You’re a lawyer, and you must argue whether or not a new state statute is constitutional.?
A. federal codes.
B. the U.S. Constitution.
C. the state constitution.
D. common law.
Answer:
Well since you seem to be arguing the constitutionality of
a new state statue, you can only argue on the State or
US Constitution.
Federal codes and common law would not exist for anything
that was already unconstitutional.
What? Is that a question?
what are you asking exactly? I am taking it you're asking what I would use to argue the constiutitionality of the particular new law?
First - don't call me a damn lying hipocritical servant of the court that sacrafices it's clients to the blind folded goddess with the proof of faulty weights and measures in her extended hand ... otherwise known as a liar ... or lawyer or attorney and/or etc.; however,
I will answer your question - but if you choose this route you need to do your homework, though I will explain to you ...
THERE IS NO VALID STATUTES, CODES, REGULATIONS AND/OR ETC. ... THERE IS NO SPOON ...; however,
Your answer to your question is "C" ... let me explain why, as I can almost guarantee that you would never see this in a million years ...
In Texas where I am a flesh and blood man living on Texas Soil - and fighting the City of Abilene, Texas ... and winning - got them with their backs to the wall - (I will leave a link at the bottom to show you how they came at me with religious hate crimes, even admitting the deprivation of the public information/open records act - AND THEY PUBLISHED IT ... link will be below for your entertainment ... send it to everyone you know to see what occurs to a man that has a demolition crew show up in the morning and ordering the owner and his then pregnant wife off the property and taking 2 new homes, a business and all things owned TO THE DUMP. I have not stopped fighting them and have them, the judge and his little court too billed for over a billion bucks apiece - individually, jointly and/or severally; and,
I got 10 (ten) Plaintiffs against me - PUBLIC SERVANTS - MOSTLY ATTORNEYS OR THOSE WORKING IN THEIR OFFICE - USING MISAPPROPRIATED PUBLIC/FEDERAL FUNDS TO CONDUCT THIS SELECTIVE PROSECUTIONS AGAINST ME ... FOR PERSONAL GAIN ... In other words - poop is on the fan blades and they don't know how to wipe them without turning off the motor); and anyway - your answer;
The Texas Constitution states emphatically that: in order for any law, regulation, statute and/or etc. to be ratified or carry any weight whatsoever - that I might be required to follow it or answer to breaking it - IT MUST STATE - BETWEEN THE HEADING AND THE BODY OF THE LAW; "BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS" ...
If it does not state such - it is not a law and has NO AUTHORITY ...
I recently kept a friend out of prison earlier this year (not me but my heavenly father Yahweh) - when we discovered that the State of Lousy Anna has the same requirements.
Now - do not expect to just copy the constitution of your state and show them there is no "ENACTING CLAUSE" found between the Heading and the Body of the Statute, law, code and/or etc. and expect to have any agree with you - you need more - such as case law for your state or even from other states as your state is ... ummmm - supposed to ... rely upon such case law in their rulings as well - thus "United states" ... right.
Here in Texas we also have what is called "Vernon's Annotated" statutes or some crap like that - it is late and a Sabbath day and I am shutting down mentally so I can be alert in services in the morning; but;
"Vernons's Annotated" is a compiling of the State's Statutes, Codes and other B.S. that is only truly applicable to Corporations and the agents/employees and/or etc. thereof. I am not going there - I just want you to know what this book is ... A COMPILATION OF THEIR B.S. RULES, REGULATIONS, CODES AND/OR ETC. THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN ENACTED ...
Top it off - when you look in the front of "Vernon's ..." you will see a (c) but, with the full circle and it says all rights reserved.
Know what that means?
We are now in the realm of PRIVATE LAW ... in fact - to bring up and use such statutes, codes, regulations and B.S. found between it's many covers - as it is very voloumnous ... if you can't read what I misspelled - I meant to say A BUNCH OF BOOKS IN THE UNLAWFUL SET...
Now - if you know anything about COPYRIGHT LAW ... anything at all - you cannot use what is copyrighted WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT - THE GUY THAT OWNS THE LAWS, STATUTES, CODES AND/OR ETC.
So - you try to defend yourself by copying or typing out words from that copyrighted set of B.S. ... so you can have a defense? You can be imprisoned for infringing on the copyright law - A PRIVATE LAW that IS NOT PUBLIC AND THEREFORE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS WELL - why?
Because it is copyrighted and you are not allowed equal access to it or equality before the law ... make sense?
It is no different than a friend of yours renting a video or DVD and making you a copy ... it is a Federal Offense and infringes on the owner's copyright.
Check out your law books your state uses ... see for yourself the (c) with all rights reserved right there in the front of that bad baby ... then check out the judge's face when you tell him he is infringing on another one's copyright while using a PRIVATELY OWNED AND OPERATED LAW that he DOES NOT HAVE PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER IN WRITING - PRIOR TO HIS DESIRE TO CREATE WEALTH BY DEFRAUDING ME OUT OF MONEY BY USING THAT COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL OF WHICH I DO NOT SUBMIT AND DO STAND ON THE TEXAS BUSINESS & COMMERCE CODE 1-207 ... and there has been no full disclosure for me to even make an educated decision - therefore the offer is null and void ab initio ...
Is there anything else pressing in this fraudulent action filed by the opposing party before this court yer honorable honor?
LOOK - THE ONLY VALID LAW - IS WHAT YOU SUBMIT YOURSELF TO BE SUBMITTED TO ... there is no freakin' spoon ...
I file my Motions that are continuously dismissed - and I file Sui Juris (meaning of standing in my own jurisdiction and not a subject of the court) ... but; I sure have a blast telling these guys wearing dresses how the cow chews the cud.
On December 15, 2006, I had a judge flee the courtroom once I exposed him to our creator and everybody - that he was a co-conspirator with the Plainitffs and I billed him in a Notarial Protest (which is more lawful and powerful than the Supreme Court's rulings ... there is nothing left to argue once the Certificate of Default is lawfully issued) ... and I billed him and his little court too - ON THE RECORD - FOR OVER A BILLION DOLLARS EACH.
If I get the several hundred bucks necessary to file a Default Judgment - I will take him and the Plaintiffs against me to court and get my judgment ... THEY CANNOT CLAIM THAT THE LAW IS NOT ENACTED .
As The contract is the law between parties - and they fully agreed by silence to pay me - they never answered the Notary Public who conducted the Protest on my behalf ...
This is the same process the IRS uses to rob you from your property and money when you wipe your buttox with their B.S. claim that you owe them money ... and then toss it in the waste can.
That is how they get you - you don't answer - you consent. Check out your State laws - ours is under Civil proceedure and under Affidavits of services rendered - says if you make a claim and the other party does not controvert your complaint within the time specified - THEN YOU AGREE AND THE COURT WILL USE YOUR SILENCE AS A LAWFUL STANDING AND FINDING OF FACT against you - so -
Moral of the story is - if you get a bill or invoice ... UNLAWFUL claim from the IRS and you wipe your buttox on it ... DON'T THROW IT IN THE TRASH ...
Mail it back to them prior to the time limitation THEY SET FORTH in this negotiations you are forced into ... if they try to foreclose on you and claim that you sent back their B.S. claim - with smelly unidentifiable matter on it ... with corn ...
You can tell them that - that ... was your reply and you did so within the time limitations and therefore any act to forclose upon you while in the act of negotiating with them is unlawful and they must cease and decist immediately - otherwise the agents personally as well as the IRS will be held liable and properly billed and Notarial Protest conducted to pay for their mistakes ... and the Sheriff can be used to collect - just as the IRS uses them ... they are not privately owned by the Texas Corporation State ...
Sorry for the carry away - hope I answered your question.
Peace;
Aintmyfault
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Questions and Answers: