest if I touched them. But a Community Police Officer is allowed to use reasonable force to protect someone. Do they hold special training that makes it okay for them to use this restrained force without one arrested? When I asked the Community Police Officers for help when I be being attacked by the gang, they did zilch. Could this be because the gang was Black as be the Community Police Officers? Or were they lately too scared?
Answers: No. this is a complete misconstruction and indicative of the complete confusion around the defence of "fair force" to an assault charge.

Police officers, PCSO's, Bouncers, financial guarantee guards, etc. have no more power to use judicious force than anybody else.

Police Officers have more powers of arrest than other citizens - and arrest is signified contained by practice by laying hand on a person (technically a battery).

What most citizens understand as an assault, is in reality (letter of the law) a battery. An assault is committed when you grounds somebody to fear imediate personal hostility (so in a argue where both party think they will win and do not fearfulness the other, no assault is technically committed - just lots of battery-operated!), but violent offence are catergorised as types of "assault".

Regardless of your reason, as soon as you lay hand on somebody where they do not consent for you to do so, you commit an assault and mobile. For an assault causing injury that amounts to an aBH - or more serious injury - you may be arrested.

Defences (such as sound force being used surrounded by self defence) are used in court - or contained by actual practice by the CPS before they settle on if it's worth taking to court. The offence have still been committed, but you may enjoy a legitimate security which means you will not be convicted contained by court.

"Reasonable force" is such force as is reasonable surrounded by the individual circumstance - which is why it appears that police officers enjoy extra powers, such as using handcuffs and pepper spray, but use of these have to be justified for the circumstance.

Certain activities are not legitimate uses of "fair force" per se. For example, if somebody attacks you with a blade and you believe they are trying to kill you, it could be see as a reasonable use of force if you pick up a stool and hit them with it to prevent the attack. However, if somebody knock into you and say, "watch it", picking up a bench and smashing them over the head near it would not be considered reasonable.

So to come to your specific problem, if a gang of people are trying to impair your family or reduce to rubble your property, it is a reasonable use of force to push them away next to such force as is neccessary to stop them from carrying out the attack. If you do hit, push, kick them, though, you are technically assaulting them and may be arrested. Then it's down to the courts to resolve if the force you employed was passable in the circumstances.

If the system worked as it is intended to, it would be, so, better to tleave the fighting to the professionals (the police) when you are attacked. They, too are subject to just using reasonable force, but are trained within how to best judge and prove this in respectively situation.

Back in the concrete world, get yourself a couple of "witnesses" who are liable to swear blind that the yobs attacked you and slap the ringleader hard when he's not expecting it... Not exactly decriminalized, but effective.
"But a Community Police Officer is allowed to use believable force to protect someone"
You answered your own question.
Theyre no more than uniformed Grasses.

New Labour... Closet Commies.
It be the same when the little boy drowned just now, they aren't trained.
Total waste of money.
where on earth do you live that you do not have the right to protect yourself? you should move if i.e. the case.
You want to report this to the Internal Affairs Division of the local police department,NOT the Community police. If Internal Affairs doen't do anything,take it to the District Attorney. If they don't do anything,lug your case to the State Attorney General's bureau and report it to them.
When you were threatened near arrest, it was probably because the cops feel safer threatening you than dealing with the gang. I saw a duo of CPO's recently contained by Maidstone, threatening and abusing some language rules school pupils and manifestly enjoying the opinion of power it gave them. However I don't presume they have any more rights than any other bough of the public. The tossers' uniform means zilch.
Glorified traffic wardens short the power to give parking tickets.

Chocolate T pot comes to mind.
They are cheap workforce and no, they don't have any more powers than an humdrum citizen.

In a ch7 bankruptcy what happen if I am awarded money from a lawsuit after filing? In Illinois?

I am thinking roughly speaking filing chapter 7 liquidation but i have a near-term trial by jury to decide almost a car wreck i be in a few years ago and wether im gonna be awarded any money. but if I am awarded what happen if i have already file?
Answers: Your pending lawsuit must be tabled in your collapse "statement of affairs". It is a possible asset that the court will want to evaluate in your bankrupcy shield. If it later become actual $$$ and you are no longer bankrupt, your liquidation case could be dismissed.
First, you must include this asset within your bankruptcy file. Secondly, if the money is awarded after the bankruptcy discharges it depends on the ruling of the conciliator as to whether or not you must use it to pay debts.
If it is awarded earlier the discharge or dismissal of accounts, it will more than likely be included as the assets liquidate during the bankruptcy.
In Illinois, the trustee is going to inform you to inform him or her of any money you receive during the 6 months following your filing. If you are awarded money during that time you entail to report it to the trustee. You also should list the court suitcase in your collapse documents. You need to consult your ruin attorney and PI attorney, as how much you receive through the law suit (if anything) may be a determining factor on whether you should even wallet.

I am 12 do i have the right to free speech?

do I?
Answers: Yes, but surrounded by home and school your rights are set. You gotta listen to mom, dad and teachers.
Not really, at 12 you are underneath the power of parents and teachers

I muse it takes a strong child to speak up against tyranny but have an idea that it out clearly and try to do it non-attacking
You have the right to free speech if you're an American, for example-however, that doesn't tight you can say anything anywhere and not enjoy to deal next to consequences.

To everything, there is a string attached. No?
We could answer this better if we know what speech you're asking about, surrounded by what context and circumstances.

For instance, I'm pretty sure that schools hold editorial control over what students print in school-funded publications.

There are restrictions on free speech for everyone (threats, slander and libel, and others).

And your parents enjoy the right to punish you for cussing, or talking stern to them, for example.

And, for yet another example, on this site, we are adjectives bound by the Guidelines for using this site.

If you have some specific instance surrounded by mind, posting that would yield more relevant answers.

But contained by general, yes, but beside restrictions we all enjoy and others due to your age.

More Questions and Answers:
[1099] - [1375] - [1765] - [1062] - [1857] - [1597] - [67] - [951] - [234] - [257] - [2566] - [444] - [183] - [191] - [1859] - [192] - [1538] - [2385] - [2217] - [1485]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: