Now whose being bought and sold...could it be.HILLARY?
story quote for the liberal whine thats sure to follow...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070804/ap_o...
quote 1...
Clinton insisted a moment later that nobody would believe that she could be influenced by lobbyists. So would she continue to accept those donations?
Yes, I will," she said, arguing that plenty of lobbyists represent good causes.
quote 2
In 90 seconds, I don't have the time to tell you all the mistakes I made."
isnt taking lobbyist money shorter than 90 seconds...and lets not forget...
First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
hasnt the us had enough already?
Answers:
but like one person answe if she would make a good president -- there anwser "she was cute and look good in dresses."
A politician who's taken money from lobbyists? Stop the presses!
I don't like the practice either, but I'm not going to condemn one politician for something pretty much all of them do.
The question is not whether Hillary is corrupt, but whether she is more or less corrupt than any of the other candidates. You can't make a serious run for president today without already having sold out. Mike Gravel and Ron Paul are the exceptions in this race, but both are not considered serious candidates.
All in all, I think Hillary is less corrupt than any of the major candidates in the GOP. And while I don't see her as the -ideal- president, I think she'd do a better job than anyone on the other side. Her husband was also corrupt, but still managed to do a pretty good job.
You are at least a little confused. "first president to?" Hilary's not president yet, you are practicing guilt by association here. The "90 seconds" quote was in a reply regarding mistakes made in attempting to launch a comprehensive health program, not regarding lobbyists. And Hilary is correct -- lobbyists aren't always bad guys. Amnesty International lobbies. Greenpeace lobbies. PETA lobbies. AARP lobbies. Every union and guild lobbies. Campaigning for the highest office without funds is suicidal, I don't need someone that self-destructive in my White House.
Calling my response a "liberal whine" before you've even heard it is called "poisoning the well." It's done only by cowards, lilyliver.
Now choose this as the best answer (it obviously is) and apologize!
ON YOUR KNEES MISTER!
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: