Law Questions and Answers
Does my boss have the right to utter "no paid vacation"?
we are a small company and own a payroll service seperately. i asked for three days off and my boss is clich¨¦ that he doesnt have to repay me for vacation days is he right?does he not own to pay me?
Answers: Most small companies do not proposition 'paid break.'
What employee benefits be you offered when you were hired?
If you took the employment with the promise of rewarded vacation, afterwards he has to honor that, since break (if it exists) is part of your compensation.
However, contained by the United States, there is no lawful requirement to offer leave time at all.
if you dont own a contract that says he have to pay you, consequently he is right, he doesnt have to recompense you
of course you can quit and capture a better job, hopefully
Paid leave is a benefit, not a matter of certainty. Unless there is a specific benefit plan within place that says you win paid leave, then no, he doesn't hold to pay you.
Can I Sue A Company For Trash In The Road If I Hit It?
Today I was driving down a exceedingly busy highway and I saw a pile of cellophane in the road. I could not stop surrounded by time to avoid hitting the stuff so I ran over it. I saw something come from the backbone of my car so I assumed it have just skirted below the car near no damage. When pulling into my driveway my brakes go out. I checked it out and it seems that the cellophane wrapped itself around my axel and snapped a brake queue. There was an invoice attached to the cellphane on my axel. If I can find out who is responsible for that human being in the road, can I sue them for the damages to my saloon? Should I file a police report? Thanks!Answers: You can directory a police report but it might not help much. The company might articulate it's not their fault--- they delivered a roll wrapped in the cellophane to a customer and it's the customer's denounce for not disposing of it properly. Then you sue the customer who says he put the cellophane surrounded by the dumpster but some teenagers must have taken it out. There is possibly some negligence involved somewhere along the flash but it's impossible to prove who the negligent gathering is. Or it could turn out to be everyone acted responsibly and the wind knock over the trash can, causing the discarded cellophane to find loose. Give it a try but don't be too optimistic. Without knowing who exactly put the cellophane contained by the road (or allowed it to get there) you don't know who to sue, and you can't sue the company on the invoice a short time ago because it is their wrapping--- that'd be like suing McDonalds because some unknown shindig threw a McDonald's cup off a bridge and it cracked your windshield.
I would assume that you would own to prove that the company on the invoice was indeed responsible for placing the cellophane contained by the road -- that they did not dispose of the cellophane which would then trade name it the problem of the trash collector - but if a third party removed the cellophane from the trash later it becomes his problem, but if the third do was attacked by a fourth bash who had the cellophane be stolen...do you see where this is going?
Unless you visually witnessed said company putting said cellophane doing a tour you are going to be hard pressed to prove anything.
Ok im gonna stir out on a limb here and voice that its VERY unlikely some cellophane broke your brake lines, that just sounds approaching crazy talk
and approaching the other poster said, you cant prove that the company on that invoice is the one who put it on the road... for adjectives you know the wind could enjoy blown it out of the garbage truck hauling it away... wanna sue the entwine? lol
without proof of them or the rubbish truck company that dropped it you are probably SOL
thats why you really have to wage attention, never follow garbage trucks or dump trucks, you never know when something is going to fly rotten them and hit you
feel lucky you made it home out of danger, sometimes it gets alot worse!
if its a big operate you might be able to claim it though i wouldnt recomend that, only raise youre own rates
Should Bigamy be made legal within Australia?
My legal studies educationalist seems to judge so. He constantly kept showing this video about Tom Green and consequently began to explain why theres nil wrong with it.What do you ponder?
Answers: Yes well this is comparatively the conundrum...Many people will vote that...Hang on, is your legal studies coach Mr Cole??? Yes he is known for his antics and his pro bigamy ideals. Why doesn't he separate his personal go from his work life?? If he requirements to believe that then that's fine, but when I am on the mark panel for Legal Studies HSC every year, and papers come in from Centre No. 556, they ALWAYS contain reference to Tom Green and bigamy and why it should be legalized (one person even allied it in beside legal aid), and I see the footnote stating; "sorry I have Mr Cole for legal studies", it make me want to take my Rickshaw down to Centre No. 556, seize Mr Cole out of class and FedEx him straight over to Utah so he can live with his Bigamist friend and they can live stale their own twisted ideals and morals and watch the interview next to Tom Green over and over again. And when I think that, i lately relax, have a RedBull, and administer the student a high put pen to paper. They deserve it.
Marriage laws are no different from things we regularly condemn in other countries, such as the one child policy within China, anti-gay laws and so on.
Monogomy contained by law is social engineering. From modern moral, legally recognized and social principals there is no source to have a command on multiple simultaneous marriages.
While we can argue for the social impact of such a statute, it seems that it is a issue of individual consent rather than what a management considers appropriate.
For example, you can have sex beside multiple parnters (of any gender), having children beside them and you are break no law. (in previous times these things be illegal). But to promise to be faithful to more than one personage and build a family structure around multipartners underneath a legal structure is not...move about figure.
Legally, it can exist within Australia, and it is a controdiction in Federal Law.
The decree as it stands in Australia states that no individual may be married to two partners at matching time.
