Is an MOU enforceable just like a contract?
If two parties sign an MOU, is it enforceable in court just like a contract would be? What is the difference?
Answers:
A standard MOU from one government entity to another is binding.
If this is the case I cannot see why your would be different.
No, it's not.
A memorandum of understanding is just an agreement to make a contract -- it does not have the same force as the later contract.
However, a MOU may itself be a separate contract -- but that is uncommon because the MOU usually doesn't have the same consideration that an actual contract has.
No, not at all. An MOU is merely an agreement to agree on something and it is NOT binding at all. It is merely an expression of intentions.
It depends upon the words and intent of the parties. If it says, "shall do x in exchange for y", then yes, it is a contract in the form of an MOU. If it says, "expects to do x in exchange for evaluation of y," then no it only envisions a contract.
A binding MOU may even have liquidated damages for breach or other termination, say, where you are considering purchase of a company and they stop discussions with other buyers, pending a contract for sale.
Well, a MOU is not all that different from a "handshake" that is to agree to something from both parties. It is not legally binding and the same applies to Memorandum of Understanding. It is NOT a contract that allows for legal recourse. Maybe, a compromise can be reached? I hope that this helps.
not unless you record the agreement.. its basically he said she said if not. a contract is more binding, and you have it in writing thats the way to go..
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: