Is Arizona a "Common Law Negligence" state or a "No-Fault Negligence" state?

thanks

Answers:
I'm not sure what you mean? You're kind of vague. Common law is not the opposite of No-fault, when it comes to legal definitions. Common law refers to laws made on previous cases decided on by judges. The opposite of common law is Statute law. The opposite of No-fault in a divorce proceeding (for example) is Fault meaning to obtain a divorce one party commtted adultry or something and the other party gets benefitted due to the other side's negligence. So if you are asking whether cheating on a spouse in Arizona is taken into account when divorce settlement is concerned, I don't know. In Oregon it is a "No Fault" state so you can cheat and it won't affect the outcome of your divorce.

There's no such thing as "no-fault negligence".
That's like having "no-death murder".

Negligence, by definition, requires a breach of a duty, and that breach is being at-fault.

So, you must be mixing up the terms, or confusing contributory negligence (no recovery if the plaintiff is any bit at fault) with comparative fault (partial recovery, split by relative fault)..

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question:


More Law Questions and Answers:
  • I want to ask the DEA a hypothetical question. How do I go about doing that?
  • Will you accept my challenge?
  • Photo shoot package cancellation?
  • Is it possible for me to cancel the bond i posted for my mother to get out of jail before she is sentenced?
  • How can NBC show the faces of the guys caught on "catching a predator"?
  • I am in need of a good personal injury attorney for your county. Could you please suggest one?
  • In Australia what does it cost the taxpayers to house a criminal in prison for a day?
  • What are the restrictions on a jonior license in NY?
  • Fired as apartment manager in Hawthorne, California?