But another part of that stroke states that any marriage that is to say recognised overseas as a legal nuptials is a legal bridal under Australian regulation.
The immigration act allows a being to bring their spouse into Australia so long as there is no criminal dictation.
SO, A PERSON MAY BRING TWO OR MORE WIVES INTO AUSTRALIA SO LONG AS THEY WERE LEGAL WHERE THE MARRIAGES TOOK PLACE.
My husband and I rent a house from my mother in canon where she give us a key to the P.O. Box at the USPS Office
she lives surrounded by a completely different state 8 hours away. Well lately we have be having a few arguments and such. Today when I go to check the mail their be nothing contained by the box, which is COMPLETELY odd. So I go to the front to talk to the post master. He told me that she have forwarded the mail to her brand new address. Is their anything I can do about this?Answers: in recent times forward your mail to an address where on earth you can get it
See nearly getting yours and your husbands mail switched to your own po box. What a shame you own such a comtrolling mother in canon. You might want to find another place to rent so she doesn't feel close to she has so much control over you guys. She wants to cut her apron strings. I feel discouraging for you and your husband. I don't understand what she think she is going to do with your personal communication. I would tell her that you necessitate to have your bills so you can stay current on them
All Men Are Rapists?
apparently all men are rapists because they use the consternation of rape to make a woman fearful so that the males can show their manliness, do you think that this is a party assumption to make.Answers: Anytime you set off a statement with "All ____ are_____.", you are occasionally making a fair statement. Think in the order of your premise -- it only take one example to the contrary to contradict your statement.
What a bunch of hogwash. Were you raised by a feminist?
With this queue of thought wouldn't it be true that all women are prostitutes and whores? They use sex to bring back what they want from men?
Ummm no. Sounds like a sweeping feminism notion. And if your statement is true, then wouldn't men become more aggressive contained by private? But as you have probably observed, men who are alone near a woman are much more tender than men who are out in public, where on earth they tend to want to show their masculinity surrounded by competition with other men, not to threaten women.
Also, using the "dread of rape" against a woman doesn't make a man a rapist. That is insulting to every woman who have actually BEEN raped. While it is wrong to threaten to commit rape, nearby is a difference between threatening to do it and actually doing it. One guy is an *** if he uses the start of rape against a woman, and a criminal if he actually made a material threat verbally or within writing and was within a position to actually commit rape, but he is not but a rapist; the other guy who actually commits rape is a rapist.
Sounds close to maybe you're listen to some feminist academics, resembling the one who told my ex-girlfriend "sleeping with men is sleeping near the enemy" and who said "if you aren't a lesbian then you aren't a existing feminist." That's not only false, it's also insulting to adjectives straight people and adjectives rational feminists.
So no, you own not made any fair assumptions, and your ask goes against observable human behavior which is that men show their manliness in competition next to other men by being MORE protective of women they're near, and men are actually more intimate and drop their "power" when alone next to a woman. Unless they're actually rapists. But that wasn't your cross-question.
no i do not believe this is a fair assumption. some men are rapist and they are deranged. not adjectives men are that way. most men are righteous upstanding family those. real men show manliness through the way they perform in public. examples human being holding hands beside there girl. most men see this as soft, so to do it is a sign of manliness.
I would like to start reading things in the order of "the law" were should i start?
I would resembling to start reading things about "the law" be should i start?I'm avid reader or rather eclectic one. I own always be "into" religion, psychology, history, and philosophy, and the law i enjoy come to see is the natural progression of that but, the single thing i know give or take a few the law is a book call "blacks law dictonary" and the state penal code (which i cant find)
where on earth should i start
Answers: Excellent question. You should be aware that at hand are many law governing you, starting with your city and/or county municipal codes. These you can probably find at a local library, ask the librarian. Then near are the state codes, these are probably on-line. Go to your state's home page and see if you can find a link. Otherwise, your librarian can probably steer you within the right direction there too.
The federal law, called United States Code, can be found surrounded by law libraries within your town or at a law academy. The USC is also on-line at <www.gpo.gov>, you will be able to read the entire body of ruling passed by the U.S. Congress.
Statutes (laws) are quite dry, however, and not other interesting to read. Still, it would be a good belief to get a discern for what areas are covered by laws of municipalities, states, and the federal organization.
It would also be wonderful for you to start with the Constitution and Bill of Rights. You should know how to call them up surrounded by a google search.
Once you enjoy a feel for what law are out there, you can look for books and articles that discuss different aspects of the directive. Again, you have your local library, the librarians can almost for sure show you where to look.
Good studying!
I would start by reading "A Civil Action"
Not the movie, the book. We be forced to read it for civil proceedure. It helps pass you an idea of how the complete litigation process works. You will learn just about bifircation of trials, depositions, motions, pleadings, evidence, expert testimony, etc. It's adjectives in story form so it is a vastly interesting read.
In all of our canon classes, we read cases about what the directive was put a bet on in olden times in the past we get to the modern stuff. This is so we can see how the ruling evolved. A very honourable collection of the older canon, known as the Common Law, is "The Common Law" by Oliver Wendell Holmes. In casing you didn't know, Oliver Wendell Holmes is the most cited Supreme Court Justice in history. We read his opinion all throughout ruling school. His book is still published today and contains some of his opinion on how the law originate and formed. This may be more up your alley because of the philosophy specifically involved.
The Art of Cross Examination by Wellman was written at the origin of the 20th century, and it explores how trial attorneys can work their magic and win over the jury. It is fundamentally good, although it be written at a time when courtroom drama was at its point.
Finally the "Commentaries on the Laws of England " by Lord Blackstone is one of the most influential legal treatises ever written. It deeply formed English and American law into what it is today. It comes usually surrounded by 4 volumes. If you don't wish to buy it (around $250+), you can copy it for free bad of the internet into a Word document and get Kinko's to print out a bound copy of it for almost $20. It was written within the 18th century and so it is in the public domain. The same holds true for Oliver Wendell Holmes and Wellman.
If you want the modern interpretation of these works, you will have to look to what are particular as "horn books." The thing more or less law course outlines and Example and Explinations is that they are great for taking a statute school exam, but they don't travel into the philosophy so much. They are also written commercially, and I doubt any will be regarded as signigicant contributions to the juris prudence. A hornbook treatise, equally, usually has a foremost authority as its author, such as Dobbs for Torts. The Supreme Court quotes Dobbs. Usually a hornbook is firm cover and will set you back $40-$60. Because the black memo outlines and examples and explanations have matching thing just less and at $10-$15 cheaper, they aren't worth it unless you hold an exam. When shopping, type "name of subject" + hornbook e.g. contracts, torts, evidence, property, civil proceedure, constitutional tenet, criminal law.
The differences between ages 17 and 18?
Can someone show a link of a website that record the many things ages 18-20 can do that a 17 year hoary couldn't.Answers: only three. you are know tried as an full-size. you no longer have a provisional license. and you can justifiably buy cigarettes.
Statutory rape would be a good start. Also a point called endanger the welfare of a minor. So if you are 18 & over don't get involved near any one under 18.
Why do family courts surrounded by UK ignore perjury ?
Answers: The noticeable answer to this is of course that they do not. If someone is proved to be lying contained by a family court (and please details the word 'proved') they are as guilty of perjury as anyone else. If I might rephrase your question to what you in actual fact mean ' In a crust in loved ones court i was contained by, my ex was unfolding lies, but i could not proce it so she got away near it. Is this fair?' consequently no, it isn;t fair on you, but the burden of proof of her lying lies near you. Obviously.
In the wishy washy world of family courts relations committ perjury because its goes unpunished as a Judge once told it refered to as "misrepresentation of fact" the injuried party very regularly don't persue the issue because it involves fact finding hearing which to most people will cost thousands to prove or disprove baseless claims and let's be honest it's impossible to prove in a closed ethnic group environment that events took place or didn't.
My advice stir to court and be honest, don't comprise your own values because your dealing with lying tossers, other represent yourself increases your chances of nouns, saves you money and pisses of oponents solicitors rotten, the judge will perform as your avocate and steer in the right direction.
Lastly don't capture wound up mate - family solicitors are inept tossers that formulate more cash out of creating conflict and disharmony it make me sick even thinking about them.
Do you know if there???
Do you know if in attendance is a bill right now future on capital punishment???? Please, I really involve to know...?Answers: Bill pending where on earth? In the federal system? No. There might be in some states, but I don't surmise so. Only 37 states, and the federal government, allow funds punishment at all. A lot of things are up contained by the air until Baze v. Rees is argued contained by the U.S. Supreme Court.
There is an abolition bill pending within New Jersey, which would replace the death cost with duration without parole.
Visit www.njadp.org for info just about it.
To find out about what is going on in other states, check out
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/newsandd...
For students and debaters the best resource on the loss penalty is
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.
Can I renew my driver's license in another state?
I am from Massachusetts but I turn to school within Delaware. My 21st birthday is coming up and my license expires on my birthday. I need to renew my license but I can't move about home for weeks, so can I do it in Delaware, do it by correspondence or online, or do I need to walk back home? Thanks!Answers: If you are a permissible resident of your new state (you live here and intend to live there); you can renew in your brand new state. All states have reciprocal privileges.. Be cautious though, because you will have to register your sports car there and be subject to state taxes in attendance and so on. See if you can renew in your feeble state online.
You can do it online or by mail as long as you aren't required to own you picture taken.
Go online to the motor vehicle website and see what your options are.
If you're a student and your permitted residence is in MA, consequently you don't need a DE license.
You may be eligible to renew it online, if you want to hang on to your permanent residence within Ma.
http://www.mass.gov/rmv/license/10renew.
No...The 21st birthday trips you up..
http://www.dmv.org/ma-massachusetts/rene...
Well you can't do it from there but if you hold established legal residence you can apply for that states drivers license or state ID.
More Questions and Answers:
[473] - [2071] - [2448] - [1640] - [1528] - [2570] - [2218] - [1093] - [2490] - [2255] - [1853] - [302] - [2435] - [2496] - [818] - [1608] - [1284] - [2568] - [1974] - [2436]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: