Law Questions and Answers
If I wanted Child Protective Service Reform to silver where would I start?
For the thousands of relations out there I've read abundant many stories, I've even get a few of my own to add to those thousands. A thousand face who were and are wronged I've never met but even so we share a common interest, the place to start transform is changing the courage to goings-on within us adjectives and taking action presently to change our law and our country.Answers: Federal Welfare Laws seem to provide compliance funding thru local agencies who're on tenterhooks to streamline the juvenile court's docket with cookie-cutter application/interpretation of applicable law. Then their recommendations are slickly rubber-stamped by lazy, tactless Judges, as 'de riguer', or business as usual.
It's hard to find average support to go after those contained by the big business of pre-adoptive fostercare placement. Especially since their stalwart cry is to 'Remember the Children!', its always nearly 'The Children'.
Yeah, perhaps we share a adjectives interest-if so then you own my deepest sympathies. I commiserate endlessly. Until we can take home the unbelieveable at least plausible, we'll be stuck near the supposition '...well, here must have be a good cause...'
check out www.fightcps.com
I am a hater of cps and the entire child stealing anti-family agenda of these animals that work for the cps programs
to truly reform the system a integral new set of rules must bedrawn up and next ALL cps workers from top to bottom must be replaced spare no one for they are adjectives part of the problem
the best track to get this adjectives started is to find a legislator in your state that is to say willing to fashion this a project and then lend a hand him and his office adjectives you can
Is it fraud and am I obligated to report it?
I work for a large university. Our passage is an off campus site. We lately got a tentative supervisor who is big buddies with one of the women here. The up to date supervisor promise this woman and another a pay status raise. She couldn't verbs it off, I suppose the relatives over her said no due to budget. So, supervisor told them not to count off their lunches and if they needed to give up early etc dance ahead but still put down 40 hours a week.Basically we're talking minumum of ten hours per month per individual of falsified time or more (more often more, ie 25 hours worked, 40 put down) It's cause tension because we are individual 13 employees and everyone know but no one know what to do.
Answers: This may not be fraud. Many companies include the lunch hour in the working light of day. This could certainly be an executive declaration that is clearly legitimate.
Wow! A university member of staff worried about the budget. You are a uncommon breed. Why do you think tuition is so expensive?
You should run for president for self so honest.
Do you think that you are the one and only organization getting rewarded while you eat lunch? If you are on pay, you get rewarded. Your boss gets remunerated for their lunch break. Why are you so concerned?
If you pick up a penny off the street, do you look for the party who dropped it?
If you pay taxes than you are paying for what sounds approaching 15 hours a week for nothing but a promise that be not of your doing. They are stealing from everyone, and you and your co workers have every point in the world to be pissed past its sell-by date. spill the beans.
If bigamy is against the law contained by the UK, why are certain cultures allowed to do it?
The same imperative should surely apply to everyone living in the UK.Answers: No one who is already married is allowed to be in motion through a civil or legally recognised religious matrimonial ceremony in UK.
Some countries allow multiple marriage - we don't arrest people beside more than one spouse when they come to UK, but we don't allow them to contract further marriages contained by UK, and if they do go through some religious ceremony, it is not lawfully recognised.
The maximum penalty for bigamy is, as expected,.
Two mothers-in-law.
Not in the UK you can't.
You can solitary legally marry one spouse at a time. Trying to marry when you're already married is against the law, but you can have as several live in lovers as you similar to - whatever your culture.
It's because lower than our law one's dimensions to marry is governed by the country of domicile. This money that if you were domiciled surrounded by a country which allowed bigamy when you entered into these marriage, then they own to be recognised under English imperative to the extent that you cannot have criminal charges brought against you for bigamy. However, if you acquire a UK domicile, then a bigamous conjugal would be unlawful. Moreover, the law of our country does not contract anyone to enter into a bigamous union, so it is not on to marry in the UK while you are already with authorization married to someone else.
There used to be a system whereby only the first wife of a bigamous or polygamous relationship be recognised as the legal wife for purposes of state benefits. That seem fair ample to me.
okay certain cultures are base multiple marriages on religious principle so as freedom to express ones religion would superceed the bigamy law
A question going on for a will??
Okay...here is the sinerio.my mother past away almost a year & 1/2 ago. My brother took adjectives her money & used it to support himself & family while she be in the nursing home. After she have past, we go to the attorney for the reading of the will. My mom & 2 of her brothers own a piece of land. In the will she required her piece of the land to be split between me & my brother. I did not pay cheque any of her debt, as my brother had asked me to, lone because it was mostly HIS debt that be ran up lower than her name. Anyways, I haven't talk to my brother since my mothers passing, and prefer to hang on to it that way! Tonight I receive a phone hail as from an Aunt who tells me that my brother go to an attorney & had me "removed" from the will, so he get the whole share of my moms home! Is that even legal?? Can you modification a persons will after they are already unresponsive??Answers: >Can you change a those will after they are already dead??
No. Seek representation.
That should be "scenario" and "passed away". Please don't try this yourself. Get a legal representative.
If your in favor contained by abortion what is your best reasons and why?
Answers: 1st, no man have a right to answer this questions, solitary women.
If you get rid of religious ideology the answer is a personal one. I and not a soul should be allowed to dictate to a women what she should do. It is her body, her life, her FETUS. A fetus is not a human mortal. Did you know up to a month in womb we still enjoy TAILS? We as a fetus look exactly like every other fetus of every other animal on mud. We kill out of womb general public with period of war, crime, and religious ideals. We fight the GOOD face-off, right? Come on, why would you want to screw up 2 lives instead of none?
The question is when is it enough time to establish? How far along is to long? And don't give me the crap of "in good health if you kill the fetus, its indistinguishable thing as slaughter a 3rd term baby" that's a cope out.
But my judgment should not matter for, I am a man
Because I guess the authority of government to dictate personal behavior should be used lone when necessary. Otherwise it is one abused and loses legitimacy.
So I say the murder of actual adults and children already born rates governmental intervention, the scrape off and flushing down of an embryo or fetus does not.
You can debate adjectives day roughly where the procession should be drawn, but it has to be drawn somewhere.
It's a political debate, not a irrefutable one.
First and foremost, victims of sexual abuse should be afforded the opportunity to enjoy an abortion. Those who didn't ask to be pregnant in the first place should NEVER own to have a tot. More controversially (and bring on the thumbs downs), i think that contained by a society where at hand are so many neglected children, and ancestors who are unable (or unwilling) to safekeeping for children, abortion makes sense. It's a sin to hold them before wedding ceremony anyway according to the right wing.
Baroness Williams is going to chain herself to the railing in Downing street?
or throw herself surrounded by front of the Queen's horse at Ascot, rather than take an ID card which she considers to be 'a Big Brother scheme of the most TERRIFYING brand.'When I arrived in the Crown Colony of Hong Kong contained by 1979, the first thing I have to do, although I am a British Citizen, was to get an ID card.
I take it that residents surrounded by Hong Kong were not expected to prospect this as a terrifying organization.
I must also assume that Baroness Williams is not aware of the true meaning of 'terrifying'.
Dual standards?
Answers: I agree,and I am glad that she inhabits a world where on earth the most terrifying scenario is to fetch an ID card.It must be a wonderful planet,where is it?
I have an idea that Baroness Williams has lately realised how long it is since she's been contained by the news and have decided to do something roughly speaking it.
I live in california and i want to know what i get to do before i can purchase a handgun?
I live surrounded by california and already got my safekeeping for hunting and want to purchase a handgun? what do i need to do formerly i can buy a handgun?.Answers: If I already have a Basic Firearms Safety Certificate (BFSC), do I still obligation a Handgun Safety Certificate (HSC)?
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/hscfaqs.php#a1...
Yes. There are no "grandfathering" provisions in the statute culmination the Basic Firearms Safety Certificate (BFSC) program and initiating the Handgun Safety Certificate (HSC) program. Anyone wishing to purchase or acquire a handgun wants an HSC, regardless of whether he/she possesses a BFSC.
What is the process for purchasing a firearm in California?
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs.php#7
All firearms purchases and transfers, including private knees-up transactions and sales at gun shows, must be made through a licensed purveyor under the Dealer Record of Sale (DROS) process. California impose a 10-day waiting period earlier a firearm can be released to a buyer or transferee. A person must be at most minuscule 18 years of age to purchase a rifle or shotgun. To buy a handgun, a person must be at lowest 21 years of age, and either 1) possess an HSC plus successfully complete a safekeeping demonstration with the handgun self purchased or 2) qualify for an HSC exemption.
As part of the DROS process, the buyer must present "clear evidence of identity and age" which is defined as a valid, non-expired California Driver's License or Identification Card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles. A military authorization accompanied by undying duty station orders indicating a posting surrounded by California is also acceptable.
If the buyer is not a U.S. Citizen, later he or she is required to demonstrate that he or she is legally inwardly the United States by providing to the firearms dealer next to documentation that contains his/her Alien Registration Number or I-94 Number.
Purchasers of handguns are also required to provide proof of California residency, such as a utility bill, residential lease, property creation, or government-issued identification (other than a drivers license or other DMV-issued identification).
(PC Section 12071)
*/End of Line.
Determine that you in truth need it.
I prefer miracles. Someday I'll bring up to date you a few.
.
As a person living within Europe this question amazes me. Why contained by the name of God would a babyish person necessitate a gun? Your history is full of gun crime, mass slaughters in school etc. Do something about it a bit than falling into a cycle of duplicating that what is already there.
To do something a short time ago because everyone else does it, requires no more intellect that a monkey.
What a bunch of hippies that responded.
I live in California and I don't own a gun, so don't embezzle me up on this completely, but I do believe it's something like this:
I know you inevitability a permit to purchase a handgun and you also have need of a permit to pass a concealed weapon, which I've read is pretty hard to pick up. And I know once you purchase one, you have a waiting time of 10 days and you need to enjoy it registered within 60 days. Also, you're required to rob safety training and it's mandatory to own a locking device on your gun.
Gun laws correct frequently, so don't take my word for it. Check beside your local law enforcement agency for more up-to-date law about it. They'll recount you everything you need to do.
your best bet would be to move out of california
preferably to a smaller amount marxist state where the citizens and the affairs of state are not so morally corrupt as to pretend to not understand "the right to keep hold of and bear arms"
I live surrounded by Oklahoma and if I want to buy a handgun I just dance down to the gun store pick out the firearm of my choice fill out the paperwork do the framework check and pay for my purchase
Best bet is to move to Texas or Oklahoma, they are still free states.
California does not want you to own a handgun and will do everything to prevent you from doing so.
Copyright/Intellectual property law request for information regarding DVD region coding within Australia. Can you help PLEASE???
Hello,I'm an australian next to a DVD player, and I'm trying to get hold of a show I used to have on VHS, but I can't find it at Australian retailers, even online. So I considered import it from the US or UK, but then I remenbered that discs are region coded, preventing play outside that region. I looked up DVD region code contained by Wikipedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_region_... and found that all australian DVD players sold since the bag cited below are required to be region 0, meaning they can play DVDs from any region. I've purchased 2 DVD players since after (2005), and both have a region 4 symbol printed on the outer cover.
Please advise as to if these products are any incorrectly labelled (ignore the symbol, because it'll work beside all regions), or if the capitalist is in contravention of Aust federal law??
ref:
Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment [2005 HCA 58; (2005) 221 ALR 448; (2005) 79 ALJR 1850 (6 October 2005)], High Court of Australia.
Answers: hi from Sydney
this whole code bull s*** is within blatant violation/ infringement of the so called "free trade agreement"!
what i did (& what you should do) is internet search(google /yahoo etc) :dvd/hack
this will provide you "codes" to change your dvd player to multi(any) region.
the codes are usually something like 15 "instructions" using your remote such as-enter 2, enter 7 , open tray, close tray etc.
this is done near your tv on & connected, but no dvd inside the player.
you need to know the manufacturor & model of your dvd player(have you kept your instruction book ?)
after successfull "hacking" of your dvd player a message will appear on your screen such as "dvd /multi region".
when be the "free trade agreemnt" signed? 2005?
maybe your manufacturor simply "snuck in"
dvd region coding is a CON!
it is /was designed to "prevent piracy"( i don't know how that would work!)
remember the dvd player manufactureors want you to buy another dvd player, & the dvd (disc) manufactureors prefer this anti competative system also.
Is it right to say; As economically as Mr...and Mrs... in soul and own representation?
I'm not sure if using as well as contained by this context is right, could someone help me beside this?what's the best way of writing this surrounded by a legal document?
gratitude
Answers: I don't understand your put somebody through the mill. Do you mean when they are appearing within court and representing themselves and instead of having lawyer?
How to take exploit against Threatening / assault by or to the member of society?
Answers: It depends on the state you are surrounded by as to what can be done.
In my state, North Carolina, there are two types of movements determined by the relationship with the individual harassing you.
1. A restraining order - this is single when you have have a relationship with the creature (more than friends)
2. Order of Constraint - this is when you have not have a sexual relationship with the being but the person is harassing or stalking you.
File a criminal charge of grave threats against a accomplice of the society. Be able to reap evidence and statements of witnesses to prove the crime.
More Questions and Answers:
[1702] - [885] - [2565] - [76] - [2441] - [401] - [923] - [1541] - [2522] - [1505] - [2463] - [1090] - [1182] - [709] - [158] - [961] - [939] - [505] - [230] - [1976]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: