Consider the arguments that the Queen-in- Parliament can be bound in law by its own previous legislation ?

Explain the morden UK constition is a product of convention ,rather than law,& examine whether these convections should be changed into law.

Answers:
a) Britain does not have a written constitution.
b) The monarch is above the law


For the benefit of Dr John, the constitution does not have to be written.

The question rather sounds like an exam question, so I don't know how many pages the asker.

I did not know that Morden had a separate constitution, but the Queen in Parliment can certainly change previous legislation. Why not?
No-one here's going to write your law essay for you - jeez you couldn't even type it out properly.

The Queen isn't above the law anyway, but that my boy is down to convention, not law. You'll have to do the rest of the research yourself.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question:


More Law Questions and Answers:
  • Dr. Mengele or H.H. Holes, who was worse?
  • How can you have your pudding if you don't eat your meat?
  • Anyone know how I can report a scam? I hired a mechanic from craigslist to fix my car and he took the money?
  • How do you feel about legalizing marijuana? Will it help or not help the countries problem with it?
  • Adoption/ Visitation/ Moving out of the State. Please Help!?
  • Age requierments...?
  • Does the O.J. Jury know that leather shrinks?
  • If I could can I sue my parents?
  • Social security question?