Law Questions and Answers

Certain websites on the internet should be banned for general public under the age of 16?

please afford me the disadvantage and advantage
Answers: No website should ever be prevented, for any reason. No book should ever be burned, or excluded from any library. Reason? When is the concluding time "reason" was demonstrated surrounded by the decisions to prevention the flow of information to citizens? The right to read what you want to read, hear what you want to hear, and do what you want to do, like the neocon's keenness for the right to collect assault rifles for the sole use of ending human duration, is non-negotiable and protected by the constitution. The disadvantage to this type of thinking and action (of veto websites) is that it limits the flow of information. There is no positive aspect unless you have the power. If you bend here, and grant the government (and the religious zealots that very soon control them) the right to ban 16 year olds from viewing supposed objectionable materials on the www, what's subsequent? There is always a subsequent, for the book burners are never satisfied, they must other have a target. In the term of protecting their children (I have 2 children by the way) they would reliquish your rights, in need a second thought. In the name of sanctuary, they would allow the government to snoop through your messages, listen to phone calls, and monitor your every move. Would this be a place you would like to live surrounded by? Does it sound impossible that it could spiral extensive like this? See pre-WWII Germany if this sounds impossible. The one and only thing that keep a government from controlling it's medium, is it's citizenry demanding it be independent. If we let the parliament (and those who now control it) agree on what one group can read, soon they will decide what is legitimate thought, and behavior for all of us. That's not democracy, that's totalitarianism.
youtube
myspace
yahoo
google
and every website that exist
most kids singular use the internet for dumb reasons.
trust me i know
my little cousins and every kid explicitly related to me
mommy has to work to recompense for the computer so she cannot monitor you every waking moment.

Do people in a minute understand the pressure of Gov. regulation on greedy corporations?


Answers: I do. I have since I be in college and ripened enough to hold a grasp of reality.
US Government is a
puppet for US corporate interests.
Dont fool yourself.
the govt is of the general public if we would vote and see past the corporate medias propaganda ,,,,,,, something we cant do

so some want govt have very little power as they are puppets of the corps...



it is an arguable issue both ways
GOVT is responsible to supervize and coordinate exploit of corporations and dvise required regulations as the situation calls for. if within were no concern of GOVT supervision there would be no finishing to what the corporations do to draw more and more profits out of people's pocket.

Whether the arrears will be given from 2006 January or not?


Answers: question thoroughly vague
as per rumours circulating surrounded by market the 6th retribution commission is not in rather of giving arrears. but if at all the arrears are given somehow, they would be decisive 01 jan 2006. But hopes are very deeply dim.

What happen if you allowed someone to live near you in your home and they foot half the rent is that in that home


Answers: Yes, that is their home. You should own a written agreement in shield you need to evict them surrounded by the future. One never know what may happen.
No- If you own the home and it's contained by your name it's your home & they are renters.
If you're worried you should hold a renters agreement between you two. You can get them at any stationery store.
If they hold been near more then 30 days they techinacilly live at hand but in no approach OWN part of your house, But are infact renting sector of it. where is ya contract?

Do copyright laws prevent authors from using legitimate world commercial locations in fiction?

For example, could someone write a sex scene set at Disneyworld that would displease the Walt Disney company and publish it minus being subject to a lawsuit? Could they write and publish a fresh about the New York Yankees, set at Yankee Stadium, and enjoy the characters in the book adjectives take steroids?
Answers: Not copyright law -- defamation law are what you would have to verbs about. (And possibly trademark violation.) If you seriously intend to write and publish anything of that nature, consult an IP attorney.

How much money can I contribute to a presidential candidate as an individual?

If I am self employeed, can I donate as a business entity and if so how much?
Answers: I'm pretty sure the control is $2300 per candidate per see (ie primary, general, etc.) There are aggregate restrictions also.

Most businesses can also contribute but some cannot,

See this link to start, later go to the FEC site (but it's enormously confusing)

http://usgovinfo.roughly.com/od/thepolitic...
Why waste your money?

Can I change My guilty plea to not guilty?

My mom is person charged with a felony, 1st scope with residental burglery and breaking surrounded by an entry.. Her court-appointed pressured her into to pleaing gulity and yelled at her and call her names and told her she have no other choice but to take it and told her not to give an account anyone the info she found out cause it would create the case worse. What she found out be the person who be pressing charges against her didn't even own the house and the people who did own the house would testify against the general public charging my mom. What it was be my moms friend told her she could have a natural fibre basket (worth $10 contained by the rain) and when she took it they called the cops on her. So my mom believed the legal representative and pleaded guilty. Can she change her plea to not guilty produce she hasn't got sentencd however? And do you think the deem will grant her request? Thankyou..
Answers: It depends on the conciliator. When she goes for sentencing the referee will ask her if she has anything to utter. She should tell the court that she is not guilty and her advocate pressured her to plead guilty. That should work. They will give her a current attorney and she should not plead guilty.
A defendant can withdraw a guilty plea up until the point that the referee enters the verdict. This is usually prior to sentencing.

She needs to find out if the pronouncement has be entered. Once it have been the plea cannot be withdrawn.

Richard
Sometimes those court appointed lawyer aren't the best. The case I worked on the attorney told the client to plead self-defense to a murder where he walk up to a car within the dark and blasted some innocent mildly retarded dude for no plea. The "self-defense" he testified to be that he "thought the guy had leaned down to achieve for a gun." I'm serious! He actually admit the crime, described the entire incident, and said it was self-defense. But within had be no witnesses, no description, no murder weapon, nothing! The dude get 29 years.

Is it legal to totter around in public surrounded by your underwear???

Like in a bra and panties, a short time ago walk down the street?

Just curious =)
Answers: Different states/cities own different laws and how much you can expose. It will depend on where on earth you live and how much your underwear covers. Also, if it is see thru or not. Some cover just as much (if not more) than a swimsuit so look up the law in your nouns for such. I live in Daytona, FL so our law aren't as strict as most places (mostly due to Spring Breaks)
it should be a law

but curiosity kill the cat so what do you think foe
i suppose if your pretended it be a bikini you could
'
i walk around contained by my back patio in bra and panty
i own 3 neighbors(sides and back) and i dont care
i hold run to mailbox in a bra
if a bikini is ok i dont suggest a bra and panty is a problem
FUNNY Q!

depends on where you live. i suppose if you live contained by AFGANISTAN or IRAQ then yes considering the korans scrict clothing rules.
but it probs depends on the state statute and how cute the police officer thinks you are if he see you as to whether you would get charged.
I for one will assure you I would never report you to the authorities!

Obama/edwards 08?? how could we ever do better?

these guys clearly intend to make a adaptation for the better on issues like drug company rip offs! when did you final buy one and what did it cost? isn't it time to make a relocate????and insurance~~i have it and if i didn't i simply could not buy a simply piece like eye drops($70 a tiny bottle!) my husband have an allergic reaction and the scrip cost impossible to tell apart ($70) for a few pills!! this is criminal! surely we care plenty to go for a modify!!
Answers: Why don't you ask Edwards if this is what he had surrounded by mind when he was raping the medical profession as an ambulance chaser (oops I plan class action lawyer). We could do deeply better than Obama/Edwards. I'm liking a Giuliani/Paul or Romney/Paul ticket more and more everyday. John Edwards is one huge explanation this country is in dire stipulation of health aid reform, and Obama doesn't own a plan to solve the problem. Obama has a plan to receive the problem worse.
Harold and Kumar, Abbott and Costello, Ben and Jerry, or even a Turd and a punchbowl.

Do you think its a coincidence that areas that own high crime rates also own high job loss rates?

Or could it be that poverty, in reality, does breed crime?
Answers: There is no coincidence!
You obviously enjoy not lived in an indigent environment.
But the root of the problem is not poverty itself, its the lack of local, state and federal involvement surrounded by investing in these areas surrounded by the form of providing and building good school with okay qualified teachers.
I myself grew up surrounded by Washington D.C., and I can tell you that here is nothing more self demeaning than impression like you are not literary enough to share equal room with some who you surface is more educated than you!
It breeds anger, resentment and a denial of self respect. Its the unconscious explanation that so many stop up on drugs and alcohol. I myself while not having much contained by the form of "things", I always have a sense of self through my education. My mom worked no smaller amount than three jobs to put myself and three other children through Catholic arts school. And compared to the public education at the time, within was no comparison. As I get older I did attend public High School, but I be fortunate enough to be bused to the best public elevated school D.C. have to offer. Other elevated schools be like little 'prisons', next to some of the gangs running the school.
Make no mistake about this reality, my young friend.
the lawmaker, and big business know that an educated man or woman doesn't want to work at McDonalds, or pick up someone's trash, or verbs someone's house. So by having an nouns of impoverished and undereducated, creates a workforce of those who will settle for any living at all!
So no the answer is not that poverty breeds crime...no not at adjectives! Breeding anything is a deliberate exploit! Crime is a by-product of poverty! People breed poverty!!!!!!
No, it is not a coincidence. Poverty breeds criminals.

Nor is it coincidence that areas with dignified tax rates and restrictive labor law also have large rates of unemployment.

Not a extremely positive outlook for the liberal economic model.
Idle hand are the devil's play things-
People are poor because they are unemployed.
People are on the dole because of :
lack of work
drought of skills
lack of background

In areas where here is a lot of crime- not a soul is going to spend money on creating jobs because the criminals will of late destroy it..

Until culture in the elevated crime areas start making better choices for themselves such as:
Don't steal
don't do dope
don't sell dope
finish conservatory
go stern to school
stop have unprotected sex
don't gang bang
- nought is going to change.
Gosh, this put somebody through the mill deserves much more thought, analysis and examination than a black and white answer of yes, poverty breeds crime.

In a city, yes, poverty can breed crime as it is a socio-economical problem. Yet within is evidence that inequality might be fueling the crimes (yet it is linked to poverty).

Then again, what almost a country like Cuba? The associates are poor but there is NO crime. In this casing you can't say poverty breeds crime. But near are plenty of examples to show the contrary.

More Questions and Answers:
[1202] - [89] - [414] - [1058] - [73] - [1697] - [143] - [2488] - [915] - [52] - [1644] - [1750] - [1251] - [559] - [530] - [2453] - [1383] - [265] - [1759] - [1826]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: