Congress, why have you covered the Department of Children and Family services, Social Workers with amnesty?
The Social Workers for the DCFS or Children and Family Services or some of the highest paid State Jobs.The Department is hiring students even before they get out of school. The lies these people tell on families that is destroying families all across America. These Social Workers cannot be sued because they have amnesty, under the our Government. Is this Department being controlled by the ACLU, because this Department, has its own Government and Courts across
America. They are very secretive about what they are really
up to.When I saw this Department in action, I thought this cannot be happening in America, I knew immeditialy that something was wrong, what I saw was driven by evil. So I started to investigate what was going on myself. When you find
a Government and Courts hidden, by privacy. I began to cut articles and investigate on the internet what I could. This Department is covering abuse so bad, of experiments on children, by Drug Companies and other abuses.They have no voice
Answers:
Yahoo simply has to start vetting questions so that libelous people like you are STOPPED .
What the hell are you talking about and where is YOUR PROOF of the slanderous,vile condemning accusations you have made.You need to have your sorry butt sued !
And you have no sources. Lots of hyperbole, no substance.
Also, from personal experience these ARE NOT the "highest paid" state jobs. In many states they are employees of the county they work in, not the state, and the pay is horrible.
Is this related to the other question you posted? I looked up the cases from 2005 you were talking about and it was scary:
"In New York City and Illinois, where more than 650 foster children combined were enrolled in AIDS drugs tests since the late 1980s, the states required researchers to sign agreements promising to provide the advocates for all foster children."
"Several of the research institutions, including Columbia Presbyterian, said last month that they did not believe they needed to provide advocates because their experiments held the promise of improved health for the children. Medical ethicists disagreed, saying the foster children were vulnerable and required the added protection."
But I believe certain things may be necessary for children's services. First of all, those vulnerable children shouldn't be having all their personal family matters out for the whole world (and sickos) to see. It's hard enough when they are taken away from their family, even when the family is bad and it's just, but they should be allowed their privacy.
I have to say in defense of childrens services that they are necessary. I'd say for each child that is actually taken out of the home, at least 100 are still in their homes being abused every day.
They do need some improvements though. This is one social program that I would support needing more money. It takes forever for the cases to go through the court system, and innocent families have to wait months to even be heard. It takes forever to get your kids back (happened to someone I knew) even when you're innocent. But I think in the case where the parents are truly guilty it's a good thing.
Plus the caseworkers are overloaded and screening and assistance for foster parents doesn't appear adequate. The whole thing is just sad, that people can't step up to the plate as parents so it wouldn't be necessary. :*(
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: