Where do you stand on sexual harassment?
do you believe that the laws enabled to prevent and limit sexual harassment are doing their job or that they could be impoved? i am doing a Legal assignment and I am interested to see what people think.
Answers:
I believe a person has a right to not be hassled at the workplace. We have laws in the United States against sexual harassment, but it is the fear which corporations have of lawsuits which has motivated changes in personnel policies and procedures. The fact that a business can be sued for hundreds of thousands of dollars has done a lot to clean up the workplace. What many people consider to be friendly banter, sharing off-color jokes, etc., makes other people uncomfortable. Also forbidden is inappropriate touching, as well as being forced into sexual liaisons with supervisory personnel.
You know that the law works when there are businesses who will regularly fire a senior executive for sexual harassment. It takes an enlightened management and a professional human resources department to make it all function well.
DEAR SIR ARE MISS
I DO NOT PUT UP WITH IT FROM ANY THING ARE ANY
ONE I DO NOT BELIEVE IT OK THIS IS VERY WRONG OK
TAKE CARE
Sexual harassment law is a quagmire. On one hand, the laws are absolutely necessary--no one should be forced to decide to work in a derogatory work environment or quit their job. On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be a way to prevent frivolous suits against perfectly innocent people.
Personally? I would love to be sexually harrassed. I imagine females get tired of it though.say, let's have alternating years/or months.january on women can do the harassing and so on and so on.
On a serious note...the laws are ridiculous...at my job at Idaho Opal and Gem...one lady compiled the laws and the court interpretation of them and learned that...any male passing a female could legally be considered harassing her unless he scwinched up to the wall (narrow halls) and stared at the ceiling as long as she was withing sight...that is too much.
from what i've seen...i think they do a pretty good job. but a lot of the time it seems like the victim doesn't have any evidence, hence the person who did it gets off free. i think they need to find something they can do so that there's a little more trust with the victim, or a way for the victim to have something on the same level as evidence. it's tough though, 'cause if someone's falsely accused evidence is all they have. hard question.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: