When parents decide to have many children, how does it burden tax payers?
Answer:
Parent's that have children and can not support them, they have to get welfare, food stamps, wic, medicare, medicaid etc. paid for by the Citizens per taxes. In other words, someone has to feed, provide health care etc.. for the children, so taxpayers taxes is what is used to do that with. That is one of the problems, people have children, never consider the fact that these babies get hungry, get sick etc.. they should have waited until they could provide the children with these things them self, like a responsible adult parents do, instead of just keep having children and expecting some one else to give them their necessities in life. If a person can not afford to take care of them, they need to wait or at least not bear so many. Children are precious, but they are not the taxpayers child and tax payers should not have to take care of them, when birth control works just fine.
It depends on the people having children. If you can afford to have the number of children you decide to have, it isn't a burden to tax payers However, if you will read the question below, you will see the inverse.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
It doesn't, unless the parents are getting food stamps and medicaid for their children.
it is very good toward your taxes, i think you get to pay less. its like alone 20% of your paycheak goes toward your taxes, but depending on how many kids you have you get a discount, like 2% off or a bit more.
but its very good! not a bad thing
it really depends on the socio-economic status of the parents. If they do well economically then having many children won't impact others. if however they can not financially afford the cost of the children (including the medical bills) then they must rely on assistance from the state. This uses up taxes that people have paid into the system that may not have been budgeted for. The tax revenue might have been targeted to build new roads or help schools. Instead the state must spend it on caring for the folks that can't afford it.
It shouldn't, if they can support them, and are taxpayers themselves who do not depend on the government to give them assistance without working
the burden to the taxpayer is wayyyy below that of the parent.it is not the reproducing couple that puts a burden on the general populace, it is the government that taxes beyond the ability of it's citizens to afford
It does not.
The decision to have children is not the same as having children.
Being able to support your family is not the same as seeking financial aid when you get in over your head.
Getting government financial aid after you have paid a pile of taxes to make that aid practical is not the same as getting aid over and above the taxes you paid.
Well, look at ALL sides of your logic.
There are people in your school district who have no children - either by choice or by being a senior citizen. They still pay the same taxes as the household with 2 or 6 children. They are, theoretically, getting nothing for their money.
When the large family goes shopping, they buy 3 times more product than the 2 family home..and therefore, pay more taxes.
Your logic is skewed.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Questions and Answers: