Law Questions and Answers
Is this legal my decree /?
this woman has a girl .her girl is.12. years weak and this.19. year old grab the girl by her . ***. and her mother saw it and told the girl not to say nothin or she would take took by the welfare . the mother was going near this.19. year old her self by decree is there a curbing by law to report it by her. or anyone who know what he did the mother is in her.40.s as okayAnswers: seem.s similar to the childs so called mom onl think of her self i read there a tape recording ably that.s legal enought to unstop a felony charge of abuse on both the mother as resourcefully this 19. year old by canon and that.s hard to rhythm a recorder with your voice on it own this tape given to local statute . and they know how and who to get by canon that. legal . ??/
If you be a witness you can report it to child services and/or the police. If you just hear the story, then possibly child services would investigate, but likely nil would come of it unless the child was feeling like to repeat what she told to you to them and face the consequences of going to stay at child services and testify against the man. And unless there be witnesses willing to testify, the man might not even be arrested tolerate alone the case going to trial. There's no opening to force the mother to testify, since apparently she already has chosen the man over her own daughter. I'd articulate the girl is in serious trouble from the man, especially without mama's protection, and if he get away with this he will presume he can get away beside more in the adjectives.
Why is the wa still going on?
why is the war still going on? what is the reson/ and whom are we conflict agenst if the people from iraq next to use please tell me !!!!!!!!!!!!Answers: bush is a retard
BECAUSE WE CAN.
GF U TRIEDTM
Iraq is Pandora's box and Pres. Bush open it.
The Sunni hate the Shia antipathy the Kerds and vice versa. Iraq will have a civil time of war whether we leave contained by ten minutes or in ten years.
Saudi Arabia on one side...Iran on the other. Saudis support the Sunnis and the Iranians support the Shia. We enjoy royally de-stabilized the Middle East. There is no end to this period of war in Iraq.
There is really no track to define accomplishment in Iraq because it will never be a stable nation until nearby is a civil war and any the Shia or the Sunni win and subjugate their foe.
Bottom line is that Bush lied and our soldiers...and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians... died contained by a war that never needed to be fought.
Oh yeah...Bush have turned our budget surplus that he inherited contained by 2000 into a 3 TRILLION dollar deficit in huge part because of the Iraq time of war. That deficit will affect many adjectives generations.
The dollar have slipped 35% in good point internationally.
Gasoline is over $3.00 a gallon.
Damn it must suck to be a neocon Republican.
Brother and sister in canon are in here divorce , and shocked at outcome,anyone please already at it?
My Sister in directive had an 7 month affair that be exposed to everyone who known these those.The divorce was my bother (1/2) who have CHALLENGED the NOFAULT RULE in Ca., stating the affair be the primary cause of divorce beside evidance and asked the JUDGE for a CAUSE OF ACTION with detail so as to sue his wife for custody, and majority potion of the community property!
HE GOT IT 90% of the community property as very well as physical custody of the children because he proved that his wife started to CO- habituate with individual who she be having the AFFAIR WITH and detrimential to kids ably being.
Now agree to me say this I ruminate the whole suggest STINKS to high HEAVEN, both party's inevitability to grow up.
That said I can't fathom how this woman had the affair, how the LAWS of NO FAULT could be side stepped close to this.
I practice Financial Meadion and contract negotions so I'm out of element on subject .
HAS ANYONE HERE SEEN THIS KIND OF CHALLENGING NO FAULT TO DIVORCE LAWS LIKE THIS?
Answers: Sounds close to she got what she deserved
Frivolous lawsuit?
Only answer this if you know anything about civil imperative.In short, I was surrounded by a car chance caused by some foreign idiot who I took to court for damages. The believe to be ruled that the moron would not be liable for my damages (even though I had a notarized witness statement), but he also give this individual an opportunity to counter sue; which this person decline. The judge told the character that that would be the only time he could folder a claim (sue me for the incident). My insurance company went over the evidence and refuse to pay that individual's insurance company. Now the insurance company is trying to come after me. First, a year after the quirk. I sent a copy of the ruling to the law firm and they promptly dismissed the claim against me. Now, three years later they are at it again single with another ruling firm. I am going to get a attorney this time and deal next to this within the subsequent 30 days, but isn't this harassment? A frivolous lawsuit? Can I sue the insurance company?
Answers: It's NOT your problem to traffic with adjectives this stuff. Your insurance company has an requisite to defend you. All you own to do is pass anything you catch on to hem, and they'll take it from within.
Richard
Yep! Get a lawyer. Why didn't your insurance company provide a advocate at the initial trial?
NOTE: ONLY A LAWYER CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH LEGAL ADVICE.
There are too few details regarding what happen in court to draw any conclusions from your post. Sorry.
What happens if you find caught stealing from a 7-11?
Answers: In the Holy Name of Allah, the store clerk cuts off your paw with a sword he keep in one of the popicle freezers. LOL!
They create you clean the bathrooms for the subsequent 20 years.
Is it illegal to landscape streaming material?
My brother and I be arguing about alluc.org. Which prompts the query is it illegal to examine STREAMING content that was improperly copied?P.S. don't answer unless you know it's illegal for sure!
Answers: as long as you are not downloading it after no
Has anyone ever asked an emplyer for rehire after beign fired and was rehired?
Answers: I’ve never individually known anyone who did it, although I’m sure at hand are cases where it’s happen.
I never rehired someone after firing them. But I never fired anyone on the spur on the moment either. I other gave it greatly of thought. And I never fired anyone without point and without first giving them a requirement (well, one time I fired someone without giving them a stipulation first, but that guy did something MAJOR).
I would not recommend going to the boss’s house. If a former employee have come to my home, that would have almost guaranteed that I wouldn’t re-hire them (it’s remarkably unprofessional, and my work life is separate from my home life). I also wouldn’t recommend using tears to attempt to sway them (again, incredibly unprofessional). Try using sincerity. ie “I know I was wrong, I apologize, it won’t start again” etc.
Of course, I have no clue WHY the creature was fired, and that will feasible play a huge part contained by rather or not the boss will consider re-hiring them. But they’ll never know until they ask.
yes, I only just rehired an employee that stood me up several months ago. I be mad at her at the time, but she be a good worker while it last. I feel that if a personage wants a second randomness, well, everyone (well, almost everyone) deserves a second break!
Freedom of Press? - ON HEALTHCARE REFORM?
According to the Connecticut Coalition for Universal Health Care, the United States is the only industrialized nation not to enjoy universal healthcare coverage to its citizens. In 1993 Bill Clinton seeked to install such a system call a multi-payer health guardianship system that would focus on the center of the healthcare crisis of America: COST and COVERAGE. Today, over 40 million Americans lack healthcare coverage and frequent more millions are with not enough healthcare insurance coverage. However the media, expressly conservative stations such as FOX labeled the plan instead of described it. As a result people be told that this was "socialized pills," and as a result of polls, most opposed it. Criticism of lack of coverage by companies contained by a few ads be hardly or never aired because of the threat of lawsuit by the company for "libel and slander". Is this freedom of press? Or is press controlled by the bazaar?Answers: the first answer shows the reason we don't hold it. each american feel that he/she needs his own money for their own consumption. after adjectives, people trendsetter us based on what we own. if we provide away our money to healthcare, well, i can't wear a pin that say that. then i won't know how to afford a new deck and my neighbor will own more status than me. who cares if relations are dying of things that could be easily treated if they could afford to see a doctor, i want another house. that's the american mindset. we're not willing to brand name the sacrifice.
I want my taxes lower buddy. I shouldn't have to wages for anyone's healthcare.
http://myamericantoday.blogspot.com/
I agree something drastic needs to be done. But socialized medical care is not the method to go. People contained by Canada who need serious operation flee to the U.S. or they will die waiting in strip and that is a certainty.
Health care costs are unbridled. A pill that costs 13 cents to make is hiked up to $3 or more. I read Clinton's plan particularly carefully and it be not the way to run, it would put us in matching position as Europe and Canada. We don't need or want that.
Let's come up beside a new plan. I don't concern what it's called. But at hand is no excuse that the elderly have to put away dog food because they cannot afford their medication. That might be a bit of an overstatement but not much.
The republicans don't seem to present a &%#@ and the democrats pander: say anything people want to hear to obtain a vote. I say this because look at how masses years this nonsense have gone on. How hard can it be to sit down and reckon this important issue out and develop a workable gentle plan?
Big oil and the pharmaceutical companies come across to rule the world. The media doesn't make a contribution a flip--whatever produces ratings it the bottom line.
I agree this is perchance the most important social issue facing America. Let's listen closely to what nation running for the highest bureau in the parkland have to utter about it.
Do landlords ask for some type of ID?
I want to know if landlords usually ask for some way to prove credentials or age? If so what do they ask for?Answers: Yes a landlord will ask for your state issued passport, social security number and require you to plague out an application. They will conduct credit checks and criminal background check. They will contact your current employer to see if everything you stated on the application checks out they may also contact the place your used to live. This is how the prove your identity and if you are competent to live there. I hope that help.
Identification card from the department of motor vehicles.
Why is it wrong to use abortion as a method of birth control?
In a recent survey at California State University at Northridge, 96.1% said they think it is wrong to use abortion as a method of birth control.http://str.typepad.com/weblog/files/ywam...
I found that curious because in attendance are so many individuals who are pro-choice. Apparently, there must be closely of pro-choice people who deduce it's wrong to use abortion as a method of birth control. So I'm curious why the pro-choice people have an idea that that would be wrong.
Let me explain why this is a puzzle to me so you can better address my question. It seem to me that the only defence an abortion for any reason could be wrong is if the unborn is a human anyone with a right to natural life. If it's just a blog of tissue, I don't see why any evidence for abortion would even be necessary, so a being ought to be able to enjoy an abortion for any reason. It's no more licentious than having a bunyon removed. But if it is a human individual with a right to enthusiasm, then why be pro-choice?
Answers: As a method of birth control, it is wrong. Not singular because no one will ever swot responsibility if that is the luggage.. but (from experience) and from other cases I have hear about it is emotionally wounding. But that aside, sometimes in the bag of accidents or rape etc etc abortion is a better alternative than most for within Australian alone 1 in 10 children is mortal abused and that is worse if you ask me. Better to not impart life than to supply a life of hell.
Being pro-choice does not stingy you are pro-abortion. Pro-choice is about not letting the administration decide what a woman can do next to her body.
You can be pro-choice and anti-abortion. They are not mutually exclusive.
That's an excellent point you make concerning this really controversial issue.
I, too, find it curious that a baby beside a different DNA, different fingerprints and often a different sex somehow equates to what a woman can or can not do beside HER body.
Very curious indeed.
Just because a person is pro-choice doesn't suggest they do not have an appreciation for human existence.
I am pro-choice, because I realize life is not black and white.
On the other foot, I could never imagine myself going through near an abortion, because that is in recent times me, personally. It would be something amazingly hard for me to promise with.
Sometimes nation decide to own an abortion because they do not feel they would be bringing a toddler into a safe and loving environment, and to be precise actually a tremendously responsible choice. True, they could send them to an adoption agency, but that *still* does not completely ensure a child's safekeeping physically and mentally.
When a person have a child, they had better be prepared to offer the rest of their life to it.
I'd approaching to hope that the majority of pro-choicers do not consider having an abortion so insubstantially as a cosmetic operation like have a bunion removed O_o
Basically the best way I can depict this sentiment is a pregnant woman wearing a shirt that say "My Choice".
I'm sure most women would try their hardest to avoid the entire ordeal of getting pregnant altogether by other means, a bit than regularly having abortions.
Plus.I importantly doubt that's safe, and could probably do some principal damage contained by the long run, preventing them from having children contained by the future.
The majority of pro-lifers tend to be driven by concrete religious ideology...but if you'd similar to to do your research, *living* babies and children used to be sacrificed for strictly religious purposes, as ably.
And ultimate sacrifice to prove their belief to their God.
So...I don't think it would hurt society to be a little more unseal minded about confident practices and the reasoning behind them.
It's a depressing sentiment, but associates do die every day.
Sucking a fetus out of a womb and tossing it within a plastic garbage pouch is a sick, vicious procedure. It is immoral and should not even be legitimate.
I don't know your age or background, but because of the indifferent way you ask this, it is adjectives how calloused we have become. God lend a hand our next generation.
People think it's wrong to use abortion as a method of birth control because,
if you are pro-choice, it can also aim that you yourself would never have an abortion, but you can follow why someone might in special circumstances, so accordingly just have an abortion because you happened to indifferently get pregnant after alot more people would be disagreeing.
That is what they believe.
At what point does the unborn child devolution from a "blog of tissue" as you put it, to a recognizable existence? Did you know that at five weeks, a sonogram can pick up the heartbeat of the unborn child? At eight weeks, appendages such as feet and hand are noticeable. To enjoy an abortion at these points seems to be a termination of a potential time.
Does life inaugurate at conception? That seems to be the debate. But next to this in mind, in attendance are still state-sanctioned abortions all the channel through the first trimester (12 weeks) and it does seem unsafe to use this as birth control. In a manner of speaking, it isn't in recent times control, it's total birth cessation. A bunyon is not something that has the potential to become a living creature near a will and a conscience, so that analogy leaves much to be desired.
The pro-choice argument is weak single because it denies the right to life (and the right to choose) by the unborn child.
If its murder, next when a woman has an unpremeditated miscarriage, is it Unintentional Manslaughter?
The baby doesn't NOT observe the implements being used to abort it. It have no way to see, hear, or touch at the point in gestation which abortion occur.
I love how many populace are anti-abortion, yet they can devour animals, or watch horror movies, or survey a police officer shoot someone.
Okay let's see here...the question.through me road off course. I am for choice, likelihood, it's my body, what ever is the newest, hippest, am I maxim it legally politically correct for abortion. Why is my put somebody through the mill back to you and I know you are not to answer a grill with an answer but why would anyone intentionally take pregnant so they may have the chance of abortion?
I am not educated chronological high academy. I have some college credit hours but that be almost 40 years ago. Where the heck are people coming from when abortion become birth control?
Like I said, I am for abortion. There are alot of battered children out there alot of hungry children out at hand who should of never been bought into this world. The race that fathered them and gave birth to them could contemplation less except on the 3rd of every month.
I suppose specifically a bit of a conundrum, but in my evaluation, an abortion is a last resort for an unwanted pregancy and should be used merely as such. At the risk of sounding callous, deliberate of it in language of driving a car and preventing a crash.If your brakes come to nothing, or if you're somehow distracted while driving and suddenly you're just just about to crash and your brakes lock, you might pull the emergency brake..The E brake, within that respect, is there a moment ago in defence you need it.it's not an excuse not to drive soundly, wear your seat belt, and uphold your car properly.again, I'm not making a moral comparison, it's freshly an analogy. Legal abortions are safe(r) abortions, period. Making them unjust won't stop women from getting them, it will just breed them sketchy and financially unattainable for the women who probably "need" them the most. That fact is the road I (and I imagine, most wise and reasonably cultured pro-choice individuals) justify my stance on that issue. I'm incredibly fortunate that a safe, court abortion was available for me when I be 16 and got pregnant when my boyfriend's condom broke.after my parents confiscated my birth control pills. That person said, I respect pro-life individuals.especially the ones who, coming from a "religious" or spiritual perspective, don't rush to judge and condemn others for their decision, but rather endorse this issue, ultimately, as a personal one. No one but God knows when "life" really begin.. with a "blob of tissue" or the birth of a kid...but as a Catholic, I do believe that God is the only true consider of what is sinful or "wrong."
Bottom line.. continued, impulsive birth control education and availability is the switch, people.
I don't know of any pro-choice being or organization that say abortion is a form of birth control. As a matter of reality, I have never see it in any doctors bureau that abortion is a form of birth control.
Therefore, your question is flawed.
Abortion is a surgery - beside the risks and complications that come with surgery. It is not a method of birth control.
All the poll results show is that the ancestors polled are more educated than you are roughly the procedure.
MYTH: Women are using abortion as a method of birth control.
In fact, partly of all women getting abortions report that contraception be used during the month they became pregnant.1 Some of these couples have used the method improperly; some have forgotten or neglected to use it on the particular episode they conceived; and some had used a contraceptive that ruined. No contraceptive method prevents pregnancy 100% of the time.
If abortion were used as a primary method of birth control, a typical woman would own at least two or three pregnancies per year - 30 or more during her lifetime. In reality, most women who have abortions hold had no previous abortions (52%) or solitary one previous abortion (26%).5 Considering that most women are fertile for over 30 years, and that birth control is not perfect, the chance of having one or two unintended pregnancies is awfully high.
MYTH: Women enjoy abortions for selfish or frivolous reason.
The decision to own an abortion is rarely simple. Most women underside their decision on several factor, the most common individual lack of money and/or unreadiness to start or expand their family due to existing responsibilities. Many feel that the most responsible course of feat is to wait until their situation is more suited to childrearing; 66% plan to own children when they are older, financially competent to provide necessities for them, and/or in a supportive relationship near a partner so their children will have two parents.8 Others needed to get pregnant but developed serious medical problems, literary that the fetus had severe abnormality, or experienced some other personal crisis. About 13,000 women each year enjoy abortions because they have become pregnant as a result of rape or incest.1
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/...
Birth Control: prudence, the pill, Nuva-Ring, Depo-Provera, diaphragm, IUD, tubal ligation, condoms etc. In short.. "birth control" is intended to prevent pregnancy.
The morning after pill - is not put forward as a method of birth control - it is intended for those times that you engaged surrounded by sexual activity near out protection - or had a "contraceptive malfunction" - it is not intended to be taken after every sexual encounter. It should lend a hand reduce the number of abortions by preventing the egg from implant. However, pro-life organizations enjoy also gone after this as well. What's subsequent, they target the birth control pill?
I am pro choice.
I am pro choice because I believe that every woman has the right to determine if she requests to carry on a pregnancy. She have to search her heart and enjoy a conversation with her god. She have to look at the resources and support systems she has around her.
If I be to become pregnant - abortion would not be the right choice for me. But just because it's not the choice I would brand name, does not mean that I do not want that right protected for other women. I'm 35 near a good work and good support system. Being a single mom would be tough, but it could be done. That's not the situation every woman is contained by.
And lets frontage it - there are too lots men out there that will generate the baby and disappear when the pregnancy happen. Suddenly the baby that it took 2 race to make become the responsibility of the woman.
.If we made castration a consequence of failing to pay child support...within would not be nearly as many unresponsive beat dads out here! And some women may reconsider have an abortion if they knew at hand was going to be financial support for the child.
More Questions and Answers:
[2230] - [2028] - [2499] - [1286] - [2151] - [1422] - [981] - [2211] - [472] - [1313] - [34] - [1822] - [929] - [1509] - [951] - [2011] - [1900] - [686] - [2360] - [1010]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: